Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1821. (Read 2761624 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
So with darkNXT out there has anyone thought already about mining it? Smiley

I have some thoughts on how to do this from the technical standpoint but don't really know if it's profitable. Can someone perhaps provide rough estimates on number of darkNXT accounts and their total amount?

~250M @ 1000+ accounts.

Edit: U should start from one with almost 50M on it.

holy crap that is a LOT.  OK, can we get some darkNXT tracking built into blockexplorer and into API?

ETA: how easy would it be to adapt one of the terraminer 2THps machines cranking on that?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
So with darkNXT out there has anyone thought already about mining it? Smiley

I have some thoughts on how to do this from the technical standpoint but don't really know if it's profitable. Can someone perhaps provide rough estimates on number of darkNXT accounts and their total amount?

~250M @ 1000+ accounts.

Edit: U should start from one with almost 50M on it.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
So with darkNXT out there has anyone thought already about mining it? Smiley

I have some thoughts on how to do this from the technical standpoint but don't really know if it's profitable. Can someone perhaps provide rough estimates on number of darkNXT accounts and their total amount?
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1001
I'm waiting for EvilDan to show up.......
hero member
Activity: 860
Merit: 1004
BTC OG and designer of the BitcoinMarket.com logo
Who knew that Come-From-Beyond had a twin brother called Come-from-Beyiond Cheesy

lol good catch Tongue

also, thats not the real BCNext

Yea it's BCNext's freakish twin sister called BCNext. Grin
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
anyone got any idea on what the bounty would be for getting an article on NXT published in bitcoinamagzine?
legendary
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1007
Who knew that Come-From-Beyond had a twin brother called Come-from-Beyiond Cheesy

lol good catch Tongue

also, thats not the real BCNext
legendary
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
I was tired that my client always hung after working for some hours and decided to code little hack. Now it seems to me its working much smoother. Cool
Sorry, but i am no way a programmer, so could some gurus look at it? It is very rude attempt to regulate connected peers.

I added two functions in activePeers.html into "function initialize()"

Original code:
Code:
			function initialize() {
setInterval(function() {
var i, time = (new Date()).getTime(), element;
for (i = 0; i < downloadingDeadlines.length; i++) {
if (downloadingDeadlines[i] > 0 && downloadingDeadlines[i] <= time) {
element = document.getElementById("downloading" + i);
if (element != null) {
element.className = "disabledDownloading";
}
downloadingDeadlines[i] = 0;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < uploadingDeadlines.length; i++) {
if (uploadingDeadlines[i] > 0 && uploadingDeadlines[i] <= time) {
element = document.getElementById("uploading" + i);
if (element != null) {
element.className = "disabledUploading";
}
uploadingDeadlines[i] = 0;
}
}
}, 100);
}

And with my hack:
Code:
			function initialize() {
setInterval(function() {
var i, time = (new Date()).getTime(), element;
for (i = 0; i < downloadingDeadlines.length; i++) {
if (downloadingDeadlines[i] > 0 && downloadingDeadlines[i] <= time) {
element = document.getElementById("downloading" + i);
if (element != null) {
element.className = "disabledDownloading";
}
downloadingDeadlines[i] = 0;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < uploadingDeadlines.length; i++) {
if (uploadingDeadlines[i] > 0 && uploadingDeadlines[i] <= time) {
element = document.getElementById("uploading" + i);
if (element != null) {
element.className = "disabledUploading";
}
uploadingDeadlines[i] = 0;
}
}
}, 100);
setInterval(function() {
var ev = new Event("click");
var p = document.getElementById("peers");
for (var k = 0; k < p.rows.length; k++) {
if (p.rows[k].cells[0].className == "disconnected" || p.rows[k].cells[4].className == "disabledWeight") p.rows[k].cells[12].dispatchEvent(ev);
}
}, 60000);
setInterval(function() {
var ev = new Event("click");
var p = document.getElementById("peers");
for (var k = 0; k < p.rows.length; k=k + 2) {
p.rows[k].cells[12].dispatchEvent(ev);
}
}, 300000);
}
Can anyone comment on this? Grin
hero member
Activity: 860
Merit: 1004
BTC OG and designer of the BitcoinMarket.com logo
Who knew that Come-From-Beyond had a twin brother called Come-from-Beyiond Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010

omg...

The guys don't quit...they already made $400 though lol.

I'm not convinced those two transfers weren't shills to give it some legitimate appearance. At least, that's what I hope.

Or just to get the old "NOOOO, some idiot actually PAID THEM!!!!" rants going. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250

omg...

The guys don't quit...they already made $400 though lol.

I'm not convinced those two transfers weren't shills to give it some legitimate appearance. At least, that's what I hope.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500

omg...

The guys don't quit...they already made $400 though lol.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Many have reported bad experiences with using Dgex. I wished they had not happened. While I really dislike the exchange for its features and user interface, I'd like to share that I have traded several million Nxt through this exchange since the day there were launched - with not a single problem. All withdrawals were delivered (within their stipulated time frame) and all arrived safely.

Having said that, I join all other users in stating my displeasure over the way they increased fees without any notice.
+1

Same here. Never had problems with DGEX but I really hope Graviton will pay some coders to bring DGEX into the year 2001.

+1

2001? Haha, I guess it's 1998 now so 2001 would be a good improvement ;-)
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
BCNext:

Personal question: What do you think about the Iron Man franchise? Do you think they portrayed your life in an authentic way, or did they romanticise it too much?
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 1011
Many have reported bad experiences with using Dgex. I wished they had not happened. While I really dislike the exchange for its features and user interface, I'd like to share that I have traded several million Nxt through this exchange since the day there were launched - with not a single problem. All withdrawals were delivered (within their stipulated time frame) and all arrived safely.

Having said that, I join all other users in stating my displeasure over the way they increased fees without any notice.
+1

Same here. Never had problems with DGEX but I really hope Graviton will pay some coders to bring DGEX into the year 2001.

+1
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
Yes, good idea but no need to make a new address.

Yes there is.

a) the checksum must be mandatory on the protocol level or it won't be used enough.
b) the check cannot be done only on the client, this doesn't solve unhealthy server problem. This leads us again to the protocol level.

And checksum should not be easily distinguishable from the address for various psychological reasons.


Later transactions will be signed on client side.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000

Question for BCNext:

Are you supported by known SR vendors?


that would be something woudnt it?

Pin
Even if true I think we will not admit it..
Jump to: