So the minimum deposit is $10 in whatever coins are available and this is given time in this draw 1 month from now, for me this is a fairly easy task and the more deposits the more chances of getting the sweepstakes, I see in the rules it will be selected 500 winners of the $10,000 prize.
For me this is a good opportunity where we can get and the team will choose randomly who the winner is, who knows this will be lucky because the initial capital is very minimal.
What I read in the rules.
$3000 for one winner
$200 10 winners
$10 for 500 winners
Yes, the opportunities is good. But at least some details should be clarify. I have seen other site that the more wager the more chance to win. Or player will get a ticket if they wager x amount etc. Also the draw should be in public or with a method where there is system of verification of the result. I am not saying team could do something suspicious but to keep player happy they should be transparent always imo.
Hi sujonali1819, $crypto$ and Fatunad
There is no wagering requirement but the min withdrawal is set to $25, everyone is treated equally, wagering more or less will not make a difference, we are looking into how to make the comp 100% transparent, so that all players can verify that the winners were chosen in a true random way using an RNG. We will have some more updates regarding this as soon as we have something concrete to demonstrate the transparency of the First time on Flush promo. Think of it as everyone who deposits over $10 will get a ticket and that the winning tickets will be picked randomly $crypto$
Think of it in this way Fatunad there are 511 players that will go into this draw.
511 numbers will then randomly be chosen which all correlate to one of the tickets produced, when the registration and deposit that was $10 or more occurred.
Have a look at this
https://medium.com/pancakeswap/why-were-using-chainlink-vrf-as-a-provably-fair-way-to-draw-lottery-winners-f1da41af125f, for the record this has not been integrated into Flush, and if you have read this carefully even provably fair systems can have their problems as you can see in this quote taken from the article " However, accessing a manipulation-resistant source of randomness on-chain in a verifiable manner isn’t as straightforward as it might seem. On-chain RNG solutions like blockhashes can be subject to miner manipulation, while off-chain RNG solutions are opaque and provide no proof of integrity"
We are very happy to hear all Bitcointalk forum community feedback related to the best way to demonstrate that the event and winners were chosen in the most verifiable transparent way possible, as you can see it is no simple task. The bottom line is that it most likely falls into the integrity of the operator and playing on a licensed casino that also has had their RNG certified by a leading accredited testing house is also a plus.
We look forward to feedback and happy to also make sure we pick the best way to do this in the spirit of decentralisation and the provably fair transparent world that we are all fighting for.
Flush Casino