Topic: Not all projects are bad - page 4. (Read 562 times)
We understand how difficult it is to be a developer of a certain project. But of course, it is the developer's job to at least stick to the roadmap of developing the system or application. We all know that the project really depends on it. No matter how good is the marketing team or even the leadership team, if there is no good output from the developers, I think the project will be considered a failure. If there is no output, then there is no project. If the developer is not qualified or he needs a team to develop the said system, then they should hire someone that could help the developer on his endeavour.
certain that not all projects / ico are bad, there is a small percentage (about 1%) that has great potential the difficult and to be able to identify them, you must evaluate the team's skills with objectivity, the idea if it is innovative and if it has outlets on the market but not even then and said to be successful if they have not made a targeted and pounding advertising, so you have to invest with wisdom and caution...
I think for a prize hunter, when participating in a project and then the project fails then it will still get a bad assessment of it. Because after doing research and the time and thought expended to be in vain.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
I think new projects can't fail if partnership, legit idea and strong team members exists in any project. In 2018 billions USD were gone for scam project, then some some legit project couldn't success. Now legit project can't failed for scam history, before any project can get promoted by hunters. 
From my perspective if a project fail i think its because the team behind the project it self. They dont have a strong concept or being greedy in mid time. Bounty hunter just doing his job and wait for the payment. Its not bounty hunter responsibilty if the project ended fail.
I am not going to blame bounty hunters, they did their job and they deserve to be paid. Nobody would like to put in hard work for a very long time only to be told that they’re not going to be paid, they wouldn’t feel happy about that. You should be talking about the investors that are expecting the project to grow immediately and fetch them millions of dollars profit. Those are the ones that will even make it worst for most of these new projects by pumping and dumping them.
So, I am not going to blame the bounty hunters, they did their job which is to help promote the project and they deserve to be getting paid.
So, I am not going to blame the bounty hunters, they did their job which is to help promote the project and they deserve to be getting paid.
Some projects are just failed experiment but who are to be blamed? The team of course, why embark on something you hardly know about? Why start something you can't finish? Is this not why some hire professionals as team?
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Bounty hunters certainly expect their expectations according to the campaign. Most bounty hunters or investors are disappointed because prices in the market differ greatly from IEO or ICO prices and this makes the rewards or profits that are not according to expectations. I agree that not all projects are bad and there are some projects whose prices may go up after the initial listing
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
True not all of them are bad maybe they just lack of funds to continue but if they shown some eager to continue wouldn't it attract some investor?The problem is people are tired of getting scammed and doesn't want to support or invest in new project anymore.
I think it is time for the developer to at least show some development or products before looking for investor.
Project could be bad is market turns red and developer never share their progress. If developer replace high expectation is not a problem because expectation meaning dream/ imagination. They only fails if not follow their own rules and have no back up fund to handle negative impact from bitcoin. I agree not all project bad, they just don't have ability to raise performance for better rank, just like that.
There are many projects that failed after the market suddenly down after the bullrun. After investors put their money in their project, and yet they can't handle the negative impact of the event. I think they should have different plans to execute if this suddenly happened. Plan A, B or C. If this couldn't work it they will have plan B to execute. I know a lot of projects that have a great idea and platform, but they are not prepared for this. It's just purely business. Yes, not all projects are bad because a project with a solid team and has a solid roadmap will always the project to reach the desired target. Community members will support the project only when we are seeing improvements from the team, in the beginning, it is impossible for us to find the potential about the company. Based on their activity we can understand the project and their goals.
If the project is well manage by the team itself even it's not getting the community support right away, the desire of continuing and surviving and keepdoing progress will attract investors to check it out and do some research.
There are projects that quietly moving ahead and still trying to convince people to support them not just by doing some hypes but convincing that the
project have a good usage in the long run.
Yes, not all projects are bad because a project with a solid team and has a solid roadmap will always the project to reach the desired target. Community members will support the project only when we are seeing improvements from the team, in the beginning, it is impossible for us to find the potential about the company. Based on their activity we can understand the project and their goals.
The main reason why a project fails even if they have a great team, a good plan and promote it for months is because they can't produce the outcome they promise to their investors. They can't show how highly effective their progress by developing the project.
Always remember, even if how good the project is and their plan, if the investor can't see the potential due to how the developers handle the project, the project will die soon after.
Always remember, even if how good the project is and their plan, if the investor can't see the potential due to how the developers handle the project, the project will die soon after.
The problem is we know there is project built without preparation, just sell promises and low price coin with out information in which exchanges will list?. I stay positive with every project but when they look play with us just leave it. Developer should have ability to make bounty hunter, investor and trader stay in their project even not easy for that. Even only have little expectation but don't have ability, every project will fails.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
You have your point but it will always be a scam when the team didn't reach the right amount of investment the token will be released in the market since the team or funds needed is not reach.This is already common to ICO it would be right if you could refund your money if you invest in the token and if the funds do not reach or the token is not successful you should be able to withdraw your money.
Building a project is not easy especially at the beginner level. This i guess is what affects most projects and turn them to a failed project
It is quite difficult to develop projects. I agree with you on this. Also in any other case. You need to give your best and spend a lot of time and effort on this case. Only then is it possible to succeed.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Not really. If the team is working really hard on the project, then their community will really appreciate them. They won't hate the team. The dedication by the developer team will instead cause the price of the tokens to increase. Most of the people hate the projects and calls them a scam because the developers really stop working at their project at all. They don't give any effort for the further development. Most of them are "all talk" for which people start to hate them even more.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Actually what you said is true, but when someone or rather a team or developers cares deeply about their project or about what they aims to achieve all the bad words people throw at them will only encourage them to do more so as to prove them wrong. Giving up means they were right about the bad words they said, thus only the developers will be at the receiving end. Also, in the outside world many projects passed through that stage and today they are on lips of everyone. Therefore in my own opinion, stick to what you believe in as a developer, do your best, seek advice and help and lastly prove them wrong, it will make you a winner.
This is right,being a developer takes a great deal,putting up innovation and making it work is another thing,then also making People believe in your project,I understand all that,but then every developer should try their best with good and unique concept,and a a good marketing team,I believe the project will gradually excel.
Jump to: