Author

Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux) - page 418. (Read 784874 times)

member
Activity: 413
Merit: 17
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
You dont need any antivirus  on the system if your running miner.This miner is 100% clean and is the fastest miner you can get with its lowest fee.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Core clock should be use to lower the load on memmory but should never get over +150, and this also lower the power to get the card running between 80 and 100 watts with reduced power limit between 50 and 60%

Here you have a good guide how to overclock  nvidia cards https://mining.help/nvidia-ethereum-mining/
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
Core Clock: +99

You do not need to overclock core clock for ETH. Use +0.
copper member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 4460
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
hashrate with gtx 1070 ?

These are my stable settings:
Driver: 391.01
Using MSI Afterburner set as:
  Core Voltage (%): 0
  Power Limit (%): 55
  Temp Limit (%): 83 (linked with Power Limit)
  Core Clock (MHz): -200
  Memory Clock (MHz): 635


Is your core clock set to negative 200 mhz?  I'm getting similar hash rates with my MSI GTX 1070s, (just two for the time being.)  Here are my afterburner settings:

Core Voltage: 0%
Power: 65%
Temp: 67 degrees Centigrade (linked with power)
Core Clock: +99
Mem Clock: +650
newbie
Activity: 80
Merit: 0
Hi PM developers. I have caught 719 error again two times

Quote
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main *** 67:17 ***************************************************
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 67:17
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth speed: 192.436 MH/s, shares: 4483/0/0, time: 67:17
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main GPUs: 1: 32.080 MH/s (759) 2: 32.077 MH/s (728) 3: 32.071 MH/s (742) 4: 32.076 MH/s (742) 5: 32.071 MH/s (772) 6: 32.061 MH/s (740)
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Accepted shares 4483 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 437.9 TH (!!!)
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 192.436 MH/s
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main Eth: Effective speed: 185.05 MH/s; at pool: 185.05 MH/s
2018.04.30:18:28:55.438: main 
2018.04.30:18:29:00.508: main Eth speed: 192.436 MH/s, shares: 4483/0/0, time: 67:17
2018.04.30:18:29:00.508: main GPUs: 1: 32.080 MH/s (759) 2: 32.078 MH/s (728) 3: 32.070 MH/s (742) 4: 32.076 MH/s (742) 5: 32.071 MH/s (772) 6: 32.061 MH/s (740)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.221: GPU3 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.255: GPU2 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.262: GPU3 GPU3 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.262: GPU2 GPU2 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.271: GPU6 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.271: GPU6 GPU6 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.319: GPU1 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.319: GPU1 GPU1 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.319: GPU5 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.319: GPU5 GPU5 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.326: GPU4 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:18:29:02.326: GPU4 GPU4 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:18:29:02.832: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.
2018.04.30:18:29:03.566: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.30:18:29:03.639: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x883fa91730edc42848c2f91f1a5945dc86876f0ee669a2484b39733c2662cd06","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:18:29:05.656: main Eth speed: 192.435 MH/s, shares: 4483/0/0, time: 67:17
2018.04.30:18:29:05.656: main GPUs: 1: 32.081 MH/s (759) 2: 32.078 MH/s (728) 3: 32.069 MH/s (742) 4: 32.076 MH/s (742) 5: 32.071 MH/s (772) 6: 32.061 MH/s (740)

Quote
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main *** 5:24 ***************************************************
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Mining ETH on eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 for 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth speed: 192.454 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.079 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.079 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.069 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Accepted shares 344 (0 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.00%
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 338.2 TH (!!!)
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 192.450 MH/s
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main Eth: Effective speed: 176.88 MH/s; at pool: 176.88 MH/s
2018.04.30:23:54:18.043: main 
2018.04.30:23:54:18.823: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.30:23:54:18.823: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xb788eab","0xdc186dc6449f3ed8555c0ee3383c94cfb7efe302fed5427f9733ac049b2035cd"]}

2018.04.30:23:54:18.873: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x983050918378fb6f287be2d4985c47405b9cef936795b53105fca0ae77b70e91","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:23:54:23.113: main Eth speed: 192.454 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:23.113: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.079 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.068 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:23.519: main GPU1: 46C 47%, GPU2: 47C 48%, GPU3: 46C 48%, GPU4: 44C 47%, GPU5: 51C 51%, GPU6: 44C 47%
2018.04.30:23:54:26.085: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1fb12e5947b11e66a63fbcf2ead58235be455f6c1a40ba3ffca0c5fb55045028","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:23:54:26.085: eths Eth: New job #1fb12e59 from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999; diff: 10000MH
2018.04.30:23:54:28.183: main Eth speed: 192.453 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:28.183: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.078 MH/s (55) 4: 32.078 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.067 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:28.838: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.30:23:54:28.887: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1fb12e5947b11e66a63fbcf2ead58235be455f6c1a40ba3ffca0c5fb55045028","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:23:54:33.253: main Eth speed: 192.455 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:33.253: main GPUs: 1: 32.076 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.078 MH/s (55) 4: 32.079 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.069 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:38.323: main Eth speed: 192.453 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:38.323: main GPUs: 1: 32.076 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.078 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.069 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:38.853: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.30:23:54:38.853: eths Eth: Send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xb788e1f","0xdc186dc6449f3ed8555c0ee3383c94cfb7efe302fed5427f9733ac049b2035cd"]}

2018.04.30:23:54:38.902: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1fb12e5947b11e66a63fbcf2ead58235be455f6c1a40ba3ffca0c5fb55045028","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:23:54:43.393: main Eth speed: 192.453 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:43.393: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.078 MH/s (60) 5: 32.075 MH/s (46) 6: 32.068 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:48.463: main Eth speed: 192.452 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:48.463: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.078 MH/s (60) 5: 32.074 MH/s (46) 6: 32.068 MH/s (63)
2018.04.30:23:54:48.868: eths Eth: Send: {"id":5,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork","params":[]}

2018.04.30:23:54:48.918: eths Eth: Received: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1fb12e5947b11e66a63fbcf2ead58235be455f6c1a40ba3ffca0c5fb55045028","0xee63422e92cf28183646f59a751579cce4e676242da40ec068bf1c3a940099b9","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
2018.04.30:23:54:51.610: GPU3 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.614: GPU4 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.629: GPU1 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.645: GPU5 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.653: GPU4 GPU4 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.653: GPU5 GPU5 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.653: GPU3 GPU3 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.653: GPU1 GPU1 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.676: GPU2 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.676: GPU2 GPU2 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.692: GPU6 CUDA error in CudaProgram.cu:264 : unspecified launch failure (719)
2018.04.30:23:54:51.692: GPU6 GPU6 search error: unspecified launch failure
2018.04.30:23:54:51.912: main GPU1: 45C 47%, GPU2: 47C 48%, GPU3: 45C 48%, GPU4: 43C 46%, GPU5: 51C 51%, GPU6: 44C 47%
2018.04.30:23:54:52.316: wdog Thread(s) not responding. Restarting.
2018.04.30:23:54:53.533: main Eth speed: 192.452 MH/s, shares: 344/0/0, time: 5:24
2018.04.30:23:54:53.533: main GPUs: 1: 32.077 MH/s (55) 2: 32.078 MH/s (65) 3: 32.077 MH/s (55) 4: 32.079 MH/s (60) 5: 32.074 MH/s (46) 6: 32.068 MH/s (63)

I use PM 2.9e with the following params

set miner_params=-nvidia -cdm 2 -cdmport 3333 -cdmpass 123 -minRigSpeed 188 -rmode 2 -tstop 65 -tstart 40 -logsmaxsize 0

Rig configuration in my footer.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
hi,

there is one more problem,
for pausing a single gpu, i press 1..9, but what if i have more then 10 gpus, and i need to pause #12 ?

thanks
Shift + #. For 12 GPU you need to press Shift+2.
jr. member
Activity: 43
Merit: 1
hi,

there is one more problem,
for pausing a single gpu, i press 1..9, but what if i have more then 10 gpus, and i need to pause #12 ?

thanks
jr. member
Activity: 43
Merit: 1
hello,

i have to say, i like this miner very much, but have 1 problem.

i have rig with 12 x rx580 cards,

i set parameter -minfan 90  , but it doesnt work, fans still work as default

any advice ?

thanks

Try with -fanmin 90 -fanmax 95 and see if it does anything, but it should resolve the issue. Watch out for the syntax!

thanks! that did it! now i put all 5 home rigs on phoenixMiner!
good job developers!
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hello Admin

-stales not working in new version.

Reported Hashrate 0
jr. member
Activity: 117
Merit: 3
Hi just tried new amd driver 18.4.1. I get error errors on vega 64;

windows 10 pro

2018.04.30:19:12:24.575: GPU1 build: Failed to GPU1 program: clBuildProgram (-11)
2018.04.30:19:12:24.575: GPU1 GPU1: Failed to load kernels: clCreateKernel (-46)

tried using
-clKernel 0 and 1 no luck.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
With 7 x 1070:
Claymore 11.6: ~226+ Mh/S

Huh Huh

seriousely ?

I don't lie ... this picture it's from my brother rig's, he still mine ETH on Nanopool with both rig's (AMD and Nvidia).
People say that Nvidia it's not for eth but...with 60% TDP you have ~ 100W / GPU and 33Mh/s.
Me I'm with LUX for the moment...
https://preview.ibb.co/hxbWEH/Capture.png

212 - from 7 RX580 XFX / Asus Z270-A
196.5 - from 6 x 1070 G1 Gaming / Asus Z-270A / TDP 60% Core Clock 0 and Memory Clock +800 (MSI Afterburner).

I'm not sure about nvidia driver, I'm the one who take care that 2 rig's, he is not so good on computers.
Today just changed the driver with the oldest one ... 391.35 (on my rig's).

If you want it's something HERE about Nvidia driver.

Regards,
Radu
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
hashrate with gtx 1070 ?

These are my stable settings:
Driver: 391.01
Using MSI Afterburner set as:
  Core Voltage (%): 0
  Power Limit (%): 55
  Temp Limit (%): 83 (linked with Power Limit)
  Core Clock (MHz): -200
  Memory Clock (MHz): 635

Note: The power limit is set in cmd (as admin) using next commands:

Code:
cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI
nvidia-smi --id=0 --power-limit=100
nvidia-smi --id=1 --power-limit=105
nvidia-smi --id=2 --power-limit=100
...
A draw can be checked by:
Code:
C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI>nvidia-smi --query | find "Power Draw" | find /v "1911" | find /v "N/A"
        Power Draw                  : 100.11 W
        Power Draw                  : 104.22 W
        Power Draw                  : 99.06 W
        Power Draw                  : 99.08 W

I figured when reducing the power limit further down it would had an effect on hash rate (reduced). Found a min limit point at witch the hash was maximised at given settings manually by trial.
Note that the settings above only work stable for me when the power limit was reduced. With the power limit at 100% the settings were note stable at all.

Stats from PhoenixMiner:
GPU1: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU2: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 2), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU3: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie 6), CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU4: GeForce GTX 1070 (pcie Cool, CUDA cap. 6.1, 8 GB VRAM, 15 CUs
GPU1: 54C 27%, GPU2: 57C 34%, GPU3: 52C 25%, GPU4: 53C 26%
GPUs: 1: 31.755 MH/s (3367) 2: 31.774 MH/s (3365) 3: 31.733 MH/s (3267) 4: 31.754 MH/s (3395/3)

Did push memory freq. further but it did not run stable for long.
sr. member
Activity: 487
Merit: 252
bou !
With 7 x 1070:
Claymore 11.6: ~226+ Mh/S

Huh Huh

seriousely ?
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
hashrate with gtx 1070 ?
Hi,
From the beginning .. sorry for my bad English

I have:
Asus Z-270A
Gigabyte 1070 G1 Gaming (Micron ...but wasn't my choice)
Nvidia Inspector for OC

TDP: 60% - 65% (more stable with 65%)
Core Clock:-200
Memory Clock: +800
Fan: 60%

For lower Memory Clock (~750) you will still have 32-33 Mh/s.

With 7 x 1070:
Claymore 11.6: ~226+ Mh/S
Phoenix Miner 2.9e: ~231-232+ Mh/s
I'm waiting for other coins/algo to be added...and dual mining I hope in the future Grin

Regards,
Radu
sr. member
Activity: 487
Merit: 252
bou !
jr. member
Activity: 47
Merit: 1
Decided to try this out on 1 GTX 1070ti today.  ETH-only mining with Claymore was giving me a consistent 34.2 Mh/s, Phoenix is reporting 34.6 Mh/s so I'm going to let it run for a day or 2 and compare shares, but this looks like a winner to me.  Thank you!!

When making a final judgement make sure that you account for all the contributing factors such as luck, long enough testing period...

Stats from some of my rigs (all 13 GPU rigs 8GB, both RX580 and nvidia 1070 8GB):
Rig 2: Eth speed: 404.844 MH/s, shares: 41520/1/3, time: 115:23, shares per min: 5,895215107
Rig 4: Eth speed: 407.562 MH/s, shares: 120660/1/49, time: 337:48, shares per min: 5,953226761
Rig 1: Eth speed: 409.197 MH/s, shares: 98235/0/31, time: 274:26, shares per min: 5,965929795
Rig 3: Eth speed: 411.097 MH/s, shares: 122320/2/17, time: 337:44, shares per min: 6,036320568
...
The running time is several days for each of the above rigs.
The higher the hash rate the higher the number of shares per minute. As it should be.
But this only become right after several days of running time. For the first few days it was almost random...
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
Uh ..

Eth: Accepted shares 49778 (276 stales), rejected shares 3 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 4 (0.01%), est. stales percentage 0.55%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 33297.4 TH (!!!)


Max share difficulty of 33000?  So 10x the network difficulty of 3200 TH?
There is a very very very slim chance that rig found a block, but 33297 seems more like a software calculation error :/
jr. member
Activity: 69
Merit: 1
Decided to try this out on 1 GTX 1070ti today.  ETH-only mining with Claymore was giving me a consistent 34.2 Mh/s, Phoenix is reporting 34.6 Mh/s so I'm going to let it run for a day or 2 and compare shares, but this looks like a winner to me.  Thank you!!
Jump to: