Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 109.

Thul

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: meterse on October 15, 2018, 11:10:50 AM

Quote from: jwinterm on October 15, 2018, 09:32:03 AM

Who is going to sit around and wait twelve months for twelve dollars?

thats just for one referral

10 referrals is $120 etc. many people put a lot more effort into earning $120 than posting a voucher code on facebook

And so one mischief follows another...

"I make myself the world as it pleases me".

Self-reflection and insight = 0

Thul

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: meterse on October 15, 2018, 11:06:41 AM

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 09:13:05 AM

Quote from: pineapple express on October 15, 2018, 08:02:58 AM

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 07:45:37 AM

Quote from: tonych on October 15, 2018, 06:59:50 AM

Introducing Smart Vouchers: [...blub...]

Bullshit again.

The demand is certainly not increased with such a thing.

"Simplicity is beauty"
You should finally follow your Sig yourself.

I am almost full of it.
Question to the community: Are there Byteball clones whose leadership has a little more sense?

there is better coins, like bit[Suspicious link removed]d place to exchange your bytes on bitcoins is cryptox

As already mentioned here, I prefer BISQ. I am not dependent on the arbitrariness of centralized exchanges.

I was especially interested in Byteball because of "Blackbytes" (what a terrible name). But if you can't use them to offer goods and services, they are useless.

No customer can be motivated to exchange Fiat in BTC, these then in Bytes, which must be converted then again in Blackbytes.
For the customers the exchange in BTC is already too annoying.

Blackbytes is an excellent name, and they can be used for goods and services

Right, you just have to believe in it. Roll Eyes

meterse

copper member

Activity: 226

Merit: 8

Quote from: jwinterm on October 15, 2018, 09:32:03 AM

Who is going to sit around and wait twelve months for twelve dollars?

thats just for one referral

10 referrals is $120 etc. many people put a lot more effort into earning $120 than posting a voucher code on facebook

meterse

copper member

Activity: 226

Merit: 8

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 09:13:05 AM

Quote from: pineapple express on October 15, 2018, 08:02:58 AM

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 07:45:37 AM

Quote from: tonych on October 15, 2018, 06:59:50 AM

Introducing Smart Vouchers: [...blub...]

Bullshit again.

The demand is certainly not increased with such a thing.

"Simplicity is beauty"
You should finally follow your Sig yourself.

I am almost full of it.
Question to the community: Are there Byteball clones whose leadership has a little more sense?

there is better coins, like bit[Suspicious link removed]d place to exchange your bytes on bitcoins is cryptox

As already mentioned here, I prefer BISQ. I am not dependent on the arbitrariness of centralized exchanges.

I was especially interested in Byteball because of "Blackbytes" (what a terrible name). But if you can't use them to offer goods and services, they are useless.

No customer can be motivated to exchange Fiat in BTC, these then in Bytes, which must be converted then again in Blackbytes.
For the customers the exchange in BTC is already too annoying.

Blackbytes is an excellent name, and they can be used for goods and services

jwinterm

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1116

Who is going to sit around and wait twelve months for twelve dollars?

barborrico

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 2

Lol finally you implement partially my idea!! After some months of getting dust on slack.

My complete idea would be:
Instead of

Quote

$12 is sent to a smart contract on Ben’s wallet. He can withdraw that amount 1 year later.

should be

Quote

$12 is sent to a smart contract on Ben’s wallet. He can withdraw that amount 1 year later OR use it to fund attestations.

By this way, IT COULD BE viral. I don't know if it is possible.

EDIT: well, if the bot sends the $12 to Ben's voucher, then it is done. Or did I missed something?

Thul

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: pineapple express on October 15, 2018, 08:02:58 AM

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 07:45:37 AM

Quote from: tonych on October 15, 2018, 06:59:50 AM

Introducing Smart Vouchers: [...blub...]

Bullshit again.

The demand is certainly not increased with such a thing.

"Simplicity is beauty"
You should finally follow your Sig yourself.

I am almost full of it.
Question to the community: Are there Byteball clones whose leadership has a little more sense?

there is better coins, like bit[Suspicious link removed]d place to exchange your bytes on bitcoins is cryptox

As already mentioned here, I prefer BISQ. I am not dependent on the arbitrariness of centralized exchanges.

I was especially interested in Byteball because of "Blackbytes" (what a terrible name). But if you can't use them to offer goods and services, they are useless.

No customer can be motivated to exchange Fiat in BTC, these then in Bytes, which must be converted then again in Blackbytes.
For the customers the exchange in BTC is already too annoying.

pineapple express

full member

Activity: 630

Merit: 103

Quote from: Thul on October 15, 2018, 07:45:37 AM

Quote from: tonych on October 15, 2018, 06:59:50 AM

Introducing Smart Vouchers: [...blub...]

Bullshit again.

The demand is certainly not increased with such a thing.

"Simplicity is beauty"
You should finally follow your Sig yourself.

I am almost full of it.
Question to the community: Are there Byteball clones whose leadership has a little more sense?

there is better coins, like bitcoin. Good place to exchange your bytes on bitcoins is cryptox

Thul

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Quote from: tonych on October 15, 2018, 06:59:50 AM

Introducing Smart Vouchers: [...blub...]

Bullshit again.

The demand is certainly not increased with such a thing.

"Simplicity is beauty"
You should finally follow your Sig yourself.

I am almost full of it.
Question to the community: Are there Byteball clones whose leadership has a little more sense?

tonych

legendary

Activity: 965

Merit: 1033

Introducing Smart Vouchers: A New Way To Earn Referral Rewards By Sending Bytes To New Users

Smart Vouchers is a safer way to get referrals than sending them $8 in Bytes (which they might not spend as intended).

As before, attestation rewards are sent to smart contracts vesting in 1 year.

Referral rewards are sent back to the smart voucher and allow to fund more attestations. Net profit from referral rewards can be withdrawn to a smart contract vesting in 1 year.

Read the full story https://medium.com/byteball/introducing-smart-vouchers-a-new-way-to-earn-referral-rewards-by-sending-bytes-to-new-users-38972ec645a7

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:36:55 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on October 14, 2018, 05:27:22 PM

where did anyone get the idea that world coin grid or any other folding was going to help byteball in any way other than to crush the value lower??

i am a big investor in curecoin since the start - that has not worked out well at all.

But where do you get the idea that this is what is crushing the value lower? Have you noticed that Byteball price drops when rest of the cryptocurrencies drop, especially when closest technological competitors (IOTA and Nano) drop? Latest $50 to $40 drop was exactly at the same time as Bitcoin dropped from $6600 to $6300, since Byteball is low marketcap coin, it is more volatile, so gains and drops will be bigger.

I am following this thought process...

folders tend to not care about other projects - they care about folding and being able to sell what ever coins they get to pay for their electricity to fold ... this is highly evident with cure coin actually.

other coins - you buy them so hold for profit.

folders tend to dump quickly and have no loyalty to the project.

most folders dont care at all about crypto in general.

this compared to rewarding holders of bb monthly with more bb is no comparison.

In summary folding for bb is a terrible idea if you are interested in increasing community size or starting to get more holders and investors.

barborrico

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 2

Quote from: Freefactomizer on October 15, 2018, 05:27:46 AM

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 05:03:09 AM

Quote from: Freefactomizer on October 15, 2018, 04:27:47 AM

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:28:49 PM

Your example of big cruncher is also a new address (first transaction on 2018-10-14), which means it is new a new joiner and that's why they are not on wcg.report yet. Looks like they are claiming bytes from multiple accounts to same address.

So, please no FUD if you don't fully understand what you are reading.

It doesn't matter if it appears on wcg.report or not. If a million points are sent, I expect to see a $10 byte transaction, and this is not the case.

I see 437 million points and only 9,2 GB ($460 at $50/GB)-> https://explorer.byteball.org/#367663IOBS6XJD4EYKEMZ7AUU44PEE4O

It is no FUD if its truth.

Lol you are looking at an address balance, not at a transaction. The guy has spent or moved elsewhere the remaining bytes while all WCG points stay on same address.

Lol where? There are NOT out transactions from that address.

Check the aforementioned address before talking, thanks.

Seriously, Why happens this? Why byteball can not keep his word?

This is hilarious. Please transition to a serious project, tech is already here.

And hire keeek as an advisor, for the sake of god.

For the WCG points you crunched before registering to distribution you get these rewards:

Quote

If you are already a WCG member and earned some points before enrolling into the distribution, you also receive a one-time reward that depends on the amount of WCG points you generated:

   100,000 to 1,000,000 points: $0.20;
   1,000,000 to 10,000,000 points: $3.00;
   10,000,000 to 100,000,000 points: $40.00;
   over 100,000,000 points: $150.00.

They are below the ratio of 1$ for 100000 WCG.
Byteball doesn't fool anyone, stop spreading your bullshit.

Oh shit, I thought this was discontinued...

Is there an unique place where I can check all distribution stats and rules? A serious project would have it.

Freefactomizer

full member

Activity: 346

Merit: 107

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 05:03:09 AM

Quote from: Freefactomizer on October 15, 2018, 04:27:47 AM

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:28:49 PM

Your example of big cruncher is also a new address (first transaction on 2018-10-14), which means it is new a new joiner and that's why they are not on wcg.report yet. Looks like they are claiming bytes from multiple accounts to same address.

So, please no FUD if you don't fully understand what you are reading.

It doesn't matter if it appears on wcg.report or not. If a million points are sent, I expect to see a $10 byte transaction, and this is not the case.

I see 437 million points and only 9,2 GB ($460 at $50/GB)-> https://explorer.byteball.org/#367663IOBS6XJD4EYKEMZ7AUU44PEE4O

It is no FUD if its truth.

Lol you are looking at an address balance, not at a transaction. The guy has spent or moved elsewhere the remaining bytes while all WCG points stay on same address.

Lol where? There are NOT out transactions from that address.

Check the aforementioned address before talking, thanks.

Seriously, Why happens this? Why byteball can not keep his word?

This is hilarious. Please transition to a serious project, tech is already here.

And hire keeek as an advisor, for the sake of god.

For the WCG points you crunched before registering to distribution you get these rewards:

Quote

If you are already a WCG member and earned some points before enrolling into the distribution, you also receive a one-time reward that depends on the amount of WCG points you generated:

100,000 to 1,000,000 points: $0.20;
1,000,000 to 10,000,000 points: $3.00;
10,000,000 to 100,000,000 points: $40.00;
over 100,000,000 points: $150.00.

They are below the ratio of 1$ for 100000 WCG.
Byteball doesn't fool anyone, stop spreading your bullshit.

barborrico

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 2

Quote from: Freefactomizer on October 15, 2018, 04:27:47 AM

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:28:49 PM

Your example of big cruncher is also a new address (first transaction on 2018-10-14), which means it is new a new joiner and that's why they are not on wcg.report yet. Looks like they are claiming bytes from multiple accounts to same address.

So, please no FUD if you don't fully understand what you are reading.

It doesn't matter if it appears on wcg.report or not. If a million points are sent, I expect to see a $10 byte transaction, and this is not the case.

I see 437 million points and only 9,2 GB ($460 at $50/GB)-> https://explorer.byteball.org/#367663IOBS6XJD4EYKEMZ7AUU44PEE4O

It is no FUD if its truth.

Lol you are looking at an address balance, not at a transaction. The guy has spent or moved elsewhere the remaining bytes while all WCG points stay on same address.

Lol where? There are NOT out transactions from that address.

Check the aforementioned address before talking, thanks.

Seriously, Why happens this? Why byteball can not keep his word?

This is hilarious. Please transition to a serious project, tech is already here.

And hire keeek as an advisor, for the sake of god.

Freefactomizer

full member

Activity: 346

Merit: 107

Quote from: barborrico on October 15, 2018, 04:01:08 AM

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:28:49 PM

Your example of big cruncher is also a new address (first transaction on 2018-10-14), which means it is new a new joiner and that's why they are not on wcg.report yet. Looks like they are claiming bytes from multiple accounts to same address.

So, please no FUD if you don't fully understand what you are reading.

It doesn't matter if it appears on wcg.report or not. If a million points are sent, I expect to see a $10 byte transaction, and this is not the case.

I see 437 million points and only 9,2 GB ($460 at $50/GB)-> https://explorer.byteball.org/#367663IOBS6XJD4EYKEMZ7AUU44PEE4O

It is no FUD if its truth.

Lol you are looking at an address balance, not at a transaction. The guy has spent or moved elsewhere the remaining bytes while all WCG points stay on same address.

meterse

copper member

Activity: 226

Merit: 8

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:36:55 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on October 14, 2018, 05:27:22 PM

where did anyone get the idea that world coin grid or any other folding was going to help byteball in any way other than to crush the value lower??

i am a big investor in curecoin since the start - that has not worked out well at all.

But where do you get the idea that this is what is crushing the value lower? Have you noticed that Byteball price drops when rest of the cryptocurrencies drop, especially when closest technological competitors (IOTA and Nano) drop? Latest $50 to $40 drop was exactly at the same time as Bitcoin dropped from $6600 to $6300, since Byteball is low marketcap coin, it is more volatile, so gains and drops will be bigger.

exactly

meterse

copper member

Activity: 226

Merit: 8

Quote from: cryptohunter on October 14, 2018, 05:27:22 PM

where did anyone get the idea that world coin grid or any other folding was going to help byteball in any way other than to crush the value lower??

i am a big investor in curecoin since the start - that has not worked out well at all.

Byteball is a platform, I believe curecoin is just a coin. I dont think WCG payouts are enough to affect the price much

barborrico

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 2

Quote from: tarmo888 on October 14, 2018, 05:28:49 PM

Your example of big cruncher is also a new address (first transaction on 2018-10-14), which means it is new a new joiner and that's why they are not on wcg.report yet. Looks like they are claiming bytes from multiple accounts to same address.

So, please no FUD if you don't fully understand what you are reading.

It doesn't matter if it appears on wcg.report or not. If a million points are sent, I expect to see a $10 byte transaction, and this is not the case.

I see 437 million points and only 9,2 GB ($460 at $50/GB)-> https://explorer.byteball.org/#367663IOBS6XJD4EYKEMZ7AUU44PEE4O

It is no FUD if its truth.

Thul

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

A lack of usability results in a lack of demand.

The demand, again, is generated from those who recognize a usability. - Certainly not from those who have hoped for a non productive income through the Airdrop.

The customer consuming the goods generates demand. There is a real demand for crypto currencies where goods are offered almost exclusively against crypto currencies. Here I only mention "Open Bazaar". - Also this potential is not recognized by the management and the development and supported accordingly.
The creation of not usable gimmicks seems more important.

Roadmap:
1. name change (byteball, bytes, blackbytes are not possible at all)
2. easily switch to Fiat and vice versa via the wallet, using the code from BISQ.
3. to be able to buy from Open Bazaar via this currency, as is already possible with BTC, BCH and ZEC.

tarmo888

full member

Activity: 563

Merit: 103

Quote from: cryptohunter on October 14, 2018, 05:27:22 PM

where did anyone get the idea that world coin grid or any other folding was going to help byteball in any way other than to crush the value lower??

i am a big investor in curecoin since the start - that has not worked out well at all.

But where do you get the idea that this is what is crushing the value lower? Have you noticed that Byteball price drops when rest of the cryptocurrencies drop, especially when closest technological competitors (IOTA and Nano) drop? Latest $50 to $40 drop was exactly at the same time as Bitcoin dropped from $6600 to $6300, since Byteball is low marketcap coin, it is more volatile, so gains and drops will be bigger.

Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 109. (Read 1234271 times)