Topic: [Official] Cryptsy Delisting Poll - page 2. (Read 5487 times)

if 99.99% of people are only here to make money doesn't that just make it a pyramid scheme ?

one day you will realise that money is not everything

I couldn't agree more.. But the question is, does Cryptsy want to make a profit over the long term or the short term ?

I've spent fiat to invest in crypto, as well as spent fiat on hardware and electricity for mining.

Fortunately, although I'm a lousy trader, I've been around long enough to have an idea of what I'm doing.

Not everybody does though, and some will invest in a coin just to have it delisted and become a bagholder.

If Cryptsy enters a cycle of listing and delisting coins and leaving bagholders then investor confidence in all crypto's will suffer. In fact it's already started to decline.

I'm also a little confused.. More coins may mean more trades, which means more commisions, but more coins means less market capitialisation per coin which should mean less value per commision.

In the end I think it comes down to does Cryptsy want to make profits over the short term, or possibly smaller profits for much much longer.. Given the inherrent deflationary aspect of most crypto's, a long term approach may be the most profitable.

But I'm not a business man, economistic or trader... My views may be over simplistic... 

people that only care about money are the reason the governments are the way they are 

if people are only doing it for the money there never going to help crypto on the long run all they will do is milk it until its dry

+1 just remove the least trading activities i believe

Low difficulty coins are crying for double-spend attack, so requiring some minimum hashrate is a good idea.

What I found in this forum is that long paragraphs are usually junks. This is because the people who wrote it:
- don't know how to make their points, or they simply have no points to make
- use long paragraph to confuse people
- use long paragraph to make them looks like they have a lot of arguments
- they have nothing else to do in life
- they are eager to promote/defend their shit coins or to bash good ones.

So I learned to read the long paragraphs in the opposite way:
- if it promote/defend a coin, that coin = shit coin.
- if it bashes a coin, that coin =  a great one.

Just to share my experiences

Good thing nobody cares about your opinion because your facts are way off lol go look at the cryptonerd and tickets thread time stamps for example. I didn't even bother to read all of this nonsense, so I'll only respond to the one point I actually saw before being overcome by boredom of the same lies and bullshit you've been spouting for the last 2 months

damn straight !

i should not have been under fire for ages because i wanted to know who made TIX for example.
i happen to know by name who was involved now after fighting for teh info blood bath style for ages.. banned many times on cryptsy for asking about it too pretty much.

that criteria Zack mentioned is common sense yet he had to post it because far too many coins were added that fall under it in the first place.
Uncheck the checkbox does not stop this scene from spiraling down the drain either so no i don't want to hear that
Why is it when i asked about TIX i was told by a few orange named guys more than once they know who the TIX dev is and there for it could be added to the exchange
yet the same orange colored names at cryptsy have kept giving me the same excuse for adding coins.. "USER DEMAND"
why is user demand not good enough to know who the hell started the coin and yet used as an excuse to get them listed ?
See the hypocrisy ?
There is a scammer tag rating here and one should be added for liers.. and that is reason enough to make it mandatory for the public to know the dev is /period
this is non optional as far as i'm concerned.. either i know clearly or i won't touch their crap. Hell i think it should be added on the exchange right beside the coin trade symbol etc


This whole releasing coins on BCTalk is not a rule routine is a blatant attempt at scammy behavior such as when TIX and CENT had this happen
both of these were flash mined by Cryptsy mods and friends and these coins were fast tracked to the exchange almost instantly in comparison to others waiting ages..
Cent on Shake's topic some random guy here made said it was a joke / experiment coin so why was it added at all ? And was is it ok to add a coin pre-released and flash mined on Cryptsy chat ? (Cent)
And same crap with TIX.. this was deliberately released elsewhere in advance i have Spots logged saying it was released exclusively 4 days previously in a chat log at cryptonerd
TIX was a collaboration between well known devs that release many coins under lots of names and cryptsy mods all doing their own part in the whole deal.. i have TONS of proof of this.
kinda of a funny coincidence how this new market was added while adding TIX at the same time while dozens of other coin devs wait months and give up waiting..

So uuuuuuhhhh we wouldn't have to de-list any if we used some intelligence adding them in the first place lol
but we ALL know that know don't we

I don't think that any coin is best I just know that those 3 coins out of the list of coins that were posted were not junk but I don't know about the others if you had read all of what I said it would have made more sence lol

You got a chat ban for going on and on how IFC, ADT and PYC were better than other coins and then at the same time telling us we should remove more coins I asked you to stop you just keep yammering on so you get a time out. Again people dont care about chat bans you would have gotten one 40x faster on other exchanges but after a while it gets old so you get a timeout.

today I managed to get my first cryptsy chat bans after asking bitjohn a load of questions about bribes for adding coins and about whey they don't clear up the exchange

Any coin that has some of these should never be on the exchange in the first place

instamine
premine that's not accounted for
inactive devs
devs releasing under anon name
coins with stupid names
coins by devs that already have multiple coins
coins with no community
blatant pump and dumps



 

If it happens, I will quit immediately.

this is the DE listing poll

How about Zeuscoin? random blocks and No Premine.

maybe it was a little light on reasons

I started a thread about delisting some time ago, it is still very relevant here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3206275

this list does not make sense to me at all. What are the facts making you to say "no use", "pure dumping" etc? These can be applied to all the alt coins, your favorites included.

don't suggest a list simply because you don't like them, better put the facts there so cryptsy can make a correct judgement based on facts, not based on the imaginations.

Isn't cryptsy the new coin market?