Author

Topic: [OFFICIAL]Bitfinex.com first Bitcoin P2P lending platform for leverage trading - page 204. (Read 723866 times)

member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
Quote

Right. OK. So set a limit buy (not OCO) for 22BTC at $400.  And a separate stop at $475 for 10.
Edit: but I don't think you'll have enough margin available to set a 22 BTC buy, even at 2.5x. Maybe enough for 20BTC after profit, but that'd be close to being maxed out on margin, which I wouldn't recommend.  Maybe just do a 15 BTC buy.
$3000x2.5=$8000.
$8000+10*$55=$8555
$8555/$400=21.3875BTC.  That's why you can't do a 22btc buy, plus there's fees and swap. Can't do 22btc buy starting with $3000.

I understand the 3000x 2.5 is the max I can margin, but what is the + 10*$55?
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10

Quote
I'm no expert, so maybe someone can correct me.
I believe you need to open your 10btc short first (that's a margin sell 10btc).  Then create an OCO buy order (clicking tick box on OCO opens up the options) for 10btc, with a stop at $475, and a limit of $400.  (All these options will be on the left hand side, BUY side of the window). I don't think you can include the extra 2BTC you wanted in that specific order, but you can add a separate limit buy at $400 for 2 BTC (Untick the OCO). When the take profit hits, it should then queue up, and have enough profit for, buying those extra 2 at $400.

Thanks Trilogy,

However With the limit @ 400 for 10 BTC, that just cancels out my original short of 10 BTC right? I would need to buy 12 BTC @ 400 and not 2 is that correct?

I think ive tried doing something like this in the past but it said not enough funds or something of that sort so I wanna make sure whats the proper way to do it

Thx
Right. OK. So set a limit buy (not OCO) for 22BTC at $400.  And a separate stop at $475 for 10.
Edit: but I don't think you'll have enough margin available to set a 22 BTC buy, even at 2.5x. Maybe enough for 20BTC after profit, but that'd be close to being maxed out on margin, which I wouldn't recommend.  Maybe just do a 15 BTC buy.

hmmm yea thats the problem im facing. It's saying I dont have enough funds if I want to do a 22 BTC order, but it can't recognize that 10 of the 22 BTC are used to close out the short position?

I tried setting in a buy limit order for 10 BTC first to take profit from the short and then another 12 BTC buy limit but says not enough funds as well
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
ASICMINER shares: Havelockinvestments.com

Quote
I'm no expert, so maybe someone can correct me.
I believe you need to open your 10btc short first (that's a margin sell 10btc).  Then create an OCO buy order (clicking tick box on OCO opens up the options) for 10btc, with a stop at $475, and a limit of $400.  (All these options will be on the left hand side, BUY side of the window). I don't think you can include the extra 2BTC you wanted in that specific order, but you can add a separate limit buy at $400 for 2 BTC (Untick the OCO). When the take profit hits, it should then queue up, and have enough profit for, buying those extra 2 at $400.

Thanks Trilogy,

However With the limit @ 400 for 10 BTC, that just cancels out my original short of 10 BTC right? I would need to buy 12 BTC @ 400 and not 2 is that correct?

I think ive tried doing something like this in the past but it said not enough funds or something of that sort so I wanna make sure whats the proper way to do it

Thx
Right. OK. So set a limit buy (not OCO) for 22BTC at $400.  And a separate stop at $475 for 10.
Edit: but I don't think you'll have enough margin available to set a 22 BTC buy, even at 2.5x. Maybe enough for 20BTC after profit, but that'd be close to being maxed out on margin, which I wouldn't recommend.  Maybe just do a 15 BTC buy.
$3000x2.5=$8000.
$8000+10*$55=$8555
$8555/$400=21.3875BTC.  That's why you can't do a 22btc buy, plus there's fees and swap. Can't do 22btc buy starting with $3000.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10

Quote
I'm no expert, so maybe someone can correct me.
I believe you need to open your 10btc short first (that's a margin sell 10btc).  Then create an OCO buy order (clicking tick box on OCO opens up the options) for 10btc, with a stop at $475, and a limit of $400.  (All these options will be on the left hand side, BUY side of the window). I don't think you can include the extra 2BTC you wanted in that specific order, but you can add a separate limit buy at $400 for 2 BTC (Untick the OCO). When the take profit hits, it should then queue up, and have enough profit for, buying those extra 2 at $400.

Thanks Trilogy,

However With the limit @ 400 for 10 BTC, that just cancels out my original short of 10 BTC right? I would need to buy 12 BTC @ 400 and not 2 is that correct?

I think ive tried doing something like this in the past but it said not enough funds or something of that sort so I wanna make sure whats the proper way to do it

Thx
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
ASICMINER shares: Havelockinvestments.com
hey guys...was wondering if anyone could help me out here:

let's say I have $3000 USD in my account and I want to trade on margin

If I want to open up a short position lets say 10 BTC @ 455

But I want to set a stop loss at 475, but I also want to take profit at 400. And then I also want to use these proceeds to open a long position of 12 BTC @ 400.


What is the proper trade I need to input?

1. Margin sell 10 BTC @ 455
2. Stop buy 10 BTC @ 475?
3. Limit buy 10 BTC @ 400?

And then what about creating a long position of 12 BTC @ 400 after taking profit at 400?

Thanks
I'm no expert, so maybe someone can correct me.
Edited:
I believe you need to open your 10btc short first (that's a margin sell 10btc).  Create a 22 BTC limit Buy at $400, and separate Stop buy at $475 for 10 BTC.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
hey guys...was wondering if anyone could help me out here:

let's say I have $3000 USD in my account and I want to trade on margin

If I want to open up a short position lets say 10 BTC @ 455

But I want to set a stop loss at 475, but I also want to take profit at 400. And then I also want to use these proceeds to open a long position of 12 BTC @ 400.


What is the proper trade I need to input?

1. Margin sell 10 BTC @ 455
2. Stop buy 10 BTC @ 475?
3. Limit buy 10 BTC @ 400?

And then what about creating a long position of 12 BTC @ 400 after taking profit at 400?

Thanks
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Feature Request,

I'm wondering if the Bitfinex team would ever consider an "unclaim" function? What I mean by this is being flat and then "unclaiming" say 100 litecoins... The margin wallet would create a -100 litecoin position and simultaneously add 100 litecoins to the wallet... The scenario I'm thinking about here is if I want to move those 100 litecoins to another exchange but not be subject to any volatility while in transit... This can be done manually off course but requires two separate transactions now and thanks to the damm bots your gonna incure significant slippage... This would be my number one feature request, is such a thing in the pipeline???
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
Hey fellow traders,

I've already mentioned this in the Wall observer thread about a week ago but obviously that's not quite the place for some sort of advertising.

Today I improved my Bitcoinsounds-tool even more so I thought I might as well share it in the official BFX-thread as it's using their data exclusively:

http://bitcoinsounds.0x3d.lu/

It makes a customizable sound whenever one of 3 conditions is given:
- When price changes by an absolute value of n dollars
- When volume during the past n seconds passes a threshold of m BTC
- When the number of executed trades during the past n seconds passes a threshold of m trades

I'm going to add some more (less annoying Wink) sounds this evening or during the next days so stay tuned.

If you have any other suggestions feel free to contact me using the email at the bottom of the page.

Added new sounds, a history function and some more minor tweaks...
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
Lets have a bEEr and just go with the flow, what else? Smiley

I'm all in for that! Smiley

Ente
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
Lets have a bEEr and just go with the flow, what else? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
What lenders must realize, is that swap rates are 100% controllable by them. If coordinated just a bit, the rates can be held at no less than a agreed upon minimum. The reasoning, especially for a big hand is that "I'd better get less than usual, than nothing at all", which obviously backfires. Moreover, when one posts a lot lower rates than wanted, he/she typically sets shortest duration possible (2 days) in hopes for rates to improve, so that new offer can be made 2 days later. This, backfires even more, because without major market movements and all existing swaps expiring every 2 days, the rate decrease is amplified even faster.

So, if Bitfinex team does not feel that "capping" the lower end of lending (and perhaps cancelling the FRR for better rates discovery) is a viable option for the system, the only solution I could think of and AM suggesting, is for those concerned to get together and communicate the strategies to each other in some sort of a "club". If anyone knows about the existence of such group, please let me know. If not, feel free to PM me and we can think of something together.

Another, very easy to implement right now suggestion, in attempt to recover the rates, especially to those who already stated (just above) that you do not wish to lend at the current rates, let's see if we can indeed communicate a bit. As the first step, I suggest you to set your offer to 0.09% (even) not less. I personally agree with your reasoning, I am NOT lending at 0.05 and I did set my offer to 0.09% even, please go see and join. I also have other swaps expiring in about a day and set my autolending to 0.09% as well.

That's funny! :-)
How about "no, the liquidity takers controll 100% of the rates!1!!"
I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?

I'll gladly pay higher rates than now, when we leave the bear market. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to go through five months of bear valley with any "reasonable" rates? In no way would I take anything even close to 0.9%. Wake me up when we crossed the ATH, then we talk.

In other news, I lend out a smaller position since January too.

Ente
Sorry, can we make at least a little sense here? I have no idea where are you coming from with your reasoning.

Once again, "liquidity takers" can ONLY take what lenders are offering, absolutely not the other way around. Market conditions do obviously have an effect on rates, but purely technically, it is only the lenders who determine the rates, 100%. For instance, if hypothetically lenders do somehow manage to agree on the lowest rates they wish to offer all together, then THIS will be the rate, which "takers" WILL have to use (or pass of course).

"...I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?...."  <-- I do not see how is this even relevant. The "two groups meet" all over the place, FRR is just an average of that process over time. I personally "met" several traders at 0.1085 a few days ago, we are still doing business right now and this value is NOT where the FRR has been for a while now.

I do have a perfect, first hand and quite extensive idea about how expensive the loans can be. No one is forcing you to play the "sideways" market, I don't and that is why I am currently lending. No one will be "waking you up", you'll need to set you own alarm that would float your own boat.
P.S. Did you mean to say 0.09% or you did say 0.9%? If 0.9% I agree, a lot of traders, would most likely prompt for lending.


Well, I guess we are talking the same here. Yes, lenders set the rates, and takers accept or refuse. And then lenders either lower, or don't.
For every time you probably think "hey, let's form a lenders union", I slam my head on the desktop shouting "why did he put up a borrowing offer at 50% higher than the highest one? Why not just 0.001% higher?!?".

Don't worry, I don't need a wake up call. I'm still taking liquidity, and using this sideways action to lower my swap average. Instead of closing altogether. Which is, I guess, in the best interest for all three of us.

Oh, yes, I did write 0.9%, where you wrote 0.09%. I liked the old "yearly rate display" better :-)

Let's have a vote altogether: Who wants bear, who wants sideways, who wants bubble? ;-)
Ah, screw that, we'll get there soon enough anyways.

Ente
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
What lenders must realize, is that swap rates are 100% controllable by them. If coordinated just a bit, the rates can be held at no less than a agreed upon minimum. The reasoning, especially for a big hand is that "I'd better get less than usual, than nothing at all", which obviously backfires. Moreover, when one posts a lot lower rates than wanted, he/she typically sets shortest duration possible (2 days) in hopes for rates to improve, so that new offer can be made 2 days later. This, backfires even more, because without major market movements and all existing swaps expiring every 2 days, the rate decrease is amplified even faster.

So, if Bitfinex team does not feel that "capping" the lower end of lending (and perhaps cancelling the FRR for better rates discovery) is a viable option for the system, the only solution I could think of and AM suggesting, is for those concerned to get together and communicate the strategies to each other in some sort of a "club". If anyone knows about the existence of such group, please let me know. If not, feel free to PM me and we can think of something together.

Another, very easy to implement right now suggestion, in attempt to recover the rates, especially to those who already stated (just above) that you do not wish to lend at the current rates, let's see if we can indeed communicate a bit. As the first step, I suggest you to set your offer to 0.09% (even) not less. I personally agree with your reasoning, I am NOT lending at 0.05 and I did set my offer to 0.09% even, please go see and join. I also have other swaps expiring in about a day and set my autolending to 0.09% as well.

That's funny! :-)
How about "no, the liquidity takers controll 100% of the rates!1!!"
I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?

I'll gladly pay higher rates than now, when we leave the bear market. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to go through five months of bear valley with any "reasonable" rates? In no way would I take anything even close to 0.9%. Wake me up when we crossed the ATH, then we talk.

In other news, I lend out a smaller position since January too.

Ente
Sorry, can we make at least a little sense here? I have no idea where are you coming from with your reasoning.

Once again, "liquidity takers" can ONLY take what lenders are offering, absolutely not the other way around. Market conditions do obviously have an effect on rates, but purely technically, it is only the lenders who determine the rates, 100%. For instance, if hypothetically lenders do somehow manage to agree on the lowest rates they wish to offer all together, then THIS will be the rate, which "takers" WILL have to use (or pass of course).

"...I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?...."  <-- I do not see how is this even relevant. The "two groups meet" all over the place, FRR is just an average of that process over time. I personally "met" several traders at 0.1085 a few days ago, we are still doing business right now and this value is NOT where the FRR has been for a while now.

I do have a perfect, first hand and quite extensive idea about how expensive the loans can be. No one is forcing you to play the "sideways" market, I don't and that is why I am currently lending. No one will be "waking you up", you'll need to set you own alarm that would float your own boat.
P.S. Did you mean to say 0.09% or you did say 0.9%? If 0.9% I agree, a lot of traders, would most likely prompt for lending.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
Hey fellow traders,

I've already mentioned this in the Wall observer thread about a week ago but obviously that's not quite the place for some sort of advertising.

Today I improved my Bitcoinsounds-tool even more so I thought I might as well share it in the official BFX-thread as it's using their data exclusively:

http://bitcoinsounds.0x3d.lu/

It makes a customizable sound whenever one of 3 conditions is given:
- When price changes by an absolute value of n dollars
- When volume during the past n seconds passes a threshold of m BTC
- When the number of executed trades during the past n seconds passes a threshold of m trades

I'm going to add some more (less annoying Wink) sounds this evening or during the next days so stay tuned.

If you have any other suggestions feel free to contact me using the email at the bottom of the page.

legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
Maybe you borrowed some BTC while clicking around?

Nope pretty much 100% sure thats not the case all I did yesterday was lend out the BTC.

Strange, then..
Post a log?

Ente
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Maybe you borrowed some BTC while clicking around?

Nope pretty much 100% sure thats not the case all I did yesterday was lend out the BTC.

EDIT: Situation resolved by Ente through PM. Thanks again for that.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
Maybe you borrowed some BTC while clicking around?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
I havent leant out BTC or USD before but I thought I'd try it out and see how it worked.

So I loaned out a few BTC yesterday afternoon and logged in this morning to see what sort of payment it would accrue.

When looking at the history I see the swap payment on wallet deposit but then above that there is a swap charge on wallet trading. This is more than the swap payment on wallet deposit.

Im not using any swaps myself and have no open positions. Maybe im missing something, whats going on ?
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 500
Life is short, practice empathy in your life
That's funny! :-)
How about "no, the liquidity takers controll 100% of the rates!1!!"
I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?

I'll gladly pay higher rates than now, when we leave the bear market. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to go through five months of bear valley with any "reasonable" rates? In no way would I take anything even close to 0.9%. Wake me up when we crossed the ATH, then we talk.

In other news, I lend out a smaller position since January too.

Ente

While there is a bear market, the volatility has been high and if margin longs get in at the lower end of the ranges they still make a lot of money. Also, bear markets are actually riskier for USD lenders. So, it does not justify these cheap rates.

As others have suggested, the biggest culprit seems to be the illusion of insurance and more people using auto lend, which is not a sustainable business practice and may backfire at BFX one day.
legendary
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
What lenders must realize, is that swap rates are 100% controllable by them. If coordinated just a bit, the rates can be held at no less than a agreed upon minimum. The reasoning, especially for a big hand is that "I'd better get less than usual, than nothing at all", which obviously backfires. Moreover, when one posts a lot lower rates than wanted, he/she typically sets shortest duration possible (2 days) in hopes for rates to improve, so that new offer can be made 2 days later. This, backfires even more, because without major market movements and all existing swaps expiring every 2 days, the rate decrease is amplified even faster.

So, if Bitfinex team does not feel that "capping" the lower end of lending (and perhaps cancelling the FRR for better rates discovery) is a viable option for the system, the only solution I could think of and AM suggesting, is for those concerned to get together and communicate the strategies to each other in some sort of a "club". If anyone knows about the existence of such group, please let me know. If not, feel free to PM me and we can think of something together.

Another, very easy to implement right now suggestion, in attempt to recover the rates, especially to those who already stated (just above) that you do not wish to lend at the current rates, let's see if we can indeed communicate a bit. As the first step, I suggest you to set your offer to 0.09% (even) not less. I personally agree with your reasoning, I am NOT lending at 0.05 and I did set my offer to 0.09% even, please go see and join. I also have other swaps expiring in about a day and set my autolending to 0.09% as well.

That's funny! :-)
How about "no, the liquidity takers controll 100% of the rates!1!!"
I don't have to state that the rates and FRR are set where those two groups meet, do I?

I'll gladly pay higher rates than now, when we leave the bear market. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to go through five months of bear valley with any "reasonable" rates? In no way would I take anything even close to 0.9%. Wake me up when we crossed the ATH, then we talk.

In other news, I lend out a smaller position since January too.

Ente
hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 501
What lenders must realize, is that swap rates are 100% controllable by them. If coordinated just a bit, the rates can be held at no less than a agreed upon minimum. The reasoning, especially for a big hand is that "I'd better get less than usual, than nothing at all", which obviously backfires. Moreover, when one posts a lot lower rates than wanted, he/she typically sets shortest duration possible (2 days) in hopes for rates to improve, so that new offer can be made 2 days later. This, backfires even more, because without major market movements and all existing swaps expiring every 2 days, the rate decrease is amplified even faster.

So, if Bitfinex team does not feel that "capping" the lower end of lending (and perhaps cancelling the FRR for better rates discovery) is a viable option for the system, the only solution I could think of and AM suggesting, is for those concerned to get together and communicate the strategies to each other in some sort of a "club". If anyone knows about the existence of such group, please let me know. If not, feel free to PM me and we can think of something together.

Another, very easy to implement right now suggestion, in attempt to recover the rates, especially to those who already stated (just above) that you do not wish to lend at the current rates, let's see if we can indeed communicate a bit. As the first step, I suggest you to set your offer to 0.09% (even) not less. I personally agree with your reasoning, I am NOT lending at 0.05 and I did set my offer to 0.09% even, please go see and join. I also have other swaps expiring in about a day and set my autolending to 0.09% as well.
I also am not lending out these days.  I don't really feel like lending out below 0.1.
As for bitfinex's financial holdings, is it stated somewhere that they will use some of their cash to cover lenders losses accrued via leveraged trade losses in a catastrophic price drop?  I'd bet they aren't going to cover a penny of anyone's loses.  
Can someone from Bitfinex clarify this point?  How much if any losses and in what sort of event will you cover any of the lenders losses?
Peace
Jump to: