New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin - page 16.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: doublec on December 18, 2011, 02:09:30 AM

Quote from: kano on December 18, 2011, 02:03:56 AM

Hmm, you mentioned in the other thread that you were considering merge mining of i0coin and iXcoin on a pool ...
That would certainly turn me away from it.

How would you know a pool was doing it? They could do it in secret and you'd be none the wiser.

I need to explain it to you?

I already pointed it out in the post you are quoting ... (LP's)
Then of course you could easily check the blocks in both to tell ...

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: kano on December 18, 2011, 02:03:56 AM

Hmm, you mentioned in the other thread that you were considering merge mining of i0coin and iXcoin on a pool ...
That would certainly turn me away from it.

How would you know a pool was doing it? They could do it in secret and you'd be none the wiser.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Hmm, you mentioned in the other thread that you were considering merge mining of i0coin and iXcoin on a pool ...
That would certainly turn me away from it.
i0coin was created because of iXcoin and the fake scam person who created iXcoin - not to join with it.

Also note that merged mining anything means more LP's and more LP's equate to more stales and invalids.
People should consider that when considering merged mining also.

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: markm on December 17, 2011, 09:50:16 PM

Not in any of the bitcoins or knockoffs I have looked at. The whole checkpoint thing exists only within the initial download section.

This is incorrect. The checkpoint is checked during normal operation of a node as it receives blocks from peers - only if it receives a block for the height that matches the checkpoint of course.

You may be thinking of the fact that if a checkpoint is introduced but the hash is incorrect then existing nodes that are beyond that checkpoint continue to operate normally. This is because they don't re-validate the chain it already has. This is the issue the devcoin chain had with the invalid checkpoint that was introduced. If it were to receive a reorganisation that involved getting a block at the height of the checkpoint then it would check it.

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

Quote from: doublec on December 17, 2011, 08:26:57 PM

Quote from: markm on December 17, 2011, 08:15:24 PM

Only if the code is changed to actually check the checkpoints during re-organisations.

Normally it is only checked when people grab the blockchain initially from scratch.

So if they do re-write, we have to hope someone has a backup that matches the checkpoints.

Correct me if I'm wrong but for the node to have got the block in the first place to be able to rewind back to it during a reorganisation then the checkpoint has been checked for it. The checkpoints are checked during the normal process of receiving a block from a node, not just the initial download.

Not in any of the bitcoins or knockoffs I have looked at. The whole checkpoint thing exists only within the initial download section.

-MarkM-

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Coinotron is using the new i0coin logo;
http://coinotron.com/coinotron/AccountServlet?action=home

Doublec use it on http://i0coin.bitparking.com/, I0coin + logo on top.

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: markm on December 17, 2011, 08:15:24 PM

Only if the code is changed to actually check the checkpoints during re-organisations.

Normally it is only checked when people grab the blockchain initially from scratch.

So if they do re-write, we have to hope someone has a backup that matches the checkpoints.

Correct me if I'm wrong but for the node to have got the block in the first place to be able to rewind back to it during a reorganisation then the checkpoint has been checked for it. The checkpoints are checked during the normal process of receiving a block from a node, not just the initial download.

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

Quote from: doublec on December 17, 2011, 07:24:28 PM

Quote from: worldinacoin on December 17, 2011, 07:17:56 PM

Is there a need to upgrade to the latest version or can we continue using 7?

The more nodes that upgrade the less risk there is of someone rewriting the blockchain back to the checkpoint in 7.

Only if the code is changed to actually check the checkpoints during re-organisations.

Normally it is only checked when people grab the blockchain initially from scratch.

So if they do re-write, we have to hope someone has a backup that matches the checkpoints.

-MarkM-

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: worldinacoin on December 17, 2011, 07:17:56 PM

Is there a need to upgrade to the latest version or can we continue using 7?

The more nodes that upgrade the less risk there is of someone rewriting the blockchain back to the checkpoint in 7.

worldinacoin

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Is there a need to upgrade to the latest version or can we continue using 7?

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Source and binaries for version v32508 of i0coin is now available at http://i0coin.bitparking.com. The only change is to add a checkpoint at block 155,000. I'm working on including the i0coin icons that were made by lightlord in the next version.

DutchBrat

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

What ? NO Namecoin adress ? Too bad then Wink

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Send me i0coins and make me go Grin

I0coin add: jNijCd2j8aZW9KHySKJwcL5YqFwtYoBpkJ
Ixcoin add: xbdzj6wDQW86jjUZgQE77EhcQpzewj4Jk3
Btc add 19w8rFvE4wrd4K1VuVkdj7jUCs6fxKRssa
Sc add: sg81t9ordAaPFDGhVaD9fVMBCP2cyfoKw2
ltc add: LV5BP1BxqoDCUu6ysJ53sgZAC6866mioCR
fbx add: fVExye5RYL1FFwhFLFcaV2a5Wi2S5Mtr7L

MaGNeT

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1002

Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na

Quote from: kano on December 16, 2011, 03:54:15 AM

Well ... actually ... no one posted a bounty for a logo ...
So maybe that explains why he didn't get any Tongue

Edit: though the fact that he said he has more than 300k i0coins sorta makes any bounty pretty worthless to him anyway

It's like Bill Gates who asks you for a $10 fee Tongue

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Well ... actually ... no one posted a bounty for a logo ...
So maybe that explains why he didn't get any Tongue

Edit: though the fact that he said he has more than 300k i0coins sorta makes any bounty pretty worthless to him anyway

Mousepotato

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Seal Cub Clubbing Club

TY sir

DutchBrat

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Block 154.746

Difficulty: 602.628

Mousepotato

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Seal Cub Clubbing Club

What's going on with i0coin? It's been stuck at the same block for the last 3 hours (according to Allchains anyway). Is it just an Allchains display error or something? Anybody know what the true current difficulty is? I'm at work so I can't czech.

DutchBrat

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

More likely a screwup with blockexplorer, happened earlier this week as well

Mousepotato

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Seal Cub Clubbing Club

Looks like someone just added 100GH/s to i0C. Fork attempt maybe?

Topic: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin - page 16. (Read 217119 times)