[OFFLINE]P2Pmining.com-Hybrid P2Pool-NO FEE!!!-BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DEV/LTC - page 28.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

Quote from: RandomQ on April 26, 2012, 07:40:39 PM

I hope its fixed crosses fingers.
285 April 26, 2012, 7:56 pm 5/120 0.00005828 0%
The Last block at 7:56PM EST is still showing a low payout maybe it will take 24 hrs for me to catch back up. Good thing is I didn't show any MINED payout on the last block so that part is fixed.
The only other thing I noticed was the Share % is still show 0%, but that may be a switch over to PPLNS.

I felt bad that you lost out because of my screw up.

I took some of my last payout from the last block and transferred it to your address http://p2pmining.com/?method=miner&data=1JkxLX3FC8dovhcSSAEVyb6Z7786PPqvXK#ui-tabs-1

RandomQ

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

I hope its fixed crosses fingers.
285 April 26, 2012, 7:56 pm 5/120 0.00005828 0%
The Last block at 7:56PM EST is still showing a low payout maybe it will take 24 hrs for me to catch back up. Good thing is I didn't show any MINED payout on the last block so that part is fixed.
The only other thing I noticed was the Share % is still show 0%, but that may be a switch over to PPLNS.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

Quote from: RandomQ on April 26, 2012, 08:08:46 AM

Can you check the payouts on the latest changes, I'm showing 0% share on the last few blocks.I switched back to your pool@midnight PST to test out the new difficulty code and to see how the new DOA stats work Currently 5%. Your 30% more BTC stat "Just when I thought I was out they pull me back in" lol. I verified my miners are pointed to you, and that my local p2pool is not showing any new shares. I did notice some payouts but they aren't the normal payouts i get from your pool. they are (Newly Generated Coins) payouts. If you switched the payouts then stats on your site are NOT reflecting it.

http://p2pmining.com/index.php?method=miner&data=1JkxLX3FC8dovhcSSAEVyb6Z7786PPqvXK

There was a problem with my p2pool code yesterday morning. The Mysql database connection closed in the python script and then when Someone found a block (You) and it kept throwing an error and your worker kept submitting a valid share over and over again to my client. Well I guess your address then was forwarded as an owner of that share and was put into the p2pool payout addresses for a few blocks. During this time, your shares where not getting recorded in the database which is why your payouts from the pool are so much less. As you can see now, your payouts are climbing back up. To make up for the snafu yesterday, I sent a subsidy. The extra bitcoin that you received from direct generation should cover losses from your shares not being recorded.

Sorry for the screw up. I fixed all the errors and I did some error catching so this should not happen again.

The other miners address you PMd me has a different issue. He is a pool hopper and his rewards are now greatly reduced from the new PPLNS system. His loss is our gain.

check_status

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician

I think JayCoin instituted PPLNS instead of proportional so payouts may accrue differently but payouts should be identical. Also, with p2pool, I think you have to mine for at least 24 hours to get close to your expected share %. Someone with p2pool knowledge could explain better.

RandomQ

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Can you check the payouts on the latest changes, I'm showing 0% share on the last few blocks.I switched back to your pool@midnight PST to test out the new difficulty code and to see how the new DOA stats work Currently 5%. Your 30% more BTC stat "Just when I thought I was out they pull me back in" lol. I verified my miners are pointed to you, and that my local p2pool is not showing any new shares. I did notice some payouts but they aren't the normal payouts i get from your pool. they are (Newly Generated Coins) payouts. If you switched the payouts then stats on your site are NOT reflecting it.

http://p2pmining.com/index.php?method=miner&data=1JkxLX3FC8dovhcSSAEVyb6Z7786PPqvXK

Tittiez

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: JayCoin on April 25, 2012, 08:47:48 PM

New feature -> Dynamic Difficulty

You can change the difficulty of shares that you submit.

The default setting is to use a dynamic difficulty based on p2pming.com total hashrate. This may not be desirable on some mining rigs. To set a specific difficulty, just add a + at the end of your username followed by the desired difficulty. I have tested this with CGminer and it works.

example cgminer command line for 1.5 difficulty shares

Code:

cgminer -o http://p2pmining.com:9332 -O 1KgFh9kWBpz4TsX92xcx78VQ2Fo1jP2Ddx+1.5:anything -g 1 -I 8

minimum difficulty allowed is 1.

Tweaking this setting could increase/decrease hashrate or rejected and doa shares.

Difficulty is tracked along with shares submitted. So, for example, 4 difficulty 1 shares are worth the same as 1 difficulty 4 shares.

You are amazing.

TCPC

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Very nice i like the new list. I am 1LexnfSV8QasaY2XkpB2HR14A1GkQ5QUfV with 5.1% now. I was around 15% for a while till I change intensity and GPU threads. Just wanted to get it set as efficient as possible. although after looking at that I can see that I am doing pretty well. I will test changing the difficulty and see how it works for me. Thanks.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

Quote from: TCPC on April 25, 2012, 10:32:34 PM

Quote from: JayCoin on April 25, 2012, 08:47:48 PM

New feature -> Dynamic Difficulty

You can change the difficulty of shares that you submit.

The default setting is to use a dynamic difficulty based on p2pming.com total hashrate. This may not be desirable on some mining rigs. To set a specific difficulty, just add a + at the end of your username followed by the desired difficulty. I have tested this with CGminer and it works.

example cgminer command line for 1.5 difficulty shares

Code:

cgminer -o http://p2pmining.com:9332 -O 1KgFh9kWBpz4TsX92xcx78VQ2Fo1jP2Ddx+1.5:anything -g 1 -I 8

minimum difficulty allowed is 1.

Tweaking this setting could increase/decrease hashrate or rejected and doa shares.

Difficulty is tracked along with shares submitted. So, for example, 4 difficulty 1 shares are worth the same as 1 difficulty 4 shares.

So would a lower difficulty decrease rejected? Or the other way around? Reason I ask is I have been struggling to lower my rejects, I have already been using -g 1 -I 8 and this did help, but I am still having a much higher rate than most i see on the charts here.

All I can say is maybe. If you are mining under 800 Mh/s then I would start at trying a difficulty of 2.

See new miner list to see how your stales and DOA compare to other miners at http://p2pmining.com/index.php?method=pool#ui-tabs-4

TCPC

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Quote from: JayCoin on April 25, 2012, 08:47:48 PM

New feature -> Dynamic Difficulty

You can change the difficulty of shares that you submit.

The default setting is to use a dynamic difficulty based on p2pming.com total hashrate. This may not be desirable on some mining rigs. To set a specific difficulty, just add a + at the end of your username followed by the desired difficulty. I have tested this with CGminer and it works.

example cgminer command line for 1.5 difficulty shares

Code:

cgminer -o http://p2pmining.com:9332 -O 1KgFh9kWBpz4TsX92xcx78VQ2Fo1jP2Ddx+1.5:anything -g 1 -I 8

minimum difficulty allowed is 1.

Tweaking this setting could increase/decrease hashrate or rejected and doa shares.

Difficulty is tracked along with shares submitted. So, for example, 4 difficulty 1 shares are worth the same as 1 difficulty 4 shares.

So would a lower difficulty decrease rejected? Or the other way around? Reason I ask is I have been struggling to lower my rejects, I have already been using -g 1 -I 8 and this did help, but I am still having a much higher rate than most i see on the charts here.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

New feature -> Dynamic Difficulty

You can change the difficulty of shares that you submit.

The default setting is to use a dynamic difficulty based on p2pming.com total hashrate. This may not be desirable on some mining rigs. To set a specific difficulty, just add a + at the end of your username followed by the desired difficulty. I have tested this with CGminer and it works.

example cgminer command line for 1.5 difficulty shares

Code:

cgminer -o http://p2pmining.com:9332 -O 1KgFh9kWBpz4TsX92xcx78VQ2Fo1jP2Ddx+1.5:anything -g 1 -I 8

minimum difficulty allowed is 1.

Tweaking this setting could increase/decrease hashrate or rejected and doa shares.

Difficulty is tracked along with shares submitted. So, for example, 4 difficulty 1 shares are worth the same as 1 difficulty 4 shares.

Tittiez

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: RandomQ on April 25, 2012, 03:51:06 AM

My share rate went from like 2/m to 8/m. I have 3 more graphics card coming in this week, so I will do another test and double check my numbers.

Mine is at .71/m rather then 3.55/m :/

RandomQ

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

I think my connection problem to p2pmining was alot worse than I thought. My ping times are closer to 250ms. I switched to p2pool running on my own system, and my stale rates went from ~5% to .5%. My share rate went from like 2/m to 8/m. I have 3 more graphics card coming in this week, so I will do another test and double check my numbers.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

Someone PM me a good question. How much more BTC as a percentage does all these merged mining blocks give you based on current exchange rates (Vircurex). I did some calcs and to my surprise here are the results:

Devcoin - 0.47%
iXcoin - 2.5%
i0coin - 3.7%
Namecoin - 25%

Total of 31.6% more BTC (Theoretically) with merged mining vs. without

Happy Mining Grin

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

24hr PPLNS is now in effect

Quote from: Krak on April 24, 2012, 08:23:47 PM

Quote from: JayCoin on April 24, 2012, 06:40:54 PM

I am running CGMiner 2.2.5 with -g 1 . That's it. I don't set the intensity. I let the dynamic intensity do its job.

You could probably set the intensity up considerably higher than what the dynamic intensity sets it to. Dynamic intensity is just there to allow for normal desktop functions and usually hovers around 3-5 on my machine. Your cards could probably upped to around 7-8.

I use to set at 8 but I wanted to try this to see if the rejects would go down. It didn't.

Krak

hero member

Activity: 591

Merit: 500

Quote from: JayCoin on April 24, 2012, 06:40:54 PM

I am running CGMiner 2.2.5 with -g 1 . That's it. I don't set the intensity. I let the dynamic intensity do its job.

You could probably set the intensity up considerably higher than what the dynamic intensity sets it to. Dynamic intensity is just there to allow for normal desktop functions and usually hovers around 3-5 on my machine. Your cards could probably upped to around 7-8.

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

You can see a orphaned i0coin block on the merged mining tab .

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

I get 3.4% DOA and I have the biggest miner on P2Pmining.com. If we can all get to 3.4% we would be making a killing. We would be making more per hash than any other pool, fee included.

I am running CGMiner 2.2.5 with -g 1 . That's it. I don't set the intensity. I let the dynamic intensity do its job. I am in Northern Michigan and the server is in Southern Florida and My mining rigs are on a crappy AT&T DSL. I use Linuxcoin on thumb drives and have 7 5970s and 2 5870s and 2 5770s. The 5770s are mining on windows 7 64bit. That's all there is to it.

Tittiez

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Quote from: JayCoin on April 24, 2012, 06:17:29 PM

DUE TO POOL HOPPING I'LL WILL BE SWITCHING TO PPLNS INSTEAD OF PROPORTIONAL.

This will occur in the next day or two. There will be a bump (30 seconds of all rejected shares) in the server when I restart P2Pool.

Should be interesting mathmatically. A PPLNS pool (p2pmining) mining to a PPLNS pool (p2pool). Double Whammy

Any suggestions on time for a PPLNS. Should it be 24hrs like p2pool, 12hrs, 48hrs, 1 week, etc.?

I'm guessing this guy is the culprit?
http://p2pmining.com/?method=miner&data=173Qmir9hTmvkb3Cmvgj78AV2CjL5azZYS

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

DUE TO POOL HOPPING I'LL WILL BE SWITCHING TO PPLNS INSTEAD OF PROPORTIONAL.

This will occur in the next day or two. There will be a bump (30 seconds of all rejected shares) in the server when I restart P2Pool.

Should be interesting mathmatically. A PPLNS pool (p2pmining) mining to a PPLNS pool (p2pool). Double Whammy

Any suggestions on time for a PPLNS. Should it be 24hrs like p2pool, 12hrs, 48hrs, 1 week, etc.?

JayCoin

sr. member

Activity: 409

Merit: 251

Crypt'n Since 2011

Quote from: check_status on April 23, 2012, 11:21:10 PM

Quote from: JayCoin on April 22, 2012, 11:27:30 PM

P2Pool seems to be on a big ass run of bad luck. Figures that would happen after I shell out some bucks for a new server.

These shells? http://www.24shells.net/#cho2

Are you on VPS or Dedicated now? Maybe look at these also...
http://ritmohost.com/index.php?page=linux_vps
http://magmahost.com/vps.html
http://swvps.com/dedicated-servers.html
http://www.sshvm.com/

One of the above has dedicated servers starting at $34.95/month.

Just went from VPS to dedicated server. All the daemons for the currencies ate up too much memory for a VPS. I couldn't even compile on the VPS. Had to compile at home and upload the binary. Everyone probably saw some connection issues during the change over and testing. Thanks for the heads up on the other suppliers. I am paying $120 a month for the following:

Hardware
2.33Ghz Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
2GB DDR2
500GB SATAII
Remote Reboot
Network
3TB (3,000GB) Transfer / 100Mbps Port
Software
Ubuntu 11.10 64 Bit

Topic: [OFFLINE]P2Pmining.com-Hybrid P2Pool-NO FEE!!!-BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DEV/LTC - page 28. (Read 56648 times)