Topic: Not all projects are bad - page 8. (Read 562 times)
A good project is not meant to be successful while a successful project doesn't mean it is good
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Agree, we cannot meet the needs of everyone in this market. So all altcoins in this market have FUD, even many people say that BTC is a scam. The best, developers work their way and should not care about what investors and people say, they only care about profit. If their investment were to suffer a loss, they would surely curse the project
A good develover will never say that the project that he build is bad when the project can't be used by many people. But they will looking for many thing and learn more about the project that he develop. Indeed it is not easy to build a good team with many character in it. They should have a same why in order to their innovation can be accepted by many people and they will support everything when then run it. It is otherwise when the team behind the project which is many character and didn't have the same why, an affected that will happen is when the project cannot be used by many people they will leave it and find another chance or even make another project which is in line with what he wants. We can see it with a project that eventually being shitcoin right now, there is no any information about the project because the team have leaved it.
Having a good projects, good teams and yet failed to be recognized is not a reason to give up and yes some are still here even if they are dumping and most of them was able to survive. Hunters should think positive and don’t think for an easy money on the bounties but of course they deserve to be compensated well. Not all projects are bad, they just failed to deliver and investors didn’t see their importance.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
That's right, you know what's wrong on the mindset of the people? They think that all projects that are getting failed are all bad projects, they don't know that there are also some projects who are good but doesn't get the expectations or meet it and becomes failed. This probably might change the mindset of many people that not all of the projects that are getting down is bad but instead there are still some good projects who doesn't just get their expectations. 
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
One question, how can the community know the project is working and not dead? It is by updating the community on latest developments and so on. It is hard to see a project which constantly updates it's community on their latest success and fails most which do keep their community is updated keeps growing might be slow but still worth it. There are many projects once they face a challenge Instead of them to keep the community abreast of all that is happening they will go mute from there come up with a long write-up then shut down, most times it is all planned. If a team sincerely creates a project and cares about it, they will take several steps to ensure they come out of their issues. There have been projects surviving for years, and one of their secret is, keeping their social media accounts active, keeping the telegram group active etc.
I am a bounty hunter I have been involved in many projects with good ideas but did not raise enough capital, they informed the community that, I sympathize and have no complaints. But on the other hand, some of the projects successfully call for capital and are listed on exchanges but don't pay rewards to the hunter or reduce the rewards by a lot.
Many projects end up failing and there are many factors that cause. Developers start to give up on the project they work on. There are several projects that can be included in exchanges but buying and selling transactions are not crowded. So many bounty hunters hold the coin for a long time.
Investors are not like the year 2017 when many Bounty projects have success. Nowadays many new projects but have poor quality. But I was a bounty hunter who would also not give up because I am optimistic that there is still a great opportunity to make money.
Investors are not like the year 2017 when many Bounty projects have success. Nowadays many new projects but have poor quality. But I was a bounty hunter who would also not give up because I am optimistic that there is still a great opportunity to make money.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Really not easy I have seen some good developers trying to build something for the community, but having a hard time because the atmosphere and investors sentiment is not good towards a new projects, so it's very important that developers launch their project at the right time with the right atmosphere.
I'd like to have an insight on what the project is trying to achieve before investing on them. The teams should altogether stop issuing and ICO the next day they have dreamt about an idea. If the person or team want to have their dream come true, they should look for some private investors or a bank loan to go for the initial development and use ICO as a fund raiser for expanding their market. Just the way IPO of shares works.
If all projects are bad, there would be no altcoins now, the truth is, most of the projects are bad so the altcoins market are heavily affected by that reality.
Actually if investors will be more matured, we can prevent investing on bad projects because we are already knowledgeable in choosing a legit one.
Actually if investors will be more matured, we can prevent investing on bad projects because we are already knowledgeable in choosing a legit one.
It's sad the way crypto users condemn projects just because a flaw. I agree with you. Most projects tagged bad only needs encouragement from the community to boost the activeness of the project. It's true we have 70% of bad project, but let's give some credit and try as much as we can to believe in these projects.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Really not easy I have seen some good developers trying to build something for the community, but having a hard time because the atmosphere and investors sentiment is not good towards a new projects, so it's very important that developers launch their project at the right time with the right atmosphere.
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
You can blame those people on not to trust easily with most projects in the market currently due to lots of scams and frauds do happen after all these years.Its no surprise that people would really have that kind of expectation or treatment even into those legit projects.Its true that not all projects are scams but even though they are high likely to fail, projects now that arent passing through IEO would hardly get financial support.I cant even spot
a project that succeeded on accumulating funds through ICO these days or im just missing out.
It's getting really hard for new projects to attract investors as investors have became too much dubious about investing in just another ICO.
For them to get attention, they need either to stand out or get a official license from the government to operate an ICO.
For every other teams dedicated on their project, it would be better to look for fund their initial works and come up with a working project for the ICO.
For them to get attention, they need either to stand out or get a official license from the government to operate an ICO.
For every other teams dedicated on their project, it would be better to look for fund their initial works and come up with a working project for the ICO.
I know it's hard, and the reality that happens on the ground right now is that the bounty hunter can't wait to get paid while the team always has a reason behind the pending, I'm sure. I think as long as the team still provides clear communication and confirmation to the participants, I think they can still be trusted. yes, although it's a little bad with this situation because bounty hunters really want to get paid immediately and with a good price or exchange rate too. so, just respect each other's work and don't occasionally spam and scam so the bounty industry never dies.
Investors are to blame. They continuously fall inti the trap of marketing teams dream white papers. These are often pure techno garbage that sound convincing to the untrained.
Investors that are untrained should keep with completed new designs that have a real use case.
So many investors running to every new dream. That leaves a lot of almost completed interesting designs at good price point for entry.
Investors that are untrained should keep with completed new designs that have a real use case.
So many investors running to every new dream. That leaves a lot of almost completed interesting designs at good price point for entry.
It is a fact and truth that it's not easy being a developer. But before committing themselves into a project, they need to think of it as many times as they can. It's not just about the creation but also the commitment that they will dwell while making the project.
The progress should also be monitored and expectations are normal for the fellow investors but if the developers really see that it's not going anywhere, they can admit it despite doing all that they can.
The progress should also be monitored and expectations are normal for the fellow investors but if the developers really see that it's not going anywhere, they can admit it despite doing all that they can.
You are right, we need to take every new startup project just like any other business that one starts in hopes of making good money but not all businesses end up in profit rather ratio of failure or loss is more than profit, so we should take each new crypto startup as the same and if we invest we should know about the risks.
This is more reason why you must keep on updating the community and do not give false hope. Many devs have midget dream already. So it is better to always give an update and do not work to impress the communities. If things are not working let the community understand what you are doing to make it work and how you intend to go about it. It is only you that know you are working, the community does not see you, so they do not know what you are doing. Do not be afraid to lose some of the community members, those who believe in you will stay till the end but if you do not communicate or you like giving false hope, it will boomerang on the project
If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations
Jump to: