Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 414. (Read 784874 times)
May 07, 2018, 03:40:16 PM
Is there a chance that 3.0 will have dual mine (preferably keccak/blake2s) ?
May 07, 2018, 03:29:00 PM
Hi Everyone,
First post on the forum, started mining as a hobby a few months ago.
Changed to PhoenixMiner over the weekend as Claymore crashed out after a few minutes when using the EthLargement pill [I have an 1080TI in my rig].
PhoenixMiner doesn't crash when on the pill and the hashrates are also a bit higher, so far so good [apart from when Windows Defender ignores the fact that PhoenixMiner is added to the exclusions].
The issue I'm having is that every now and then the reported hashrate on nanopool drops to 0 and stays there until I reboot the miner.
The start_miner.bat I'm using looks like below:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
PhoenixMiner.exe -pool eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -wal 0xe"myethadress"19e2e58/gaming1
Do I miss something from the bat file?
The rig is running windows 10 64 bit.
Any insight as to where I go wrong is appreciated!
First post on the forum, started mining as a hobby a few months ago.
Changed to PhoenixMiner over the weekend as Claymore crashed out after a few minutes when using the EthLargement pill [I have an 1080TI in my rig].
PhoenixMiner doesn't crash when on the pill and the hashrates are also a bit higher, so far so good [apart from when Windows Defender ignores the fact that PhoenixMiner is added to the exclusions].
The issue I'm having is that every now and then the reported hashrate on nanopool drops to 0 and stays there until I reboot the miner.
The start_miner.bat I'm using looks like below:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
PhoenixMiner.exe -pool eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -wal 0xe"myethadress"19e2e58/gaming1
Do I miss something from the bat file?
The rig is running windows 10 64 bit.
Any insight as to where I go wrong is appreciated!
May 07, 2018, 02:18:43 PM
Will CLO be added as dev fee soon? It takes quite a while to rebuild the DAG everytime it switches.
In the meantime, does anybody know which dev fee coin that has smallest DAG for now?
In the meantime, does anybody know which dev fee coin that has smallest DAG for now?
May 07, 2018, 02:11:33 PM
Anybody knows why today PM 2.9e does not report hashrate to Nanopool?
PhoenixMiner 2.9e
Params: -nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass 123 -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40 -logsmaxsize 0 -nvnew 0
Before 2018-05-07 12:30 -nvnew was absent and -mi 10 was used.
After 2018-05-07 12:30 -mi was removed and -nvnew 0 was added.
PhoenixMiner 2.9e
Params: -nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass 123 -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40 -logsmaxsize 0 -nvnew 0
Before 2018-05-07 12:30 -nvnew was absent and -mi 10 was used.
After 2018-05-07 12:30 -mi was removed and -nvnew 0 was added.
Same issue for me since yesterday, I think it's an issue from Nanopool as I've other errors (miner not found & so on).
May 07, 2018, 02:04:47 PM
Hi PM developers. I have a request to one little improvement
Can you add current date and time in a line
*** 0:04 ***************************************************?
So it will be, for example
*** 2018.05.07:21:00:40.760 (0:04) *****************************
Can you add current date and time in a line
*** 0:04 ***************************************************?
So it will be, for example
*** 2018.05.07:21:00:40.760 (0:04) *****************************
Code:
*** 0:04 ***************************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 0:04
Eth speed: 192.449 MH/s, shares: 6/0/0, time: 0:04
GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (1) 2: 32.080 MH/s (1) 3: 32.068 MH/s (0) 4: 32.074 MH/s (2) 5: 32.071 MH/s (1) 6: 32.078 MH/s (1)
Eth: Accepted shares 6 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 6490.2 GH (!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 192.429 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 221.40 MH/s; at pool: 221.40 MH/s
Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 0:04
Eth speed: 192.449 MH/s, shares: 6/0/0, time: 0:04
GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (1) 2: 32.080 MH/s (1) 3: 32.068 MH/s (0) 4: 32.074 MH/s (2) 5: 32.071 MH/s (1) 6: 32.078 MH/s (1)
Eth: Accepted shares 6 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 6490.2 GH (!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 192.429 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 221.40 MH/s; at pool: 221.40 MH/s
May 07, 2018, 01:42:52 PM
Anybody knows why today PM 2.9e does not report hashrate to Nanopool?
https://content.screencast.com/users/SergeyBervinov/folders/Jing/media/c09614be-e98b-4dda-b987-fc30830790e5/2018-05-07_2035.png
PhoenixMiner 2.9e
Params: -nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass 123 -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40 -logsmaxsize 0 -nvnew 0
Before 2018-05-07 12:30 -nvnew was absent and -mi 10 was used.
After 2018-05-07 12:30 -mi was removed and -nvnew 0 was added.
https://content.screencast.com/users/SergeyBervinov/folders/Jing/media/c09614be-e98b-4dda-b987-fc30830790e5/2018-05-07_2035.png
PhoenixMiner 2.9e
Params: -nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass 123 -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40 -logsmaxsize 0 -nvnew 0
Before 2018-05-07 12:30 -nvnew was absent and -mi 10 was used.
After 2018-05-07 12:30 -mi was removed and -nvnew 0 was added.
May 07, 2018, 07:57:15 AM
I've noticed This:
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
For nvidia set power limit at MSI Afterburner to a value betwet 50-60 % - find a minimum value that does not lower the hash.
For Amd - assuming you use the modded Rom with memory timing patch only and no other changes use miner setting for freq and voltages. Set voltages for both men and core to 850. Again you need to find optimal and stable values...
Send a PM if you need additional help.
I have similar rig with 7x 1070 and 6x rx580 hashing at 409 MH/s at 1680W.
Thanks for the tip. The best i can do is 1900w.
Can tou Share your command line and Afterburnner config for NVIDIA(our systems are the same).
I pay 0.20€/kW... So every watt counts.
Thanks.
Sure I can; Complete setup:
Power Usage: 1660W @Wall
This rig has an i7 core 7700K which runs at 50% (about 50 watts) for XMR mining.
Nvidia Driver: 397.31 (GPU: GIGABYTE GTX 1070 8GB GDDR5 - GV-N1070WF2OC-8GD)
AMD Driver: Win10-64Bit-Radeon-Software-Adrenalin-Edition-18.2.1-Feb7 (GPU: ASUS STRIX RadeonRX 580 8GB O8G -
ASUVG-RX580-O8G)
AMD Modded ROM: Only Memory Timings STRAP Patched using PolarisBiosEditor (One click patch).
MSI Afterburtner Settings:
Core Voltage: +0
Power Limit %: 58
Temp. limit (oC): 60
Core Clock (MHz): -200 (minus 200)
Memory Clock (Mhz): +705
Fan Speed (%): 45 (Manual)
start script:
Code:
setlocal
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set DEFAULT_POOL=eu1.ethermine.org:4444
set WORKER=
set WALLET=
:: Archive old logs
move log*.txt old
echo Last start at: %TIME% %DATE% >>reboot.log
PhoenixMiner.exe config.txt
endlocal
Command Line - I use config file for PH:setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set DEFAULT_POOL=eu1.ethermine.org:4444
set WORKER=
set WALLET=
:: Archive old logs
move log*.txt old
echo Last start at: %TIME% %DATE% >>reboot.log
PhoenixMiner.exe config.txt
endlocal
:config.txt
Code:
-epool %DEFAULT_POOL%
-ewal %WALLET%.%WORKER%
-epsw x
-clKernel 1
-cclock 0,0,0,0,1170,0,0,1160,1140,1160,1180,0,1120
-mclock 0,0,0,0,2160,0,0,2165,2150,2160,2155,0,2085
-cvddc 0,0,0,0,835,0,0,835,835,900,835,0,835
-mvddc 0,0,0,0,835,0,0,835,835,900,835,0,835
-rmode 2
-ewal %WALLET%.%WORKER%
-epsw x
-clKernel 1
-cclock 0,0,0,0,1170,0,0,1160,1140,1160,1180,0,1120
-mclock 0,0,0,0,2160,0,0,2165,2150,2160,2155,0,2085
-cvddc 0,0,0,0,835,0,0,835,835,900,835,0,835
-mvddc 0,0,0,0,835,0,0,835,835,900,835,0,835
-rmode 2
Command line: PhoenixMiner.exe config.txt
:reboot.bat--
Code:
:: Some trickery to mitigate the PH bug: config file not found from reboot.bat.
echo Last reboot at: %TIME% %DATE% >>reboot.log
copy config.txt config-reboot.txt
PhoenixMiner.exe config-reboot.txt
echo Last reboot at: %TIME% %DATE% >>reboot.log
copy config.txt config-reboot.txt
PhoenixMiner.exe config-reboot.txt
Stats from PH:
Code:
*** 42:18 ***************************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on eu1.ethermine.org:4444 for 42:18
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU2: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 2), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU3: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 6), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU4: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 8), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU5: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 9), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU6: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 10), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU7: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 11), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU8: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 13), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU9: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 14), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU10: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 15), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU11: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 16), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU12: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 17), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU13: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 18), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU1: 56C 45%, GPU2: 59C 45%, GPU3: 54C 45%, GPU4: 52C 45%, GPU5: 50C 41%, GPU6: 56C 45%, GPU7: 59C 45%, GPU8: 50C 0%, GPU9: 52C 41%, GPU10: 51C 41%, GPU11: 51C 41%, GPU12: 53C 45%, GPU13: 52C 0%
Eth: Accepted shares 15142 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 11.6 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 410.120 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 397.60 MH/s; at pool: 397.60 MH/s
GPUs: 1: 32.357 MH/s (1183) 2: 32.334 MH/s (1203) 3: 32.340 MH/s (1258) 4: 32.340 MH/s (1222) 5: 30.843 MH/s (1145) 6: 32.378 MH/s (1197) 7: 32.376 MH/s (1190) 8: 30.932 MH/s (1104) 9: 30.618 MH/s (1144) 10: 30.803 MH/s (1113) 11: 30.868 MH/s (1133) 12: 32.356 MH/s (1210) 13: 29.492 MH/s (1088)
Eth: Mining ETH on eu1.ethermine.org:4444 for 42:18
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU2: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 2), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU3: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 6), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU4: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 8), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU5: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 9), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU6: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 10), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU7: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 11), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU8: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 13), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU9: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 14), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU10: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 15), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU11: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 16), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU12: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 17), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU13: Radeon RX 580 Series (pcie 18), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 36 CUs
GPU1: 56C 45%, GPU2: 59C 45%, GPU3: 54C 45%, GPU4: 52C 45%, GPU5: 50C 41%, GPU6: 56C 45%, GPU7: 59C 45%, GPU8: 50C 0%, GPU9: 52C 41%, GPU10: 51C 41%, GPU11: 51C 41%, GPU12: 53C 45%, GPU13: 52C 0%
Eth: Accepted shares 15142 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 11.6 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 410.120 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 397.60 MH/s; at pool: 397.60 MH/s
GPUs: 1: 32.357 MH/s (1183) 2: 32.334 MH/s (1203) 3: 32.340 MH/s (1258) 4: 32.340 MH/s (1222) 5: 30.843 MH/s (1145) 6: 32.378 MH/s (1197) 7: 32.376 MH/s (1190) 8: 30.932 MH/s (1104) 9: 30.618 MH/s (1144) 10: 30.803 MH/s (1113) 11: 30.868 MH/s (1133) 12: 32.356 MH/s (1210) 13: 29.492 MH/s (1088)
May 07, 2018, 06:18:05 AM
I've noticed This:
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
For nvidia set power limit at MSI Afterburner to a value betwet 50-60 % - find a minimum value that does not lower the hash.
For Amd - assuming you use the modded Rom with memory timing patch only and no other changes use miner setting for freq and voltages. Set voltages for both men and core to 850. Again you need to find optimal and stable values...
Send a PM if you need additional help.
I have similar rig with 7x 1070 and 6x rx580 hashing at 409 MH/s at 1680W.
Thanks for the tip. The best i can do is 1900w.
Can tou Share your command line and Afterburnner config for NVIDIA(our systems are the same).
I pay 0.20€/kW... So every watt counts.
Thanks.
May 07, 2018, 04:19:03 AM
Does this miner work well with ETHLargement - The Hashrate
Harderner on 1080ti?
Harderner on 1080ti?
If you want more heat and power consumed then use ETHlargement.
May 07, 2018, 03:26:08 AM
I've noticed This:
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
For nvidia set power limit at MSI Afterburner to a value betwet 50-60 % - find a minimum value that does not lower the hash.
For Amd - assuming you use the modded Rom with memory timing patch only and no other changes use miner setting for freq and voltages. Set voltages for both men and core to 850. Again you need to find optimal and stable values...
Send a PM if you need additional help.
I have similar rig with 7x 1070 and 6x rx580 hashing at 409 MH/s at 1680W.
May 07, 2018, 01:47:10 AM
I've noticed This:
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
With Claymore the consumption is 1600w. With This 2000w.
I've got a Rig With 8*1070 and 5*580.
The settings are the same.
Im using afterburnner.
Help needed.
May 06, 2018, 11:19:43 PM
Yes I use it with just that 
. See the post above.
. See the post above. May 06, 2018, 10:43:28 PM
Does this miner work well with ETHLargement - The Hashrate
Harderner on 1080ti?
Harderner on 1080ti?
May 06, 2018, 09:19:40 PM
Does the command line (-tt -cclock and -mclock) not work on Nvidia Card ... i have tried to put -cclock and -mclock on bat file, but it doesn't work
I had issue with msi afterburner. When afterburner running a few hours, it's massively lagging and hard to change the clock setting (Nvidia Inspector got same issues)
I had issue with msi afterburner. When afterburner running a few hours, it's massively lagging and hard to change the clock setting (Nvidia Inspector got same issues)
When u stop pushing your cards too much this will stop happening.
U want greed u get lag. May 06, 2018, 09:10:31 PM
336.6/6 gpus? Gotta be 1080Ti or some shizzle.
Obviously they are 1080ti
May 06, 2018, 06:19:06 PM
Thank u
336.6 at ~1050 watts! Stable A F. May 06, 2018, 05:39:26 PM
May 06, 2018, 02:44:55 PM
So about that Linux version? That coming anytime soon?
May 06, 2018, 11:54:45 AM
BTW: When using the 18.3.4 driver, will the hashrate be the same or almost the same as with blockchain driver?
All AMD drivers released after august blockchain drivers contains all fixes from them. All next drivers gives speed not less than blockchain drivers.Only reason to stay on blockchain drivers is for Vega owners, as I know...
Thanks, that's some nice info
May 06, 2018, 10:42:34 AM
Any news on next version?
Jump to: