Pages:
Author

Topic: [OFFICIAL]Bitfinex.com first Bitcoin P2P lending platform for leverage trading - page 43. (Read 723903 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1196
STOP SNITCHIN'
Hello, I need help.
I created the withdrawal request and it maybe complete. but, the tx is not found. I think something is wrong.
So, I created ticket 2days ago. But, i don't any response. The ticket # is #472576. please send any response to me.

They usually provide a TX ID in your withdrawal history. Did they? If not, what does your history say? If you have a TX ID, and feel comfortable posting it, please post it here.

If the withdrawal really is stuck: Make a post on Reddit at r/bitcoinmarkets. Cross-post it to r/bitcoin. Tag one of their reps in the post: https://www.reddit.com/user/bfx_brandon

I would also link to the post in a tweet sent to @bitfinex on Twitter, with hashtags #bitfinex and #bitcoin. The exchanges tend to be more responsive when complaints start being circulated on social media. Sad but true.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hello, I need help.
I created the withdrawal request and it maybe complete. but, the tx is not found. I think something is wrong.
So, I created ticket 2days ago. But, i don't any response. The ticket # is #472576. please send any response to me.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Hi, Bitfinex announced on July 27 that all BTC wallet balances will receive BCH and that margin positions will be ignored. This opened an arbitrage opportunity. I positioned myself in order to take advantage of this opportunity, which cost me time, fees, interests and risk exposure. Bitfinex was aware of this situation (they saw the BTC interest rise to 0.75% / day and they saw the BTC shorts swelling) and happily collected the resulting trading fees and their share of the interest. Yet, after the fork, they changed the rules and didn't credit any BCH to those who opened these shorts.
Therefore, I intend to sue Bitfinex. If anybody is in the same position or if anybody can recommend a competent lawyer, please drop me a PM.
The TOS literally say that bitfinex has the right to force-liquidate open positions any time they wish.
HPt
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 15
Hi, Bitfinex announced on July 27 that all BTC wallet balances will receive BCH and that margin positions will be ignored. This opened an arbitrage opportunity. I positioned myself in order to take advantage of this opportunity, which cost me time, fees, interests and risk exposure. Bitfinex was aware of this situation (they saw the BTC interest rise to 0.75% / day and they saw the BTC shorts swelling) and happily collected the resulting trading fees and their share of the interest. Yet, after the fork, they changed the rules and didn't credit any BCH to those who opened these shorts.
Therefore, I intend to sue Bitfinex. If anybody is in the same position or if anybody can recommend a competent lawyer, please drop me a PM.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
It's already fixed as I mentioned before, but let me explain again what happened.

(numbers are approximated)
the matching engine receives a 30 day market bid of 10k. (there might be a chance this bug occured for x-day bids (x!=30) where 30 day offers are taken)
The loan offer book, filtered by period=30daysormore looks like:
14k$ @ 0.14%
>100k$ @ different percentages  between 0.141 and 0.5%
20k$ @ 0.5%

Normally the engine will match 10k$ at 0.14%. But the public lending history log showed 10k$ @0.5%.
My 30 day loan offer @0.2xx% was still sitting there!
So I cancelled this offer, offered at @0.5 and it got matched within no time.
Some time shortly after, I saw matches @0.75 and got some matches myself with some money that was released from other loans.
During all of this time, there existed 30 day offers at way lower rates. (e.g the 14k offer was still sitting there according to the bfx book and bfxdata.com book (which uses the public api).
I got a nice 7x interest compared to yesterday Smiley

I never saw nor used this bug myself

But it is clear from your description that you obviously weren't the only one who had noticed or in fact been using this flaw. Heck, I guess all these dudes will be very angry at you now when you have reported it to the support team (provided the bug is really fixed, of course). The only thing which I can't understand is why anyone would take loans at so high an interest (like 0.75 per day) when they could easily borrow at much better (i.e. lower) rates?

I see that bug happened in the rate-run-up the past couple of days.  The matching engine is just odd - instead of the bug favoring the lenders as described, you more often then not see rates like 0.01% matched even when there's better rates sitting on the bid side for the same period.  I had been extremely critical of the FRR for ages but that just never go away

Well, yesterday I watched the whole process for some time

I must admit that I couldn't make out how it actually works. This doesn't mean that there is a bug in it or anything, but the whole process is certainly not straightforward. Maybe, there are a few things going on behind the scenes (so to speak) which we don't see and thus can't grasp the whole idea. They seem to have some Funding API functions (I just checked), and I am going to make use of it soon since I'm trading at Bitfinex using their API anyway, and it makes sense to use it for funding too (and it may be worth looking into)
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
It's already fixed as I mentioned before, but let me explain again what happened.

(numbers are approximated)
the matching engine receives a 30 day market bid of 10k. (there might be a chance this bug occured for x-day bids (x!=30) where 30 day offers are taken)
The loan offer book, filtered by period=30daysormore looks like:
14k$ @ 0.14%
>100k$ @ different percentages  between 0.141 and 0.5%
20k$ @ 0.5%

Normally the engine will match 10k$ at 0.14%. But the public lending history log showed 10k$ @0.5%.
My 30 day loan offer @0.2xx% was still sitting there!
So I cancelled this offer, offered at @0.5 and it got matched within no time.
Some time shortly after, I saw matches @0.75 and got some matches myself with some money that was released from other loans.
During all of this time, there existed 30 day offers at way lower rates. (e.g the 14k offer was still sitting there according to the bfx book and bfxdata.com book (which uses the public api).
I got a nice 7x interest compared to yesterday Smiley

I never saw nor used this bug myself

But it is clear from your description that you obviously weren't the only one who had noticed or in fact been using this flaw. Heck, I guess all these dudes will be very angry at you now when you have reported it to the support team (provided the bug is really fixed, of course). The only thing which I can't understand is why anyone would take loans at so high an interest (like 0.75 per day) when they could easily borrow at much better (i.e. lower) rates?

I see that bug happened in the rate-run-up the past couple of days.  The matching engine is just odd - instead of the bug favoring the lenders as described, you more often then not see rates like 0.01% matched even when there's better rates sitting on the bid side for the same period.  I had been extremely critical of the FRR for ages but that just never go away.

legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
It's already fixed as I mentioned before, but let me explain again what happened.

(numbers are approximated)
the matching engine receives a 30 day market bid of 10k. (there might be a chance this bug occured for x-day bids (x!=30) where 30 day offers are taken)
The loan offer book, filtered by period=30daysormore looks like:
14k$ @ 0.14%
>100k$ @ different percentages  between 0.141 and 0.5%
20k$ @ 0.5%

Normally the engine will match 10k$ at 0.14%. But the public lending history log showed 10k$ @0.5%.
My 30 day loan offer @0.2xx% was still sitting there!
So I cancelled this offer, offered at @0.5 and it got matched within no time.
Some time shortly after, I saw matches @0.75 and got some matches myself with some money that was released from other loans.
During all of this time, there existed 30 day offers at way lower rates. (e.g the 14k offer was still sitting there according to the bfx book and bfxdata.com book (which uses the public api).
I got a nice 7x interest compared to yesterday Smiley

I never saw nor used this bug myself

But it is clear from your description that you obviously weren't the only one who had noticed or in fact been using this flaw. Heck, I guess all these dudes will be very angry at you now when you have reported it to the support team (provided the bug is really fixed, of course). The only thing which I can't understand is why anyone would take loans at so high an interest (like 0.75 per day) when they could easily borrow at much better (i.e. lower) rates?
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
It's already fixed as I mentioned before, but let me explain again what happened.

(numbers are approximated)
the matching engine receives a 30 day market bid of 10k. (there might be a chance this bug occured for x-day bids (x!=30) where 30 day offers are taken)
The loan offer book, filtered by period=30daysormore looks like:
14k$ @ 0.14%
>100k$ @ different percentages  between 0.141 and 0.5%
20k$ @ 0.5%

Normally the engine will match 10k$ at 0.14%. But the public lending history log showed 10k$ @0.5%.
My 30 day loan offer @0.2xx% was still sitting there!
So I cancelled this offer, offered at @0.5 and it got matched within no time.
Some time shortly after, I saw matches @0.75 and got some matches myself with some money that was released from other loans.
During all of this time, there existed 30 day offers at way lower rates. (e.g the 14k offer was still sitting there according to the bfx book and bfxdata.com book (which uses the public api).
I got a nice 7x interest compared to yesterday Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
While in Your Funding History there will be correct entries? On the other hand, if you offered your dollars at a lower interest and there are bids which are higher than that (i.e. people want to pay more than you ask), why would you get higher rate and not those people lower interest (i.e. your rate). This is a tricky question, and it might not work in the same way as regular trading orderbooks work. It might be a bug or an intended feature

A lending bid or offer first tries to execute against existing bids/offers in the order book and any portion that is unable to get filled will be placed in the orderbook. I don't think this is a particularly controversial procedure, and am unaware of any kind of market place that does not execute orders this way

This is how it should work

But as the guy above says this is (was) not the case. As I got it from his post, he complains that offers are executed, first, out of the queue order, and, second, not at the interest rate as they should. Indeed, this shouldn't be controversial but I had seen a similar bug or behavior at Cryptsy (with regular orderbooks, obviously) when only some part of my order got filled, and then another order placed later at the same price got executed, and it was controversial, to say the least of it
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
I've been lending out for years, I'd have to have been hallucinating to be this wrong.
Sometimes auto-renew loans are being ignored, according to some people I spoke to; this might be related.

Support responded that a fix was put in place.
My educated guess would be that the loan matching engine has a bug which causes it to enter a faulty state, and they solved it either by restarting or effectively fixing the bug.
My bet would be on the first, or maybe patching and code review proces is lightning fast

Well, I have another idea

Strictly speaking, I didn't notice anything strange but maybe it is particularly because I didn't find it strange at all. You seem to implicitly assume that loan offers should be matched as they are in regular trading orderbooks but should they? For example, if we place a sell order which is at a higher price than the lowest Ask price in the book, we expect our order to be executed against the orders with lowest prices first (which is kind of logical). But is it or should it be the same for loans?
I understand that bitfinex works this way on the account level. However I believe that at least at one point, if you offered USD for 30 days at .01% per day and there were sufficient USD bids to fill that offer at .05% per day, there will be a lending trade reported at .01% but both accounts will reflect.05%.

In other words, we shouldn't believe what is shown in the Market Funding History?
I don't see any real reason why anyone would rely on the market funding history anyway. Potential borrowers/lenders want to look at the order book to determine the market rate and act accordingly. I think the displayed funding history is accurate the overwhelming majority of the time anyway.

While in Your Funding History there will be correct entries? On the other hand, if you offered your dollars at a lower interest and there are bids which are higher than that (i.e. people want to pay more than you ask), why would you get higher rate and not those people lower interest (i.e. your rate). This is a tricky question, and it might not work in the same way as regular trading orderbooks work. It might be a bug or an intended feature

A lending bid or offer first tries to execute against existing bids/offers in the order book and any portion that is unable to get filled will be placed in the orderbook. I don't think this is a particularly controversial procedure, and am unaware of any kind of market place that does not execute orders this way.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
I've been lending out for years, I'd have to have been hallucinating to be this wrong.
Sometimes auto-renew loans are being ignored, according to some people I spoke to; this might be related.

Support responded that a fix was put in place.
My educated guess would be that the loan matching engine has a bug which causes it to enter a faulty state, and they solved it either by restarting or effectively fixing the bug.
My bet would be on the first, or maybe patching and code review proces is lightning fast

Well, I have another idea

Strictly speaking, I didn't notice anything strange but maybe it is particularly because I didn't find it strange at all. You seem to implicitly assume that loan offers should be matched as they are in regular trading orderbooks but should they? For example, if we place a sell order which is at a higher price than the lowest Ask price in the book, we expect our order to be executed against the orders with lowest prices first (which is kind of logical). But is it or should it be the same for loans?
I understand that bitfinex works this way on the account level. However I believe that at least at one point, if you offered USD for 30 days at .01% per day and there were sufficient USD bids to fill that offer at .05% per day, there will be a lending trade reported at .01% but both accounts will reflect.05%.

In other words, we shouldn't believe what is shown in the Market Funding History?

While in Your Funding History there will be entirely correct entries? On the other hand, if you offered your dollars at a lower interest and there are bids which are higher than that (i.e. people want to pay more than you ask), why would you get higher rate and not those people lower interest (i.e. your rate). This is a tricky question, and it might not work in the same way as regular trading orderbooks work. It might be a bug or an intended feature
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
I've been lending out for years, I'd have to have been hallucinating to be this wrong.
Sometimes auto-renew loans are being ignored, according to some people I spoke to; this might be related.

Support responded that a fix was put in place.
My educated guess would be that the loan matching engine has a bug which causes it to enter a faulty state, and they solved it either by restarting or effectively fixing the bug.
My bet would be on the first, or maybe patching and code review proces is lightning fast

Well, I have another idea

Strictly speaking, I didn't notice anything strange but maybe it is particularly because I didn't find it strange at all. You seem to implicitly assume that loan offers should be matched as they are in regular trading orderbooks but should they? For example, if we place a sell order which is at a higher price than the lowest Ask price in the book, we expect our order to be executed against the orders with lowest prices first (which is kind of logical). But is it or should it be the same for loans?
I understand that bitfinex works this way on the account level. However I believe that at least at one point, if you offered USD for 30 days at .01% per day and there were sufficient USD bids to fill that offer at .05% per day, there will be a lending trade reported at .01% but both accounts will reflect.05%.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
I've been lending out for years, I'd have to have been hallucinating to be this wrong.
Sometimes auto-renew loans are being ignored, according to some people I spoke to; this might be related.

Support responded that a fix was put in place.
My educated guess would be that the loan matching engine has a bug which causes it to enter a faulty state, and they solved it either by restarting or effectively fixing the bug.
My bet would be on the first, or maybe patching and code review proces is lightning fast

Well, I have another idea

Strictly speaking, I didn't notice anything strange but maybe it is particularly because I didn't find it strange at all. You seem to implicitly assume that loan offers should be matched as they are in regular trading orderbooks but should they? For example, if we place a sell order which is at a higher price than the lowest Ask price in the book, we expect our order to be executed against the orders with lowest prices first (which is kind of logical). But is it or should it be the same for loans?
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
I've been lending out for years, I'd have to have been hallucinating to be this wrong.
Sometimes auto-renew loans are being ignored, according to some people I spoke to; this might be related.

Support responded that a fix was put in place.
My educated guess would be that the loan matching engine has a bug which causes it to enter a faulty state, and they solved it either by restarting or effectively fixing the bug.
My bet would be on the first, or maybe patching and code review proces is lightning fast.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

Are you sure of that?

I'm regularly lending out my funds (though the US dollar mostly), and I don't remember I saw it the way you describe it. Could you post a snapshot? Most likely, you are confusing another thing. That is, when you lend out for 30 days, you are kind of stuck, and you can't demand the borrower to return the funds before the end of the whole term, while the borrower can return the money any time he sees appropriate. In this way, if you expect the loans to surge further, you'd be better off if you lend the money at a lower interest but for a shorter term. There can also be a case when what you see is not what happens in reality. Which is to say, all loan offers are taken up to higher rates but you only see the highest rates shown, and then the offer book gets instantly refilled
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
What's up with the USD loan matching?

I've been monitoring the usd loan matching for a few hours.
There's a 40k @ 0.14, 30 day loan offer, and plenty around that rate also for 30days. (specifically 30 days, not '2-30days' mixed offers)
But somehow, hundreds of thousands USD worth of 30 day loan offers @0.75% (per day!) are matched instead of those at lower rates!

I also noticed some 2 day loan offers @0.75% being taken while there's plenty below that rate.

source:https://www.bitfinex.com/funding/history/usd ,
example: ID 9319520:
22-07-17 03:37:50   0.749998   30   28,535.18138908$
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
Poloniex and Bitfinex both have withdraw delays or not processing all together

Where did you get this info?

Just a few days ago, I tried to withdraw a few litecoins, and the withdrawal was processed pretty fast (within a few minutes). Indeed, I don't know what my mileage would have been if I had tried to withdraw a few thousand litecoins (or bitcoins), but if there were numerous issues with withdrawals at Bitfinex (obviously, apart from fiat withdrawals which are disabled right now), there would be a lot of noise across the forum (and in this thread specifically). Other than that, I agree with you that withdrawal issues are a telling sign of possible problems in the future. It was the same with Cryptsy, and it had been constant delays with withdrawing even tiny amounts that finally made me abandon this exchange for good. That turned out to be a wise decision in the end

Yes I meant fiat withdraws not processing

So what's the problem?

You convert fiat to some crypto (Litecoin seems to be the best in this department) and withdraw the proceeds to an exchange when you do the process in reverse and withdraw fiat if you really need that (you will lose dust at worst, and in fact may even earn something in the process). But as I tried to explain it to some dude here (he turned out to be a pathetic troll in the end), people are not interested in fiat, at least, as long as an exchange (in this case Bitfinex) is not going to scam. They use both fiat and crypto as vehicles for speculation and lending, and they are not interested in parking their capital in bank accounts where they won't earn anything (or enough just to outpace inflation)
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
ALL the big exchangers are using the bot(Willy) in order to fake the trading volumes. The volumes are not real ( see the chinesse exchanges, BTC-e, Bitfinex, Poloniex and many others). It's not only me who is saying and knowing that, kid Smiley

Yet you use an account name on MtGox as "proof" that something is wrong. Where is your acutal proof? If it's not only you, which other credible sources are claiming this and what's their concrete evidence?

do you want me to "audit" their shit fake volume? it's something of common sense.

the Chinese exchanges didn't accept deposits for months. they had BIG volumes. Now, Bitfinex do not have any bank account and they have big volumes. It is a NON SENSE Smiley

you must be blind if don't see that... what's so hard to admit that BTC market is an unregulated shit and almost all the exchangers are doing what they want(for their own benefit)? Smiley

even, Bobby Lee, CEO of BTCC, has also stated that his competitors, Okcoin and Huobi, are known for inflating trading volumes artificially, a market manipulation technique called "wash trading."   Grin

you may read these:

http://www.bitcoinfuturesguide.com/bitcoin-blog/reminder-chinese-bitcoin-spot-exchanges-okcoin-and-huobi-are-faking-a-majority-of-their-trading-volume

http://www.coindesk.com/real-volumes-revealed-bitcoin-reacting-new-age-trading-fees/

http://www.coindesk.com/chinese-bitcoin-exchange-okcoin-accused-faking-trading-data/

newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Poloniex and Bitfinex both have withdraw delays or not processing all together

Where did you get this info?

Just a few days ago, I tried to withdraw a few litecoins, and the withdrawal was processed pretty fast (within a few minutes). Indeed, I don't know what my mileage would have been if I had tried to withdraw a few thousand litecoins (or bitcoins), but if there were numerous issues with withdrawals at Bitfinex (obviously, apart from fiat withdrawals which are disabled right now), there would be a lot of noise across the forum (and in this thread specifically). Other than that, I agree with you that withdrawal issues are a telling sign of possible problems in the future. It was the same with Cryptsy, and it had been constant delays with withdrawing even tiny amounts that finally made me abandon this exchange for good. That turned out to be a wise decision in the end

Yes I meant fiat withdraws not processing.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
ALL the big exchangers are using the bot(Willy) in order to fake the trading volumes. The volumes are not real ( see the chinesse exchanges, BTC-e, Bitfinex, Poloniex and many others). It's not only me who is saying and knowing that, kid Smiley

Yet you use an account name on MtGox as "proof" that something is wrong. Where is your acutal proof? If it's not only you, which other credible sources are claiming this and what's their concrete evidence?
Pages:
Jump to: