Pages:
Author

Topic: OLD: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB - page 65. (Read 1193208 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C
Greetings,

I'm running a cube using the bfgminer proxy but the longpoll is showing as inactive & I'm only getting 67% efficiency as well as 34% rejects - can you tell me the command to enable longpolling as I can't find it in the readme......thanks anyone.

Peace.  Grin

I had this discussion with Luke-Jr about a month ago.  There is no Longpoll support, but he said he'd look in to adding it.  

I found that running bfgminer on Linux helped a lot - I'm getting a solid 38GH out of my Cube connected to bfgminer on a Celeron 847 PC running Debian Wheezy. 
When I point the Cube to the Pi running MinePeon and bfgminer, the Pi's CPU is running flat out and efficiency goes to crap.  It runs OK on the BeagleBone Black running Debian, too (dual 1GHz ARMv7).  The same Celeron machine running a stripped down Windows 7 install is also inefficient.

Well bugger me sideways, that's several hours wasted then, thanks HelldiverUK. I'm running Xubuntu 12.04 but was unable to get slush's proxy working with my cube & p2pool for some reason, it just wouldn't connect, but works fine on other pools - any pointers or ideas my man?

Peace.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 501
Greetings,

I'm running a cube using the bfgminer proxy but the longpoll is showing as inactive & I'm only getting 67% efficiency as well as 34% rejects - can you tell me the command to enable longpolling as I can't find it in the readme......thanks anyone.

Peace.  Grin

I had this discussion with Luke-Jr about a month ago.  There is no Longpoll support, but he said he'd look in to adding it.  

I found that running bfgminer on Linux helped a lot - I'm getting a solid 38GH out of my Cube connected to bfgminer on a Celeron 847 PC running Debian Wheezy. 
When I point the Cube to the Pi running MinePeon and bfgminer, the Pi's CPU is running flat out and efficiency goes to crap.  It runs OK on the BeagleBone Black running Debian, too (dual 1GHz ARMv7).  The same Celeron machine running a stripped down Windows 7 install is also inefficient.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C
Greetings,

I'm running a cube using the bfgminer proxy but the longpoll is showing as inactive & I'm only getting 67% efficiency as well as 34% rejects - can you tell me the command to enable longpolling as I can't find it in the readme......thanks anyone.

Peace.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Running the new antminer version of bfgminer with the antminer overclocked and two usb block erupters. Look at the Hardware Error Rate:

They're all less than 1%. You are doing good.

Yup ... should have looked before I posted.  I overlooked the "/" for some reason.

<<<< STUPID NOOB MOVES ALL DAY LONG
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
Running the new antminer version of bfgminer with the antminer overclocked and two usb block erupters. Look at the Hardware Error Rate:

They're all less than 1%. You are doing good.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Running the new antminer version of bfgminer with the antminer overclocked and two usb block erupters. Look at the Hardware Error Rate:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15558107/Pictures/bfgminer_antminer_HW.png

On bfgminer 3.9.0, I was only receiving errors on the antminer because it didn't realize what it was.  The ASIC Block Erupters never really threw an error.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Helperizer
Hi nwoolls,

I've got the newest version of your 3.9.0 build for the antminers, and I do all the steps for linux - autogen.sh, configure, make, and antminer shows up on the -h switch.  However, even though my ants work with the bitmain cgminer 3.8.5, and with fractalbc's cgminer 3.9.0, I can't get your bfgminer to recognize them.  bfgminer -d? -S antminer:all shows no devices, yet they're there just fine in lsusb, and of course for the two cgminers.  I don't notice any errors during compilation, configure shows it as enabled for the antminer, and I'm using the correct binary - even called it by the full path just to be sure.

FWIW, this machine is Edubuntu 13.10, 64 bit version.

Any idea what could be going wrong?
Thanks,
- Tye
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
So, if I download the bfgminer-npw-antminer from the link posted previously ... I just have to run that by itself for now correct?

In other words, I can't drop those files into the 3.9.0 directory.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Is it possible to overclock antminers separately with different oc?  I have one antminer I would like to oc to 0881 and the other one to 0981?

One of my antminer has 14% HW and the other one 0% HW with 0981 oc.

Yes you can. First run bfgminer with -d? -S antminer:all to list the devices and their paths:

Code:
bfgminer -d? -S antminer:all [2014-01-12 13:16:59] Started bfgminer 3.9.0
 [2014-01-12 13:17:00] Devices detected:
 [2014-01-12 13:17:00]  Device (driver=antminer; procs=1; path=/dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART)
1 devices listed

Then use the path displayed (above) in the --set-device argument:

Code:
bfgminer -S antminer:all --set-device antminer@/dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART:clock=x0881

You know, you are really good and fast! Thank you very much, it works perfectly.

Cheers Smiley

Cool77
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
I have just tried this update.
My hash speed has gone up from 2.05 to .............................2.05
If I go any higher I have massive HW errors

From what I understand, depending on the unit you can't over-clock it higher without giving it more power.

One of the forum pages has some more info on changing the power resistors, to improve the overclocking.
I will stick at this level for now, 2.05Gh at the 5 second interval and 1.98Gh average at the pool.
Not bad at all for the price and power consumption. 1.28watts/Gh on 11 sticks.
Blue/RedFury are showing at 1.23watts/Gh but cost 3 or 4 times more to buy.
(starting to become a power tart)
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
I have just tried this update.
My hash speed has gone up from 2.05 to .............................2.05
If I go any higher I have massive HW errors

From what I understand, depending on the unit you can't over-clock it higher without giving it more power.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
I am using this (https://www.dropbox.com/s/z29x4n6ng510joi/bfgminer-npw-antminer.7z) in Win7x64 with the parameter "--set-device antminer:freq=0981" It starts up ok, finds the antminer but reports that
"AMU 0: Applying rule antminer:freq=0981: Unknown option:freq" and then starts hashing at the standard speed. Why? Supposedly overclocking is working? Am I doing something wrong?

Full start parameter is "bfgminer.exe -S antminer:all -o pooladdress:port -u XXX -p XXX --set-device antminer:freq=0981"

The format is now:

Code:
--set-device antminer:clock=x0981

I have just tried this update.
My hash speed has gone up from 2.05 to .............................2.05
If I go any higher I have massive HW errors
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0

The format is now:

Code:
--set-device antminer:clock=x0981

Thank you!
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
Is it possible to overclock antminers separately with different oc?  I have one antminer I would like to oc to 0881 and the other one to 0981?

One of my antminer has 14% HW and the other one 0% HW with 0981 oc.

Yes you can. First run bfgminer with -d? -S antminer:all to list the devices and their paths:

Code:
bfgminer -d? -S antminer:all [2014-01-12 13:16:59] Started bfgminer 3.9.0
 [2014-01-12 13:17:00] Devices detected:
 [2014-01-12 13:17:00]  Device (driver=antminer; procs=1; path=/dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART)
1 devices listed

Then use the path displayed (above) in the --set-device argument:

Code:
bfgminer -S antminer:all --set-device antminer@/dev/cu.SLAB_USBtoUART:clock=x0881
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Is it possible to overclock antminers separately with different oc?  I have one antminer I would like to oc to 0881 and the other one to 0981?

One of my antminer has 14% HW and the other one 0% HW with 0981 oc.

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
I am using this (https://www.dropbox.com/s/z29x4n6ng510joi/bfgminer-npw-antminer.7z) in Win7x64 with the parameter "--set-device antminer:freq=0981" It starts up ok, finds the antminer but reports that
"AMU 0: Applying rule antminer:freq=0981: Unknown option:freq" and then starts hashing at the standard speed. Why? Supposedly overclocking is working? Am I doing something wrong?

Full start parameter is "bfgminer.exe -S antminer:all -o pooladdress:port -u XXX -p XXX --set-device antminer:freq=0981"

The format is now:

Code:
--set-device antminer:clock=x0981

Wonderfull!
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
I am using this (https://www.dropbox.com/s/z29x4n6ng510joi/bfgminer-npw-antminer.7z) in Win7x64 with the parameter "--set-device antminer:freq=0981" It starts up ok, finds the antminer but reports that
"AMU 0: Applying rule antminer:freq=0981: Unknown option:freq" and then starts hashing at the standard speed. Why? Supposedly overclocking is working? Am I doing something wrong?

Full start parameter is "bfgminer.exe -S antminer:all -o pooladdress:port -u XXX -p XXX --set-device antminer:freq=0981"

The format is now:

Code:
--set-device antminer:clock=x0981
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0

Make sure you have the latest version of antminer.7z
I think there have been 3 now.

Mine says it was changed on Jan 12th 2014, 7:46PM. Thats the latest one, isn't it?

Using the parameters in the way you did yields the same result: "Unknown option:freq"

I'm in the same boat.  Unknown option:freq.

I've tried both Jan 9th 01:32:18 and Jan 12th  ‏‎01:45:59 bfgminer

With Jan 9th version, it does not give an error but running w/o OC.
With Jan 12th version, it gives the error.

I have win7 x64 using 2 X antminer.

Command line : C:\Bfgminer\bfgminer.exe -S antminer:all -o stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u User -p Pass --set-device antminer:freq=0981

Cheers!
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000

Make sure you have the latest version of antminer.7z
I think there have been 3 now.

Mine says it was changed on Jan 12th 2014, 7:46PM. Thats the latest one, isn't it?

Using the parameters in the way you did yields the same result: "Unknown option:freq"
The version I am using is dated the 9th
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0

Make sure you have the latest version of antminer.7z
I think there have been 3 now.

Mine says it was changed on Jan 12th 2014, 7:46PM. Thats the latest one, isn't it?

Using the parameters in the way you did yields the same result: "Unknown option:freq"
Pages:
Jump to: