Topic: Only good coins are listed on top exchange? - page 6. (Read 930 times)

Back then, you could easily find some coins that were good for investment just before they got listed in some big exchanges like Binance and once they got listed you have just made a tremendous amount of income because their price would spike and multiplied after that. But that's not really the case every time because others took the opportunity to lie to their investors about it and until now they haven't been listed in any big exchanges. right now, the right thing to do is to update your knowledge about investment because whatever trends the scammer will always mimic it and confuse you about their scam projects.

These developers think that a reputable or big exchange will be a tool for them to gain more responds from the community and a ticket to their success. But unfortunately, it was not only the thing that they must consider as these investors are not just after those coins that are listed to big exchanges but also, it matters how useful it was in the crypto space. Even if it was listed like in Binance, still there is no assurance that investors will choice their projects unless it shows good development which could gain more interest to the community.

Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

   -    As far as I know, there are good crypto coins that are listed on the top exchanges for free as long as they meet the required requirements. Then the exchanges that offer free listing on their platforms are gate.io, Hitbtc, Mexc, and Lbank.

They differ only in fees, which are not far from the big exchanges in the crypto industry. So it is not true that there are no good coins listed on the top exchanges, even though it is not that big a name in the crypto industry, to my understanding.

Yes, I totally agree with what you mentioned, as the success and future of altcoins does not depend on their listings in the exchange platforms, even if they are top exchanges in the market, but the newly listed tokens on the famous exchange platforms are attractive to investors because they still have an excellent opportunity to be entered by investors and traders at a low price, and they can be pumped after opening trading on them for a period and after increasing the demands for their purchases, and also if the token is listed on platforms such as Binance or other famous platforms in the market, so this will reduce the possibility that the currency be a scam token, because there are fundamental and technical criteria that Binance requires from the currency team, besides the large fees for listing their currency, such as the basics of the project, the reputation of the team, its expertise and advisors, community support, the whitepaper, the basic technology of the project, the roadmap and many other more stringent criteria, but of course, the future of the token does not depend primarily on its listings on exchange platforms. The token may fail and be delisted from the exchange platform and from the rest of the other platforms, as happened with Terra Luna and others. There are other, more important factors that the investor should take into consideration and do his research before making his investment decision.

Even bad coins are being listed in the top exchanges that later on turns into a scam project, and this happened many times already.
The cost of listing to top exchange might not that expensive if they have the funds to support the project and thinking about the possible profit that they can get from the investors, I'm sure listing is not their problem at all. Well, new projects have to build their system first and have a good community to support their projects, listing is one way to tell that the project is doing good but again this is not a guarantee that the project is worth investing, better to look on the other side and understand the project too.

Not all. There's a bunch of altcoins that were delisted during the bear market, most of those coins were listed during the market where everybody is making good profit so I think that the listing fee is not that much compared to the possible profit that developers can make on the market. Being listed on a top exchange can really have an impact to a token especially on binance LOL. I've seen many projects that are sky rocketing after it was listed on binance and of course dropping down as the hype expires.

An exchange has the coins to thank for making it relevant and for creating room where the ideals of the exchange is expressed in terms of its service delivery and customer care.
The good long standing, time tested, reliable and more stable coins always make the top of the list if an exchange is to gain customers and remain in business. BTC, ETH, BNB, make some of the top coins because they have existed long time now and still show potential to do better with upgraded development and good rates.
I don't think any exchange willing to remain in business for long would consider listing altcoins without potential to withstand market volatilities on its exchange. It's simply bad for business.

Sad but true, we already evolved a lot that this has change the rules of the game, now, it's very different, anyone can make a coin and developed in and then instant profit for them because there are a lot of groups that is willing to pump it up.


Exchanges had to make some money too, so their business model is that if a coin is not selling then they as might as well delisted it. But it's not instant though, I mean they will be given the chance (developers), to make the coin active again.

But if it is already dead, then there's no other choice but to removed them.

There are a number of coins that are used to steal investors' money through ponzi schemes or other frauds through coin development, I don't deny that because there are indeed many incidents that we have witnessed to this day.
Paying attention to development and the ecosystem, as well as looking at activities in the ecosystem, needs to be continuously monitored because that is what makes an altcoin project develop.
That is if we really want to be careful in assessing an altcoin that we buy, as the principle of being an objective crypto investor regarding the future expectations that will be given by project developers to their investors.

The stock exchange market only functions as a third party that brings together sellers and buyers. Good exchanges do have standards in selecting the coins they will list on their markets. But they can also delist the coin from their exchange if there has been a lack of trading volume. So big exchanges actually prefer the coins they list because it affects the credibility of their exchange.

True, Many coins/tokens were delisted due to lack of demand and development. and this is where it reads and the issue a is fundamental and what is hot and new for me is that Paxos will end the redemption of BUSD in January 2024. will there be any changes for Hodl BUSD before the deadline for converting to usdt.

It's crazy to think someone would pay a hefty sum of money just to get his/her token listed on a centralized exchange. Only a group of developers that are well-funded (probably through an ICO) will be able to do this. You can see why the crypto market is dominated by "Wall Street" these days. Those with a lot of money hold all the cards to make an specific cryptocurrency project rise all the way to the moon. This is sad because we're moving away from crypto's original purpose.

Regarding your question if only good coins are listed in an exchange, I'd say that's not necessarily the case these days. I've seen "shitcoins" being listed on prominent exchanges like Coinbase and Binance just because they want to follow the hype. This means more money in their pockets as they collect trading fees. Just because a coin gets listed in an exchange, doesn't mean it's worth the investment. You need to do your own research prior to making any investment decisions. Unfortunately, most people don't do this and end up getting "rekt" in the process. Crypto is still in its infancy, so I'm confident it will mature in the future. As long as it stays decentralized, there should be nothing to worry about. Just my thoughts

thats not really the truth here, even I've encountered many shit project in binance alone you could simply say that shit project will be listed more in other exchanges with lesser reputation.
even you should already know that many meme coins are getting listed in various top exchanges, not because they are fundamentally good project its because
they could attract attention of many speculators thus increase trading volume of the exchanges for certain period of time which might be beneficial for them since they could
simply reap the benefits from the trading fee alone. even though that might not be significant for them but retaining massive trading volume is what makes an exchange a good exchange.

Yes, indeed, sometimes fees for listing on the good top exchange limit some potential new coins. In this case, not all good coins are able to list on the top exchange for their initial listing. On the other hand, not all coins listed on top exchanges are good coins. Because sometimes, they do have high hype when they are just listed on top exchanges. But unfortunately, there are some of them who are unable to maintain their position and have not been able to develop their potential, so that some are easily delisted from top exchanges. In this case, actually the top exchanges are at least able to provide pretty good results, but not all new projects can actually develop and survive on the top exchanges.

This is a big challenge for every project to get listed on top CEX, because the fees are high and it requires volume so you can stay on their platform. If the project’s goal is to stay longer then its better for them to create a more competitive platform just like the other projects where you don’t need to apply for the listing because the exchange itself will initiate your listing because of the demand on your project and you don’t need to worry about the fees anymore.

i consider a coin a good one if they have actual usage in this market. where their clients are indeed using them for certain use. however, most of these alts are just to enrich their respective developers. hence, most are just being used as pump and dump coin. also, look for the developments of the project. if it is stagnant and just pure talk, then the team is just buying time before they abandon the platform.

I don't know why anyone would buy something based on what exchange its on because you are right.  With the right amount of money most of these exchanges will list your coin.  Even if they don't pay theor way it means nothing, there could be many nefarious reasons for this.  Who knows insiders at the exchange could have a bag they want to pump.  Either way don't go by what exchanges it's on.

I think that not good coin but good project which can raise good amount of fund from tokensale are listed on top exchange. Because they can manage the listing fee of top exchange. But those that cannot raise a good amount of funds are listed on low quality exchanges. So everything depends on the fund and the fund depends on the investors.

It's actually wrong. If you were talking about low tier exchange site and you do need money to be listed there but the different method when it comes to the major exchange sites. The major exchange site has very strict requirement to be completed first before you will able to list your token there.

People just need waiting for the hype to go first. It's caused by people can be trapped by hype.
I often saw people were thinking if the price of token can go even higher after the pump and this totally wrong.

True, some were also being scam tokens caused by the dev was just rugpulling its investors. Exchange site is always monitoring the developments from the projects.