nodecoins have is in that it can increase my Nxt stake. The only problem I see is how to donate this fund and whether one of the committees will fund this. Any funding for this
will only be temporary because I can't imagine it would take more than a year for Nxt to be successful enough to not need nodecoins for incentive to forge.
I think going about this is just where the thinking goes wrong. Again, not attacking, but trying to illustrate a point.
Your post reveals a possible weakness in the NodeCoin idea: great.
But why does this need to be solved community wide?
That wóuld make NodeCoin a problem for Nxt.
If coins get created by a user, it's also up to the user to make it work, in whatever way he or she pleases. If that solution isn't good enough, the coin dies and fades away.
If not, it's viable.
Trying to shoehorn it into Nxt places the responsibility for it where it shouldn't be and opens a big can of ugly worms.
The creation of these coins is an open and free option. If it is truly so, then the execution of it should be the responsibility should be the creator's.
I am fully convinced that people can come up with a way to have the NodeCake and eat it.
It is a temporary solution I see nodecoin as. James made it to solve our forging problem that has been discussed a million times. Nodecoins would definitely solve short term
forging issues until we have thousands of businesses supporting the network for their own sakes. But nodecoin must be traded in for a fixed amount of Nxt like a points system.
James of course should be rewarded well by one of the committees if this is approved