Topic: New York State Rockland County Bans Unvaccinted Kids From All Public Places (Read 992 times)

One of the most juicy hypothesis about this is that it was the subject of some of the 'deepest' and most advanced forms of propaganda.  That would also imply that it is one of the highest priority projects of those who control the levers of propaganda.

I'll be honest and say that in spite of spending a fair amount of energy entertaining this hypothesis and looking for evidence, I really have not found anything which accounts for the strength which which people hold the aforementioned contradictory belief structure.  Propaganda is a vast field though, and it guards it's secrets fairly well.  The hypothesis has certainly not been killed by anything I've noticed.

My favorite part of all of this hysteria and impotent rage is pretty much everyone agrees the US healthcare system is corrupt to the core, and regularly turns the population into lab rats for testing and pushing dangerous drugs. Then these same people turn around and implicitly trust this same system to be able to forcibly inject everyone with vaccines without informed consent, and with these companies holding absolutely zero liability over any harm caused. Not a contradiction at all. What could go wrong?

I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  

...

Is everyone starting to see the pattern here? Do you really think the government cares this much about your health? This is not about vaccines, this is about control and stripping the rights of ALL OF US.

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION  = THESIS - ANTITHESIS - SYNTHESIS  =  CHAOS - FEAR - SUMBISSION

Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.

CBS News reported that the decision to stop counting H1N1 flu cases was made so hastily that states weren't given the opportunity to provide input. Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson dug into state-by-state numbers of positively-confirmed swine flu cases, but she and her CBS team were stonewalled by the CDC for months. Finally, rather than wait for the CDC, reporters took the initiative to contact each state individually and found: "Of the presumed likely swine flu cases, only a fraction of them were actually swine flu."

...

Was there ever a swine flue epidemic?

There was not even the hint of one.

What is provided here is a case study of  Vaccine criminality in which the product is hyped and sold to the corporations benefit.  However all the damage is paid by the State including much of the legal cost.  Corporate bankruptcy needs to be imposed to end this horror.

Ye all the rules have been rigged to run out another fraud any time they like.

Swine Flu Vaccine Injury Settlements Reveal Health Authorities & Big Pharma Are Partners In Crime

With these improvements, the death rates from childhood infectious diseases plummeted—long before the advent of vaccines for those illnesses. U.S. vital statistics affirm that the measles mortality (death) rate had dropped 99.4% before introduction of the first measles vaccine in 1963.


Fuzzy measles math

Prior to the measles vaccine's U.S. introduction, the estimated number of measles cases annually was between 4 and 6.5 million (depending on the source). The government-reported mortality rate—pre-vaccine—was approximately 1 in 10,000 cases. So why do today's media often report it as 1 in 1,000 cases? This appears to be an attempt to exaggerate the facts and promote fear to drive the vaccine mandate agenda. Ninety percent or more of all measles cases were so mild that they were never reported because parents never took their children to the doctor. Only 10% of overall cases were severe enough to warrant seeking medical care, but even in that subgroup, not all cases were reported. It was only among the 10% that sought medical care and were reported that the fatality rate was about 1 in 1,000. Modern news outlets get away with inaccurately reporting the death rate as 1 in 1,000 by leaving out the crucial word "reported" and referring only to "cases."

But even a death rate of 1 in 10,000 cases does not accurately reflect the situation for the majority of the population, for whom measles mortality was far less. Socioeconomic factors are very important in this discussion but often overlooked. In the middle of the last century, U.S. children living in poverty had poorer nutrition, less sanitary living conditions and less access to medical care. As one might expect, this resulted in less viable and resilient immune systems that made them more vulnerable to measles complications and death.

Two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) studies support the observation that poorer children suffered more serious complications and a higher measles mortality rate. One study, titled "Measles mortality: a retrospective look at the vaccine era" (authored for the CDC's Bureau of Epidemiology and published in 1975 in the American Journal of Epidemiology), reviewed statistics from 1958-1963. A 1980 study from the CDC's Immunization Division, titled "Measles mortality in the United States 1971-1975" and published in the American Journal of Public Health, reviewed records from 1971-1975. Both studies showed that children who lived at or below the poverty level, and especially in rural settings, were significantly more likely to die from measles than those in the higher income brackets. In fact, the second study found a ten times (1,000%) higher death rate for those below the poverty level than for the more affluent population.

As I thought about those numbers and the 1000% greater incidence of death in poverty-stricken children, I became curious as to how disproportionate those numbers might be when considering the population as a whole. Remember, the overall mortality rate for the entire country was reported as approximately 1 death for every 10,000 cases of measles. In the pre-measles-vaccine era from 1959-1962, the total U.S. population was from 178 million (1959) to 189 million (1963), and the percentage of families living at or below the poverty level was about 8% (approximately 14 million). If that 8% had a 1,000% higher mortality rate than the more affluent population, it would stand to reason that the mortality rate for that affluent segment must be far less than 1 in 10,000 cases. Here are the CDC measles mortality numbers for 1971-1975 reported in the American Journal of Public Health:

-Families with incomes of less than or equal to $5,000/year: 1 death in 237,467 (population)

-Families with incomes between $5,000 and $10,000/year: 1 death in 1,009,437 (population)

-Families with incomes over $10,000/year: 1 death in 2,190,837 (population)

In other words, for higher-income households, there was less than a one in two million measles fatality rate.

...
I wonder if Ebola has an outbreak in the US they will still be blaming "antivaxxers".

...
And every kid deserves a disease free life (atleast the diseases which are preventable).
...