That Strike Sapphire one has a distinct difference, the repetition of three numbers occurring consecutively which for all intents and purposes is impossible combined with the fact that this one also happened to be fifteen deep of reds.
All combinations of outcomes of equal length are equally likely. The 10 numbers in your screenshot are just as likely as 10 zeroes in a row, for instance.
The chances of a twenty deep string of a red/black, odd.\/even, High or low is actually 1,813,778 to 1 or a percentage chance of 0.000055% and I suggest you check your claims prior to making statements you clearly are not capable of adequately deducing as can be shown here,
I quoted the odds of losing 20 such bets in a row. That includes getting zeroes. It doesn't matter because this "20 reds in a row" never happened, according to the original reddit post itself.
and the fact you are forever telling this person how to fix his code shows more holes in your beliefs than a block of Swiss cheese.
I've never told him how to fix his code. I've never seen his code. I've seen his site, made suggestions about how it could be better, and he's listened. Sometimes he does what I suggest, sometimes he doesn't, but either way he's quick and efficient about it. Except for adding keyboard shortcuts. He sucks at that...
Perhaps like these figures you ought to reconsider your mistaken claims of knowing something you can not prove and unless the hash tag were sent to a third party and overseen by an independent governing body then "provably fair" has about as much truth as the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.
You ought to do some reading before you do more writing on the subject. You're making yourself look silly. "hash tag" is something to do with twitter. In short, here's how it works: the site picks a random text string, and publishes its hash in advance. Then I pick any text string I like, and send it to the site. The site then sticks those two strings together and uses the result to select the outcome of the spin. Then they reveal their text string. I can verify that the hash they published in advance is correct, and that our two strings together give the result we saw. That way they can't possibly pick the outcome of any spin, since my text string affects the outcome.
https://bitzino.com/about/fair goes into more detail if you want to understand. But if you want to just keep ranting about hash tags, third parties, etc. then that's OK too.
Furthermore if you wish to discuss this Strike Sapphire is quite active on the casinomeister.com forums and I am sure he would be happy to address any issues you have as you sound a little butt-hurt that they banned you from playing there for, as you claim having multiple accounts, but was more likely the fact you were either a US citizen and they are obeying the law of a country which by the way unlike bitZino is not registered in the US and therefore not liable to any repercussions but choose to do so anyway showing quite clearly they are doing the right thing by the US Government as well as their patrons, or you are running your account through a proxy and were detected doing so.
I think Josh has heard quite enough from me on the topic. He never thought I was in the US, or using a proxy. He thought that I was about 6 different people who I referred to the casino. One of them was called "Doug", and that was close enough to make him think it was me. I was actively encouraging friends to sign up, selling them Bitcoins so they could deposit, telling them about the promotional bonuses, etc. All the things that I thought he wanted, but it didn't work out. He also told me my girlfriend doesn't exist, which is a little offensive (even though he spoke to her on Skype). But none of that matters - just saying that Sapphire isn't an option for me any more.
If you wish to gamble your money with dishonest websites then I can not help you Strike Sapphire uses a genuine RNG and I will repeat myself one more time that bitZino are NOT provably fair and the fact you believe this is comical!
It's really not about belief. It's about mathematics. You can verify for yourself, spin by spin, that it is fair.
Good luck playing against a loaded dice my friend and I can assure you the gentleman in question lost what he claims.
I'm not claiming he didn't. He was obviously betting huge amounts to from $100 up to $500k and back again. Long losing streaks happen. Martingale is a crappy strategy that doesn't work, long term.
I find your sycophantic behavior to be somewhat disturbing and one need only look at the quality of Strike Sapphire using software that although doesn't compare with ours is clearly a superior site. and doesn't require input from someone such as yourself on every glitch under the sun and was not coded by some someone in their basement at home.
The Sapphire software was written by Josh (I don't know if he wrote it in his bedroom or basement, or why you care what room people write their code in), and had some really ugly bugs in it. I probably reported more bugs about Sapphire than any other site I've played at. Josh rewarded me in loyalty points for each bug I reported, promising that they're be worth something some day, and then took them all away when he banned me. Also I personally prefer the speed and clean look of the bitZino HTML5 interface to the proprietary mess that is Abode Flash used in the Sapphire interface, but realise that's just a personal preference.
