I'm trying to decide if it is fraud, or farce.
The standard view is that no monopole magnets exist, though very serious and capable investigators are searching for them.
The presentation in the film fails to present monopoles in any light that is credible.
Monopole magnets exist (the discovery was presented at the Global MAGLEV Conference in 2000 in Lausanne, Switzerland), but they are only possible in superconducting type environments, needing a ton of energy input. Regardless, you wouldn't be able to get a piece of wire to spin with a monopole magnet, since that wire would just be attracted to such a magnet the same way it would be attracted to one of the poles of any normal magnet.
What's happening in the video is the nails are hooked up to a battery hidden in the wooden block, and the ends of the wire insulation are scraped off on one side, so the wire coil becomes a magnet when the scraped side is down, and stops being a magnet when the scraped side is up. Once you get the coil spinning, it periodically turns into a magnet, pulling one end of it (actually just orienting itself) towards the magnet, then it turns off, using inertia to continue spinning until it turns on again, pulling itself once more. A fairly basic motor.
I made a device following Geim et al in Nature, 2000, nicknamed "the diamagnetic levitator."
I used a Radio Shack NiFeB, some custom made 0.5" x perhaps 3/16" Bismuth disks of which I still have perhaps 5,000, and a low energy ceramic "Kitchen Magnet" all in very carefully aligned initial geometry.
Is there any chance you have the software to do a mesh analysis of the magnetic field and potential energy vs displacement of the system?
In addition, I would like to have an analysis with a bismuth torus about 1mm tube, ideal cross section, large enough to clear the NiFeB magnet, at at the height where gravity and magnetic life nominally cancel.
Such software was far, far outside my budget in 2000.
) use a "free energy" device that does just this. You know how in a quantum vacuum state there is still energy present? Heisenberg had a lot to say about this. Here's the wiki with more info on vacuum energy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy. Now I understand that the disclosure project has a scientific importance roughly equivalent to the town drunk, but it's still a neat idea to consider. No fuel required. You're using the energy inherent to the universe. There's something beautiful about that. 
I'm into this aether theory actually, that there's an all space filling medium. That means no free energy ofc, but it can explain the appearing and disappearing particles 
