Topic: Not all projects are bad - page 2. (Read 562 times)
Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.
Yep, I agree with you...
not all ICO / IEO projects are Scams, many of them don't reach the Hardcap or Softcap target, but the mistake of the developer is not being open to the public about what happened to their project, developers tend to just disappear, so many people think that it's a scam.
not all ICO / IEO projects are Scams, many of them don't reach the Hardcap or Softcap target, but the mistake of the developer is not being open to the public about what happened to their project, developers tend to just disappear, so many people think that it's a scam.
It is true that not all projects are bad in the crypto currency space.
But we cannot deny the fact that most projects are bad, which is not a good return in the crypto space.
Whats key is investors or bounty hunters, doing the best of research functions to ensure that the best projects are always followed or worked upon.
But we cannot deny the fact that most projects are bad, which is not a good return in the crypto space.
Whats key is investors or bounty hunters, doing the best of research functions to ensure that the best projects are always followed or worked upon.
I think if a project failed, it's as a result of poor management or the team intentions is just to cash out. Alot help the project to survive like partnership, strong marketing skills and so on. And when it comes to bounty hunters, not all are selfish, many hunters also work with a project for the success of it. Many hold there tokens till it turns shit and even developers dump on hunters, and so many to name a few. The main point is, if a project fails to deliver it is neither the Dev or the hunters. All depends on the intention. We have seen cases of hunters and airdroppers dumping a token and the project still stays stronger. So I think most times, it's all depends on the Dev management.
Indeed. The only reason why a project ends up to be unsuccessful because they didn't manage it that well, and they didn't pick the right partnership that will help them to grow. It is really awful to know that a lot of bounty hunters that are expecting on a project to be good and successful, but it really turns out to be unexpected that most of us are disappointed even the project is legitimate, some of us think that it is a scam because they didn't distibute a good reward.
I think if a project failed, it's as a result of poor management or the team intentions is just to cash out. Alot help the project to survive like partnership, strong marketing skills and so on. And when it comes to bounty hunters, not all are selfish, many hunters also work with a project for the success of it. Many hold there tokens till it turns shit and even developers dump on hunters, and so many to name a few. The main point is, if a project fails to deliver it is neither the Dev or the hunters. All depends on the intention. We have seen cases of hunters and airdroppers dumping a token and the project still stays stronger. So I think most times, it's all depends on the Dev management.
You are right, that a project didn't succeed in the market doesn't mean its bad. Some developers and teamay have put in a lot of effort to get their project to desired height but failed because of technical or financial reasons.
We all know this, not to judge, but these project team and developers should be aware of what they need to run a project and get them ready before embarking on starting up the project. Some people just wake up and decide to delve into crypto projects cause they see others succeeding and think it's easy to get there.
We all know this, not to judge, but these project team and developers should be aware of what they need to run a project and get them ready before embarking on starting up the project. Some people just wake up and decide to delve into crypto projects cause they see others succeeding and think it's easy to get there.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
I do agree with you that not all projects are bad and sometimes, the good turns bad and the bad turns good equally.
And when it comes to investors and bounty hunters, i do not think there is anything like half cake
As bounty hunters, the aim and goal is to work and get paid for work done which should be the normal situation of things.
While for investors, the aim is to always get profit.
In which ever case you fall, All you have to do is dyor before making your choices.
Most new projects have good ideas but they team have no will of backing the project up, I've stop reasoning that way, now I prefer good team over quality use case because I've seen not too great use case doing better because the team are determined
yes sometimes the projects that we believe are good are not in line with the thoughts of others which is why many projects are said to be quite good and interesting but fail.
I guess Dev just needs to develop or promote other ways to get people interested.
maybe changing the name or ways to promote can help the project to be launched.
I guess Dev just needs to develop or promote other ways to get people interested.
maybe changing the name or ways to promote can help the project to be launched.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
I think it's natural that many people hope for short-term profits. But if the project is legit and has a large product and market cap value, I think it can be used as a long-term investment because I think the crypto market will continue to grow
I think if a project failed, it's as a result of poor management or the team intentions is just to cash out. Alot help the project to survive like partnership, strong marketing skills and so on. And when it comes to bounty hunters, not all are selfish, many hunters also work with a project for the success of it. Many hold there tokens till it turns shit and even developers dump on hunters, and so many to name a few. The main point is, if a project fails to deliver it is neither the Dev or the hunters. All depends on the intention. We have seen cases of hunters and airdroppers dumping a token and the project still stays stronger. So I think most times, it's all depends on the Dev management.
Maybe it just seems like a failure, but the team members earn enough money.
Projects can easily fail if not much investors have interest in them, for this not to happen developers need to produce something very useful for the public and such project will be very demanding, I'm tired of new projects anyway, too many new projects are just waste of time
The problem nowadays is that we have dozens of different projects covering the same topic. So there is a certain degree of fragmentation with the investment. Manytimes, good projects go down due to lack of interest from the whales. In such cases, the project and the promoter team may be good. But the promotional campaign may not be up to the mark.
Not all projects are bad, but the confidence and patience of investors and bounty hunters is no longer as high, due to many SCAM projects. It is frustrating for a bounty hunter to choose a project, and during its development he realizes that it is a weak project or a SCAM. Hence the lack of patience. However, the crypto market requires a lot of patience, so only the patient and knowledgeable will survive on this market.
Yes thats right,Not all projects are bad but also good projects rarely come.Some are only shit,some failed There also some successfull projects but dont paid the hunters.This is so sad,Good and legit project are hard to find now.
Indeed its hard to determine a legit project that will also pay the bounty hunters in the end of the campaign. Not all projects are bad its just that majority of existing now are just scam and sometimes it looks genuine to fool the hunters. Research is a must to avoid ending up in scam and your effort wont be wasted. 
To make a good project we need talent developers, with passion and enthusiasm. We don't need coder, normal developer. You're right about some good projects but they failed but the number of projects that just want to take money from investor are more.
Projects that only want to take money from investors are very dangerous and scam projects, because projects that don't have good ideas and goals to build in the long run will always die and won't develop, so everyone should stay away from projects that only aim to take money from investors, because developers of projects like that clearly don't have experience in any field. 
Projects can easily fail if not much investors have interest in them, for this not to happen developers need to produce something very useful for the public and such project will be very demanding, I'm tired of new projects anyway, too many new projects are just waste of time
The measure whether the project will succeed or not will start at the crowdsale, if they have a good number of investors and raise a good amount, they are like 60% successful already because they all have the resources to develop the project, so they need to work hard and smart not to fail investors. However, although they work hard for the project, still there is no assurance that the project will succeed, so investors has to always ready to face failure as well.
Projects can easily fail if not much investors have interest in them, for this not to happen developers need to produce something very useful for the public and such project will be very demanding, I'm tired of new projects anyway, too many new projects are just waste of time
everyone wants to see the good development of a project, so when the project is not good, it will cause a variety of negative reactions. because of this, the team is required to always provide information about the development of a project. however, a professional team will try to calm their investors by always providing updated developments and information. however, most projects currently do not provide new information, even for some projects that I think are good, the team rarely appears in telegrams to provide information to investors, therefore investors always put negative pressure on a project.
yes in what terms, if in terms of fundraising it will be a complicated problem because every project needs funds for development even though no matter how good the project you are running, on the contrary without the support of a good team and marketing the project will not develop.
Mostly projects that are coming are bad due to making money by the creator of projects and some projects are good and giving good profits to investors, I want to provide an example of OGN that is good project and price is increasing day by day. They also paid a lot of free tokens to the community. Still, after all, this is a good project.
Jump to: