Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 755.

D3m0nKinGx

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 507

The snake which cannot cast its skin has to die

Quote from: MultumInParvo on April 29, 2017, 08:42:54 PM

Quote from: D3m0nKinGx on April 29, 2017, 06:14:41 PM

Quote from: MultumInParvo on April 29, 2017, 06:11:38 PM

hi all,
is there someone of the dev team around? I have a problem with a wrong linked btc wallet within my byteball v1.8.2 linking process!?
I've followed the instruction must closely by sending .000082 btc to my byteball address over my btc address, but the byteball bot tells me some sort of other btc address linked to my byteball wallet.

What kind of btc wallet did you use? blockchain.info, multibit-hd, coinbase?

Ledger Nano S with the associated Ledger BTC Wallet, because of that I'm not able to sign the message of the correct btc address and pass it to the transition bot. I've told the bot the correct btc address, now he asked me to sign the byteball wallet with my btc wallet, but to my knowledge that is actually not possible with the ledger nano s?

Then that wallet must be sending btc whilst creating a newly generated address each time, which means you need to check your wallet for the address that byteball says it's linked with, and then just move your btc to that address on your nano

MultumInParvo

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: D3m0nKinGx on April 29, 2017, 06:14:41 PM

Quote from: MultumInParvo on April 29, 2017, 06:11:38 PM

hi all,
is there someone of the dev team around? I have a problem with a wrong linked btc wallet within my byteball v1.8.2 linking process!?
I've followed the instruction must closely by sending .000082 btc to my byteball address over my btc address, but the byteball bot tells me some sort of other btc address linked to my byteball wallet.

What kind of btc wallet did you use? blockchain.info, multibit-hd, coinbase?

Ledger Nano S with the associated Ledger BTC Wallet, because of that I'm not able to sign the message of the correct btc address and pass it to the transition bot. I've told the bot the correct btc address, now he asked me to sign the byteball wallet with my btc wallet, but to my knowledge that is actually not possible with the ledger nano s?

cryptohunter

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

Quote from: Viper1 on April 29, 2017, 05:24:18 PM

Greetings. Been looking into new coins and today I'm looking at DAG coins. I read the white paper which I found to be woefully inadequate for being a cryptocoin. No probability formulas. One page talking about double spend which only talked about one possible attack vector. And then I saw that it's centralized by requiring "reputable" witnesses, "captains of industry" they were called. So the only question I currently have is whether or not this coins cryptography and implemention has been peer reviewed by experts in the actual field.

Well anonymint did say it was one of the only designs he found of interest on this entire board so that seems hopeful.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: SatoNatomato on April 29, 2017, 05:58:26 PM

There has been lower amount of technical/design discussion last week due to high price and everyone clapping, its about time someone got to the technical/criticism parts again.

Great. Will it be you answering or someone more... skilled?

D3m0nKinGx

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 507

The snake which cannot cast its skin has to die

Quote from: MultumInParvo on April 29, 2017, 06:11:38 PM

hi all,
is there someone of the dev team around? I have a problem with a wrong linked btc wallet within my byteball v1.8.2 linking process!?
I've followed the instruction must closely by sending .000082 btc to my byteball address over my btc address, but the byteball bot tells me some sort of other btc address linked to my byteball wallet.

What kind of btc wallet did you use? blockchain.info, multibit-hd, coinbase?

MultumInParvo

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

hi all,
is there someone of the dev team around? I have a problem with a wrong linked btc wallet within my byteball v1.8.2 linking process!?
I've followed the instruction must closely by sending .000082 btc to my byteball address over my btc address, but the byteball bot tells me some sort of other btc address linked to my byteball wallet.

SatoNatomato

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Viper1 on April 29, 2017, 05:24:18 PM

Greetings. Been looking into new coins and today I'm looking at DAG coins. I read the white paper which I found to be woefully inadequate for being a cryptocoin. No probability formulas. One page talking about double spend which only talked about one possible attack vector. And then I saw that it's centralized by requiring "reputable" witnesses, "captains of industry" they were called. So the only question I currently have is whether or not this coins cryptography and implemention has been peer reviewed by experts in the actual field.

Greetings,

The implementation has been reviewed by interested developers, some bugs were found and closed, the discussion of cryptography/schemes happened on this forum before the launch. Correct, it is not trust-less, requires to trust 12 honest/well-behaved/incentivized/fee-collecting nodes/entities called witnesses on the network. There is no probabilities of confirmation times or similar, a transaction can be in two states, unconfirmed or confirmed.

There has been lower amount of technical/design discussion last week due to high price and everyone clapping, its about time someone got to the technical/criticism parts again.

Viper1

sr. member

Activity: 686

Merit: 320

Greetings. Been looking into new coins and today I'm looking at DAG coins. I read the white paper which I found to be woefully inadequate for being a cryptocoin. No probability formulas. One page talking about double spend which only talked about one possible attack vector. And then I saw that it's centralized by requiring "reputable" witnesses, "captains of industry" they were called. So the only question I currently have is whether or not this coins cryptography and implemention has been peer reviewed by experts in the actual field.

Fern

sr. member

Activity: 247

Merit: 250

Is BlackByte price listed somewhere?

naska21

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 635

Quote from: European Central Bank on April 29, 2017, 11:53:09 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

better to buy

why? btc linking costs you nothing.

Quote from: davidoski on April 29, 2017, 07:34:57 AM

Let's not forget that 1GB is a huge measure unit.

1 GB is 1/millionth part of (eventual) total coin supply
1 BTC is 1/16millionth part of (current) total coin supply

Therefore 1GB is like 16 bitcoins in terms of total coin supply share.

If byteball achieved parity with BTC with regard to market cap, 1GB would be worth 16 BTC.

... and you can buy one now for 0,16 BTC with a guaranteed 10% free airdrop on a monthly basis...

thanks for this. it makes things nice and clear. too many zeroes otherwise.

look. suupose I decided to invest 1 btc. In the case of linking u will get 0.065 GB for it. Let us assume u decided to buy 5Gb at 0.2 - the worse case. The same 1 btc investment but your bounty will be 0.5 GB > 0.065 GB

kola-schaar

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Jeff Jefferson

sr. member

Activity: 307

Merit: 252

Quote from: blackhawk101 on April 29, 2017, 12:49:22 PM

ME PLAN:
1. SELL ALL BYTE BALLZ FOR BITCOIN
2. PUT BITCOIN IN ELECTRON WALLET, LINK BB
3. WAIT FOR FULL MOOON
4. PARTY

Nice plan to minimize your roi. But it's OK to play it safe

blackhawk101

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

ME PLAN:
1. SELL ALL BYTE BALLZ FOR BITCOIN
2. PUT BITCOIN IN ELECTRON WALLET, LINK BB
3. WAIT FOR FULL MOOON
4. PARTY

Jeff Jefferson

sr. member

Activity: 307

Merit: 252

Just linking 1 btc gives you around 13 usd. For 1 btc you get 6.25 GB which means you get around 130 usd with the next drop

That's tenfold. So it's better to buy some bytes

Ano

sr. member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 253

I like the distribution model of this coin which is really unique like the code. I think price will continue to rise if polo will add this coin than it will be over $400.

European Central Bank

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1087

Quote from: ?? on ??

better to buy

why? btc linking costs you nothing.

Quote from: davidoski on April 29, 2017, 07:34:57 AM

Let's not forget that 1GB is a huge measure unit.

1 GB is 1/millionth part of (eventual) total coin supply
1 BTC is 1/16millionth part of (current) total coin supply

Therefore 1GB is like 16 bitcoins in terms of total coin supply share.

If byteball achieved parity with BTC with regard to market cap, 1GB would be worth 16 BTC.

... and you can buy one now for 0,16 BTC with a guaranteed 10% free airdrop on a monthly basis...

thanks for this. it makes things nice and clear. too many zeroes otherwise.

Arvydas77

hero member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 504

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: memii on April 29, 2017, 08:11:41 AM

Byteball getting more value but from my point of view this is just beginning soon we will be on poloniex because this technology is totally new and it deserve moon. Waiting for next distribution my coins are ready into my wallet hope this time will get more value.

Think what amount of GB Polo has and then think again if you really want them to add it to their exchange.

yutyuf8687696

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Thanks for the info,is it better to link a btc wallet or get some bytes (for the same value as btc) for the drop?

escapefrom3dom

sr. member

Activity: 1932

Merit: 288

Quote from: yutyuf8687696 on April 29, 2017, 08:35:01 AM

Q:Is 1btc the minimum you need for a full moon drop?

no, u may have not integer btc balance (even less than 1 btc).

GER_Nexus

jr. member

Activity: 80

Merit: 1

Quote from: yutyuf8687696 on April 29, 2017, 08:35:01 AM

Q:Is 1btc the minimum you need for a full moon drop?

No, I don't think so.
There isn't a minimum as far as I know.

Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 755. (Read 1234271 times)