Topic: [Official] Cryptsy Delisting Poll (Read 5463 times)

Thanks, Kelsey, that was a typo. 

That's the POINT of Cryptsy. No one would put up with how buggy it is if it wasn't the only place to trade shitcoins.

  A Trading Exchange such as Cryptsy evolving into a Selective Exchange at the request of a minority screams in the face of it's very business model to date.

 Of course it's entirely up to Cryptsy. And I for one have put my faith and trust in only them as my own Trading Exchange (so far) for the very business model they selected from the outset. But I wont be supporting Trading Exchanges that don't follow a Open & Fair Free Market Agenda. A REAL one. Not a controlled marketplace where winners are selected and chosen, others singled out for what amounts to termination without just cause, especially by a small minority, unless it happens to follow a well defined set of prudent Rules & Regulations.

 Rules, Regulations, Stipulations are all fine. Set them up. Have a guide to follow. Put them in writing. Cryptsy can make judgement calls if needed.

 But de-listing any currency unless truly required by Cryptsy's own Rules, Regulations, Stipulations is merely a self serving witch hunt no matter what the best of intentions may have been.

 No, I don't support the majority of crypto-currencies at Cryptsy. Not hardly. But I do only support Free Market Capitalism. Real Free Markets, and their Businesses.

 Some here don't seem to support anything but their own interests.

 Cryptsy asking all of us here what to list and de-list is also very likely not extremely wise. There are far too many self-serving interests here.

 Maybe merely asking what kind of rules, regulations and stipulations here would be far wiser.


 Please, consider working on PRUDENT regulations and rules. Not overburdening, or overbearing ones. List idea's here, or start a new tread. Make it so we can reasonably trim the fat, so to speak, ever so slowly. So that those that are stuck with dying currencies at least have a time limit to either get out of them, or hold them as they choose to.

 What does concern me, and hopefully a lot of others is having a  broad crypto-currency Exchange that allows us all to trade any and all viable crypto-currencies that each have any real market value. Higher demand, or lower demand doesn't matter. It's market value per unit is the key to look to for this. Below a preset threshold value it should maybe be up for being de-listed. but only after it fails to rise back up over that level after a certain amount of time has gone by. Say 30, 60, or 90 days. This is basically what the stock market exchanges do in case anyone is wondering.

 But if it's not worth Cryptsy's efforts to extend their business to the lowest demand types that would also be fine too. It's their business after all.  But seeing as how the costs of services are close to zero when on top of all their other offerings it seems wiser to choose to take whatever meager profits there are from those trades too, which would directly add to any net profits, over and above all other net profits. End result is pure gravy on top per say. Not much maybe, but all gravy.



Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware!

 Only Prudent Regulations are sensible. Not self serving ones.



Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware!

Fixing your typo

That's the POINT of Cryptsy. No one would put up with how buggy it is if it wasn't the only place to trade dump shitcoins.

This not a bad idea .

Dam I love it , but I like pyramids generally. 

Good post .

Amen and +1 to that statement.

Maybe use the BTC/LTC/XPM markets more, move coins from market X to market Y depending on Z factor/factors.
No point in having coins listed on 2 or 3 markets..
Remove some of the really dead ones and move in a bunch of new ones.

this threads looking like the hardcopy version of cryptsy chat 

very short sighted business model. best idea for longterm viability is not to make such a joke out of cryptos by listing every scam/joke coin that comes along.

Just goes to show you how many junk coins are out there nowadays, which only makes support work for the exchanges with little return.

If I was Cryptsy I would look at the last months volume of each coin, set a minimum BTC volume they should have achived, and suspend any that didn't make that minimum.

I figure a month is long enough to see if a coin is still alive.

You don't need a poll, you could auto script it.

oh by the way i would appreciate it if you could keep your unprofessional "business man" Trolling confined to Cryptsy chat..
I would expect better from a guy who runs around bragging to be a certified Mensa genius lol

This spots character is a lyer and a thief and a scammer and worst of a Troll and usually has nothing to contribute but snotty comments
AND THAT is why some of you out there are on my shit list.. you guys know better ..you watch him pull stunt after stunt yet still work with him ?
gimme a break.. suffer the consequences.

I sneeze at Cryptsy and they dive on me this guy pull stunts non stop and they play dumb about it all..

And yea i can and have proven my statements far too many times.. so much i have been banned for proving it many times
because they quote / unquote don't want to here it.. so take your pick guys ..you can't have it both ways.

Last thing this guy did was steal coins and offer them to BigVern basically..
I watched him offer to help r3wt get a super block to revive his coin NAN and when Spots got the block he said,
I got the block but it turned out to be an orphan and i don't know who got it..
About 24 hrs later i watched Spots in front of us all on Cryptsy chat offer the super block he was supposedly trying to get as a favor to r3wt to BigVern
and he said word for word that he got it and that he was holding it for only BigVern and that he does not trust r3wt with it and won't give it to anyone else..
And later i told r3wt and he made excuses for Spots ..wow some people like getting stabbed in the back lol

So yeah that is what i call theft and to go along wit this "business mans" Trolling lies and threats i would call that stealing etc
This "business man" has called me a fag in front of mods endlessly while they pretend they didn't see it and if i respond they ban me..
Even after i have posted such things as the 3/4 pm's this Mensa genius" has sent me swearing at me and thretening me with a lawsuits.
combined with threats that he was rich and knew who i was and could "come get me"..
So uhhh your gonna beat me up and sue me ?

Who is the crazy one ? hhhhhhhhhhmmmmmm ?

Spots you need to learn to shut your mouth

I can't help but point out that they do regulate and restrict the marketplace.. If they didn't they would add every coin...

And if they added every coin they would oversaturate the marketplace...

The question then, is by which criteria do they decide to list a coin, because if they do it arbitrarily, they would end up listing cryptocurrencies with little value as currencies, and having no commericial value, those currencies would fail and then be worthless, and require a delisting process.

Perhaps, instead of bringing out new "currencies", developers should take an existing currency with no development, such as royalcoin buy it up, mine it and develop it...
.

 Maybe going forward, starting from right here and now many of these idea's and suggestions posted would be wise for new arrivals.

 But what about those that are already listed, and have already been traded?

 Those traders that hold those crypto-currencies will be left in the cold, as will those currencies likely gravely hammered.

 Doesn't seem fitting, nor like smart business either.

 I joined and put my trust and faith in Cryptsy for exactly the very reason that their willing to list the widest selection of coins while doing their level best to comply with a regulations and rules in the land their in, the same land I am in. (the USA).

 Suddenly doing an about face with their existing business model would have me running for cover and not able to trust them very much anymore.

 Picking and choosing what to list is one thing, but de-listing should be left to the marketplace itself. In other words let their values fall to almost zero, at a predetermined price, much like stock exchanges have in place, before being de-listed, for ones that were fortunate enough to get listed in the first place.

 Sure we all know here that their are many 'crap-coins' and such. And going forward yes Crypsy may want to establish more firm rules for getting listed in the first place. Seems like a great idea, Going Forward. But not retro-actively for existing listings that likely should be merely Grandfathered in place and let the real Free Market deal with them as it cares to do so with set. to be determined minimum price levels before their able to be de-listed from future trading.
 


 Some suddenly are here asking our Exchange to in essence regulate and restrict the marketplace somewhat arbitrarily. Maybe they have great intentions but it's a very slippery slope!



Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware!
 

Well said, we have so many examples...

The crazy has come to bitcointalk

i can't argue with that.. the atraction for me here (altcoin scene) was being able to make some money.. i won't even try and deny that. lol
But lets be real here you can't say all coin devs and their goals are equal.. there is wolves among the sheep ..hiding ..always
and when it comes time to add or delist coins is not important which ones have worked with integrity and which have not ?
making money is not evil.. i have no problem with that.
But i don't deal with banks who have their tellers wearing gloves and sky masks to protect their identity (aka: coin devs who need to lurk around in secrecy)

anyway there is a couple guys that went to a lot of trouble to post the info here requested and i see no point in repeating it.. i agree 100% with the other guys earlier here
when they mentioned which coins by name should be removed and why.. the reasons seemed solid and i have my vote as YES me too i agree !
i also agree with BJ when he said that one coin was just recently added.. good point.. give it a chance (i have none of them and prob never will but i like fairness)

What to remove ? hmmm what i want removed and what *should be removed are two separate things ..a good point here to bring up is
once one of these coins has taken off it gets investors and its not fair to them to yank the plug which is why i get bothered when say TIX was added..
Now that its on there yeah i would love to see it removed but in reality its been invested in by legit people so i say no leave it on there..
Once a coin is added to an exchange is fair game for trading i think. Some of these coins have a bad history but that is not the whole issue.
Pretty sure NVC is a long bad story yet its popular and worth a lot..

What is needed is some GUIDELINES by Cryptsy intended for coins devs. A criteria of sorts for them to aim for..
NOT rules.. i did not say that !
Hell just create a topic here and make a list of thing you want from the devs and that should help a lot and its simple.

say for example.

Wanted / Requested Coin Features
---------------------------------
- Github page with source code for all wallets and miners etc.
- A publicly known Coin dev identity / persona / alias
- A minimum amount of time for the coin to exist.

you guys get the idea.. its all common sense.. and you know what ? so is this topic .....
your answer is the same thing i just posted for Coin's added guidleines.. if they don't meet those THEN REMOVE THEM .

or.... let's get creative making excuses as usual lol

黑平台，骗子平台！

It's almost the exact opposite, actually. Otherwise you would basically be calling every stock that went from a penny to a dollar a pyramid scheme, which they quite obviously are not

That's not what a pyramid scheme is at all. That is just what advertising does