Topic: [POLL] Does EVAN DUFFIELD regret instamining DRK/DASH at 100x emission? - page 31. (Read 31431 times)

Lol, sure Monero isn't dumping, based on a snaphot of the Poloniex market's box, the beating heart of the XMR scam-clone scam, which somehow evades the attention of your crack scam-team.

You are not even embarassed to be here "bustin' scams" aka trying to suck blood from the competition, while Monero tanks? 

Keep digging Smoothie!

I really wonder if it is hard to make such asinine posts or if it comes naturally to you.




It is also impossible to disprove the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus. So yes, I do understand that you so much want to Believe.

You're not even trying anymore. I feel for you; it's tough to win an argument when you're wrong.

Smooth - you are a renowned scammer on BCT.  You claim to be a core dev of Monero but everytime the 5 whales that hold 80% of Monero on Poloniex dump (like now), or buying on real exchangess raise the Dash price, you throw your toys out the pram and spam every page with the same tired accusation that the whole Dash project is "a fraud" because 16 months ago there was a bug in the emission (a claim which whether you believe it or not is impossible to disprove)...so it is you that is a total fraud, and absolutely no one outside of Monero greed-driven community believes that your anti-Dash campaign is for altruistic reasons, get a fucking grip lol.  Let this be known around crypto, it' time for the toxic people like you to get called out I think.  Go back to your shitcoin and try to add value instead of thinking you can steal it from Devs who are honest and do real innovation by slandering and entire community which has worked hard for 16 months, and who a lot of people think are doing something that will benefit crypto as a whole....which seeing as Moohnero just had 50% of it's value wiped out while you *still* troll, is really your responsibility right now.

They are running out of shit to say? What can they do? Irrelevant Youtube videos are the last resort to a technical dialogue

Same to anything said in this entire thread.

That added a lot to the debate.

Is this you by any chance ?

Exactly.  

Or increased centralization with slavenodes working at minimum reward and masternodes working at the most gain with the least amount of risk of catastrophic failure--did you even read the graph? 1000 is optimum for gain, so now you have slavenodes passing the buck when they realize they're aren't getting rewarded. It will be a continual cycling of unrewarded slavenodes handing off their nodes to the masternodes with the most leverage of computational power. It's like you guys want to be slaves to Evan.

And keep never minding that other systems like crave will pop-up with better/fairer reward systems--probably the same results, but that's not for me to worry about--when i see centralization in cryptosystems, I run.

w.t.f. are you talking about. The "reward" for attacking other nodes is a destroyed network and zero value for all.

That's nonsense. I posted about scams before Monero existed, most notably but not exclusively the Bytecoin scam that led to Monero being created. I just hate scams. It has nothing to do with "marketing"

In doing so I'd suggest referencing this page which is a well-respected independent investigation of many coin launches including darkcoin/dash

What are you talking about?

Node systems that reward nodes for attacking other nodes are centralizing in nature.

https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-wizards/2014-11-27/?msg=26349785&page=4

Goto #7

www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2zufu1/a_great_podcast_by_lets_talk_bitcoin_discussing/cpmvogy

No, they are not actually because they're decentralised.

Removing an entire blockchain from public scrutiny is however far more useful to a corrupter than knowing what any individual has in their account balance.

I know masternodes are a honeypot--that's why I'm on a thread about dash discouraging people from buying it.

I'd have a few complaints for that school if I were your parents.

(Apart from not being able to detect a glaring NSA honeypot at point blank range, that is).

It's not that I don't like your answer, I just know it ignores a large swathe of the population who aren't cynical or greedy, or those that have a core code of beliefs that they follow in their lives such as ethics or principles. I also think it misses the big picture when you talk about mainstream acceptance. Many people don't like cheaters (see baseball scandals) and if they believe that gains are ill gotten they simply won't invest, and if they are in the media, may attack what they perceive as evil or ill gotten.

Personally, I just think once you've tried to hide an instamine and failed, that no amount of rebranding is going to distance you enough from the fraud for you to reach mainstream success--so without a relaunch, a fair one, dash doesn't stand much of a chance of sniffing Bitcoin's market cap. Also, all things being equal, why would I invest in dash when a coin like crave has a masternode system that may have a better/fairer distribution system at around half the cost. Not an endorsement of crave, but if profit is your only motive why wouldn't I invest in a similar system that is less top-heavy and has more room to grow? That's the problem with things built short-sightedly, if they are successful, then others will borrow their structure, add some bells and whistles, and potentially steal their market share.

I'll  take the long view and stick to the best privacy solution with the best team with the best chances of creating the most useful network.

And yes, I do go to school every day--life is a constant lessen and wisdom can be found everywhere if you're willing to work and keep your eyes open.  

Are you kidding ?

It was them that f*cking sold you it you limpet.

There's nothing that would suite them more than a brand new monetary system that's beyond public scrutiny and where the masses are prevented from acting coherently as a group.

sorry to burst your bubble Kazuki because you sound like you actually believe all this.

'Scam busting' and this righteous Monero image is just part of it's marketing drivvle coming from the top down to cover any lack of unique value or innovation the 'maintaners' decided not to have done.  All the posts about how Monero holders are not greedy and everyone else is..  It's just more marketing bullsh*t.  Can't you see that?

Or how come Monero's infamous "scam busting" outbursts all around BCT *only* really pick up when Monero price goes down or a competitor goes up?

And no one seems to get the irony that the group going to prevent scam because they are so righteous, themselves exist only because of a scam, the very thing you say you are fighting to prevent?

Co'mon now guys, it's obvious, for the love of crypto.....Staaaaahp!!!