Only good coins are listed on top exchange? - page 4.

ultrloa

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1228

Quote from: Hypnosis00 on September 08, 2023, 06:44:56 PM

Quote from: danherbias07 on September 06, 2023, 04:36:44 AM

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

Where it was listed is a very important matter to consider because that will also affect the future of the project and possible ROI.
I have had an experience before where I bought some coins during their pre-sale period as they were promised to get listed in reputable exchanges, so I jumped and took the opportunity but unfortunately, that was a broken promise and made a lot of investors lose their money. But now, I realize that was a big mistake, I'd rather be buying coins that are already in the exchange whether it was on the top or not for at least we have the chance to sell them if needed.

But we cannot call automatically that they are good because their coins has been listed on reputable exchange since anything could happen especially we cannot control the minds of the devs so trade with proper caution is always we need to do so that we can be aware of possible outcome and can assure that we are always ready to trade it then take profit if anything good or bad happen for that coin. Expect that broken promises made because that's how dev attract their investor so you need to be more smart than them to avoid getting frustrated about things not being followed by them.

Hypnosis00

sr. member

Activity: 2422

Merit: 343

Quote from: danherbias07 on September 06, 2023, 04:36:44 AM

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

Where it was listed is a very important matter to consider because that will also affect the future of the project and possible ROI.
I have had an experience before where I bought some coins during their pre-sale period as they were promised to get listed in reputable exchanges, so I jumped and took the opportunity but unfortunately, that was a broken promise and made a lot of investors lose their money. But now, I realize that was a big mistake, I'd rather be buying coins that are already in the exchange whether it was on the top or not for at least we have the chance to sell them if needed.

Heulahee

jr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 1

I have seen many top-class exchanges that require a huge fee for listing a coin, and due to this, if some projects have a great or positive sight can't push them to that exchange to the exchange fee, and thus they listed on low exchange and loose their community, their holders and volume as well.

kentrolla

hero member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 566

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

It's a hard mix of both money and the team behind the project as major centralized exchanges require a lot of funds to be listed in their exchange and I have seen some projects who don't have huge funding but they have impressive roadmap and scope of technology, they initially get listed on tier 2 exchanges and eventually gets listed on exchanges like gate.io, kucoin or huobi before making it to Binance.

It's a sad thing as we see some shitty projects getting listed on Binance just because of money and sell their tokens , then delisted after a while due to unethical practices and those who believed in Binance and it's listing are the ones who suffer.

AakZaki

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 1084

zknodes.org

Quote from: Hanadawa on September 06, 2023, 07:02:29 AM

It usually happens because of a good coin with a good community but it doesn't have a good foundation and usually it happens in an instant project. Investors dumping tokens they hold is common in meme coin projects. Because we all know that meme coins won't last long and investors won't hold onto them for long enough.

some hyped meme coins just turn into pump and dump practices, and it happens over and over again.
We can see that many meme coins today continue to appear with strange names and they have increased by hundreds of percent. Those are just manipulative whales that are behind meme coins to attract new investors to enter.
Meme coins that are good and have a strong community will naturally be listed on top exchanges because they can afford fairly expensive listing fees. Of course there will be choices besides the registration fee that can be paid. See how meme coins like PEPE, FLOKI entered the Binance exchange because of their strong community.

Blitzboy

hero member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 561

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: justdimin on September 07, 2023, 07:29:32 AM

Quote from: isaac_clarke22 on September 05, 2023, 07:10:29 AM

Quote from: Saisher on August 29, 2023, 03:28:00 AM

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

That's the problem with most of the projects today, people do not realize that they are the ones making it so shitty. I mean if you invest into a project with a dev at the top, that means there is no decentralization, you expect centralization to make it more profitable, and then you pressure the team into making stuff that will take it higher and then you do not really end up doing anything that will make it go higher and that causes a lot of trouble.

I think it should be important to realize that we are not going to get that much return that quickly and that should not result with something that will benefit you, it will not be a good thing if you are not careful about it and you do not do it properly.

People often ignore the basic ideas of autonomy when they get into projects, because they are mostly motivated by the promise of big profits. Multiple times, I've seen how centralized control can cause choices that aren't based on facts or are harmful. The draw of quick wins can make it hard to see the project's bigger picture.

Its important to know that greedy choices made quickly can compromise the very core of a project. I agree with you completely that patience and a deep understanding of the project's goals are top priorities. Not doing so can quickly turn the excitement of possible gains into the fear of big losses.

justdimin

hero member

Activity: 3122

Merit: 672

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: isaac_clarke22 on September 05, 2023, 07:10:29 AM

Quote from: Saisher on August 29, 2023, 03:28:00 AM

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

That's the problem with most of the projects today, people do not realize that they are the ones making it so shitty. I mean if you invest into a project with a dev at the top, that means there is no decentralization, you expect centralization to make it more profitable, and then you pressure the team into making stuff that will take it higher and then you do not really end up doing anything that will make it go higher and that causes a lot of trouble.

I think it should be important to realize that we are not going to get that much return that quickly and that should not result with something that will benefit you, it will not be a good thing if you are not careful about it and you do not do it properly.

Bazzu

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 60

Quote from: danherbias07 on September 06, 2023, 04:36:44 AM

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

I think buying coins before they are listed on an exchange is a good thing, because you have the potential to make huge profits, and it could even potentially increase by thousands of percent for the coins we hold.

Indeed, in this case our tactics in buying
crypto has to be good, and you have to be smart in choosing coins, because in my opinion, even if a coin is already on the top exchange, it doesn't necessarily mean that the coin has good potential for the long term.

Hanadawa

sr. member

Activity: 546

Merit: 367

rollbit.com/trading

Quote from: ?? on ??

That's Truth, because I have come across so many alt-coins in the most top cryptocurrency exchange platform at the initial time coin we pump and dump after some period of time and even get delisted in top exchange, but I still wonder such thing normally occurs, in most cases the community are strong with a very good plan in whitepepper and still get dump in the hand of investors.

It usually happens because of a good coin with a good community but it doesn't have a good foundation and usually it happens in an instant project. Investors dumping tokens they hold is common in meme coin projects. Because we all know that meme coins won't last long and investors won't hold onto them for long enough.

danherbias07

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1130

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

Bazzu

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 60

Actually, I'm a bit confused about answering your question, because I don't think we can accuse such and such altcoin of being bad or good, or whether the altcoin is listed on a top exchange or not and I also often see many altcoins listed on top exchanges collapse. , for example ftx, luna and so on, so I think in this case it will be difficult for us to guess which altcoins are good and which are not good.

Abiky

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1363

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Xal0lex on September 04, 2023, 11:46:44 AM

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

This is bad because it makes crypto extremely-centralized. Not only that, but the variety of useless coins makes the whole industry look like garbage. I guess crypto needs more time to mature before it can be taken seriously. With upcoming regulations, the number of scams and useless projects will decline. The ones that will ultimately win are centralized exchanges. That's because they hold all of the cards to move the market in their favor.

Newcomers into crypto will get "rekt" as their investments go all the way down the drain in an instant. After all, they're only thinking about getting rich quick. Who knows how the crypto market will grow 5-10 years from now? Just my opinion

Xal0lex

staff

Activity: 2436

Merit: 2347

Quote from: uneng on September 05, 2023, 06:51:22 AM

Quote from: Xal0lex on September 04, 2023, 11:46:44 AM

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

Investors should be very careful on this aspect, because they have nobody to protect them from such scam or poorly developed altcoins. Investors just have a false impression big exchanges are a guarantee of something, but in fact, they are listing and allowing their customers to deal with such coins and tokens because it's being profitable for them. However, exchanges don't care if an investor is going to lose money by adopting those altcoins.

That is a cons of an unregulated and decentralized market, although personally, I think it's also an opportunity for investors to evolve as individuals, responsible for their own acts and destiny.

The mere presence of a major exchange is not a guarantee of reliability and attractiveness of a token for an experienced investor. This reliability manifests itself in a group of signals that form analytics and decision making about investing in the token. For example, if a token is listed on a major exchange but it does not have any major investors, this is a reason to reject the token. Delistings on major exchanges also happen, and if no one funds the token, it can be forgotten very quickly.

isaac_clarke22

sr. member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 264

Quote from: Saisher on August 29, 2023, 03:28:00 AM

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

uneng

hero member

Activity: 2044

Merit: 784

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Xal0lex on September 04, 2023, 11:46:44 AM

Quote from: Abiky on September 01, 2023, 05:37:43 PM

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 31, 2023, 07:52:42 AM

Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

It's all about money these days. If a coin or token makes the exchange a lot of money, it get listed without remorse. You can see why worthless "meme" coins are listed on top exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. It's not because these coins are serious long-term investments, but rather a way to make short-term profits with trading fees collected from customers. A huge win for exchanges if you ask me.

In a DEX, things are even worse because anyone can list any coin they want at an affordable price (usually an on-chain fee is paid by the user). This opens up the doors for scams and theft. At least, we're not tied to a single option. As long as there's a way to buy or sell crypto, there should be nothing to worry about. Who knows if bad coins are removed from the market, leaving us only with good ones in the long run? Just my thoughts Grin

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

Investors should be very careful on this aspect, because they have nobody to protect them from such scam or poorly developed altcoins. Investors just have a false impression big exchanges are a guarantee of something, but in fact, they are listing and allowing their customers to deal with such coins and tokens because it's being profitable for them. However, exchanges don't care if an investor is going to lose money by adopting those altcoins.

That is a cons of an unregulated and decentralized market, although personally, I think it's also an opportunity for investors to evolve as individuals, responsible for their own acts and destiny.

gabbie2010

sr. member

Activity: 2590

Merit: 322

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

Quote from: Johnyz on August 29, 2023, 05:58:04 PM

Quote from: Cadaver20 on August 29, 2023, 03:14:51 PM

I think that not good coin but good project which can raise good amount of fund from tokensale are listed on top exchange. Because they can manage the listing fee of top exchange. But those that cannot raise a good amount of funds are listed on low quality exchanges. So everything depends on the fund and the fund depends on the investors.

This is a big challenge for every project to get listed on top CEX, because the fees are high and it requires volume so you can stay on their platform. If the project’s goal is to stay longer then its better for them to create a more competitive platform just like the other projects where you don’t need to apply for the listing because the exchange itself will initiate your listing because of the demand on your project and you don’t need to worry about the fees anymore.

Of course the importance of volume cannot be overemphasized because after payment of huge listing fee the token or coin must be well traded on daily basis on the exchange that is why most projects are well advertised and promoted and many are solution to a problem so as to continue to gain adoption or investment for it sustainability in the long run, if not there is the tendency of the coin getting delisted from the exchange this is very common in Binance which periodically delist some coins whose trading volume had dropped and it developers are no longer promoting it.

Xal0lex

staff

Activity: 2436

Merit: 2347

Quote from: Abiky on September 01, 2023, 05:37:43 PM

Quote from: Xal0lex on August 31, 2023, 07:52:42 AM

Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

It's all about money these days. If a coin or token makes the exchange a lot of money, it get listed without remorse. You can see why worthless "meme" coins are listed on top exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. It's not because these coins are serious long-term investments, but rather a way to make short-term profits with trading fees collected from customers. A huge win for exchanges if you ask me.

In a DEX, things are even worse because anyone can list any coin they want at an affordable price (usually an on-chain fee is paid by the user). This opens up the doors for scams and theft. At least, we're not tied to a single option. As long as there's a way to buy or sell crypto, there should be nothing to worry about. Who knows if bad coins are removed from the market, leaving us only with good ones in the long run? Just my thoughts Grin

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

Godday

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 397

dice9.win/ - Simple, fast and provably fair

Quote from: Best-mary on September 01, 2023, 03:26:32 PM

I don't think it is only good coins that are listed in good exchanges. What about PEPE? I don't mean it's a bad coin but looking at it as a meme coin shouldn't be listed on good exchanges right? But rather it is listed in almost all exchanges even with one of the exchanges organising a PNL competition. But I understand what you mean. You should also know that these exchanges don't know the future of this coin when they get them listed too.

Exchanges will only list coins that are good for them, not traders. Stop talking about reputation or other things. In the ToS it has been stated that any form of loss resulting from trading is not the responsibility of the exchange. Several times we have seen that coins that were originally on large exchanges have now had to be delisted due to rugpull.

bluebit25

sr. member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 292

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Not sure exactly, but this is all I can remember from a listing service:

Quote

1. Tier 1
Okx - 150k$-300k$
Crypto.com - 150K$-300K$
Phemex - 100K Liquidity-Free
Huobi - 100K-250k$
Kucoin - 100k-300K$
Bithumb - 70K-100K$
Bybit - 60K-200k$
Gate.io - 50K-300k$
BitGet - 40K -150K$
BingX - 40K-100K$

2. Tier 2
MEXC - 20K$ + 30K$ Tokens
Lbank - 40K$
Bkex - 34,500$
BitMart - 29,500$
XT - 20,000$
BTCEX - 15K$-20K$
Probit - 15K-20k$
Coinw - 15K$
Bitrue - 12K-25K$
Digifinex - 10K$

3. Tier 3
Latoken - 10K$-15K$
Coinstore - 10k$
CoinTiger - 5K$
Localtrade - 4k$-6K$
IndoEX - 3K$-5K$
Coinsbit - 3,5K$
DEX Trade - 2.5K$
Azbit - 1K$-3K$
vinDax - 924$

It's not really quality, which I refer to here and also another listing story, simply relationships and financial security to be able to be anywhere. Some of the places I know of are like spaces for listing memecoins and shitcoins. Perhaps the marketing as well as the introduction of many projects are following a certain pattern, sometimes they just differ in the form names and the content is the same and there is a rich source of money to spread many different exchanges(small tip for exaggeration), in addition to not only listing with cex, but I also came across dozens of different marketing services.

Gallar

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 346

Quote from: Jocuserious on August 28, 2023, 01:01:16 PM

No way

~Snip

Yup, that's absolutely right OP. Not all coins listed in the top market can guarantee that they are good and very high quality. Because in reality all coins on the exchange depend on the number of investors who enter and buy these coins. But from what I know, there aren't too many coins removed from an exchange. Because what I see in markets like Binance, most of the coins that are listed there always have investors. Even though most of the coins have only a few investors, the bottom line is that they still have investors. And basically all coins can also enter an exchange, but still, each exchange must have certain requirements, to be able to make a coin enter / be listed on the exchange.

But in conclusion, coins that have succeeded in entering a large market, such as Binance. Certainly at the beginning of the registration these coins must have met the requirements applied by binance. But after taking to the field (market) these coins compete with each other. So it's not surprising that some of these coins have high increases, those that have moderate increases, and some that even go down.
Because in essence, the key to the success of a coin lies in existing investors.

Topic: Only good coins are listed on top exchange? - page 4. (Read 889 times)