good to know that we can receive free coins... is there any other coins doing free distribution?
Stellar Lumen.
And bitcore also
Cool, thanks for the info!
Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 623. (Read 1234317 times)
June 28, 2017, 01:02:34 AM
Stellar Lumen.
And bitcore also
Cool, thanks for the info!
June 28, 2017, 12:57:39 AM
good to know that we can receive free coins... is there any other coins doing free distribution?
Stellar Lumen.
And bitcore also
June 28, 2017, 12:50:10 AM
good to know that we can receive free coins... is there any other coins doing free distribution?
Stellar Lumen.
June 28, 2017, 12:40:43 AM
good to know that we can receive free coins... is there any other coins doing free distribution?
June 27, 2017, 05:05:48 PM
It's about to pop. Check the ascending triangle on the charts.
June 27, 2017, 04:01:46 PM
Byteball really weathered the downturn well, very solid
June 27, 2017, 03:58:57 PM
If my byteball wallet don't have GB so I will not get GBB.
Is it correct?
Getting GBB what will be minimum GB must be there so I will also get GBB.
Is it correct?
Getting GBB what will be minimum GB must be there so I will also get GBB.
June 27, 2017, 03:54:47 PM
@tonych, Hi, recently I did a BB transaction via light client, v 1.9.0. As it was expected the remaining fund (f=f1+f2) has been split between two addresses i.e ADDR1 (f1) and ADDR2(f2). I have decided to consolidate all of it on ADDR1, but after choose "Send all" option and click "Send" nothing happened in sense that fund again was split between ADDR1 (f1) and ADDR2(f2). I have repeated the same once more but the result was exactly similar. So I look on transaction and found that it was that really happened ADDR(f1) ==> ADDR(f1) (transaction) and ADDR(f2) = ADDR2(f2) (which means no transaction). Then I did the following : choose Amount, put into Amount field f1 + f2 (in fact a bit smaller to take into account the fee), choose ADDR1 and Send. With this procedure I have finally got ADDR1 (f1+f2). So conclusion: the "Send all" does not function properly in v 1.9.0. With previous client's version there was no such problem
This is true. Glad to see I'm not going crazy. Personally I won't be using the "send all" button until it has been fixed. I posted about this x pages ago on June 3. No idea what version that was but I had the same problem where I simply could not get all my bytes to a single address (until I tried the manual approach). They just kept being sent around at seemingly random numbers. Also, my total value still is missing .1 gbytes even though the bot keep telling me I still own the .1 in a different address from the rest of my coins. This last thing however could be a separate issue, or simply me misunderstanding something. I'll repeat what I said below:
I'm using the light wallet and just moved my byteballs to a new address, but when trying to use the "send all" function it did not work as expected and instead just moved around small chunks at seemingly random numbers (even though my "available balance" was much higher than what was actually sent!). I tried it two or three times but just random numbers. So I couldn't get them all in one address. I tried to use a new address I had just generated and send 0.1 gb to it but then it just said "sent" instead of moved and it disappeared from my balance. Then I made yet another new address to which I sent the rest of my bytes to, this time also skipping using the "send all" button and just typed it in manually. Now it worked.
So "send all" seemed to bug for me and I won't dare to use it again for now. But now it's all good except from my missing 0.1 gb. They do however show up in the transition bot, it lists the address with 0.1 gb as my address...then my other address with x gb. but my actual balance does not count the first one with 0.1 gb. Any ideas?
June 27, 2017, 12:39:27 PM
Byteball is one of the best crypto of 2017
I'm not a coder, but wallet front end is amazing
I'm not a coder, but wallet front end is amazing
I second that Byteball is one of the best crypto projects around but please note that the wallet fronted is from Copay.......
June 27, 2017, 07:09:01 AM
guys!
bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
i didnt heard about this info at all. but you will get byteball every month on full moon, if you have BTC or BB in your wallet.
BB have a long road up
June 27, 2017, 03:17:33 AM
@tonych, Hi, recently I did a BB transaction via light client, v 1.9.0. As it was expected the remaining fund (f=f1+f2) has been split between two addresses i.e ADDR1 (f1) and ADDR2(f2). I have decided to consolidate all of it on ADDR1, but after choose "Send all" option and click "Send" nothing happened in sense that fund again was split between ADDR1 (f1) and ADDR2(f2). I have repeated the same once more but the result was exactly similar. So I look on transaction and found that it was that really happened ADDR(f1) ==> ADDR(f1) (transaction) and ADDR(f2) = ADDR2(f2) (which means no transaction). Then I did the following : choose Amount, put into Amount field f1 + f2 (in fact a bit smaller to take into account the fee), choose ADDR1 and Send. With this procedure I have finally got ADDR1 (f1+f2). So conclusion: the "Send all" does not function properly in v 1.9.0. With previous client's version there was no such problem
June 27, 2017, 01:53:09 AM
Does anyone know where SatoNatomato is?
I completely forgot that he was supposed to observe the results of the test, but this letter reminded about him:
I completely forgot that he was supposed to observe the results of the test, but this letter reminded about him:
June 26, 2017, 07:04:45 PM
guys!
bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
no bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
June 26, 2017, 03:52:59 PM
guys!
bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
bittrex give a 20% for a bytes on the full moon, or not to give?)
June 26, 2017, 01:28:58 PM
Check if your wallet fully synched (look at your wallet main chain index). If no expect the bytes to arrive when your wallet has finished synching process (may take days).
It's strange that this balance is not pending at least. The rest is fine, the node is syncing, more than 0.5 GB is already processed.
I think it would show up as pending if your wallet was synced, but the payment hadn't been confirmed and it was very recent.
If your wallet isn't synced you're not getting the latest version of what's going on with the transactions
Your wallet has fisrt to synch up to the very unit where your transaction is "pending" (then he will be able to show "pending").
June 26, 2017, 01:20:07 PM
Check if your wallet fully synched (look at your wallet main chain index). If no expect the bytes to arrive when your wallet has finished synching process (may take days).
It's strange that this balance is not pending at least. The rest is fine, the node is syncing, more than 0.5 GB is already processed.
I think it would show up as pending if your wallet was synced, but the payment hadn't been confirmed and it was very recent.
If your wallet isn't synced you're not getting the latest version of what's going on with the transactions
June 26, 2017, 01:17:42 PM
Check if your wallet fully synched (look at your wallet main chain index). If no expect the bytes to arrive when your wallet has finished synching process (may take days).
It's strange that this balance is not pending at least. The rest is fine, the node is syncing, more than 0.5 GB is already processed.
June 26, 2017, 01:10:04 PM
I've got 0.1 MBs sent to my address (UNADMSFFDDS5TW6PTPIQLQL7JIF7WQDZ) more than 30 mins ago but I still don't see them in the balance (even pending) of my headless node.
In log.txt I spotted
My SQLite folder is only 190 MiB.
My convo with the node via RPC:
Should I wait for my node to completely sync? How large is the DB now? What is average time for a complete sync?
In log.txt I spotted
Code:
Mon Jun 26 2017 11:01:49 GMT+0000: RECEIVED ["justsaying",{"subject":"joint","body":{"unit":{"version":"1.0","alt":"1","messages":[{"app":"payment","payload_location":"inline","payload_hash":"A4PVgndQPexkgsd5EVxw9d9sahuG8AxyWhBqM5HcEx8=","payload":{"outputs":[{"address":"UNADMSFFDDS5TW6PTPIQLQL7JIF7WQDZ","amount":100000},{"address":"YOONISCTYV7T7U2PQO7W6MCUVVDEPXGQ","amount":417188}],"inputs":[{"unit":"A8Q7ia2TfNqvlweOKfGF9o2y1Q25WsOMol0BA6t+uXY=","message_index":0,"output_index":1}]}}],"authors":[{"address":"RDNBMAG2Y6NRI7P7VKNOLBM3WAW4MPY4","authentifiers":{"r":"vCib16wH2XIPUZHDXycUqVSruycXTHELOajbiWer1C072xB8CDXyQuc5P116l+T7EKDS8jqzA0O3lD/P1hi0Pw=="},"definition":["sig",{"pubkey":"AsQTkOjTgEee1IWS4GkYldciQ1Wdtf8E5i3IaJGzuav5"}]}],"parent_units":["I/9IuvrS91KIaOvfrVG3FgH2aADbzCqdrPxvuNxtXBU="],"last_ball":"ZtkB5sCM1++czUFI03JCQS36zg/CZzKGer7VY/btzO4=","last_ball_unit":"iDlEp7vD537kj3RsiYlPawfoRuB1vy+Ayf6eLCrwOfo=","witness_list_unit":"oj8yEksX9Ubq7lLc+p6F2uyHUuynugeVq4+ikT67X6E=","headers_commission":391,"payload_commission":197,"unit":"dFOPFD1+18FXmLwWWdX5bB7mdqfI7YnZX0DEHtVKmJ8=","timestamp":1498474908}}}] from wss://byteball.wang/bbMy SQLite folder is only 190 MiB.
My convo with the node via RPC:
Code:
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getinfo", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"last_mci":1720,"last_stable_mci":1704,"count_unhandled":138},"id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getnewaddress", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":"U6BJJRNVZ3PCWE4T6OKKJ2MMSKIK2WL3","id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getnewaddress", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":"2XZQTUHWEE65VL4I4VX6WUMJNUCBXQUE","id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getnewaddress", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":"UNADMSFFDDS5TW6PTPIQLQL7JIF7WQDZ","id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getbalance", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"base":{"stable":0,"pending":0}},"id":1}
// After the transaction was sent
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"listtransactions", "params":[] }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":[],"id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getbalance", "params":["UNADMSFFDDS5TW6PTPIQLQL7JIF7WQDZ"] }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"base":{"stable":0,"pending":0}},"id":1}
{"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id":1, "method":"getbalance", "params":{} }
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"base":{"stable":0,"pending":0}},"id":1}Should I wait for my node to completely sync? How large is the DB now? What is average time for a complete sync?
Check if your wallet fully synched (look at your wallet main chain index). If no expect the bytes to arrive when your wallet has finished synching process (may take days).
June 26, 2017, 10:35:33 AM
Do I have to wait for it to sync?
yes, you need to wait for it to sync
but you can check here:
https://explorer.byteball.org/#UNADMSFFDDS5TW6PTPIQLQL7JIF7WQDZ
you own this:
1,100,000 bytes
June 26, 2017, 10:27:42 AM
Byteball is one of the best crypto of 2017
I'm not a coder, but wallet front end is amazing
I'm not a coder, but wallet front end is amazing
That is a fair call actually. It is extremely simple but really user friendly...
Jump to: