To the detractors who have appeared today, remember that no project needs to be (nor can be) perfect out of the gate, but it must be resilient. And I think this NXT team is.
This echoes my sentiments.
I think a lot of the detractors are seeing this the wrong way. It seems to me that they're looking to invest in a shiny product that does shiny things out of the box (and will continually be updated to do even shinier things). That shinyness is not for themselves, but for the public, who for the most part are attracted to shiny things. They hope that if the public eventually buy into a lot of shiny NXT, the value of their own NXT, bought much earlier at much lower prices, will jump tremendously. They are also thinking of the launch as when this shiny product gets shipped out to people.
But personally, that's not what I looked at when I bought into NXT a few days ago. I saw a remarkable set of
principles like decentralization (not just of software and hardware running the NXT protocols, but also of the ability for people to get NXT), security, proof of stake, trust in mathematical algorithms instead of human institutions for handling transactions, NXT as not just a currency but an ecosystem of services. And most importantly of all IMO, freedom. From reading this thread, I see a lot of people, including the devs, who believed in these principles, enough so that they would risk their $ when this was a much less certain thing. And who now also give out, with no strings attached, the now valuable NXT to compensate theft victims and get new people interested in NXT.
From these principles are founded the features, and protocols that support these features. (Much smarter folks in this thread who are familiar with all this, so I won't go into them.) The launch is not a traditional launch in the sense of opening a store or shipping out the first boxes. It really is about making the source code, the instructions that make NXT work, publicly available, so that people (with the knowledge and skills) can verify that NXT is indeed doing what the devs claim it does, and indeed keeping to the principles that it is founded on. And also increasing public awareness about NXT.
I think people didn't focus as much on the principles of usability and accessibility early on, seemed like they felt that it was more important to get the other principles (and consequent features) right first. But certainly we do believe in usability, the alias system is an example of that. And more and more people here (including myself) are talking about the user-friendliness and idiot-proofness of the client. I fully expect these features to similarly become a reality, starting from the principles.
Basically, I invested in
people and their principles, rather than the product. To me the product is a consequence of the people and principles, and I think with this group of people (not just the devs, but including the community of stakeholders), there will be an excellent product, much shinier than anything we have so far. And, again from reading the thread, I think a lot of people share my feelings. I'm glad to be with good company here.
So for potential investors: If you just want to invest in a shiny product, maybe wait a while for that product (in particular the client) to shape up first before you decide. If you want to invest in people and principles, you don't have to wait to decide, read through this thread and take a look at the people and principles for yourselves.
EDIT: Sorry, not just this thread, also the original thread at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303898.140