Sorry, I don't deal with shitcoin holders, you're all beneath me.
Just messing with you bud. I don't believe any of those alternate cryptos will survive, so excuse my bluntness.
Which of your copycat coins, do you think will actually survive with no real development or real investment? Awaiting your response and reasons(this ought to be good).
Bluntness excused. But I'm not your bud, guy.
Have you watched the talk by Andreas? What do you think about it?
My main point is still: it's not about if one or two altcoins will survive. Many will survive. And many will disappear and new ones created. There will be coins created for a single event, not existing longer than the event itself. There is absolutely no reason for just one cryptocurrency to exist. I just can't wrap my mind around why anyone would think that there would be only one cryptocurrency. Could you please explain why there would?
If certain cryptocurrencies are just copycats of others, surely there is not much reason for them to survive. Not even to create them. In 2014 there was a lot of copycatting for pump and dump reasons, but those times are over. It's a learning process that we're in.
The cryptocurrencies that are still here are usually not copycats of BTC. On the contrary, they usually aim to fill a void left by BTC or aim to build new stuff upon it. Or remedy an ailment, like UNO remedies the inflation problem. If you would like to learn more I'd suggest you just go to one of the threads of the more popular ones, install a wallet and look what they have to offer.
One exanple is NXT. It offers in-wallet exchanges for assets, it has a new monetary system that makes it very easy to create a new cryptocurrency and work with it. It also features a voting system.
Public ledgers are also very interesting ways to account for valuables other then money. There are way to many lawyers, accountants and other financial professionals making money off of things that could be easily handled with public ledgers (I'm trying very hard to avoid the word 'blockchains' here).
So I repeat myself - there are altcoins that offer technologically advances (or just differences) that make them valuable to society in one way or the other. That does not mean they will replace BTC as 'the number one'. But again, if BTC fails to innovate, it will be dethroned one day, just like MySpace was dethroned by Facebook, and Facebook will one day be dethroned by something better, most likely.
I'd like to hear from you, ChuckBuck (or someone else), why BTC deserves the market cap is has today. In what way, for exanple, is BTC better then NXT? And I'd also like to know why you think there could be only one cryptocurrency in general use.