ALF - has no uses
AMC - has no active dev or mining support
GDC, GLX, GLC, STR - made purely for dumping
SBC - dev ran off after making promises
MST - just terrible in every way
1-2 month probation coins i would de list if support drops or nothing new is developed for them
BUK, CSC, KGC, PYC, NEC, ELP, CENT, NET, RED
coins with nostalgic value that should probably be removed
BQC, BTB, BTG, LKY, JKC
saying that cryptsy is still an exchange for coins that are just starting out, there are other places to be for more established coins and there's always that nice untick coin box
Topic: [Official] Cryptsy Delisting Poll - page 3. (Read 5468 times)
If that is the case, delist BTC. It was premined and instamined for the 2nd or 3rd time this past winter. 
I don't think it makes much sense talking about de-listing coins as it creates instability and people will just sell off every coin which looks like it might get de-listed
+100
Talk of delisting a coin has a very big destabilizing effect on the coin. Why delist any coin? Reasons given in the past are low hash rate so moving coins in and out is difficult. Okay set a hash rate level that is necessary to stay listed on the exchange.
Regarding dev activity, it is difficult to gage. Just because somebody doesn't log into this forum doesn't mean they are inactive. If a coin is running smoothly what else is needed. Some "services" are obvious scams so why even consider services as important?
We have a lot of blowhards in the cryptsy chat, maybe we should delist their coins!!! Then we won't have to listen to them. They pretend to be active devs but they really are just trying to promote their pump and dump of a copy and paste coin.
I think we should have a separate topic for "bringing down" coins from BTC to LTC/XPM market... very low-value coins (GDC@33, QRK@135 as mentioned above, as well as STR@127, BQC@805, EMD@660, GLC@331, SBC@311)
I disagree. Some of these coins have low volatility. Some people actually enjoy trading this coins at these prices. Please consider the following:
QRK has a marketcap of $41,000 USD.
ARG has a marketcap of $8,200 USD.
So what "low-value" are you speaking of? A low price doesn't mean low value. The only time a coin should be moved from the BTC market to the LTC market is when it trades really low, like when IFC was listed in BTC market and it traded at .00000001.
If you know how to trade these coins, you can make serious gains. in the last 24 hours BCQ has moved from a low of 722 to a high of 926. GDC can support block trades and I don't have to move the price over 500% just to buy 1 BTC worth of GDC.
Anything with a premine or inactive dev team should get the boot
Anything that's obviously just a scamcoin.
Problem is if we do that Cryptsy will be a very quiet place indeed.
we shouldn't move coins like GDC to the LTC market. liquidity is thick and price doesn't move much. this is a good thing. Not everyone wants to trade coins with low liquidity and huge spreads.
leave GDC where it is.
leave GDC where it is.
for the most part this is all great feedback keep it coming
TIX-for scam only.
Why did you touch the code then?
TIX-for scam only.
Sure, let's just delist all the coins that actually have services, active development, hashrate and no premine I vote for CSC (low volume and hash), JKC (same, also the coin literally has no purpose), PYC (developer went silent after making lots of promises and not fulfilling them), PXC (Nowadays pretty much established as a thought-out scam alongside phenixex), ELP (no purpose, low hash), STR (low hash, no purpose and low volume), NBL (no purpose, near non-existant volume), EZC (near non-existant volume)
I also vote on GDC being moved to LTC market. GME is pretty much the same in amount of coins produced, and it's only on the LTC market.
ELC - interesting concept but it's pretty much dead in the water.
TIX-for scam only.
CL, cause noone likes Russian premines or Russians in general
Hold your horses. I have 2 CL I need to sell. Now I have to find my wallet.
Just delete all those which keep on dropping and show minimal trades. I don't care useless coins being there, except the exchange remains sluggish all the time and most of these useless coins are just eating resources.
I don't think it makes much sense talking about de-listing coins as it creates instability and people will just sell off every coin which looks like it might get de-listed
The better option would be to have a league system so in the top class you would have the most respected coins like BTC, LTC, NMC, then in the next league down would be like DGC, MEG, CGB and so on to the very bottom league where you would have the most shitty coins.
when a coin is not doing to well it would get relegated to a lower league and others promoted when doing well. you could have higher buy/sell fee's for the lowers leagues as their would be less interest.
It could be quite a big thing when a coin is promoted, and every new coin should maybe start in the bottom league. also every coin should have a Star rating which people could vote on, would give a good idea of which are the most popular and safe investments.
The better option would be to have a league system so in the top class you would have the most respected coins like BTC, LTC, NMC, then in the next league down would be like DGC, MEG, CGB and so on to the very bottom league where you would have the most shitty coins.
when a coin is not doing to well it would get relegated to a lower league and others promoted when doing well. you could have higher buy/sell fee's for the lowers leagues as their would be less interest.
It could be quite a big thing when a coin is promoted, and every new coin should maybe start in the bottom league. also every coin should have a Star rating which people could vote on, would give a good idea of which are the most popular and safe investments.
I think we should have a separate topic for "bringing down" coins from BTC to LTC/XPM market... very low-value coins (GDC@33, QRK@135 as mentioned above, as well as STR@127, BQC@805, EMD@660, GLC@331, SBC@311)
I think QRK should be moved to LTC, since its price has dropped fairly significantly from the initial price, and there is an awful lot of them out there.
Matthew:out
Matthew:out
saw this thread and wondered where to start?
Glad its not turned into a delist coins you troll/dislike thread, but yeah coins with no support from a dev team are just a waste of space.
Math's well thought out post just above is a good start.
Glad its not turned into a delist coins you troll/dislike thread, but yeah coins with no support from a dev team are just a waste of space.
Math's well thought out post just above is a good start.
Casino coin has nothing new, and it was listed by cryptsy shortly after it is launched, it is a typical pump and dump. Now the dump is done, it is dead, I don't see any need that it is continuously be listed there.
We should put a rule that a new coin can be listed only after a week it is launched. If not enough people mine it, then there will be no trades, only dumps from devs and their friends.
We should put a rule that a new coin can be listed only after a week it is launched. If not enough people mine it, then there will be no trades, only dumps from devs and their friends.
ELC, AMC, NBL all have low hashrate sub 5mhs and no or little dev support.
Jump to: