...
If you're vaccinated, there is almost a zero percent chance you'll be symptomatic and have the ability to transmit the virus, so why mask up vaccinated individuals? It's ridiculous.
...
You are only vaccinated against some variants. We don't know what variants are out there.
There were no variants until they started the
vaccination gene therapy and it radically increased the evolutionary pressure on the virus.
Where on earth did Gene Therapy came from the vaccination?
In large part it came from the pharma industry itself which bent over backward to raise money for their gene therapy technology.
Fundementally, 'gene therapy' is about using specially designed genes inserted into cells to program the cell to make a protein of choice. If the protein happens to be an antigen, then the gene therapy can function as a 'vaccine'. In theory.
Anyone who understands this stuff will recognize in this article:
- nothing we are not already familiar with, and
- from the first sentence and proceeding through the entire article a chain of straw-men, assumptions, deliberated vague information, deliberately missing information, diversion tactics, etc.
These tactics are THE reason that we who do have a reasonably firm grasp of the science do not trust the mainstream media AT ALL. They clearly have an agenda, and they are clearly using every propagandist device they can think of to mis-lead the scientifically illiterate public. They would not be writing stuff like this if they were trustworthy.
I could go through the article point-by-point, but it would be tedious. The main value would be to teach how propaganda works more than the actual science, but I'm not sure that anyone would get much about either lesson.
C'mon man! Do a real survey. 95% or more of the sheeple will NEVER stop complying no matter what is thrown at them. That should be abundantly clear by now.
'Growning citizen pushback' is integral to the 'new normal' and 'great reset'. The biggest problem the designers have is to how TO get people to resist. In a funny way, it's probably the pliant masses who will cause the greatest hurdle to 'their plans'. They overdid it on fluoride or something I guess.
Data's are everywhere, researches are everywhere, professionals backing the datas.
And for some reasons some youtuber/vlogger makes a statement and you people be like "WOW, it is indeed true"
One of the most credible people I've seen so far is Dr. Robert Malone. He claims to be the first person, acting as a young researcher, to identify that one of the main problems the research team was having in their work on gene therapy back in the 1980's was that the gene therapy WAS acting as something of a 'vaccine'. In other words, the immune system was learning about the novel/foreign proteins being created and/or recognizing self-cells which were 'acting funny' and mounting a response to them.
I find Malone to be credible because he uses precise language and doesn't seem to try to blow smoke up my ass. A LOT of the scientists/doctors who are ostensibly 'on my side' ARE guilty of such things. It is OK to (and necessary to) 'dumb it down', but it must be done precisely. At least in order to be credible with someone like me.