Topic: 🦉 Owl.games 🦉 Web 3.0 Crypto Casino & Sportsbook - BTC-Metamask-Walletconnect - page 14. (Read 12412 times)

Exchange liquidity does not matter because no transaction history cancels liquidity in smart contracts, maybe the trading interest of this token has decreased significantly because the team has not released big news to pump up the price of OWL tokens, the daily trading volume is less than $100 and it is very worrying that it will be removed from the exchange trading platform, if trading volume does not reach the minimum limit specified in the rules of the exchange.

Owldao seems not aware on this sudden decrease on trading volume because there recent tweet is about there token flying high and ironic to the reality of the current market situation of Owl. The telegram group is already flooded by users participating on daily airdrop. I still have Owl tokens stake but this issue doesn’t concern me at all since there’s still a liquidity available on the liquidity pool. I think all Owl holders is just holding right now.

I just check now and you’re right. I visit the smart contract address of the token to check if token transfer is normal but it surprised me that only 8 transaction recorded OWL transfer and the last tx was 18 minutes ago with a huge gap to previous transaction. https://bscscan.com/token/0x9085b4d52c3e0b8b6f9af6213e85a433c7d76f19

It’s odd to see the CEX decrease in volume will be same to DEX at the same time. It’s either everyone is just staking there token or they are fixing something that related to the exchange liquidity.

I was seeing a really low ammoun of OWL token being trading in the market, first time i see this, its quite strange because always it was in the 100k band or even 200k in 24 hrs, but now seems like less than 100 usd being trade. Maybe MECX its in a maintenance scheudule, but also in pancakeswap its no movement.

This its not bad or good, but strange yes.

You seem to have to pay attention to the terms and conditions on the website, there may be differences from the TOS of other casinos mentioned for additional means must follow the KYC procedure when a user deposits funds into his account, so you can correct me if I misinterpret the TOS and my opinion if every user must first complete KYC procedure even for deposit.

If you look at the terms and conditions on owl.games they also state that they can request KYC documents if they suspect that there is anything fishy or abnormal with your account. So they are not different than other casinos and as discussed in many other topics, I think more and more sites will be starting to request to do KYC even for small withdrawals.

Really Good to see the consistency of the owl team in their marketing and their choice of management to use, and I also read some members here praising them for being a none KYC casino, to me that was a misconception there as I believe most casinos with a license can request for KYC from a player at any point there is a need for that.

Owl token as the native token can also be used to play games on the casino and deposits can also be made using direct wallet connect so in my understanding one needs to connect a wallet to the other chain to be able to play on the casino.

I think it is enough to discuss about the deleted thread or about the banned owl account as it is all resolved already.
If someone want to discuss about it further due to pro and cons about the rule, it is better to create a thread in the meta board.

---

Anyway I just explored owl.games a bit further especially related to the VIP program.
It is nice to see a detailed information about how to calculate the level up bonus as there is a fixed formula for it.
However I'm a bit confused to which EXP to be used to calculate for each level, is it the "Level Required" or the "Total Required"?

No. The transaction will still go first on your casino wallet same with using email. The only difference on using metamask you can quickly setup your account by just connecting your wallet but the functionality of both account is same because you will still need to deposit and withdraw to your account using metamask wallet.

I think the only advantage of email was you can change your password once your account was hacked which you can’t do when you are using metamask since your metamask address is your casino account.

Haha. Plus "BSC Bitcoin" is not actually Bitcoin. It's merely an IOU issued in another "blockchain", and in his example the Binance Smart Chain. I believe many users don't understand the difference yet, and have presumed that tokens representing Bitcoins in another chain is as good as actual Bitcoins. It's not, because you need to trust a third party holding the Bitcoins.

What's the difference between using MetaMask, and opening an account? Does using MetaMask send the coins straight to your wallet if you win? Or do you also need to deposit and withdraw to an account?

There is a pinned thread in the games and rounds, which clearly says that altcoins giveaways aren't allowed. Moderates have to deal with a lot of things in the forum. So, they are strict in some cases so that other people don't repeat those mistakes. This isn't the first time when the users received ban by participating in the altcoins giveaway of games and rounds section. We have to stay aware about those: Altcoin give-away rule results in temporary bans. Read before posting.

Based on the explanation of 'sujonali1819', Owl.games giveaway wasn't in altcoins actually. But everyone in the forum would take it as an altcoins giveaway by watching the title of the giveaway thread.

I think it was deleted by the moderators. sujonali1819 opened a thread about it in the Meta board: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mods-is-game-credit-counted-as-an-altcoin-for-a-crypto-casino-in-this-forum-5411889

I did try to participate in the deleted giveaway thread. I compare it to the one on the link above, I can say the deleted one is different. I have no idea why the one created in Games and Rounds was deleted. Was it deleted by mods or owl.games deleted it themselves? Perhaps they deleted it themselves to make some changes on the rules/requirements. Lets  wait for them to clarify, I was exited to participate but a bit confused why the thread is gone.

Only giveaways that pays Bitcoin as reward is only allowed to post in there and the rest should be on Altcoin section under the bounties category since the reward is an Altcoin. This is same in the casino that don't accept Bitcoin in there currency to separate Altcoin to Bitcoin because Bitcoin is the priority here.

Owl is paying signature campaign participants in Bitcoin so I believe this not an issue to them if they will convert there Owl tokens to Bitcoin for the reward.

I have a different understanding of what you think about this rule, I understand it that 30 posts are not what participants have to do during the giveaway period (like signature campaign) but min posts that participants must have if he wants to take part in this giveaway, I believe that this rule is to prevent multi-account or at least this giveaway is only for active forum members.
but is the giveaway the thread that has been deleted the same as this giveaway https://owl.games/airdrop?

Some moderators apparently think that this kind of competition is not suitable for Games and Rounds. Maybe the reason is that the reward was in OWL tokens and not in Bitcoin. Whatever the reason, I hope they resolve the misunderstanding.

If they post it in the wrong board then which board do you think it will fit better? I don't there is a games and round for altcoins and tokens. We do have a bounty section but they won't still be allowed there since the rule of their giveaway thread doesn't involve tasks which are often seen in bounties like reposting/posting something about the project in social media sites. Another thing is that the rules of their giveaway is too easy.

I don't mean the wagering requirements but the one where your account must have 30 posts to be able to qualify for the giveaway. We have a rule on altcoin bounty section that incentivizing low effort task are not allowed.

I cant find this topic, it seems that the post is deleted and I'm not sure why it is deleted.
I still can see it as it is archived here https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6085/60855623.html , I read the whole post for the giveaway and it seems that it is deleted because owl made it in the wrong board.
There is a rule that giveaway with altcoins are not belong to Games and Rounds board.
Will owl.games create a new topic to replace the deleted topic, I see it as an attractive promotion but it would be better if the wagering requirement is reduced.
50x wagering requirement is just too high, most other casino has 40x wagering requirement for similar promotion.

Really good to see OWL games making a post in the Games and Round section.

That was missed. So as we can se the team keeps working not only in the token, also in the casino itself.
I dont know if imgoing to participate because i dont play casino games but its good to see.

Yes the price we cant expect so much in this bear market.

Well that is a good omen for the casino, whenever signature campaigns are launched it means that the casino is aiming for the top, however the token thing is something that I really like from the point of view of project, but now as long as the BTC continues low in price it is very difficult for it to rise, but it is a good time that they have been relaunched, if in a short time bitcoin manages to be in a bullish trend, the tokens will do well, because investors at some point At the time of the bullish trend of BTC they will want to make a profit and will seek refuge in tokens or altcoins, and the advantage that casino tokens have is that they can be much more reliable.


It is very true, this is really a very good functionality, I am glad when sites have bitcoin deposits and withdrawals available, what they have to add over time would be LN, although many people do not see it as necessary, I do, some only want to use BTC but with the lowest rate, I only imagine the scenario when Bitcoin reaches a great price, I am sure that all networks will be congested, in fact BSC in 2021 was congested, and when NFT was implemented it was when there were more problems, and more so when it came to BNB, that Binance's minimum withdrawal was equal to or greater than 100USD.