Damn, scammed by a hero member ,something went wrong.
Nothing went "wrong". His ponzi was undetected until the damage was done.
The people will the power to negative trust (like me) have to be informed before we can do anything.
As soon as I was made aware I acted on it. There was no scam after that point.
If only someone had warned participants that he would likely end up not paying for their advertising.
any escrow ?
SInce you're new and only had a netral trust
Another HYIP? I would propose an escrow.
A HYIP by a hero member? I wouldn't waste 6000 hours and a hero status on a scam like this essentially ending your account.
any escrow ?
SInce you're new and only had a netral trust
I mean new, not as how long your account has exist
I mean new because
you're new providing signature campaign !--snipp--
You're acting as if I am a newbie member trying to start a non-escrowed campaign when I've done over 10+BTC in successful bank transactions in the last few weeks
can you make any prove on that ?
link ?
image or something ?
A HYIP is a fraud no matter what. It will fail to payout all 'investors' at one point in time, that is a fact.
i am sorry out this campaign for no escrow ,
From the HYIP thread:
To be fair, this was announced as a HYIP, so everyone knows it's a ponzi. The gamble is to be one of the few (if any) accounts that get their money returned.
@niothor
I think these high return rates can't be guaranteed for a longer period.
And when the system collapse you will get a negativ trust rating from many investors.
Therefore the value of your account will drop quite heavily.
So I think this whole program isn't really profitable for you...
Investing 1 bitcoin in the 7 day plan would give you 6 bitcoin in a year, how can you afford that?
It seems more seriously like the other HYIP that now is in circulation, like MajestiCoins, tradefocus and other. Anyway, invest with extreme attention, and if possible, stay away from this type of business.
The fact that this board is being censored just proves that something shady is going on in here
its to prevent:
1. Sig campaign spammers
2. Bashing of the thread
as we both know that sites like these get bashed heavily. No one can deny that
But the thread lacks a critical analysis. Why not allow an open discussion about the scheme?
I think it is safe to say that negative trust would not have stopped people from foolishly investing and advertising.