Pages:
Author

Topic: OgNasty Ponzi passthrough and ponzi fans.. BTC losses everywhere he goes - page 11. (Read 7916 times)

legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
I don't think "Exhibit 3" has even that, at least I wasn't able to find it:

After a subpoena, exhibit 3 is apparently an export that was done by pirateat40 which contains raw data of "account histories" beginning in 2012, according to the document posted by TwitchySeal.

I believe exhibit 3 is here: https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/pirateat40/gov.uscourts.txed.146063.4.8.pdf

The "balance" is odd on OgNasty's page towards the end..but if you calculate the totals listed for deposits/withdrawals/payments:
deposits: 3,890.26
withdrawals: -3,948.00
payments: 2,540.63

I'm not sure what to take away from this... this appears to be actual evidence put into the case, but whether pirateat40 had any reason to screw with the data before sending it, I don't know.
legendary
Activity: 3738
Merit: 10374
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Anybody who can understand English knows what he meant. Let's look at it again:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not.  

He uses the word "thought", as in "thought at the time." Don't know how you could possibly confuse this, but I'm sure you'll find a way.

What part of any of this changes the fact that there are no victims seeking redress and this is purely driven by clear long term motives to target OGNasty rather than to seek any kind of restorative justice?

Nobody is talking about the "victims," aka willing Ponzi participants, because nobody cares about that aspect. Its just interesting information that was recently brought to light. Don't know why you're getting all bent out of shape over it.

I am not really opposed to bringing some of these matters to light based on possible new evidence, even though I hardly know shit about a lot of the underlying case.  Nonetheless, if there is new evidence, we cannot keep considering the looking into the matter would merely be a personal vendetta or fishing expedition. 

Sure, having victims would seem to be some kind of necessity in terms of considering impact or even if there would be a damage related remedy, but, they might not even know enough details of the underlying situation to realize that they were damaged, and I keep coming back to the idea that the  extent of damage would have some reflection of the dollar value of the asset at the time of the damage, even if the asset had subsequently appreciated in price (which we know to be the case with bitcoin). 

I see most of the time in 2012, BTC prices were around $4 but towards the end of the time period in question, BTC price went up to $16 before coming back down again to $10-$12 for the rest of the year.   

There seems to be some evidence that OGNasty may have paid off the bigger of the investors, so the ONLY remaining ones would have had smaller investments. 

Of course, in retrospect, we can see that it was a ponzi shceme and too good to be true, but when people are caught up in ponzi schemes they sometimes will still participate based on their considerations that they are not going to be the last person out, so they kind of already know the risk, or could be presumed to be sufficiently taking on their own risks. 

So some of the victims might have been reluctant to make any claims, even if they did not get paid back any of their investment, because there could be some feelings of guilt about making any kinds of claims in such an obvious too good to be true situation, but even if everyone kind of knew it was a ponzi scheme that would not remove fiduciary responsibility from anyone serving as a middleman, including if there was fraud, misrepresentation or conversion that is just discovered. 

There might be plenty of investors who don't give too many shits about chances that they took on a few hundred dollars, so they don't really want to rock the boat if they got paid back some of their amount, given that they knew the whole thing was bullshit, but if they later found out that there were breaches of fiduciary responsibility, fraud, misrepresentation or conversion, then that could raise their concerns (or change their perspectives). 

I still don't believe that any reasonable remedy would purely measure damages in BTC... but we cannot really know circumstances, if we cannot pindown any actual cases of actual victims, can we?  On the other hand, there still could be conclusions of wrongdoing, based on the new evidence, even if the exact victim circumstances are not clarified?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
We really don't know the specifics because we don't know what was contained in Exhibit 3, other than the name "OgNasty" next to an amount of BTC on a spreadsheet.

I don't think "Exhibit 3" has even that, at least I wasn't able to find it:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4386354/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-shavers/
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
Nobody is talking about the "victims," aka willing Ponzi participants, because nobody cares about that aspect.

Definitely not a witch hunt..
Case closed..
/thread
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
Anybody who can understand English knows what he meant. Let's look at it again:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not.  

He uses the word "thought", as in "thought at the time." Don't know how you could possibly confuse this, but I'm sure you'll find a way.

What part of any of this changes the fact that there are no victims seeking redress and this is purely driven by clear long term motives to target OGNasty rather than to seek any kind of restorative justice?

Nobody is talking about the "victims," aka willing Ponzi participants, because nobody cares about that aspect. Its just interesting information that was recently brought to light. Don't know why you're getting all bent out of shape over it.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1192
I don't believe in denial.
[...] all you are concerned with is the perception of control that attempting to use the state to fight your petty interpersonal battles gives you. You really honestly are a pathetic excuse for a human being and it is far past time you are shunned from this community for your endless power tripping psychotic abusive behavior.[...]

Do you tell OgNasty - regarding this thread - that too? Basically a case of "what goes around, comes around" isn't it...?

And time to stop has long passed (in both threads). Even theymos asked nicely:

Quote from: theymos

But by now I - personally - (and I suspect a lot of other users too) cannot take either "side" too seriously any more... too bad.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2015
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Anybody who can understand English knows what he meant. Let's look at it again:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not.  

He uses the word "thought", as in "thought at the time." Don't know how you could possibly confuse this, but I'm sure you'll find a way.

What part of any of this changes the fact that there are no victims seeking redress

No part.

Literally nobody is alleging that victims are coming forward.

Just alleging that he lied to past investors and stole their money knowing they would assume someone else stole it.




and this is purely driven by clear long term motives to target OGNasty rather than to seek any kind of restorative justice?

It's driven by facts.  Court records, block chain transactions and forum archives.  I understand you don't consider these things 'proof' but if you change your mind I encourage you to check them out by going back a few pages and reading up.  It's all there.


legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
Anybody who can understand English knows what he meant. Let's look at it again:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not. 

He uses the word "thought", as in "thought at the time." Don't know how you could possibly confuse this, but I'm sure you'll find a way.

What part of any of this changes the fact that there are no victims seeking redress and this is purely driven by clear long term motives to target OGNasty rather than to seek any kind of restorative justice?


TECSHARE either isn't aware of what's actually going on in this thread, or he's actively trying to protect OgN by making it seem like he's "only" being accused of getting involved with a big ponzi scheme.

It's obvious TECHY is protecting OG - that's why he suggested I move to China, where you can easily pay off government officials.

No thanks Techy, the best place to legitimize crypto is HERE where the laws are enforced.  (Not this forum obviously, but our democracy)

Protecting OG from what? Mobs of midget dicks like you with serious inferiority complexes along with other comorbid compulsive psychological conditions? That tale you have spun about why I suggested you would like China is quite entertaining. Not the suggestion so much as you probably believe that those mental gymnastics make sense to anyone other than you. I am not sure why if I was corrupt and wanted to pay people off I would suggest you would want to live there, but your refractory projections usually don't make any logical sense now do they? After all the point is to just topic slide with horse shit until people get frustrated tired of trying to decipher the truth now isn't it? That is a game of volume not quality or logic.

You aren't interested in preserving the law or any kind of justice, all you are concerned with is the perception of control that attempting to use the state to fight your petty interpersonal battles gives you. You really honestly are a pathetic excuse for a human being and it is far past time you are shunned from this community for your endless power tripping psychotic abusive behavior.

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
TECSHARE either isn't aware of what's actually going on in this thread, or he's actively trying to protect OgN by making it seem like he's "only" being accused of getting involved with a big ponzi scheme.

It's obvious TECHY is protecting OG - that's why he suggested I move to China, where you can easily pay off government officials.

No thanks Techy, the best place to legitimize crypto is HERE where the laws are enforced.  (Not this forum obviously, but our democracy)
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
None of this is nearly the same as collecting funds to be deposited into what apparently everybody knew was a Ponzi scheme, Og included.
...

I took the liberty of putting the perfect hindsight and speculation in underline and bold.

This statement doesn't reflect hindsight, it reflects having a feeling about something as it was happening speculation about feelings people may or may not have had in hindsight about something that was happening.

I fixed that for you.

Anybody who can understand English knows what he meant. Let's look at it again:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not. 

He uses the word "thought", as in "thought at the time." Don't know how you could possibly confuse this, but I'm sure you'll find a way.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
the 1000 traces to being paid to investors.

The BTC1000 tx is the third to last up there ^^^ and is on this paginate:

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000c9e9219e1faec?page=55

Of the BTC1000

only ~BTC650 left the wallet...I think.  That tx looks weird though if someone could take a closer look.


After that he received 2 more from Pirate (and a bunch of small stuff that doesn't matter) with the last one being for BTC38 on the same day, August 17, that pirate announced it was closing down, and OG posted in his thread that he had request all deposit be returned (and then updated later that pirate defaulted and reserves were paid).

2 days later he sent BTC380 to an address that shortly was moved to silk road.  I don't think this was a payout to an investor due to timing and tx size.

Then on September 1, the day he said reserves were paid out,  he sent 4 transactions of BTC22.95, BTC27.54, BTC4.59, BTC9.92, which is pretty close to my original guess on the value of total reserves.

This is not conclusive proof, it looks like he had control of more of the deposits than he should've in early August.  I'll go through the individual investors deposit/interest-payment/reserve payout history later and it will be more clear.

Might have messed up a number or two somewhere, let me know.

I took the liberty of placing more baseless speculation in bold.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2015
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
the 1000 traces to being paid to investors.

The BTC1000 tx is the third to last up there ^^^ and is on this paginate:

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000c9e9219e1faec?page=55

Of the BTC1000

only ~BTC650 left the wallet...I think.  That tx looks weird though if someone could take a closer look.


After that he received 2 more from Pirate (and a bunch of small stuff that doesn't matter) with the last one being for BTC38 on the same day, August 17, that pirate announced it was closing down, and OG posted in his thread that he had request all deposit be returned (and then updated later that pirate defaulted and reserves were paid).

2 days later he sent BTC380 to an address that shortly was moved to silk road.  I don't think this was a payout to an investor due to timing and tx size.

Then on September 1, the day he said reserves were paid out,  he sent 4 transactions of BTC22.95, BTC27.54, BTC4.59, BTC9.92, which is pretty close to my original guess on the value of total reserves.

This is not conclusive proof, it looks like he had control of more of the deposits than he should've in early August.  I'll go through the individual investors deposit/interest-payment/reserve payout history later and it will be more clear.

Might have messed up a number or two somewhere, let me know.



legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
[Posts the same TX details over again to topic slide because it looks convincingly official and is a good way to avoid an actual substantive reply.]

None of this is nearly the same as collecting funds to be deposited into what apparently everybody knew was a Ponzi scheme, Og included.
...

I took the liberty of putting the perfect hindsight and speculation in underline and bold.

This statement doesn't reflect hindsight, it reflects having a feeling about something as it was happening speculation about feelings people may or may not have had in hindsight about something that was happening.

I fixed that for you.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
None of this is nearly the same as collecting funds to be deposited into what apparently everybody knew was a Ponzi scheme, Og included.
...

I took the liberty of putting the perfect hindsight and speculation in underline and bold.

This statement doesn't reflect hindsight, it reflects having a feeling about something as it was happening:

Is there anyone who thought Patrick Harnett & Pirate were doing honest dealings?  I certainly hope not. 

Sooner or later you will all be just like OGNasty and each have your turn at the unaccountable mob picking through every intimate detail of your life looking for things to report to the government simply because they can and it makes them feel less like the weak little men they are because they wield power over another.

Seeing as how most of us never promoted a Ponzi scheme on the forum, I highly doubt it.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2015
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Here are all the transactions between OgNastys known addresses wallet and Pirateats starting on 4/10/12.

It's a filtered list.  Only when Og sends or receives from a known Pirateat address from April 2012 and later.
(There were a few small ones from earlier in the year for less than BTC2 each, but pass-through didn't start till April, so they don't matter.)



datereceived fromreceived amountsent amountsent tobalancetransaction
2012-04-10 22:03:5750Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.2913531884f46fff43736475873063a95e4ec04b5b878d008babe65a818655a411b9c
2012-04-10 23:03:13300Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.29135f68edfb6b4af2dc4531b82d920e33727cf5f661c9aa5a66e7d093ee2014fc42a
2012-04-11 14:37:10250Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.342646e228a703fcbd9a5f43722054ecdbdedfadab6ed944c256259f18f5b61eb169
2012-04-12 05:42:51200Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)10.380132997641c7d39fd915ebda13b70d1323e62d40066cf96df23a544af2ae678b25bfdb
2012-04-14 01:10:52100Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.3612010277e564c3b07a2db01ab3ffa0aea417e45dc25d52f2e6a058c307da093e3c51
2012-04-15 18:40:0450Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)10.596549294a70f3ec9d0bd909b0d7a2e8e5d6b4d2cbdba25067a0c46fc182bce682a273
2012-04-17 16:37:4950Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)11.205749af256277e0f0e9c7667405e9c93b6d70c493382f5fd1033a4710239fc8473677
2012-04-17 23:54:58Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)200211.205749fc531d13696a8e17d99e92cf471f08197310deda5e22ec062489cc779076224d
2012-04-21 00:34:08100Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.0532424d6baa1fea59585da7f226f7e21489c39334771e6e941aa2aea0d540a90604d
2012-04-30 23:25:19Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)350459.3734435957d79b6a4dc19e8db16351865830fb2280afbbb678034f9b5a766b83e9a97
2012-05-02 00:29:2422Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)117.5538267ba8d733447ed086927816fb76af7deb65337db7d248be6778cdeb7cdcd617235
2012-05-04 00:40:11700Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)83.404466665dc351b9816b282b71e6488717974574d2beb3e26112b7e79ce53b887f4d325c
2012-05-05 18:45:18500Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)83.3862666601292855d2c4a9d10cd5be7042fd00b215c8b22807fca424acb310c34c3128cb
2012-05-06 18:04:1250Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)50.041142348d8d1dfb8f8258b571078b8a0b078473798723ea39653f150a53b998500cb5bb
2012-05-07 18:36:27Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)100160.1370672546ce39ddec9520d9a423c9243ab4da55bc22371caf7c657ee2b08d9af91cc8f
2012-05-12 05:39:1540Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.19726723c239f2914917867b44f4aa560ded330b562e3f2cffbb2a7157ab4ec8bdf3831
2012-05-12 17:56:57250Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)0.1972672c8b5eeed0b3280237546958a0839cbeaaa935a3aba876789f0739a54aa835755
2012-05-14 18:54:31Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)200200.32726722fe99a79ad9f1ec1161f12a8d861171b4eeb864767e4b0e280f15e848b9b95a6
2012-05-14 23:21:29100Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)200.517267296f1a50599a178870e24e5e74c63404982f8111ef4941f6e9af503a8695c7705
2012-05-17 01:43:3144.999Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)539ae5977a4cfe58fd2ffd8aecd1784b1ea7ae224434a38359b3015441e407a22
2012-05-20 16:01:15Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)300400.058985ed97dec12c4bb07ad5c8e0d313a73555d64340656a1507490f7401a9e7f015f
2012-05-21 18:15:45Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)220.3793484620.92356847951302c74f9b8ed1b21d35827c37c7afbd220cca5d2b3a1b98ba0c45976f6a9
2012-05-22 02:18:2875Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)378.951328412b25f24f82126c435e1c64abe058df5d2e77743818a3a98f9d9f76cecabbfec
2012-05-28 20:17:53Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)207.3690817207.97250510ddd30ceb422b8bf0a76596ca4358ca0e0b9911162d696cc29c6de440a3543aa
2012-06-02 04:12:31Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)200551.854605148b016d4cbd83ae5d89fa22ae151baba9d3a4db0b7edcb5ff0022d0544501c4b
2012-06-02 04:40:2658.26907056Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)3.58503453b4889137e9e7135dd4e1e64f0864635ddee9fd10d384fc87b826f5502a7df5a
2012-06-02 15:25:4030Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)3.58453456e18040b1f40186183f6e5ac64d6a8cb2422c15c47837c67d58fa8fb490a894f
2012-06-03 20:32:02Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)300303.577034578868ec14858fb56f51599714df2dab2038f32dd641f9616bb25149779586147
2012-06-04 03:57:03100Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)3.5770345e1e138493e3298282bcb074f73b519bf8f06a974b89df61ed2084f93c0bdabc1
2012-06-11 16:40:57Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)186.2206.593da113cc88c248dfe716949a5891964f00c8d47812632fc834fe89e342e5e4ad0
2012-06-13 15:33:09Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)110341.2727ad8999be2bfe99380c3b8a0a06aa4a99da5cc0c7cc79582fa4493ac51eb74405
2012-06-18 18:40:06Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)181.1801806759.17578060f792569fc1c8e7b81545cbdd9ceba2475066ad4bf0feeacb89fbb092d8425e7
2012-06-26 00:13:36Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)178.5218.6601672b023960be3dead0b4ce107473d9d8a82845ecd8d5d4a7387b007f76eb6a44ced
2012-07-02 14:37:48Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)178.5253.6415759eeb05b72d6900b8092b673ee4d7d86b5b70b92aad42c3b3c8204a5b060d0bc8a
2012-07-03 00:09:13Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)300553.64157595fbfe9b4a29e8d034cd9c696d72cebae4fcdb2703ce3698ca2dfb8bd901978e0
2012-07-09 14:03:48Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)159.8793403358.64651629db2a41de4cfbffd8b497c11184f58fd4b54ad9e8a638918a493f44934e230ea
2012-07-16 15:12:51Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)157.5657.6393266738d6f63608cbf700334dde4e983c82849f353be2107ae1afd0150c3355a123a
2012-07-18 00:00:14Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)250687.6393266fcec48d92528c70c4ce3a44eaf4707ef236c499f33d49eb8d482ec29e969b1e0
2012-07-18 00:02:40Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)6001287.639327c4a004394abb0e5fa6d98095420d7627d816e779c48f3e9baba9ff7489480e00
2012-07-21 21:00:17300Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)600.9866573232b6ab4f0046dc75d941b59f01ef80e7f408262b295ba104ee5c142b6698179
2012-07-23 16:37:48Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)93.79603241115.623112683419037e8b2572bdb1176915c20a49a37e46571e91fa5210aecd0a8a8930a7d
2012-07-31 01:10:45Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)95.2171.03818024196499760499d01540ad45f0a63ce6d3a39dde7433d20f79510a7963a1d4334
2012-08-02 15:52:01Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)10001041.953338656eb07b3c11d105bccdc0a1000777fa5f56219fd41ed75d2b4aa8ccb4b5e6e
2012-08-06 17:21:51Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)66.80685185459.7926017f591acd2d7d5233b3089d4b577ef2414eee104c38a6ff4c7776591de47f71e4f
2012-08-17 01:50:43Btcst.com-pirateat40 (001759702ef1697a)38558.1251353c265f7ec360c2f01afe7a75368160e8792bd0d5cf75305a521d29edb1b07ffb4


legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
You are involved in the ponzi scheme by way of investigating it. I was involved by coincidentally helping to expose its collapse. Theymos was involved by way of hosting the forum. Hundreds of users were involved tangentially. This is not tantamount to wrongdoing no matter how much you struggle to manufacture that appearance.

None of this is nearly the same as collecting funds to be deposited into what apparently everybody knew was a Ponzi scheme, Og included.

Could it be that nobody complained afterward because everybody knew what they were getting themselves into at the beginning?

We really don't know the specifics because we don't know what was contained in Exhibit 3, other than the name "OgNasty" next to an amount of BTC on a spreadsheet. The number may have been 1,000, it may have been 2,600+ -- we don't know for sure. We also don't know if it reflected Og's personal investment or all the BTC collected from investors, or both.

Its true that all this is well in the past and doesn't really matter anymore from a legal standpoint, but it still demonstrates behavior that is pretty far from trustworthy. The fact that Og won't comment on what Shavers was talking about in his testimony only makes things worse.

I took the liberty of putting the perfect hindsight and speculation in underline and bold. In, other words, even if all of this baseless speculation is true, the so called "victims" don't consider themselves to be an aggrieved party, and this is all being perused for ulterior motives.

Exactly, we don't know the specifics. OGNasty was named. OOoooO. Very impressive, that is for anyone who just casually skims and doesn't bother spending way too much time digging through these records looking for any ACTUAL evidence of wrongdoing. Of course that is the point isn't it? The convince as many people as possible assuming most will just make their own assumptions based on these baseless accusations and speculation while simultaneously not actually providing any definitive evidence of any wrongdoing.

If I was OGNasty I would tell you all to go fuck yourselves too and suggest you find yourself some other steaming heap to pick peanuts out of. This atmosphere of picking through everyone's activities and demanding public explanation for everything just because some one has a figment in their imagination is not just repugnant but dangerous the the freedoms of the community in general and needs to be broken. This is like the 1984 version of crypto with a boot stamping on its face for eternity.

war is peace
freedom is slavery
fascism is legitimacy

Sooner or later you will all be just like OGNasty and each have your turn at the unaccountable mob picking through every intimate detail of your life looking for things to report to the government simply because they can and it makes them feel less like the weak little men they are because they wield power over another. History shows that is really the only motive required for this to develop.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 7986
You are involved in the ponzi scheme by way of investigating it. I was involved by coincidentally helping to expose its collapse. Theymos was involved by way of hosting the forum. Hundreds of users were involved tangentially. This is not tantamount to wrongdoing no matter how much you struggle to manufacture that appearance.

None of this is nearly the same as collecting funds to be deposited into what apparently everybody knew was a Ponzi scheme, Og included.

Could it be that nobody complained afterward because everybody knew what they were getting themselves into at the beginning?

We really don't know the specifics because we don't know what was contained in Exhibit 3, other than the name "OgNasty" next to an amount of BTC on a spreadsheet. The number may have been 1,000, it may have been 2,600+ -- we don't know for sure. We also don't know if it reflected Og's personal investment or all the BTC collected from investors, or both.

Its true that all this is well in the past and doesn't really matter anymore from a legal standpoint, but it still demonstrates behavior that is pretty far from trustworthy. The fact that Og won't comment on what Shavers was talking about in his testimony only makes things worse.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
This community needs to collectively stand up to budding little goosesteppers like this, or else this is going to be the future of crypto. Is that really what you want?

Yes, I'm sure most of use would like to see crypto be legitimate.

That is what we are trying to do by exposing a habitual scammer like OG.

You should move to China if that is the kind of "legitimate" you are looking for. You would fit right in with the CCP.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
This community needs to collectively stand up to budding little goosesteppers like this, or else this is going to be the future of crypto. Is that really what you want?

Yes, I'm sure most of use would like to see crypto be legitimate.

That is what we are trying to do by exposing a habitual scammer like OG.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever

Things were different back then

What does that mean?

It means this community was young and still developing without established norms and copious amount of FUD, and for people to point back with perfect hindsight and pretend everything was crystal clear is absolute horse shit.

TECSHARE either isn't aware of what's actually going on in this thread, or he's actively trying to protect OgN by making it seem like he's "only" being accused of getting involved with a big ponzi scheme.

Analogy:

John goes to a party with some friends.  Lots of drugs at party.  Party gets robbed. John stands between robber and his friends to protect them!  Robber makes off with ~$1.5 million in cash.  John and his friends go home broke and sad, but they are glad John protected him.


7 years later evidence is found that shows John stealing $15k from his friends while they think John is protecting them from the robber.



TECSHARE is Johns friend now though, so he defends him.

TECSHARE:  "We didn't know those drugs were bad and illegal!  Things were different back then!  Leave John alone!  WITCH HUNT!!!!"

Don't ever speak for me little girl.

No, it couldn't possibly be that YOU don't know what was going on. You are involved in the ponzi scheme by way of investigating it. I was involved by coincidentally helping to expose its collapse. Theymos was involved by way of hosting the forum. Hundreds of users were involved tangentially. This is not tantamount to wrongdoing no matter how much you struggle to manufacture that appearance.

You aren't looking for justice for any harmed party. You are a mini digital Stazi agent looking to use the state to fight your interpersonal battles. You don't have any evidence of wrongdoing, you are just picking through OGNasty's turds looking for peanuts because your target is OGNasty, not because you are seeking justice for any harmed party. This is to serve yourself and your friends, and this is painfully transparent. This community needs to collectively stand up to budding little goosesteppers like this, or else this is going to be the future of crypto. Is that really what you want?
Pages:
Jump to: