Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1348. (Read 2761650 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
NXT.org
Focusing more on the green angle of NXT.


As everyone worthy of attention knows: global warming is a increasingly serious issue on this relatively small planet of ours and so everyone is looking for energy efficiency.
As most of us NXTers already know: NXT requires almost zero energy compared to altcoins. At first this might not seem like a big deal because "How much could the other altcoins really consume anyway?" To which the sad truth is: A LOT. A LOT even in the global perspective.
There are some math here: www.bitcarbon.org which shows just how ridiculous Bitcoin mining and all mining coins really is.
They are like the coal/oil of cryptocurrencies while we are the future solar/fusion powered clean crypto.

This is a ever increasing big issue in a world that is desperately looking for ways to save power.
How can Bitcoin/Anycoin be the future of economics if it relies on 19th century like primitive technology that ruins our planet? It can't.

We should really start pushing this angle and perhaps even donate to some green projects to really make our mark as the environmentally friendly futuristic currency.

Should we make a video about this? I think so. Where we outline just how ridiculous the energy consumption of the coins are compared to NXT.
Someone over at nextcoin.org calculated that NXT is ~2000 times as energy and cost efficient as Bitcoin. That is HUGE
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Btw, where is Come-from-Beyond?

Haven't seen him a while. To be honest he shouldn't be sleeping, let alone be missing for days.

This is my take... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nxt-descendant-of-bitcoin-updated-information-345619    Grin

Must be...coz this is strange.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Btw, where is Come-from-Beyond?

Haven't seen him a while. To be honest he shouldn't be sleeping, let alone be missing for days.
full member
Activity: 171
Merit: 100
Hey, it's been quiet for some time in here... Let's bring the voting discussion back! Smiley

So do we have any practical ideas of reliable voting at all?

The whitepaper is very vague about it, no technical details about how this magical democracy will happen.


ahh Voting!
one of my favorite discussions ;-)

Currently read many good aspects here!
I think we need to consider most of them in beta Client.
More and more it becomes clear there is not THE ONE way for VS.
But there are different poll-categories, e.g "assets polls" is different category as "best button-color polls".

The poll initiator should be able to choose boundary conditions depending on poll-topic.
The poll boundary conditions need to be transparent during run time.
To be more constructive lets try to collect some "Voting Models":

general options:

- min. permitted Account Deposit

- min. permitted Account age (Blocks)

- poll duration (Blocks)

- Voting Fee


Voting Models:

+ 1 NXT        ==   1 Vote  { vote = Func(accountBalance) }

+ 1 NXT        ==   x Vote  { x = Func(accountBalance) =  polynom * accountBalance}

+ 1 Account  ==  1 Vote   { vote = Func(accountBalance) =  0.5 * accountBalance}

+ 1 Account  ==  1 Vote   { Jcsarokrin Biometric Authenification: http://juliansarokin.com/100-years-the-future-of-government/}

+ coolmist:  {votingweight = ( 1 / similarity ) ^ (4/3) * (accountbalance)^(1/3) * (accountage)^2 (timesvoted)^(3/2)}


no claim to completeness!


We need to discuss selection options too:
[true]    [false]    [abstention]
I think [abstention] provides an important information too.
E.g. a high count of [abstention] tells the poll creator "interesting question buddy, but not this way!!!" ...

It makes sense to collect all ideas to keep the overview.
Please extent the "general options" and "voting models" and "selection options" ideas!!!
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
In regards to the "voting system" I would just once again like to state that the idea of "one person one vote" is practically *impossible* unless we want to rely on governments and centralised services (something I'm pretty sure the majority here do not want to do).

So I think rather than keeping on trying to get "one person one vote" we should just abandon that idea altogether and move on (as has been stated before 1 vote per person doesn't necessarily achieve anything good anyway as most people are easily swayed and not very smart).

I think perhaps what should be tried is various different approaches ranging from 1 vote per NXT to 1 vote per account with or without fees and perhaps different ways of deciding eligibility of accounts (such as only accounts older then x blocks or maybe only accounts that were created within the last x blocks).

What would probably be neat is to set up up meta-voting system that lets you create a "ballot" according to parameters so that there is no fixed voting mechanism but instead one that is effectively defined by a set of rules.
hero member
Activity: 597
Merit: 500
I was just looking at the Ethereum thread, and was wondering: couldn't NXT technically implement what Ethereum is trying to do in a parallel blockchain that allows turing-complete code to execute? IMO Ethereum is interesting, but isn't particularly innovative (not in the way transparent forging is).

A few advantages I see if this is possible within the NXT ecosystem:
1) NXT is already established. No need for massive development of the network, and thus no need for an expensive, over-complicated IPO to get it off the ground.
2) These scripts can interact with other aspects of the NXT ecosystem, which is admittedly much larger in scope than Ethereum will ever be. For example, you can send 0.00001 NXT to "Asset Merchant Rating" script, and you can rate a merchant you had a pleasant/negative experience with, and the program will keep track of it on the parallel blockchain without the bloat that may come if we used AM for this purpose.
3) Take advantage of all the idling CPU power in most nodes. Since NXT client itself does not require much resources to run, perhaps this will give all the miners from PoW-world something to focus on.
4) Provide an increase fees for people willing to participate in the parallel blockchain. People with RPi's can just stick to basic forging, while those running nodes on powerful PC's can additionally use their CPU power to run these programs.
5) NXT has already set the precedent for decentralized development (something I'm rather proud of, and I have to hand it to BCNext, that was a very smart decision), so people making a decentralized effort to create decentralized programs fits the theme rather well.

What's left is to figure out how to integrate a PoW system within a PoS system. But since c-f-b is already working on that, I assume it can be done.

sure, nxt will have the first DNA[1] latest end next month. while others talking we are coding.
DNA can also communicate with other DNA's via DNL[2], asking for additional functions and can
access external resources on demand while sandboxed and configurable to it's own special needs.
AM can be used as a direct DNA storage if the size fit's or chunk itself and recombine if
larger or even running on trusted nodes as a monolithical, remote executable code block.
client can scan AM for DNA resources or fetch the DNA directory from nodes via DNS[3] call
to get the latest jump and recombination list. DNAs can handle also thier own account, polling
the transactions and balance to verify service payments on activation.

[1] decentralized nxt agent
[2] decentralized nxt logic   (repository of pure function fragments, e.g api repo to access online quotes)
[3] decentralized nxt services
hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 500
www.coinschedule.com
Nxt Alerter now supports Alias and Arbitrary Messages

The Nxt Alerter already sent thousands of messages to our users, every time a monitored account has a transaction or a block is found.

The system can now send alerts every time an Alias Operation is performed or an Arbitrary Message is sent/received. This means you get Arbitrary Messages right in your email inbox, anywhere you are and without having to check your Nxt client.

This feature is enabled for all existing users. If you are not using the Nxt Alerter yet, head over to http://www.mynxt.info and start monitoring your Nxt accounts.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1038
the 1.3M is for how many spots?
4 weekly shows, 1 main show 2x/week, 1 minute, for 6 months

in my opinion Nxt offers enough value to be talked about on this show without any paid airtime.
1.3 MNxt is incredibly expensive in my humble opinion.
- agree 100%
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
I am three hours drive from New York. I plan to attend but I have a small baby so need to figure out how it is going to work first.
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 1011
Hi folks. I live in New York, and can be at the April conference.

Nice. Let me guess: You need some NXT for this? Cheesy SCNR...
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
Hi folks. I live in New York, and can be at the April conference.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
1.3m is insane in my opinion.

Yes. It's nearly 100k$ right now. I'm sure that after the campaign it's half a million..
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
NXT.org
1.3m is insane in my opinion. How many listeners are we talking about here?
Let's not forget that most of the Bitcoin people who listen most likely already know about NXT, we should aim for those who feel like they missed out on the Bitcoin train and the general population.
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
the 1.3M is for how many spots?
4 weekly shows, 1 main show 2x/week, 1 minute, for 6 months

in my opinion Nxt offers enough value to be talked about on this show without any paid airtime.
1.3 MNxt is incredibly expensive in my humble opinion.

Totally agree!
1.3 Million Nxt kinda sounds too much.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Made a starting point homepage for newcomers:

http://www.mynxt.org

If you find wrong information or have some suggestions, please PM me. Thanks!

I hope you like it!

(registered a new nick on bitcointalk for this)

Thanks for the anonymous 1000NXT donation Smiley

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=14831357961500528319
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
the 1.3M is for how many spots?
4 weekly shows, 1 main show 2x/week, 1 minute, for 6 months

in my opinion Nxt offers enough value to be talked about on this show without any paid airtime.
1.3 MNxt is incredibly expensive in my humble opinion.
hero member
Activity: 596
Merit: 500
 My theme would be slide after slide: Bitcoin problem, NXT solution: currency distribution, blockchain bloat, PoW arms race, 51% attack, block confirmation speed (10 min vs 1 minute), transactions per second (1 currently / 7 max for BTC, 10,000 ultimate goal for NXT), etc. etc. etc.

Excellent strategy rickyjames!

All you need to emphasize are instant transactions, earning coins from forging, anonymous messaging, and soon an anonymous marketplace - why on earth would anyone want to stick with Bitcoin?!  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000

I am very gratified by this immediate community response, thank you.   So I am going into full-speed-ahead mode here.  Hell, I'll even cover the 10K NXT from my own stash as my contribution to the cause just so we don't get hung up here.

I propose to get listed as a speaker.  There seems to be a January 31 deadline for this.   I would propose to get in the Technical: Development, Implementation and Infrastructure speaker track.  For a twenty minute talk, you've got to have laser like focus.  My theme would be slide after slide: Bitcoin problem, NXT solution: currency distribution, blockchain bloat, PoW arms race, 51% attack, block confirmation speed (10 min vs 1 minute), transactions per second (1 currently / 7 max for BTC, 10,000 ultimate goal for NXT), etc. etc. etc.

Here's details.

http://texasbitcoinconference.com/images/docs/Speaker%20Letter.pdf

You're rockin.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
yes, joefox would like to have his own Nxt show that would be built on the Let's talk Bitcoin platform. He would talk with Ricky, Pin, me, devs, helpers from all over the world...

Then there would be 1 episode of Let's talk Bitcoin about Nxt.

Then there is a chance to be for 1 minute in every episode of the main show and present there our features to the audience, to the newbies. There is a lot of demythologisation we need to provide Smiley Here is the chance to speak directly to the 10.000 (+) crypto maniacs.

Yup, I'm developing a podcast.  First episode or two may just be me droning on, but it'll grow.  I have a list of "targets" for folks I'd love to interview, so many of you regulars should be expecting to hear from me!

Adam and I have traded email, and I'm keeping him posted as it all develops.  But this is all separate from the ads on LTB, which I think are an excellent idea.  As others have pointed out, the ad spots provide a long-term, consistent messaging platform for Nxt... and since LTB is (for now, at least) a podcast, the ads will stay in archived episodes and be of ongoing use.  

Working title for the podcast, by the way, is "What's Up Nxt"  Wink

What about just "What's Nxt?"?
Jump to: