Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1709. (Read 2761645 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stable release 0.5.5:

http://download.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.5.zip

sha256: aa20fb32fe7e6cda7debee59928d5aea8ff7c581c58a56ff68e8252eaf9368c7

Change log:

Added getGuaranteedBalance API:
http://localhost:7874/nxt?requestType=getGuaranteedBalance&account=account&numberOfConfirmations=numberOfConfirmations
returns the balance of an account only considering transactions with confimration count >= numberOfConfirmations.

The API requests getAccountBlockIds and getAccountTransactionIds now return sorted results.

Added getAccountPublicKey and getGuaranteedBalance to admin.html page.

More performance optimizations.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=U0LQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Running it now on my RPi.

Any chance of an API call to get updated confirmation counts for a batch of transactions, e.g. for all transactions in a block? Updating these one-by-one will not scale.

See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4425690 for more.

Thanks!

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Asian Prepper,

Have you tried to find bugs in the released source code?
Have you ever seen so much functionality packed into such few lines of code?

From your statements it is likely that you are not a programmer. I am a pretty experienced programmer and I can usually find bugs in other people's code pretty quickly. However, only ricot seems to have been able to find any sort of problem with the current source code. I am ignoring style issues, lack of software engineering rigor, etc. This is after all a beta test.

Also, my understanding is that BCNext has spent more money than he has made with NXT. He created something totally new (Transparent Forging), tossed in all other altcoin features, made it run on cellphones and you doubt his genius??

James

I am not a programmer at all n not qualified to make any comments about the source code.  I make my comments strictly from a user's perspective....

I am glad to hear that your review of the code has been positive.  And that ricot feels the same way.

I don't understand how the new features of nxt will be coded cuz i'm not a coder at all... but as a user.... I can totally see the huge value and advantage that nxt's features can bring to the market this is why I took the risk to invest my money into nxt so I'm not some knucklehead in the media who comments on btc or nxt n has never bought, owned or sold a btc.

I'm just stating the current status of nxt.  We talk about all these new features but as a user... I'm not able to use any of those features yet so it's still a "fantasy" until it becomes a reality...

Like I said before... once the proof is available that users like myself can use the features of nxt like BCnext claims then I'll be the first to promote n market the genius behind his work but if all we have is the source code right... n no implementation.... we are far from having solid proof that BCnext is another Satoshi genius.

I understand it takes time to create the code n put it to work so that users like myself can use it n i'm wiling to be patient n waiting.

During this Beta period... i'm gonna hold back from putting BCnext on the same stage as Satoshi....

Tai Zen
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Stable release 0.5.5:

http://download.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.5.zip

sha256: aa20fb32fe7e6cda7debee59928d5aea8ff7c581c58a56ff68e8252eaf9368c7

0.5.4e worked really great. 24 hours+ and no re-scan necessary. Great work!
Now I will update to 0.5.5 - thanks!
still running 0.5.3 on my Raspberry Pi - very stable!
00:00:57 up 3 days,  4:07,  1 user,  load average: 0.66, 0.86, 0.88
sr. member
Activity: 952
Merit: 253

nxt system should have a validation function to verify the account is available.

e.g:
acct: 209832084023840384023
MD5 & SHA Checksum: DfwSgeH

so the new account: DfwSgeH-209832084023840384023

Check the MD5 or SHA to verify the account available..

thanks for this example coolfish,
could you explain further please how this checksum approach can verify account available?

it just a simple example.

acct: 209832084023840384023
MD5 & SHA Checksum: DfwSgeH    // from MD5("accountid")

so the new account: DfwSgeH-209832084023840384023  // from  substr(MD5("accountid"),6)+ "- accountid"

//substr(MD5("209832084023840384023"),6)=="DfwSgeH"
if( substr(MD5("209832084023840384023"),6)==substr("DfwSgeH-209832084023840384023",6) ) it is available..
else unavailable.

Each new account is password and userid combination : password-userid

Please see my thread about that in the other forum: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=524
We can do a lot better than merely detecting if the user made an error. With the method presented there, we can correct what the user typed. - That's 2nd gen. :p

thx, ricot,

ok, understood. usefull for users typing in account numbers but this doesn't answer my question.
this doesn't help to prevent sending funds to hiberNXT, or does it and if, could you please explain how?

as said, i am currently on this, therefore i would like to understand the whole procedure.
from what i see the main problem is to copy or even type a number to send funds to
which is not the intended number and therefore the funds are lost in hiberNXT.

is this what we are talking about?


In the days when computers were simple - people used simple solutions - why can't we just add a check digit - will catch most mistakes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I just posted a proposal to fix the account number typo-problem over at the official forums:
https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=524 <- making NXT account numbers awesome!

What do you think about that?
I think this is a great idea and I will support including it in the official client.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
Hey, what do you think about this...

NXT –  created by an unknown rebel,describeveloped by free people!

Do you like the world? Do you like the governments? The system? No? You are not alone! Nobody likes to be lied, nobody likes to be restricted, nobody likes to face a wall every time he starts a business, to be forced to break the law, to be pushed around, to be humiliated… But there’s going to be a change! BTC showed the way, it injected a virus in the system. Now NXT will do the rest. An unknown genius rebel, who watched the development of the “virus”, created his masterpiece, setting the beginning of the revolution! Nothing will stop the process, because nothing can stop it! It is irreversible! NXT creates an enviroment with countless opportunities, an environment in which we will build our empire of freedom!


I can totally see the words "genius" & "masterpiece" being used to describe satoshi but lets wait for some solid proof & evidence first before we use those words to describe BCnext.

Right now we have lots of hype n "sizzle" but I dont see any solid "steak" yet to show for the Nxt hype yet.

No hard feelings BCnext...

Right now, from an early adopter & Nxt investor perspective, all I see is another copy cat programmer attempting to copy satoshi's shroud of anonymity, idea of a public ledger,  etc.

Being "original" is genius.
Being "different" is NOT genius.

Keep in mind that satoshi created btc to take power away from the 1% on wall street  n give it back to the 99% on Main Street while BCnext created nxt for personal financial gains.

keep in mind that there is nothing wrong with doing some thing for personal financial gains but I would hesitate to compare or place an unproven coder on the genius level of satoshi.

I invested in nxt because it was the first copy cat coin to make an attempt to come up with its own source code instead of being lazy n copying satoshi's code.

Is it possible that BCnext is another genius like satoshi?  Of course its possible...

I hope BCnext is able to produce the code that he claims n provide proof of his genius. ..

Until there is proof... BCnext is just another wanna be copy cat...

once proof is clearly available. .. I will be the first to promote the genius of BCnext's.




Wow I thought you should know better since you said you are an investor from an early day. The guy doesn't care about money. You should come back and browse all the posts BCNext made in this forum and you will see that the guy want to make his idea material first. Financial gain will come but I don't think that is his primary concern. If he is materialistic, he would have done another J.R mastercoin fundraising style and pocket 1-2 thousand BTC instead of a mere 21 BTC.

It takes a historical perspective to know what kind of contributions BCNext would make so I agree that at this point over-hype is premature. But in my personal observations, he has shown some signs of a genius in the making in some levels. There are technical innovations such as POS, transparent forging, however what I see the most valuable in his works is a coherent vision of what a decentralized network could be. It's similar to the way Steve Job designs the first Iphone. There are technical improvements compared to earlier smartphones in the first Iphone, but much more important innovation is the way everything is brought together to define what a smartphone should be. NXT decentralized network could be the same. It will succeed not on a specific feature but on the way all the different features are bought together in a coherent framework; plus all that hi-techs are accompanied with strong message of decentralization and community involvement. That the whole package together imho is the novel contribution.    

Satoshi has paved the way with his blockchain original idea. But without a written evidences, I doubt Satoshi has such a strong vision of how a decentralized network based on blockchain technology could be. So in a sense, BCNext extends Satoshi's original idea.

We still need to wait for the actual implementation of NXT decentralized network and there are still much uncertainty ahead. But the only reason I has devoted so much my time to this venture is because I has a conviction in my above judgement. I believe in NXT success and the validation of BCNext's ideas.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134

So if I understand correctly some kind of format like: "Asset exchange, powered by Nxt", where asset exchange could get it's own marketable trademark, too?

yes, something like that. We don't want to be marketing a swiss army knife. People will assume that each component is some limited version. We want to market a powerful "Asset Exchange", "Arbitrary Messages", etc. Each should be strong enough to standalone and even have its own non-generic identity.

We don't want it to be like seeing generic versions of many different types of products, but rather premium versions each in its own category. NXT is always there under the hood, powering things. Anybody that digs below the surface will find that NXT is powering a whole lot of things.

For example, a company like Johnson and Johnson has many recognizable brands, but they market each brand to its specific market. The fact that they are all Johnson and Johnson brands is not really a factor. Any investor that does research into JnJ will find out that it has all these brands and more: tylenol, visine, splenda, nicorrete, sudafed, listerene, band-aid, ben-gay, neosporin, etc.

Each of these brands could be an entire company all by itself.

Which is more impressive, a company with a dozen generic products or powerful brands in a dozen categories?

At some point, we probably should come up with a non-generic name for each of the new features. This can all be wrapped into a separate NXTIPO. Decentralized. Develop each brand independently. NXT becomes the sum of all the brands, but not just an additive sum, because NXT will be the ONLY crypto that has all these features and the smart investors will certainly figure this out

James

I like this idea. It allows for people to strike out on their own or in a group and pool all their energy to make one project really worthwhile.
Not everyone will be interested in all aspects anyway.

It also means you don't have to explain the whole project to every investor, but can focus on pitching the thing you are actually working on.

Exactly!

Also by tracking the transaction fees each NXTIPO company brings in, each company can get a proportional share of the community fund.

The donors can rest easy knowing that the people who helped bring in the most transaction fees (and most likely most new people) would get the most rewards. The people working within a NXTIPO company will all know that their work will be rewarded in direct proportion to how they helped NXT. For a lot of people, this could be a secondary motivation, but it is always nice to know that you have done a good job.

New NXTIPO companies can spontaneously form in a totally decentralized way, knowing that they won't have to beg for bounties, they just need to bring in transaction fees and they will get rewarded. For some people this could be a primary motivation and that is fine too.

Each person can simply ignore the NXTIPO companies they don't understand, and just get involved in the ones they like the most.

James
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
Does anybody know how most websites that accept bitcoin implement the integration? If we can define the exact way most websites accept bitcoin, then we can create a compatibility glue layer that lets them use the same (even identical) interface to accept NXT.

Ideally, we could say, just copy and paste your bitcoin acceptance HTML, change bitcoin to NXT and now you can accept NXT on your website.

The easier we can make it for website owners to accept NXT, the more will. I just don't know the exact details on this.

James
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 1011
Stable release 0.5.5:

http://download.nxtcrypto.org/nxt-client-0.5.5.zip

sha256: aa20fb32fe7e6cda7debee59928d5aea8ff7c581c58a56ff68e8252eaf9368c7

0.5.4e worked really great. 24 hours+ and no re-scan necessary. Great work!
Now I will update to 0.5.5 - thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010

So if I understand correctly some kind of format like: "Asset exchange, powered by Nxt", where asset exchange could get it's own marketable trademark, too?

yes, something like that. We don't want to be marketing a swiss army knife. People will assume that each component is some limited version. We want to market a powerful "Asset Exchange", "Arbitrary Messages", etc. Each should be strong enough to standalone and even have its own non-generic identity.

We don't want it to be like seeing generic versions of many different types of products, but rather premium versions each in its own category. NXT is always there under the hood, powering things. Anybody that digs below the surface will find that NXT is powering a whole lot of things.

For example, a company like Johnson and Johnson has many recognizable brands, but they market each brand to its specific market. The fact that they are all Johnson and Johnson brands is not really a factor. Any investor that does research into JnJ will find out that it has all these brands and more: tylenol, visine, splenda, nicorrete, sudafed, listerene, band-aid, ben-gay, neosporin, etc.

Each of these brands could be an entire company all by itself.

Which is more impressive, a company with a dozen generic products or powerful brands in a dozen categories?

At some point, we probably should come up with a non-generic name for each of the new features. This can all be wrapped into a separate NXTIPO. Decentralized. Develop each brand independently. NXT becomes the sum of all the brands, but not just an additive sum, because NXT will be the ONLY crypto that has all these features and the smart investors will certainly figure this out

James

I like this idea. It allows for people to strike out on their own or in a group and pool all their energy to make one project really worthwhile.
Not everyone will be interested in all aspects anyway.

It also means you don't have to explain the whole project to every investor, but can focus on pitching the thing you are actually working on.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Anybody get the new admin email from DGEX on fees? Withdrawal feel lowered to .6% starting on Monday, possibly removed altogether sometime in February (paraphrasing).

It's about time they wizened up n realized they hurt themselves more by jacking up the rates which killed the momentum for adopting nxt.  Now that fees have been lowered, lets hope that trading volume will increase again....

I got the same email from DGEX:

Dear DGEX Trader,

The new year is well in progress, and new winds are blowing everywhere in the cryptocurrency scene!

As a DGEX customer, it is appropriate to bring you a recap of recent happenings and future plans of DGEX.

DGEX announced small trading fees and NXT withdrawal fee on January 3rd. The fees were not applied until a couple of days later, and the NXT withdrawal fee was shortly afterwards lowered to 0.9%.

The fees caused repercussions not wholly anticipated. Many customers unfortunately perceived fees as betrayal, as they had become accustomed to DGEX providing free conversions to NXT at its own expense for five weeks.

This reaction happened despite the fact that on the DGEX FAQ page it was prominently stated since launch in November: "NXT withdrawals carry no fee until the end of 2013".

We now, however, understand our customers and wish to do our part in proving that the decision was not motivated by greed or malevolent intent towards NXT market, but dictated by circumstances. Essentially it was our own immature business decision.

Starting from Monday Jan 13th 2014, DGEX will lower its NXT withdrawal fee to 0.6% and it will be lowered further - possibly removed altogether - in February when DGEX has recovered some of its losses suffered in the initial free trading period.

As an extra bonus, and to test the effect to trading volume, DGEX will be offering 0.05% fee trades for a number of days in January. These days will be a surprise and are announced on the DGEX.com web site.

In addition, DGEX will from January 13th onwards pay a referral commission of 0.2% of EVERY DEPOSIT from any confirmed deposits of a customer that an existing client has referred to DGEX.com. Referral tracking is automated, but can also be manually entered on your DGEX member area in case a referrer is not assigned. You can view your own referral URL after logging into your client account.

Last, I would like to comment on the negative sentiment towards DGEX as may be observed in part of the NXT community. We, as many of our psychologically cultivated customers, have noticed an obvious campaign against NXT in general - but especially against DGEX in the cryptocurrency forums. This campaign is apparently lead by agitators that wish to harm DGEX's business for the perceived benefit of an unknown party.

There is a term for this kind of covert manipulation campaigns in the internet - trolling. The "trolls" hitting DGEX are operating smoothly, coordinating and steering the consensus towards making DGEX look bad for any decisions we make in business.

In addition to the public agitation, there are various psychological tricks employed, aimed at diverting us from our main line of business. These include sophisticated hacking attempts and attacks against the DGEX web site (that take a lot of time to combat), and rather concerning death threats against myself and my family, the reason being application of fees. It fits the campaign perfectly that our moderators need to remove some of the most blatant texts from nextcoin.org - the major NXT community portal operated by DGEX.com since the beginning of NXT times. Attempts to keep the forum clean of schemes, insults and negative agenda propels the trolls to claim one crime more - "suppression of free speech".

If coming across such claims, I would suggest you tap into your reason and consider what possible long term benefit would the alleged party (DGEX) gain in performing such things or acting from the motivations presented. If there is none, chances are you are being misled.

Those things aside, with our respected customers I am happy to continue our mutual journey towards NXT's success. Volume and liquidity are good and we will be looking at some very exciting (and profitable, for you!) announcements in the next few weeks!

Thank you for your continuing support.

Graviton Capital
DGEX.com
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134

So if I understand correctly some kind of format like: "Asset exchange, powered by Nxt", where asset exchange could get it's own marketable trademark, too?

yes, something like that. We don't want to be marketing a swiss army knife. People will assume that each component is some limited version. We want to market a powerful "Asset Exchange", "Arbitrary Messages", etc. Each should be strong enough to standalone and even have its own non-generic identity.

We don't want it to be like seeing generic versions of many different types of products, but rather premium versions each in its own category. NXT is always there under the hood, powering things. Anybody that digs below the surface will find that NXT is powering a whole lot of things.

For example, a company like Johnson and Johnson has many recognizable brands, but they market each brand to its specific market. The fact that they are all Johnson and Johnson brands is not really a factor. Any investor that does research into JnJ will find out that it has all these brands and more: tylenol, visine, splenda, nicorrete, sudafed, listerene, band-aid, ben-gay, neosporin, etc.

Each of these brands could be an entire company all by itself.

Which is more impressive, a company with a dozen generic products or powerful brands in a dozen categories?

At some point, we probably should come up with a non-generic name for each of the new features. This can all be wrapped into a separate NXTIPO. Decentralized. Develop each brand independently. NXT becomes the sum of all the brands, but not just an additive sum, because NXT will be the ONLY crypto that has all these features and the smart investors will certainly figure this out

James
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Due to abuse I've had to change the system at http://nxtra.org/faucet - where previously you only needed to enter your account number, you now also need to enter your email address.

Could a couple of users who haven't used the faucet yet please try this and report if it works correctly for them?



Seems to work. At least I get the confirmation email etc.
I also like the little game instead of CAPTCHA.

Cool, thanks for testing!
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
Due to abuse I've had to change the system at http://nxtra.org/faucet - where previously you only needed to enter your account number, you now also need to enter your email address.

Could a couple of users who haven't used the faucet yet please try this and report if it works correctly for them?



Seems to work. At least I get the confirmation email etc.
I also like the little game instead of CAPTCHA.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Due to abuse I've had to change the system at http://nxtra.org/faucet - where previously you only needed to enter your account number, you now also need to enter your email address.

Could a couple of users who haven't used the faucet yet please try this and report if it works correctly for them?

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010


symbol is finally changed on coinmarket!

http://coinmarketcap.com/

thx bitcoinpaul I think

Pin

From a sales/marketing perspective... I think that calling Nextcoin by "Nxt" instead of "Nextcoin" is a huge mistake.

Nothing kills adoption faster then "confusion".  Calling something "Nxt" is confusing as hell.  I know u commented on my video once n asked me to use the term Nxt instead of Nextcoin n it took several weeks before I realized what you were even talking about.

I think we should have stuck with the term "Nextcoin".

Instead of relying on fancy names to promote Nextcoin, we should be focused on making solid features on Nxt and make it as user friendly and easy to understand as possible.

This is one area that is still lacking in the crypto market despite the fact that we have dozens of different currencies.

people who are already in the crypto currency market can figure out and understand what "Nxt" is… But people new to the crypto currency market will have no clue (unless they do extensive research) to even know that Nxt is a crypto currency.

Confusion is not good for public adoption...

I agree that confusion is best avoided.

NXT enables an entire digital economy and also creates ways for people to earn an income. It is much more than a coin. 4 of the top 10 (by marketcap) cryptos have no mention of "coin", so it does not seem to be such a critical issue of mass confusion.

I think if each NXT feature was marketed on its own merits, then the confusion will be minimized. No need to explain to somebody that is interested in Arbitrary Messages, all the details of Asset Exchange. Just need one hook to get somebody interested in NXT. Then there is the excellent wiki where they can find out all they need (or want) to know about NXT.

James

So if I understand correctly some kind of format like: "Asset exchange, powered by Nxt", where asset exchange could get it's own marketable trademark, too?
hero member
Activity: 860
Merit: 1004
BTC OG and designer of the BitcoinMarket.com logo
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134


symbol is finally changed on coinmarket!

http://coinmarketcap.com/

thx bitcoinpaul I think

Pin

From a sales/marketing perspective... I think that calling Nextcoin by "Nxt" instead of "Nextcoin" is a huge mistake.

Nothing kills adoption faster then "confusion".  Calling something "Nxt" is confusing as hell.  I know u commented on my video once n asked me to use the term Nxt instead of Nextcoin n it took several weeks before I realized what you were even talking about.

I think we should have stuck with the term "Nextcoin".

Instead of relying on fancy names to promote Nextcoin, we should be focused on making solid features on Nxt and make it as user friendly and easy to understand as possible.

This is one area that is still lacking in the crypto market despite the fact that we have dozens of different currencies.

people who are already in the crypto currency market can figure out and understand what "Nxt" is… But people new to the crypto currency market will have no clue (unless they do extensive research) to even know that Nxt is a crypto currency.

Confusion is not good for public adoption...

I agree that confusion is best avoided.

NXT enables an entire digital economy and also creates ways for people to earn an income. It is much more than a coin. 4 of the top 10 (by marketcap) cryptos have no mention of "coin", so it does not seem to be such a critical issue of mass confusion.

I think if each NXT feature was marketed on its own merits, then the confusion will be minimized. No need to explain to somebody that is interested in Arbitrary Messages, all the details of Asset Exchange. Just need one hook to get somebody interested in NXT. Then there is the excellent wiki where they can find out all they need (or want) to know about NXT.

James
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010


symbol is finally changed on coinmarket!

http://coinmarketcap.com/

thx bitcoinpaul I think

Pin

From a sales/marketing perspective... I think that calling Nextcoin by "Nxt" instead of "Nextcoin" is a huge mistake.

Nothing kills adoption faster then "confusion".  Calling something "Nxt" is confusing as hell.  I know u commented on my video once n asked me to use the term Nxt instead of Nextcoin n it took several weeks before I realized what you were even talking about.

I think we should have stuck with the term "Nextcoin".

Instead of relying on fancy names to promote Nextcoin, we should be focused on making solid features on Nxt and make it as user friendly and easy to understand as possible.

This is one area that is still lacking in the crypto market despite the fact that we have dozens of different currencies.

people who are already in the crypto currency market can figure out and understand what "Nxt" is… But people new to the crypto currency market will have no clue (unless they do extensive research) to even know that Nxt is a crypto currency.

Confusion is not good for public adoption...

Nextcoin would be just as confusing, because Nxt isn't a coin, or rather not just a coin. The "coin" is part of the larger system.
Jump to: