Topic: Never trust an ICO ranking site! - page 10. (Read 2601 times)
ICO sites are not to be trusted anymore. Most of them do paid listing just to list them. Even sites that show coins data are not to be trusted.
there are some that are based on original data such as icodrop.
as well as sites to view coin rankings, exchanges like CMC many say cmc is fake and paid.
while the accurate one is koingecko in my opinion.
so you just need to find the accurate one.
as well as sites to view coin rankings, exchanges like CMC many say cmc is fake and paid.
while the accurate one is koingecko in my opinion.
so you just need to find the accurate one.
basically people no longer want to invest in ICO, this is old science and will not work anymore for investors, because for sure investors' intention to invest in ICO no longer exists because trust is gone.
That's reasonable point, ico rating sites are not trustable anymore the owners of these sites only give priority to those projects if they're getting paid huge amount of money from the project team so it clearly indicates that these kind of rating sites are providing almost false informations and reviews about the projects just because of money. We must be very careful before getting any project informations on these sites.
Everything you say is real, but I think that I have never seen ICO ranking sites again, I don't think they are still alive
That's reasonable point, ico rating sites are not trustable anymore the owners of these sites only give priority to those projects if they're getting paid huge amount of money from the project team so it clearly indicates that these kind of rating sites are providing almost false informations and reviews about the projects just because of money. We must be very careful before getting any project informations on these sites.
We should only trust ICODROP. Because they are very honest in their assessments, they do not accept money from projects to make good and positive comments for those projects. Also we should evaluate the project according to personal experience, surely it will be a lot better
Icobech was most popular rating site in 2017, there was huge traffic but right now they manipulating in all of projects, they provided paid rating. Icodrop is little bit transparent, mostly i visited to find more information about new launched projects, i think this one is huge informative others rating site. 
I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
ICO review websites are all fake. they can accept the project owner's money and give them a high rating, easy game. Therefore, the analysis is getting more and more appreciated and only understanding can benefit us. Even with projects that have MVP products, it will probably be a scam project. We should check out their partners and angel investors. That's what we need to know about. Because the more partners, the CEO will hardly scam and the project will be of great help. That's the point to analyze when analyzing a project. The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
in the past to find a valid bounty I relied on the icobench rating site and I must say that their ratings / reviews of the ico were quite true, now for the ico/bounties i am looking here on the forum but only very few valid are left
Yep the more the team they will paid, the ICO rating will get high score or maybe in perfect score. This is not good if we rely in ICO rating, we don't know the highest score can be scam.
It's how they make money! We can't do nothing about this. It's why when it comes to trust I choose
forums and social networks, where I can see real people and their experience. Some people are qualified,
with technical knowledge, and I believe in what they say more than in any service.
Coinmarketcap is accused for the same thing, they took money in favor of exchanges and coins that paid,
same is with ICO ranking sites. Never believe in them, take a pick for some informations, but anyway check
those info on other places too.
Many trusted ICO rating websites in 2018 and they end up losing money in the process, I believe many have learned a lesson here and ICO rating websites aren't popular anymore, since ICO is no more these websites has low web traffic now, IEO is more popular now
Yep the more the team they will paid, the ICO rating will get high score or maybe in perfect score. This is not good if we rely in ICO rating, we don't know the highest score can be scam.
ICO ranking site is an independent platform for the analysis and research of ICO (Initial Coin Offering) as regards to who is doing best among the new ICO.
though their judgement are right sometimes but in most cases they bare doctored to favour certain project and hereby mislead people. to me after checking the site one should just do extra research and analysis and make final decision the site can just be use as a guide.
though their judgement are right sometimes but in most cases they bare doctored to favour certain project and hereby mislead people. to me after checking the site one should just do extra research and analysis and make final decision the site can just be use as a guide.
yes, ico ranking sites perpetrators ico paysites like icobech, topicolist, icodrops, Coinshedule and icorating as usual if they pay the full, a project ico will be given a good rating when all it is not necessarily promising projects ico success most projects ico ends with scam and detrimental to the investors a lot of projects that use fake photo to remove any trace when the project was a scam ico really fraudsters.
Are you just knowing ICO rating sites are paid to shill a particular ICO? How do you think someone will just wake to shill a particular ICO? I have never believed in these ICO rating sites though. I can always do my own research about a particular ICO I want to invest in.
Shilling is part of these ICO rating sites, if you are familiar with ICObench, you will noticed that even not a good project there is rated so high. This is not surprising cause I heard from a friend that there is payment to have a good score on their rating. Also there is a portion of kyc status, those who have been graded positive few of them are not real. What does this mean? That the site really just altering the result depends if the project paid their dues for a good review. 
Are you just knowing ICO rating sites are paid to shill a particular ICO? How do you think someone will just wake to shill a particular ICO? I have never believed in these ICO rating sites though. I can always do my own research about a particular ICO I want to invest in.
If I think never relying on ICO rankings in a project and for me the ICO ranks as looking for bonuses and the more we invest the capital then the bonuses will be greater, and we also have to be careful because a lot of data is not correct in the displays in the ICO rankings, Munkin we have to find other ways to not feel at the disadvantage.
I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
You have to search it for yourself because most of ICO projects now are totally shit and cant be trust of.No matter how they do look legit
but in the end of the line they do either turns out to be a scam or a dead project which would really be a total waste of money.
ICO investment is dead nowadays and i dont know on why there are still people whom do consider out this option.Its your choice though
because its your money after all but do research up everything before putting up some funds.
These are few mistakes that newbies make, and it is a reason why it is implored that newbies learn the basics first.
Ico ranking site were not there to be trusted; they are there to be a guide as to the information you sought; each ico ranking site has criteria to list ico projects or ratio 1-5; which sometimes include kyc.
This is why fake projects often hold ICOs, because they only want to target investors' funds and then run away.Ico ranking site were not there to be trusted; they are there to be a guide as to the information you sought; each ico ranking site has criteria to list ico projects or ratio 1-5; which sometimes include kyc.
When I first joined here, I often made a review of the ICO ranking site as a reference. That was actually quite helpful to me in getting to know the project. I am not an investor, just a bounty hunter who is trying to get the right moment to join a party, so I only take information related to the token economy and the sales agenda.
Many of us know about ICOBench website- probably the most earning ICO rating website, they get paid for doing reviews for ICOs, but the rules are simple, more you pay, better rating you get. 
If that was about icobench and that exchange site has a very bad reputation but it looks like what already mentioned by OP is about all of the ico ranking sites. I guess not all of ico ranking sites are bad. We should not generalize all of ranking sites are bad sites.
I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!
What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.
These are few mistakes that newbies make, and it is a reason why it is implored that newbies learn the basics first.
Ico ranking site were not there to be trusted; they are there to be a guide as to the information you sought; each ico ranking site has criteria to list ico projects or ratio 1-5; which sometimes include kyc.
There are no live and working products during ico, the ico was launched to crowdfund money to launch the project; if there was enough funds, there won't be reason to conduct ico.
So do learn the basics and understand how this things work
when these ico ranking websites are just starting their services to the community, many crypto users were still referring on them regarding the capability of the project. but currently, i don't think many people are still checking the ratings of these ranking sites. it has proven that even if the rating is high, it doesn't guarantee that the project can be successful. and because most of them are paid sites, they will give good ratings even if there are some questionable info on the project.
Jump to: