I guess thats the reason the download isnt working anymore. Any ideas (I have enought memory, some 4GB free)?
You'll need to delete your existing blockchain files (don't delete your wallet.dat!) and download the blockchain again. It should download successfully. It's trying to do a large chain rollback and failing. 
Topic: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin - page 9. (Read 217119 times)
Has there been a chain fork? Vircurex shows the current block as 329,592. I did a full chain download using the i0coin.bitparking.com client and it has the block count as greater than 330,000. What client is vircurex running?
I use your 32509 client.
I started it about an hour ago - downloading blocks up to 330475.
Now -only about one hour later - and it's up to 330500 and counting (fast!)
Hope this helps and the whole situation gets cleared up - I kinda like i0coin!
Block count is now 330555. This makes 55 Blocks in this hour alone shown on my client. Hope this info helps anyhow ...
difficulty drops are unlimited. But can only rise 25%. Thus, if the network went down for 3 hours, that is what you may be seeing.
The version 32509 is throwing me an error here:
When typing i0coind getinfo it shows:
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1335232383,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "EXCEPTION: 11DbException \nDb::get: Cannot allocate memory \ni0coin in ProcessMessage() \n"
}
I guess thats the reason the download isnt working anymore. Any ideas (I have enought memory, some 4GB free)?
When typing i0coind getinfo it shows:
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1335232383,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "EXCEPTION: 11DbException \nDb::get: Cannot allocate memory \ni0coin in ProcessMessage() \n"
}
I guess thats the reason the download isnt working anymore. Any ideas (I have enought memory, some 4GB free)?
Has there been a chain fork? Vircurex shows the current block as 329,592. I did a full chain download using the i0coin.bitparking.com client and it has the block count as greater than 330,000. What client is vircurex running?
I use your 32509 client.
I started it about an hour ago - downloading blocks up to 330475.
Now -only about one hour later - and it's up to 330500 and counting (fast!)
Hope this helps and the whole situation gets cleared up - I kinda like i0coin!
Block count is now 330555. This makes 55 Blocks in this hour alone shown on my client. Hope this info helps anyhow ...
The linux and windows versions might be different too.
Yeah, I built from source using kr105's repository and I can't even connect to anything. there is an i0coin-qt client too i think.
Yes, I'll try a chain download using this and see if it's on a fork.The linux and windows versions might be different too.
Has there been a chain fork? Vircurex shows the current block as 329,592. I did a full chain download using the i0coin.bitparking.com client and it has the block count as greater than 330,000. What client is vircurex running?
I use your 32509 client.
I started it about an hour ago - downloading blocks up to 330475.
Now -only about one hour later - and it's up to 330500 and counting (fast!)
Hope this helps and the whole situation gets cleared up - I kinda like i0coin!
there is an i0coin-qt client too i think.
Yes, I'll try a chain download using this and see if it's on a fork. Has there been a chain fork? Vircurex shows the current block as 329,592. I did a full chain download using the i0coin.bitparking.com client and it has the block count as greater than 330,000. What client is vircurex running?
there is an i0coin-qt client too i think.
Has there been a chain fork? Vircurex shows the current block as 329,592. I did a full chain download using the i0coin.bitparking.com client and it has the block count as greater than 330,000. What client is vircurex running?
Same here, several larger transactions are not getting any confirmations, have been sitting around for hours still showing 0 confirmations but subsequent smaller transactions are being process correctly. So what happens to those "old" transactions with 0 confirmations?
It sounds like those transactions got rolled back in the chain reorg. They will never confirm if so and will always remain. It's the same thing that happened when my original i0coin exchange got double spent. I think the vircurex exchange owner will need to check their exchange transactions to see if there are any 0 confirms stuck.kr105, is there anything in the new client that could be related to this? Or is it just a malicious rollback?
Same here, several larger transactions are not getting any confirmations, have been sitting around for hours still showing 0 confirmations but subsequent smaller transactions are being process correctly. So what happens to those "old" transactions with 0 confirmations?
Yeah Bitparking has:
That in the news. Looks like there will be an update to the i0coin daemon/client soon.
Quote
2012-05-26: i0coin is temporarily disabled due to issues with the i0coin chain. I'm investigating and will reenable when it's working again.
That in the news. Looks like there will be an update to the i0coin daemon/client soon.
Anyone see a big chain rollback on i0coin today? I have two nodes that saw it and crashed due to out of memory from the reorg.
The network hashrate on vircurex is 35 Ghash/sec. Maybe all the miners are crashing?
Might be a good idea to halt all I0coin transactions until this is figured out.
Anyone see a big chain rollback on i0coin today? I have two nodes that saw it and crashed due to out of memory from the reorg.
It'd be nice to see some usage of the coin beyond exchange trading.
I'm accepting BTC/NMC/LTC/SC for my Logitech Cube: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/wts-logitech-cube-67523
But I'll gladly accept i0 or Ixcoins as well around 10 BTC of them, whatever that works out to.
Most pools are still not doing merged mining, except maybe for NaMeCoin in some cases. So securing all the merge-able altcoins might require investing heavily into merged mining projects such as those the DeVCorp folk want to set up. (They plan to merge all the coins they can and sell all except DeVCoins *for* DeVCoins to help keep up the value of DeVCoins.)
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
well DoubleC the 50% bug was fixed, that was the main reason why the website was taken down
you lost a lot of bitcoins.
It's not fixed, it's just dependent on hash rate. Unfortunately the incident with CoiledCoin shows the a major player can still disrupt an alternate coin. As far as I know the biggest miner on i0coin, with >50% is still the coiledcoin attacker.you lost a lot of bitcoins.
That said, there's an exchange for i0coin already - Vircurex. Why not just use that?
It'd be nice to see some usage of the coin beyond exchange trading.
well DoubleC the 50% bug was fixed, that was the main reason why the website was taken down
you lost a lot of bitcoins.
But now its near-impossible for this to occur, even if i0coin is worth nothing lets say, you still make money off fee transactions.
If people decide to use it for a bit. It doesn't make any sense why you wouldn't want this just for sake of profiting
Best regards
lightlord
you lost a lot of bitcoins.
But now its near-impossible for this to occur, even if i0coin is worth nothing lets say, you still make money off fee transactions.
If people decide to use it for a bit. It doesn't make any sense why you wouldn't want this just for sake of profiting
Best regards
lightlord
I seriously doubt you have millions 
Your just saying that so it doesn't get opened.
I need proof that you actually have it.
And If you do have millions send them to me, then I'll believe you
Send a million to ja8AEDbn7mJsTnkSFLghDpNXt7TaBnfVou
If you actually have millions, surely sending 1 million would mean nothing to you.
Then I will actually believe you
Your just saying that so it doesn't get opened.
I need proof that you actually have it.
And If you do have millions send them to me, then I'll believe you
Send a million to ja8AEDbn7mJsTnkSFLghDpNXt7TaBnfVou
If you actually have millions, surely sending 1 million would mean nothing to you.
Then I will actually believe you
hey bozo....the translation was in the context of you talking...
Jump to: