Topic: Nights Watch by Afrikoin - page 22. (Read 303329 times)
$BTC is making its largest monthly green candle in history.
There is an impulse form here as predicted, lovely proportions. Wave (v) is in wave iii, it could go between 5k and 7k. Then the question is - was that a primary wave down there (1?). that would mean a correction to 3-4k, and more bull, maybe an extension, even higher.
It might be sensible to assume that this wave v is the final wave, in which case it could go a bit higher that 7k, and the correction that follows could take some time.
If you have made profit from my analysis any tips would be appreciated to 1DyaSa53z1uVDgGN7D1rk7U2h9xLbR4q7v
It might be sensible to assume that this wave v is the final wave, in which case it could go a bit higher that 7k, and the correction that follows could take some time.
If you have made profit from my analysis any tips would be appreciated to 1DyaSa53z1uVDgGN7D1rk7U2h9xLbR4q7v
What about alts? Will the follow the BOOM?
There is an impulse form here as predicted, lovely proportions. Wave (v) is in wave iii, it could go between 5k and 7k. Then the question is - was that a primary wave down there (1?). that would mean a correction to 3-4k, and more bull, maybe an extension, even higher.
It might be sensible to assume that this wave v is the final wave, in which case it could go a bit higher that 7k, and the correction that follows could take some time.
If you have made profit from my analysis any tips would be appreciated to 1DyaSa53z1uVDgGN7D1rk7U2h9xLbR4q7v
It might be sensible to assume that this wave v is the final wave, in which case it could go a bit higher that 7k, and the correction that follows could take some time.
If you have made profit from my analysis any tips would be appreciated to 1DyaSa53z1uVDgGN7D1rk7U2h9xLbR4q7v
Humans also desperately fail to comprehend big numbers. Just because doing everything on-chain feels like it's not going to scale doesn't mean IT infrastructure is not going to support it. See the kind of data Google stores and processes every 10 minutes and think again whether 1 MB block size limit makes any sense or not.
yeah, other humans put out bullshit and when they get called, they chicken away.
$1600 you said?
muahaha muahaha
Goldman was right all along
I don't think so. We go way higher.Anyone still waiting for $800? ...
Goldman was right all along
$3676
$3676
in a $100-off kinda way
suspect the city boys have never seen the likes
Goldman was right all along
$3676
$3676
shout out to sick pig for contributing to BCC/ Bitcoin ABC
37:17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By0w43NQdiY
37:17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By0w43NQdiY
;-)
Humans also desperately fail to comprehend big numbers. Just because doing everything on-chain feels like it's not going to scale doesn't mean IT infrastructure is not going to support it. See the kind of data Google stores and processes every 10 minutes and think again whether 1 MB block size limit makes any sense or not.
Google infraestructure has some minimal redundancy to achieve that scalability. Blockchain is 100% redundant by definition.
regardless of the technical feasibility of on chain scaling,
the article is a misrepresentation, and intended. Is that what is has come to? Win by all costs? even at the expense of twisting words and misrepresenting facts?
Says a lot about Samson Mow and Blockstream and how far they will go.
The article was shocking. Anyone who has a decent technical grasp of bitcoin can see through the lies in the article.
A regular average joe reader could not tell the difference.
the article is a misrepresentation, and intended. Is that what is has come to? Win by all costs? even at the expense of twisting words and misrepresenting facts?
Says a lot about Samson Mow and Blockstream and how far they will go.
The article was shocking. Anyone who has a decent technical grasp of bitcoin can see through the lies in the article.
A regular average joe reader could not tell the difference.
nice to see you using common sense to discern information. alan watts has taught you well, my friend
regardless of the technical feasibility of on chain scaling,
the article is a misrepresentation, and intended. Is that what is has come to? Win by all costs? even at the expense of twisting words and misrepresenting facts?
Says a lot about Samson Mow and Blockstream and how far they will go.
The article was shocking. Anyone who has a decent technical grasp of bitcoin can see through the lies in the article.
A regular average joe reader could not tell the difference.
the article is a misrepresentation, and intended. Is that what is has come to? Win by all costs? even at the expense of twisting words and misrepresenting facts?
Says a lot about Samson Mow and Blockstream and how far they will go.
The article was shocking. Anyone who has a decent technical grasp of bitcoin can see through the lies in the article.
A regular average joe reader could not tell the difference.
Humans also desperately fail to comprehend big numbers. Just because doing everything on-chain feels like it's not going to scale doesn't mean IT infrastructure is not going to support it. See the kind of data Google stores and processes every 10 minutes and think again whether 1 MB block size limit makes any sense or not.
Crush the unbelievers! All hail our blockstream overlords!
wow! the forbes article by samson mow is complete propaganda. The thesis is hard forks are not permissible, yet this is a valid option for public blockchain participants as any other. He intentionally misrepresented the facts to push an agenda against BCH
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
Afrikoin, do you realize what involves to store forever every damned microtx onchain? I would happily serve a 5 liters coffee enema to any bigblockers who agree to fuck off once for all with their damned altcoin.
A lot of people still dont understand the enormous potential Blockchain got. Bigger blocks is not the scaling solution 2e layers are.
wow! the forbes article by samson mow is complete propaganda. The thesis is hard forks are not permissible, yet this is a valid option for public blockchain participants as any other. He intentionally misrepresented the facts to push an agenda against BCH
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
Afrikoin, do you realize what involves to store forever every damned microtx onchain? I would happily serve a 5 liters coffee enema to any bigblockers who agree to fuck off once for all with their damned altcoin.
wow! the forbes article by samson mow is complete propaganda. The thesis is hard forks are not permissible, yet this is a valid option for public blockchain participants as any other. He intentionally misrepresented the facts to push an agenda against BCH
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
http://fortune.com/2017/08/07/bitcoin-cash-bch-hard-fork-blockchain-usd-coinbase/
People should get the full story of r/bitcoin because it is probably one of the strangest of all reddit subs.
r/bitcoin, the main sub for the bitcoin community is held and run by a person who goes by the pseudonym u/theymos. Theymos not only controls r/bitcoin, but also bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.com. These are top three communication channels for the bitcoin community, all controlled by just one person.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6rxw7k/informative_btc_vs_bch_articles/dl8v4lp/
r/bitcoin, the main sub for the bitcoin community is held and run by a person who goes by the pseudonym u/theymos. Theymos not only controls r/bitcoin, but also bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.com. These are top three communication channels for the bitcoin community, all controlled by just one person.
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6rxw7k/informative_btc_vs_bch_articles/dl8v4lp/
Bitcoin Core commits to splitting from segwit2x. Which chain will win?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep4HtGgOdjw
Matt Corallo’s pull request for Bitcoin Core to automatically disconnect from segwit2x has been accepted: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pu...
* Full nodes and miners running Core will disconnect from 2x nodes
* They have a culture of “never hard fork”
* But the entire industry backs 2x.
* Poll: Which chain will be called “bitcoin” on Dec 1, 2017: https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/stat...
* Core devs trying to make segwit2x look like an alternate coin by pitching btc1 to change their address type: https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/issue...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep4HtGgOdjw
Matt Corallo’s pull request for Bitcoin Core to automatically disconnect from segwit2x has been accepted: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pu...
* Full nodes and miners running Core will disconnect from 2x nodes
* They have a culture of “never hard fork”
* But the entire industry backs 2x.
* Poll: Which chain will be called “bitcoin” on Dec 1, 2017: https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/stat...
* Core devs trying to make segwit2x look like an alternate coin by pitching btc1 to change their address type: https://github.com/btc1/bitcoin/issue...
The Black Swan That Could Turn Bitcoin Upside Down
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@belerophon/the-black-swan-that-could-turn-bitcoin-upside-down
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@belerophon/the-black-swan-that-could-turn-bitcoin-upside-down
Jump to: