Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 148. (Read 2761645 times)

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Emule can you sell your stake to me if you foresee the price will drop ?

no as i told you i make money with my stake while others watch there investment die
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
so many altcoins,why don't you told people don't to buy them?
some of the coins are scam,you should protect those people ?
if you are really a supper man.

i am not superman

i trade against the big stakeholders founders cos i can !
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
Emule can you sell your stake to me if you foresee the price will drop ?
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
so many altcoins,why don't you told people don't to buy them?
some of the coins are scam,you should protect those people ?
if you are really a supper man.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
emule, you really think bad about nxt?
so,why are you talk so much here?
just told people nxt will die,don't buy it?

i have every right to be here, i am a trader! maybe the only one here left, i make money of nxt

while all of you sit and watch cos nothing happens
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
emule, you really think bad about nxt?
so,why are you talk so much here?
just told people nxt will die,don't buy it?
full member
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
I would say lets put this enormous thread on-going, this is where poeple throw their raw idea out and discuss about, where the forum is a perfect for poeple to work and concentrate on that particular features.



I was against this enormous thread at first, but yeah, it's kind of like a chat room with a very long history saved.

Think we can reach the limit on number of pages bitcointalk will allow? Smiley

Yes, it is a big chat room!! Grin
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

for the blind and small investors...

Nxt is in downtrend ever since January and will continue to do so.

Nxt is on its way down to test LAST line of support @0.00004.

If that support gets breached no support is left and it will tumble to 0




legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!
Looks like the largest community, most discussion of any alt, fastest development,  and most viewd topic on this entire site... In 4 months... Pretty astonishing actually

Feel free to join us!  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Looks like the largest community, most discussion of any alt, fastest development,  and most viewd topic on this entire site... In 4 months... Pretty astonishing actually
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Is there a youtube link or something to watch back how NxtMinnow performed?

I missed it!
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
emules back to his normal self again. start the day off with a troll sell off lol
edit. emule you will never make it to 0 its out of ur hands now dude way too powerful for you to manipulate. wjay ever happens its only tempory. too strong pal nxt has the power of 300

 Cheesy we shall see WHO has the power!

nxt is so weak and in dead strugle

on little push and it is of the cliff and the charts for good
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
emules back to his normal self again. start the day off with a troll sell off lol
edit. emule you will never make it to 0 its out of ur hands now dude way too powerful for you to manipulate. wjay ever happens its only tempory. too strong pal nxt has the power of 300
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82
I'm not understanding why this would make it difficult to construct a exploitative block.

If that information applied to only 1440 - X blocks (where perhaps X is just 1) then the forger of block 1440 can't really do anything to affect the outcome apart from *not forge* (which TF as originally planned would result in penalty).

(sorry - I didn't get that right before)

Note that this extra entropy is just to make sure we can't predict the lottery ticket *even if we could predict the forging hash 1440 blocks in the future*.

I see, what you are trying to accomplish here. We got 2 types of methods:

1) Hiding information from several groups of nodes: topology approach
2) Increasing difficulty: your approach

Regarding you approach:
In what way would you prove that your approach is computationally more difficult than standard TF?

One remark:
Right now, a forger only has one variable (accounts) to tweak until it suits his needs.
Just imagine the bad guy forges the last block in that (1440-X)-row (e.g. accidentally). He now has two variables (accounts, transactions) to tweak.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

no buy support + heavy selling = *flush noise* down the drain to 0

crying founder bagholders

drama's unfolding
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
I'm not understanding why this would make it difficult to construct a exploitative block.

If that information applied to only 1440 - X blocks (where perhaps X is just 1) then the forger of block 1440 can't really do anything to affect the outcome apart from *not forge* (which TF as originally planned would result in penalty).

(sorry - I didn't get that right before)

Note that this extra entropy is just to make sure we can't predict the lottery ticket *even if we could predict the forging hash 1440 blocks in the future*.


yea i understand. ive been thinking really hard about this myself. im not sure if it actually protects us in the way you are thinking. every time i try to think through it all my brain craps out on me before i can follow through all the logic. ill keep working on it.

Sorry to derail, anon, but any chance of you updating us over at nxtforum.org on your silver bullion project? (maybe I missed it...)
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
I'm not understanding why this would make it difficult to construct a exploitative block.

If that information applied to only 1440 - X blocks (where perhaps X is just 1) then the forger of block 1440 can't really do anything to affect the outcome apart from *not forge* (which TF as originally planned would result in penalty).

(sorry - I didn't get that right before)

Note that this extra entropy is just to make sure we can't predict the lottery ticket *even if we could predict the forging hash 1440 blocks in the future*.


yea i understand. ive been thinking really hard about this myself. im not sure if it actually protects us in the way you are thinking. every time i try to think through it all my brain craps out on me before i can follow through all the logic. ill keep working on it.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
is there are something wrong with the NXT blockchain?
Balance Total  was changed when i send some nxt,but can't find the transaction records.
anyone know that?
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
I'm not understanding why this would make it difficult to construct a exploitative block.

If that information applied to only 1440 - X blocks (where perhaps X is just 1) then the forger of block 1440 can't really do anything to affect the outcome apart from *not forge* (which TF as originally planned would result in penalty).

(sorry - I didn't get that right before)

Note that this extra entropy is just to make sure we can't predict the lottery ticket *even if we could predict the forging hash 1440 blocks in the future*.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
@mczarnek - the biggest problem I see with your proposal as that each forger is being asked for a "random" number - how are you going to be sure of that?

I think that for the "ticket" (which currently is looking to be the forging hash of the block 1440 in the future) could have extra entropy by something more simple like the sum of the number of bytes in each of the 1440 blocks together with the # of transactions (and maybe several other such things so that trying to "construct a block" to benefit becomes so difficult it wouldn't be attempted).

I think also adding this amount of entropy helps because your ticket "isn't" just the forging hash (which could lead to people calling out *rigged* if a forger skips its turn).


I'm not understanding why this would make it difficult to construct a exploitative block.
Jump to: