The only people who really got hurt are:
- The whales, like Molly, who for some reason had faith in Wolong
- The IPO investors who got greedy, they saw instant 200-400% ROI and didn't sell
- The traders who bought at the top and the way down
Now, the traders (as i'm not one) should expect that risk on any coin, so is it a hurt? Maybe, but that's the game they play.
0 day miners had it the best, IMO. You ended up with a lot of coin that you were able to instantly flip at great profits. If you mine hype coins and don't immediately unload 50-75% as soon as you can, I think you're just being greedy. Figure out what you want to save and see if it goes to the moon. Sure, you won't make as much as you could have, but you also won't be left in this situation.
Now, with all that said, I am still compelled by the idea of this coin from a conceptual level. If you could work out some form of actual trust in an IPO (i think that vodcast mentioned multi-sig wallets as an example), and use the IPO BTC as a form of "stock buyback" to support the coin. I think that's a pretty good idea. It's what corporations do to support their shareholders if the price falls, so why not in crypto.
It clearly failed here on 2 fronts.
- The devs seemed relatively naive to cut such a deal with Wolong (I had no idea who he was before this coin). I mean, you let this guy get his hands on ALL the BTC AND the premine?! Did no one think this was a bad idea? This, plus the IRC logs, really illustrate to me that they are knuckleheads.
- Wolong's instability. Regardless of whether he got pissed off at a dev for selling some or not, he still could have made a shit ton of money if he kept things going and talked to the devs privately. This just reinforces the notion that the devs are kinda stupid for not really having full understanding of who they went into business with.
So... how could this have succeeded? I dunno, you needed some method to insulate the IPO BTC/Premine from the person(s) supporting the price. Put it in escrow, multi-sig (does this even exist yet?) wallet, in the hands of a reputable person.
You would also need to outline the use of the IPO BTC in support of the coin. i.e. "we'll support the IPO price with BTC and every 7 days, purchase x amount of BTC at current market prices until the IPO funds are used up (make it something like a 6 month timeframe where IPO funds would be put back into the coin if the price stays above IPO price). These bought back shares will be split among the devs/team as their salary (and outline specifically who is getting what)". Do something like that and have no additional premine on top of it and it might just work. But i'm only spitballing here, haven't really thought it through.
The shortcoming on any scheme like this though is the human/greed factor... which there seems to be plenty of here