Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 273. (Read 2761645 times)

Details r not sorted yet. Had long debates (derailed few times). Let's wait for announcement.

For the record, I did reach out to several Tech-Dev members offering my services and quoting rates.
No reply, so I am assuming no interest.

No biggie. I was starting to have second thoughts about the offer anyway. I'm no longer convinced that Nxt will not turn out be
a dystopian wasteland of confusion, chaos and ridiculous fees at every turn. I'm not seeing the advantages of using Nxt over just sticking with a trusted centralized exchange.

I haven't even really gotten into my complete opposition to the idea of charging a fee for merely placing a buy or sell order, not for executing an order but just putting out your reel. In my opinion, this is going to be make or break for many considering using the AE.
No one else seems to think it will be a problem.

To the person who said I mention Ripple too much, I only do that because Ripple is Nxt's direct competitor and Nxt and Ripple are very very much alike.  I'd prefer Nxt to come out on top, but from where I sit,  Ripple doesn't have a lot of the problems I see with forging, fees and scalability, coupled with the fact that Ripple's transactions are so much faster. Ripple does have a community as well and even has a libertarian following. Check out Xrptalk.org or OpenXrp.org they have plenty of entusiastic supporters.

Considering how very much like Ripple Nxt is, I think it's pertinent. I have tried to offer solutions to at least get the thought process going but the developers are dismissive. I get the feeling of being talked down to whenever I bring up concerns and get the sense the feedback is not desired unless it consists of mindless praise and enthusiasm. I'm getting the feeling that anyone who is not a developer is viewed as an annoyance, especially anyone who has invested for speculative reasons, which is probably about 85% of Nxt holders.

Developers seem to have issues with speculators, who I believe they need dearly and are dismissive of at their peril. That's their right.
For the rest of us we'll vote with our feet, our wallets and our energy.

who was hired? Who is this guy?

https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt/commits/c1ee615e7611d1dccf62509a312d4e291392e754

I didn't mean that. I'll rephrase:

I'm not interested in policing what kinds of products people buy. But the public asset exchange is not as such a convenient forum for SR type business. It doesn't support mail-delivery type trades out of the box, and it is public. I have suggested adding password-protection and encryption on the AM based markets proposed originally by BCNext.

It was a buy order for 2mill > not a sell order !

What will they work on? Why is klee paying for it? Or is this a community fund?

Yeah, stop quoring him. He is nobody. No money. No nxt. He is all hot air.

OK! Just press 'ignore' and your world is going to be much better. 

Yup, that's true. Big stakeholders selling part of there NXT is inevitable for a better distribution. It a bump in the road we have to take to make NXT stronger in the future.

No, we need USD coz hired coders ask for fiat.

oh yes in the name of fair distribution whales dumping

omg good laugh always here

He's not leaving
He míght just be getting the price down so more people can buy.

Also: when someone sells, someone buys.
It's not as if the Nxt is running away 

The thing is if Nxt can work as a totally decentralized exchange,people will use it for these things.As long as it doesnt become a pedophile platform, or used to trade arms... But if it has the potential to do it,someone will just do it.

About assets with bigger value than Nxt,of course it will be possible.The only thing is that it wont be possible to buy them with nxt,until you can get enough to purchase that.But people can use it,agreeing the token is what they agree,and doing the payment in real life.It is your problem to trust who you are dealing with.

My opinion about asset names,is we should standarize the cryptocoins with their gateways first,and let free market grow the exchange for itself. I like the idea of having to put a number code to every asset,so people have to do a research on the asset they are buying and names can be duplicated(with different number code).Voting on letting people create assets has absolutely no sense.Will you be there everyday to do it??In what info will you base your opinion?? For good or bad,decentralized means DECENTRALIZED.

Having SR type products on the public asset exchange might result in unwanted attention. I have proposed a way to create private password-protected marketplaces on top of the Nxt blockchain:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5699472

congrats all new low incoming

Klee isn't leaving NXT? Honestly if I had 15M I would've taken out that 2M wall too.

smart money is getting out

Seems so. It would be a disaster if we would loose him

soon nxt will be zero coin, cos that will be its value