Topic: New sgminer support x11, x13, x14 and x15, fresh (with source) - page 5. (Read 34212 times)
We need to get back in time then 
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
I'm still getting errors and no work done on 5000 series cards (Cypress). 6000 series and above work fine. Should I use other kernel than bitblockold ?
Thanks.
Does you card works with x13modold or marucoin-modold ?
marucoin-modold gives error -11 when building binary. I can't seem to be able to find x13modold kernel
Tested with 5830, 5870 with 2 different rigs. Win 7 64bit cata 14.4 and 14.6 beta.
I also got the same problem with this versions..using same config from the v5 prerelease, what was working fine.
It doesn't matter which binary it is building, marucoinmod-old or darkocoinmod etc.
You have a working v5 release? Do you have a dl link?
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
I'm still getting errors and no work done on 5000 series cards (Cypress). 6000 series and above work fine. Should I use other kernel than bitblockold ?
Thanks.
Does you card works with x13modold or marucoin-modold ?
marucoin-modold gives error -11 when building binary. I can't seem to be able to find x13modold kernel
Tested with 5830, 5870 with 2 different rigs. Win 7 64bit cata 14.4 and 14.6 beta.
I also got the same problem with this versions..using same config from the v5 prerelease, what was working fine.
It doesn't matter which binary it is building, marucoinmod-old or darkocoinmod etc.
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
I'm still getting errors and no work done on 5000 series cards (Cypress). 6000 series and above work fine. Should I use other kernel than bitblockold ?
Thanks.
Does you card works with x13modold or marucoin-modold ?
marucoin-modold gives error -11 when building binary. I can't seem to be able to find x13modold kernel
Tested with 5830, 5870 with 2 different rigs. Win 7 64bit cata 14.4 and 14.6 beta.
@aznboy84: I finished compiling BAMT and i found out a problem. Everytime i tried to mine X13, sgminer gave me this error:
2 errors detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCL18047T14.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation.
[08:29:44] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[08:29:44] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[08:29:44] Re-check your config
2 errors detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCL18047T14.cl".
Frontend phase failed compilation.
[08:29:44] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[08:29:44] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[08:29:44] Re-check your config
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
I'm still getting errors and no work done on 5000 series cards (Cypress). 6000 series and above work fine. Should I use other kernel than bitblockold ?
Thanks.
Does you card works with x13modold or marucoin-modold ?
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
I'm still getting errors and no work done on 5000 series cards (Cypress). 6000 series and above work fine. Should I use other kernel than bitblockold ?
Thanks.
aznboy84!
Looks like ystarnaud fixed the HW errors, can you re-base or re-fork and then synchronize pull request 303?
Looks like ystarnaud fixed the HW errors, can you re-base or re-fork and then synchronize pull request 303?
@anzboy84: When i tried to compile for BAMT, i got this error:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
Making all in ccan
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
Making all in sph
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `x14.o', needed by `libsph.a'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Can you please have a look?
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
Making all in ccan
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
Making all in sph
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `x14.o', needed by `libsph.a'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Can you please have a look?
fixed by remove "x14.c" from "/sph/Makefile.am"
my bad linux
@anzboy84: When i tried to compile for BAMT, i got this error:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
Making all in ccan
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
Making all in sph
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `x14.o', needed by `libsph.a'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Can you please have a look?
make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/compat'
Making all in ccan
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/ccan'
Making all in sph
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `x14.o', needed by `libsph.a'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer/sph'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/miners/sgminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Can you please have a look?
Yesterday I downloaded a version called xxxxx_NEW3.rar, dated 29-06, which is fine, not sure about the version which is currently posted as 29-06...
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Thank you!
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
Yeah yeah thanks aznboy84!
I should've told you that ystarnaud was off for the weekend, and that latest sgminer 5_0 and sgminer 5_0_X15 are both kinda fucked up as they create HW errors out the ass whenever switching algos or not.
I'm using the 6_29 and just barely experiencing 3 HW/hr on 1 out of 8 total 290X
EDIT: ystar should be able to fix it up in a day or so whenever he gets back, in the meantime you da man thanks for providing a backdated link for those who might only see the newest mega link.
We need to get back in time then
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
The first release with whirlpool unroll which doesn't produce any HW error for 1 hour testing
X15_AMD_06_29.rar
Somehow the forked one on https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/tree/v5_0-x15 produce HW error, gonna work around it
Fuck that, I get a massive amount of hardware errors on the newest 06_30 build.
It might hold on x14 ok, but then switch to another algo, and about 100 HW errors in a minute.
I get hundreds immediately whenever I include an old 68xx card with a new card. I had to disable that card to get the others to work.
Nah these are on 290X.
On 6_29 build I have 3 HW errors in 1 hour.
On 6_30 build 100 HW errors 1st minute.
Fuck that, I get a massive amount of hardware errors on the newest 06_30 build.
It might hold on x14 ok, but then switch to another algo, and about 100 HW errors in a minute.
I get hundreds immediately whenever I include an old 68xx card with a new card. I had to disable that card to get the others to work.
Tested with a low-end card (HD6000 with bitblockold), seems to work great & not a single HW @ the start. Will let it run for 24hrs & add testing to a few more cards (New APU's).. Thanks aznboy84
Sincerely,
WolfLee84
Edit: Tested with a 5000+ (did have a few HW's over 24hrs), 6000+ (same as the 5000, only one or two HW errors in 24hrs), FM2 APU's A4 & A6 didn't have a single HW. Going to test an AM1 & FM2+ as soon as possible, knowing the hash/s will be low & mostly just for testing purposes)
Works great with the newest SDK & 14.6 Did manage to get the old 5000/6000+ models & an APU matched up with the bitblockold without any HW errors, not having to have separate miners running helps 
Sincerely,
WolfLee84
Edit: Tested with a 5000+ (did have a few HW's over 24hrs), 6000+ (same as the 5000, only one or two HW errors in 24hrs), FM2 APU's A4 & A6 didn't have a single HW. Going to test an AM1 & FM2+ as soon as possible, knowing the hash/s will be low & mostly just for testing purposes)
Works great with the newest SDK & 14.6 Did manage to get the old 5000/6000+ models & an APU matched up with the bitblockold without any HW errors, not having to have separate miners running helps
on my 1g memory (or above) 5xxx and 6xxx cards ,the bitblockold algorithm works fine,but 512m cards can't run,says not enough memory.
I tried to decrease TC or increase LG,can't work neither.
seems that parameter "--thread-concurrency" and "--lookup-gap" don't play a part in Bitblockold algorithm
I tried to decrease TC or increase LG,can't work neither.
seems that parameter "--thread-concurrency" and "--lookup-gap" don't play a part in Bitblockold algorithm
Anyone else getting the occasional HW errors? Over 12 hours I've got 4-5 on each card... no good.
Should I be throttling back my clocks? I'm using regular X11 settings but with 128 worksize, and 2 threads.
Should I be throttling back my clocks? I'm using regular X11 settings but with 128 worksize, and 2 threads.
Fuck that, I get a massive amount of hardware errors on the newest 06_30 build.
It might hold on x14 ok, but then switch to another algo, and about 100 HW errors in a minute.
I think this was forked from the broken sgminer 5_0 multi-algo, which isn't quite fixed up yet.
That shit is gut-wrenching to watch it ratchet up on HW errors barely 5 minutes after initializing. I went back to his 06_29 build.
aznboy84 can you please keep your daily builds up longer without replacing them?
Anyone else getting the occasional HW errors? Over 12 hours I've got 4-5 on each card... no good.
Should I be throttling back my clocks? I'm using regular X11 settings but with 128 worksize, and 2 threads.
Should I be throttling back my clocks? I'm using regular X11 settings but with 128 worksize, and 2 threads.
Jump to: