So should Mexico be a part of the US?
If illegals did two things, they couldn't be stopped from entering the States:
1. Learn to be fluent in English;
2. Understand the common law like Karl Lentz - Meet Karl Lentz https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/meet-karl-lentz-1512214.
Mexico is civil law. Most U.S. people act like the U.S. is civil law. The U.S. is common law. Common law means that in the States, a man or woman can overcome every governmental action and law in court, as long as they have harmed nobody, nor damaged any property.
Potentially, if you use common law right, you can take up ownership of any public land for free, because the government will never be able to find a plaintiff to take the stand in court, and show how you damaged him or his property. The plaintiff is THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA can't place "his" hand on the Bible, take the oath or affirmation, get on the stand, and speak anything into the record. Yet the common law requires this to be done if you, the accused, demand it.
In the case of illegals in the States, they are not required to to answer any government official. If they demand a common law trial, there must be harm or damage. There is nobody who will get on the stand and show some real kind of harm or damage. They are free. They don't have to state their land of citizenship. If they are living "here," they are domiciled here.
It's time we start to put the brakes on government.
I love how you defend common law against civil law. The constitution and bor is civil law for you? I think you oppose it right?
The Constitution is common law. But all law that comes about because of the Constitution is civil law directed.
The Constitution is reasonable. But any limitations on Congress are overridden by Article 1 Section 8 Clause 18 where it says, "The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
This clause makes it look like Congress can make any law to do anything and use, as their excuse, the idea that they are doing it so that they can perform some function of the Constitution. This scares people, because it looks like Congress can make us all slaves according to some law that they invent.
But nobody tells the people about the peoples' OWN strength found in the Preamble to the Constitution. Attorneys and judges and politicians, if they are questioned about the Preamble, they say that it was simply some words that set the stage for making the Constitution, and that it has no legal effect. Well, they are half right. The Preamble has no legal wording in it that they can use. They can't use it because ALL (100%) of what they can use is in the Constitution and the laws and statutes and codes that they make by authority of the Constitution.
The Preamble is common law, and was in official existence before any of the Constitution. It is also the strongest source the people have to use against the government, against the Constitution, against anything that flows out of the Constitution, if necessary. Yet almost nobody knows it.
The Preamble:
Quote
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
So, how is the Preamble a protection and source of strength for "we the people?" After all, Wikipedia where I copied the Preamble from, says in its introductory paragraph to its Preamble page:
The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory statement of the Constitution's fundamental purposes and guiding principles. It states in general terms, and courts have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers' intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped the Constitution would achieve.
Where is the strength for the people? Here it is.The whole Preamble talks about the Constitution as being a benefit for the people.
If government takes your tax money, is that a benefit for you? They never itemize any benefits that you received.
If government drafts you into the military, sends you off to war, but won't take care of you when you come home all disabled, is that a benefit for you?
If government allows companies to outsource to China, and you can't find a job, is that a benefit to you?
If the cops raid your house by mistake, and then won't pay for the damage they did, is that a benefit for you?
The list goes on and on. Government may say that this is all benefiting you in some way. But it sure doesn't feel like it. And often, those of us who die because of what the government does, have the most peace.
The point? When people in government are not acting as a benefit to you personally, they are acting outside of what the government was made for... as stated by the Preamble. They are acting outside of their authority. They can be sued as a regular person, and not in their governmental capacity.
Karl Lentz doesn't talk about the Preamble like this, because our common law strength exists without the Preamble. As long as we have not personally signed a contract or agreement with government, there is no place in all law where the people placed themselves under government. It doesn't exist. Government has no authority. The things that Karl Lentz promotes have to do with clearly showing the people how they can individually make government a believer that it has no authority over us, for anything, from taxation, to taking our kids from us, to making us obey traffic laws to anything.
If you want to see it clearly from what Karl says, watch Karl Lentz at Johnson City Tennessee - April 16th 2016 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3MI70PFBw#t=105m00s. Watch closely to see what Karl says exactly where you come in at the link when you click it.
