Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 946. (Read 2761627 times)

Being Android device myself, I'm often confuses with human gender identity. Only boobs IRL can help me. Have someone good boobs asset?

3rd party could add a number equal to Curve25519 group order to create a valid transaction with another id. That's how DoctorEvil hacked Nxt to replay a transaction.

Also the legit owner of a transaction could generate zillions of valid signatures for the same set of data.

sent 10k Test NXT




_________________


NXTio Now is in Chinese!

http://www.nxtio.org/?lang=zh

Thank you very much to nekokoe for his translation!
NXT Donations: 16729052528737221895

Isn't there a second signature of the issuer? I mean I do not want a node to change my transactions, right?

Sorry, was somehow confused by thinking of blocks.

Believe me - if I get overly excited by Nxt then I think all of you would have already become very rich.

Then unless the signature can have more than one equivalent representation I don't see why we actually *have* a malleability problem?

Care to enlighten me?

I have a hard time believing that anything makes you overly excited.    I do agree with cross-chain transactions, all the more reason why we need to be building coins on top of Nxt blockchain!

That's how rumors that I'm a SkyNet bot r being created...

Ah, got it. For that use case, indeed cross-chain transactions would be amazing

let's talk about it.

He's talking only about crypto-to-crypto exchanges.

Sent 10k.

But how does this solve the problem? For example say I wanted to offer 10% of mynxt.info to investors. I don't feel comfortable doing it today because it would be easy to find me via the domain mynxt.info. How is that having having atomic cross-chain transactions would help in this case?

may i have some testNXT please

17567379695603145590

Nxt transaction has the following format:

64 bytes of the header
64 bytes of the signature
X bytes of the attachment

Before signing it looks:

64 bytes of the header
64 zeros
X bytes of the attachment

All [64+64+X] bytes r signed and the signature is placed instead of the zeros.

PS: Ordinary payment is the only transaction that doesn't have an attachment.

NO NO CATS BEGGING PLEASE here have 10K.

That was C-f-B itself, who have forged that lucky block. AFAIR, he returned most of fee to alias issuer.

At the dawn of electricity in the late nineteenth century was Thomas Edison envisioned a decentralized system with many small companies competing for generators installed near the point of consumption. Since the electricity distribution cables were still rare , the Edison Electric Lighting Company focused most of his first business in installing generators in small factories, shops, hotels and homes .
In 1888 , Edison had installed 1,700 small plants . In the early twentieth century , more than half of U.S. electricity It was self-produced by industries that took advantage of the waste heat and excess electricity sold to nearby customers.

Would it be possible to implement Nxt platform under the distributed energy market ?

Is a market where producers and consumers of energy would cross their sales orders and purchase orders simultaneously.

Today a small community of neighbors or landowners can generate and sell energy through solar PV , mini wind power, etc. .

For example an owner decide to install in his home to energy consumption solar pv but at certain times of day to spare and is now selling the excess energy in the Nxt platform.

At one point he needs same energy and buys his deficit in the Nxt platform.

both buyer and seller should obviously pay transport costs to distribution companies but the market for the generation and consumption of energy would peer ( peer to peer) .

This would link with the colored coins and the contract system like Ethereum .

Does anyone dare with the idea ?

If anyone dares I'm interested to collaborate .

A good question - and another reason why I am not overly excited by AE as it stands. You'd be pretty brave not to be "anonymous" and list an Asset IMO.

This is why "atomic cross-chain transactions" *are* the holy-grail as you could deal through anonymous AE without needing to trust its owner as basically they would only then exist to set up a trade possibility between two parties (i.e. a means of finding each other and finding an agreed price) but the trade itself would happen in a way that the asset owner would have no control over (the fee in NXT being the only way that the "lister" could make anything at all assuming the system has been set up to allow this).

This is a good question... The whole BTC story is a grey zone, so I assume this is not a clear issue...