Topic: Only good coins are listed on top exchange? - page 3. (Read 930 times)

Exchanges always win. The ones who get "rekt" are none other than amateur investors and day traders. Just because a coin is listed on a prominent centralized exchange, doesn't mean it's worth the investment. You have to do your own research to determine what's best for you. A cryptocurrency with solid use cases, active development, and innovation has a higher chance of surviving in the future.

Unfortunately, the market is flooded with too many coins often driven by hype. I'm talking about "meme" coins, and centralized "shitcoins" like Ripple and Solana. It's all speculation these days. Most people don't care about this, as long as there's money to be made. Ultimately, the good projects will replace the bad ones as the crypto/Blockchain industry matures. As long as decentralization wins, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my opinion

Basically, coins or tokens listed on popular exchanges are very good coins. Considering that there are so many requirements for listing on the top exchange, and also quite large costs, makes many people think that if they want to list on the top exchange, then they have to really believe in the project they are working on, and continue to develop it.
Even though there are several tokens listed such as meme coins on top exchanges, I think exchanges are also taking several opportunities to make money from several projects that are currently hyped. But, in the end we are really advised to do research before choosing this coin as a long-term investment.

Listing fees are a problem for small cap projects and that ends up being the determining factor for which exchange the newly launched coin gets listed first. You will see initially less known exchanges are named before moving to bigger exchanges. The phrase or "when binance" has become a running meme in many project's telegram groups.

I don't think this correlates to project development because the project may have had a lower funding and need to rise from that.

I’m sure what the action of the exchange is in such situation speaks volume about them, I mean what are the things they’re able to do to support investors. In situations like that some exchange is will try as much as possible to pay the investors. An example of this was the action of Bitget regarding the REELT token, now everyone is very happy that the exchange helped them out.

Today's token developers see cryptocurrency as a business, they are willing to spend big money to list it but there is no real use for their project and they don't build a community so it's no surprise that their tokens are not attractive to traders and investors.  why the cryptocurrencies that are in the top 200 have survived to this day, because these tokens have big supporters, smart developers will definitely see that a good community will be able to make the cryptocurrencies they circulate successful.

This means that if you want to invest into something then you need to "do your own research" which is always the case and been said so many times and people just don't do it. I mean how many times have we seen people end up making a mistake regarding this? I mean we have seen it change so much and it resulted with it being something so much different, I just feel like it has to be something different and difficult in the end.

I believe that we are going to end up with a result that would be not that easy and should be considered difficult in the end. I think it is going to be tough, but we could end up with a result that would be a bit tough, it needs to be something that has to be done the way it should be, and not take any risks.

What is in our mind is that once a project has been listed to big exchanges it is considered a huge success already. It serves as an assurance to the buyers and of course, earning a profit is way possible. However, it has something to say that investors gain the courage to invest in a particular project when they hear about it from the developers. For those projects that are legit, spending huge fees to get listed doesn't really matter to them because the most important is that they will gain reputation and market demand as the profit will over flow back to them as well.

Maybe consider this as good factor but it cannot tell everything we should know that to many altcoins listed on top exchange but still experiencing heavy downfall. So for that series of cases we need to vigilant especially if we want to hold and choose only the top coins since we can assure that they have more bigger potential to pump or may have a bull run. I also research and see how the token devs perform their duties since maybe we can gather an info if they already abandon their project or doesn't give any good updates to help their token.

In order for a project to get listed on a good exchange, they normally have to have a scammy ICO. They take 50% of the funds to buy lambo and houses for themselves then give the other 50% to Binance. Then they and their VC buddies dump tokens on the market and a small portion of those will go to build something, but they will run out of money after a year or two and close shop.

The answer to this problem is decentralized listings on order book based DEXs. The problem is that there aren't many of these kinds of DEXs and most of them do not allow for self listing.

Be really careful before buying into new projects/ICOs. These days you can get tokens for free by participating in bounties on websites like zealy dot io. You can get tokens from Mantle, Q Blockchain, Lamina1, Shardeum and other new projects there before they list on an exchange or do a token sale.

we still need to consider the fact that binance itself have many programs for the bootstrap of these new projects though, so maybe they are partnering with binance but not to that extent where they gonna get instant listing, but honestly, exchange like binance doesn't always only list good quality coin from the fundamental perspective in their platform, they favour more trading volume and garnering the investors than the quality of a project itself, it can be proven from the fact that binance always list the hottest meme coin there is when the meme coin is growing so significantly so speaking about quality i don't think they are only limited to listing good coin.
the key takeaway is that if binance or popular exchange themselves didn't make announcement about listing, then some claim about that certain new project gets listed will most likely not gonna be true, though this also not necessarily a way to determine whether a project will be listed or not honestly.

I still do not believe that people could do something like that, it doesn't make sense at the moment and I think we should not consider the situation to be a lot more different than what we have so far. I think we should consider this to be something a bit different and we shouldn't really be considering the coin listing as important thing all that much.

I believe that we are seeing listing as much more important than what it is most of the time, it is not really a big deal and it shouldn't be considered as a big profit making method. I get that some people get hyped about it, but like you said it becomes a pump and dump when they get listed unless they are proper good coins and that's a way people could make a loss.

Seriously, I don't know yet. I mean I have seen several projects that claim they are part or partners of large exchanges. Sometimes I almost believe that but I also think that if there really is collaboration with an exchange like Binance then why is there no official announcement on the Binance site? And there are many new projects that claim to have partnered with Binance. This adds to my suspicions regarding whether the project is legit or not.
Moreover, a large exchange like Binance will not partner with a new project, especially if it is a metaverse, meme or game project.

That's why investors should investigate carefully. Especially in those scenario where some projects announces that they will be partnered with big exchanges to gather more investors. Proof checking should be done first. Using names of big exchanges like binance is a common thing in new projects, that's why it is better to have confirmation if it is real or not prior investing in a certain project.

the thing with some new coin is that, in regards of listing, sometime they just outright lying about that to garner attention and get as much investors as they can, thats why it should be the announcement from the exchange themselves that you could really take seriously.

have you ever found out about some new coin that proclaim to have partnership with binance just because they deployed their coin in binance smart chain? i've seen many of them, also using binance smart chain logo to boost their reputation while really they are not having any partnership or anything they just utilize this binance smart chain blockchain which quite literally everyone could do the same.

I think that when the crypto space seriously matures, it will be split into 2 camps. Those who want convenience, regulation and speed and those who want to be out of sight, who value privacy and freedom. Similar to the internet where we have clearnet and TOR. I'm sure the industry will split as it's impossible to please everyone and come to one thing. Either way there will be regulation and centralization, but if you want privacy then welcome to crypto TOR.

There are terms that follow listing of a coin or a token. However, the agreement are hidden from the public for the best between the exchange and the project owners and there is one that was explained by a YouTuber that: If after listing ya coin and it doesn't get traded and volume decline, there is a period it will reach that it will be delisted after informing the team because there are more projects outside that are trending which other exchanges are listing, the exchange will want to list that too have share of the trading fees but due to too much listing, they have to let's go of the inactive pairs.

In addition, listing comes with a fee and rules that have to be followed, like the fees, setting compensation for traders that participate in their trading competition, Airdrop for deposit to compensate people that Airdrop their token to the exchange; all of this are to boost liquidity and make the coin or token to trend and with this, the exchange get more trading fees in return as revenue for the exchange.

But there are tokens that are listed on top exchange without requesting for any fees. Some of these tokens were listed during bull run due to hype and fear of missing out on them, some exchanges listed it because people want it and also they don't want to miss the fees as well, they don't want their customers to live the exchange for another just for a coin they want to trade, this type of listing don't require any fees as they are done on the discretion of the exchange.

That's true, I have come and cross some that listen a good exchange platform and after sometime get delisted because of poor management of funds and some are intentional act to wicked some new investors that came in after have listened in good exchange get dump in the hand's of investor's and that is very very bad. Which I was once a victim and decided to invest any new most list at least 8 or more top cryptocurrency exchange platform, while holding.

I have also had the same experience. So the important point here is that all project development teams will definitely make ambitious promises to attract investor interest. My advice is NEVER BELIEVE those promises. If you are tempted by the high price when it is listed, please buy it at the pre-sale but don't spend all your money on it. I think $100 is enough if you are sure about the project (you are sure because you have done the research not because of their promises).

Anyways the market is really volatile so we can’t really predict the outcome most times but what we all need to know is that Big exchanges won’t ruin their reputation just because of getting huge fee from bad projects that will eventually rug pull. Check exchanges like Binance, Bitget and see how much processes projects pass before they can even list it into their innovation zone, the process placed check and monitor how good the project is before they can accept to list it unlike exchanges who doesn’t do a proper scrutiny and check on a project before listing it.

With the volume requirement, I still think that wash trading is still active in the exchanges.  Like how come coins that have no use case or any apps can have a huge volume?  Unless the project team is wash-trading them, yes?  Those who are trading fairly are often delisted since they are not able to meet certain requirements while those who are doing undertricks are still listed since they always meet the required volume.  So I think not because a certain coins or token stays in top exchanges, their volume is organic.