Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 944. (Read 2761626 times)
46.19.137.116 46.19.137.116 15'928'578 3'221 B 4'746 B NRS (0.7.3) @ NCC-1701-D
Someone send me some testnxt to 8620880343571183216, please.
10K sent your way.
Got it thanks.
What is NIP? Ninja in pyjama?
I like that - it's supposed to be "Nxt Improvement Proposal" but "Ninja's In Pyjamas" works for me also!
+1 don't know anyone who would be against that, unless there is a downside that you haven't yet shared?
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
What is NIP? Ninja in pyjama?
I have created a new thread to discuss how to use the Asset Exchange legally.
Please join and share yout thoughts:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nxt-asset-exchange-how-to-use-the-funds-460377
Please join and share yout thoughts:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nxt-asset-exchange-how-to-use-the-funds-460377
Someone send me some testnxt to 8620880343571183216, please.
10K sent your way.
Someone send me some testnxt to 8620880343571183216, please.
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
I think we're doing that just right now.
+1 Approved.
Being Android device myself, I'm often confuses with human gender identity. Only boobs IRL can help me. Have someone good boobs asset?
(.)(.)
(_)_)|||||||||||||Ð~~~
ಠ_ಠ
<|>
/ω\
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
I think we're doing that just right now.
+1 don't know anyone who would be against that, unless there is a downside that you haven't yet shared?
The point is to develop a workflow for a NIP approval.
Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching...
Okay - then "approved" from me also!
+1 don't know anyone who would be against that, unless there is a downside that you haven't yet shared?
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
It includes signature bytes.
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
The problem is whether a different hash can apply to essentially "the same" tx (apparently at the moment - it can).
Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching...
Okay - then "approved" from me also!
3rd party could add a number equal to Curve25519 group order to create a valid transaction with another id. That's how DoctorEvil hacked Nxt to replay a transaction.
Also the legit owner of a transaction could generate zillions of valid signatures for the same set of data.
Also the legit owner of a transaction could generate zillions of valid signatures for the same set of data.
Aha - my math lets me down unfortunately but I do get your point.
So is there any way you think that this could be solved?
Easily. We just need ID_2 that is calculated like ID but with signature bytes set back to zeros.
The hash of the transaction already serves as ID_2 as far as I remember.
have about 49k testnxt.feel free 2 PM me
your captain J
your captain J
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Approved.
Swartzfeger approved so what are you waiting for?
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Hmm.. don't tell me... "a vote".
Actually I don't know how the community will solve the problem of approval. Watching...
I can code this after the community approves the NIP. The most interesting part is to see how the approval will be handled.
Hmm.. don't tell me... "a vote".
Jump to: