Topic: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ??????????? - page 6. (Read 5168 times)

My most recent venture in to the Fox's den has satisfied my masochistic tendencies for quite some time, and thus I cannot bring myself to actually read these walls of text.

Can I get a TL;DR for the last few pages?

Agent fox poop  LOL


Undeniable observable instances of financially motivated wrong doing by his friends and dt includes = nonsense says vile vixen. I like giving them merits though he says...

You have it the wrong way around agent foxpoop. You get the observable instances first. Then you can present it. How is this difficult to understand?

 are you foxpooping again??


Still waiting for XLdiv to come here and explain how tmans auction scamming is not bad at all and is not scamming but is rather a clear example of how suitable for default trust he is LOL

Sadly xldiv has run away    running away food good?  or scratching his head pondering how to convert an undeniable scammer, trust abuser and extortionist (err undercover agent they claim), supporter of other undeniable scammers and scam facilitator for pay,  into a suitable default trust member  that stands up to public scrutiny .....hahaha

Sorry, you were boring me by spouting the same nonsense over and over again. Anyway, can you prove you never kidnapped a giraffe? I want to see OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE!

dodgy family rape = the most reasonable explanation for presenting observable and undeniable instances of clear scamming  by TMAN , the DT and merit source and genius, hahaha  WELL ...ACCORDING TO TMAN anyway lol

Shhhhhh tman the auction scammer, extortionist, trust abuser, scammer supporter, tourettes poet  and genius. Keep your undeniable "claims" of proof that are laughable  to yourself.

If you need help swallowing a large thesaurus, then I would expect a few members would be willing to give you some help. Plenty of left testicles ready to generate the much needed lubricant haha

I am still waiting for your scammer supporting buddy to scratch his head and decide whether it is best to remain hidden and run away or think of some way to tell us all about how undeniable and verifiable instances of your auction scamming is BRILLIANT and shows clearly how you are one of the most trustworthy persons on the entire board. I mean that is before we start forcing him to accept all the other undeniably dirty shit you are either STRONGLY implicated in or observable and undeniably guilty of.

Your left testicle gives you warnings of when it is best to run and hide??? that is a handy feature for a scammer I guess... hahah okay.... bye bye tourettes poet. The lack of swearing lately is very disappointing, no recent obsession with foul smelling vaginas either no vegetable sex fantasies  but still the sexual deviance incest theme is running strong . That's a good sign. Hate to see you lose ALL of your entertainment value. Although boasting about your intelligence or even daring to mention it is a new source of fun.....hahahhahahhah

Hey Tman, can you present your 5 best original thought inspiring posts for us to analyse? or even some major achievements (not scamming or extortion thanks) in all the years that you have been here???

I mean when you have taken us off ignore so you can actually read since you will not be able to see this will you? then again you have put us on ignore and promised never to talk to us again quite a few times have you not?? LOL   ask theymos is your ignore button is broken?? not sure who to ask about your broken mind though? haha

Look forward to speaking to you again shortly ToughMAN .... well when you take us off ignore and forget about never speaking to us again.


Where is XLdiv that little wussy hiding, where has he run away too? ??  anyone seen XLDIV??  he must be writing a story about giraffes or perhaps a book of cat insults. That will be useful I guess now that the other pussy (and scammer) lauda is back.


THE OTHER BAD NEWS(for you guys) (other than XLDIV RUNNING AWAY CRYING unmasking himself as deliberate and willing scammer supporter unless he comes back and debunks that observable instance now that he is fully aware...)  is that the option of stopping the poll at 66 votes  be quick guys because 666 666 votes is going to be here and then you will have missed that one too. Sadly there is nothing in between.

Very encouraging all the participation though this week.  XLDIV the main driving force and source of much needed entertainment now that some other scammer supporters have run away and are in hiding.  Let's hope he was just bluffing about running back to mommy now that we asked him some questions and we made it clear we really want direct answers to THOSE questions not the ones he creates for himself.  

Where is that wussy? how long does it take to make up these funny excuses and stories about giraffes kidnapping cat insulters?

I don't even think agent foxpoop would accept that analogy it is just far too silly and unbelievable ..... where the fuck is that thread...I am going to find that this evening. I miss reading that one over and over.  The vile vixen is now  just hiding away giving out merits sadly rather than bringing their unique view on ....well everything really...haha


69 votes down, only another few 100k votes to go, if that is what we decide to go with.... In for the long haul as they say...

Loyce pointed to Suchmoon since he/she already scraped CH's posts at some point.

whilst I may not of shoved a thesaurus up my backside whist cramming one in each ear and nostril whilst simultaneously deepthroating 2 of them I am 99% sure my IQ far surpasses yours. Proof being your posts over the last 12 months achieving nada other than you getting carpal tunnel and having 4300 TMAN/Lauda wanks.

you see young pajeet - JUST BECAUSE YOU SAY SOMETHING IT DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE.

I am now 100% sure you were bullied as a child, or maybe it was some of that dodgy family rape. Whatever happened in your past to break you like this I am genuinely sorry that another human being can suffer from such narcissistic traits.

anyway princess I feel in my left testicle it is coming to the time I hit the ignore button again.

xxxx

 

If we cut away some part of your excuses and bullshit and extrapolated answers YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH then specifically mention them and explain yourself you big girl don't start crying and run away. If you had given straight answers to the questions instead of trying to bury any real answer into a ton of unrelated speculation and crap to justify your scammer supporting ways, then it would not be needed. NOT RUN AWAY

These are undeniable independently verifiable instances of tmans auction scamming you dumb fool. This is not claiming tman kidnapped a giraffe with no evidence?? are you high or just that dumb??

People can simply click the link and investigate this for themselves.

So stop RUNNING AWAY you pathetic little weasel..


EXAMINE THE AUCTION SCAMMING OBSERVABLE INSTANCE YOU SCUMBAG and present your set of excuses as to WHY it is not scamming and is not worthy of red trust and why you are including him as one of the most trust members of the forum.

GET ON WITH IT SCUMBAG.  I will be reminding you where it is on topic and relevant and within the rules forever that you have run away from giving your explanation because YOU KNOW you deliberately and knowingly abusing the trust system and your position on it.

Now present your explanation now you big girl. If you want theymos here to hold your hand get a PM or beg him in public to save you from further humiliation.

Your proven scammer buddies giving you merit for your shit post weaseling and giving yourself an excuse to RUN AWAY out of this are just demonstrating clearly how broken this entire shit show is and what a scammer supporter you are. A thread about you is coming shortly perhaps that will bring you back to debate your conduct here instead of refusing to answer why you are including undeniable scammers on DT.

HURRY UP.

LOL at tman - the tourettes fool believes although he can offer ZERO original thought inspiring posts when asked to, ZERO achievements of any note except UNDENIABLE auction scamming, extortion and UNDENIABLE trust abuse that he can use his BOGUS shitty merit score (went from hero LOLLOL to legend LOLOLOLOL in record time apparently hahahahahahhahah) in all his years here has just been a fucking shit stain on this entire board.

Please tourettes poet, never leave our threads. We want the dumbest undeniable scammers and their little girly bear pals here  24/7 on demand to bitch slap around at will. Keep plastering merit on scammer supporters who will not even DARE to present an explanation in your defense when forced to drill down... just runs away crying for daddy theymos to come and help him.

XLDIV gets more retarded each post. Observable undeniable instances of scamming = claiming someone has stolen a giraffe and has zero evidence but the fact they said they said they didn't like cats.

XXXXXXL DIV.


Still waiting for xldivs excuses and big story about other people that demonstrates tmans undeniable auction scamming is NOT SCAMMING and is reason for DT selection.  

Come on XLDIV let's hear the story and excuses and speculations , guesses and giraffe stories about others that excuse tmans undeniable auction scamming all.

we knew you would be running away, you have disappointed us further (didn't know that was possible).

Why XLDIV will you NOT DARE to present an explanation of the observable and verifiable auction scamming and explain why it is NOT SCAMMING and why you will not say it is financially high risk, give a red tag BUT WILL RATHER CLAIM HE IS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS OF THIS ENTIRE FORUM??

WHY ARE YOU RUNNING AWAY WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE goes XL div and the little bears. Probably finding some more little bears pics to hide behind.

I expect your explanation when I return scammer supporter. OR WILL YOU RUN AWAY..... or create a bunch of excuses and reasons you will not present your reasoning here?? 

After you present your reasoning on WHAT I AM ASKING YOU HERE. Then you can go back and CLEARLY EXPLAIN WHY THE ANSWERS WE EXTRAPOLATED are not the answers you agree with and then say WHY.

I'd like to see an analysis by robovac or moon on how many merits TAA earns per word.. it has to be the lowest of all merit receivers, not per post but per individual words, with his walls of text and less merits than a 3rd world shitposting bounty hunter I believe this is firm proof of the cancer he/she/it writes to all other forum members.

TOAA weaseling out of the agreement and gone back to being obnoxious.....what a surprise...yawn



Nope. I don't have to do anything. You have not kept your part of the agreement that we made.

I could easily do what you are doing.

I can claim you have kidnapped an invisible giraffe and starved it to death. Prove me wrong ! I can twist your words and eventually settle on that you insulted a cat and therefore you are still cruel to animals. I won't play that stupid game.



I gave the answers. You are just changing what I said.

Let me demonstrate the importance of emphasis and how easy it is to alter the meaning.

I never said you stole my money – I didn’t say it but I’m implying someone else may have.
I never said you stole my money – I am strongly objecting to the implication I accused you of stealing.
I never said you stole my money – I may not have said it, but I imply that I think it.
I never said you stole my money – I am not accusing you, but someone else has stolen my money.
I never said you stole my money – I don’t think you stole my money, but you did do something with it.
I never said you stole my money – You didn’t steal my money but I suggest you may have stolen someone else’s.
I never said you stole my money – You didn’t steal my money but I suggest you may have stolen something else.
https://factinator.com/i-never-said-she-stole-my-money/

You are clearly changing the emphasis, context and content of what I said while being rude and obnoxious. Doing so is outright dishonest.

Sorry but that's the only line I actually read when scrolling through your latest monstrosity.

Sir Care Bear, please don't take my merits as an encouragement to feed the troll. Unfortunately I can't merit an absence of posts so the next best thing is to merit a calm rational response.

WOW we really thought you would be running away by now, but we see you still left yourself a little excuse to run away at any time...the old still waiting for theymos to hold my hand. COME ON MAN UP ... you have come this far. You will stay until the end right??? or what excuse will you give for vanishing??

I see already some clear signs of a person that is simply afraid to answer the questions here. Lots of extra filler excuses and refusal to answer yes or now to a clear cut question that a DT member should have no problem saying yes or no to.

Remember we must stick to what is UNDENIABLE and PROVEN not start performing some mental gymnastics and inserting excuses and personal homages to our pals. Then start trying to subvert from DIRECT AND PROVEN already committed financially motivated wrong doing to "possible" behaviors that in the future in our "opinions" with a few huge leaps and gaps that we try to fill with our own subjective garbage could be worth bringing up to derail.

We are sticking to undeniable and proven observable financially motivated wrong doing. Not we "speculate" someone has made claims that we "consider" may be untrue that "could" be seen to be a financial danger if we start making performing mental gymnastics. 


So since we are claiming YOU are CORRUPT or that you are UNTRUSTWORTHY and that YOU are posing a DIRECT FINANCIAL danger to members by DELIBERATELY allowing your "friends and fellow DT scum" to Undeniably commit scamming or admitting they are willing to facilitate scamming for a PRICE and refuse to red trust them and EVEN SUPPORT THEM TO POSITIONS OF TRUST then you need to answer questions to demonstrate this is NOT TRUE.

I mean if it is NOT TRUE then you will have no issue simply answering the questions and not trying to derail or subvert with your own subjective excuses and nonsense. Nobody cares if you knew the people when they committed acts that demonstrate undeniably they are financially dangerous, or if you think they are what is needed in other areas (not sure what they could be) Just answer the questions, directly and without the excuses and wildly subjective boarding on ludicrous claims.

SO going back to the questions again.  I will try to extrapolate some answers you are free to refute the extrapolations if you want to claim those are not your answers and correct them

I will try to extrapolate your answers for the reader in red.

1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

tman and nutildah and xldiv   ALL SUPPORT EACH OTHER ON DT

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?

YES  




3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

YES with lots of excuses and other blathering on.



I mean from xldivs above reply it is clear that already he is NOT KEEN on simply answering yes or no NOR keep to what is undeniable and proven. Also trying to move the discussion AWAY FROM UNDENIABLE OBSERVABLE SCAMMING FOR FINANCIAL GAIN and on to " speculations" of "possible" other behaviors that have no connection to the financial danger of other members without more "JUMPS AND SPECULATIONS"


So in summary then it looks fair to say you are saying.

You and nutildah and tman all support each other on DT.  You ALL benefit from YOU giving them a free pass on their UNDENIABLE SCAMMING and UNDENIABLE willingness to facilitate scams for direct payment. THAT IS TRUE is it not? I mean there is clear motivation there for you to give them a free pass. That is clear.

You accept that undeniable scamming and undeniable financially motivated wrong doing is a cause for red trust  AND NOT CAUSE FOR BEING ADDED AS ONE OF THE MOST TRUSTED MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM. Those undeniably scamming or undeniably committing wrong doing for DIRECT FINANCIAL GAIN should have red trust and be excluded from the trust system. This you agree with right?

I mean if you do NOT agree with those then speak up and we can get down to why. I am not interested in your personal beliefs that your SPECULATIONS and unproven opinions are also in your "opinons" grounds for negative trust or exclusion from the trust system.  We are dealing only with UNDENIABLE and ALREADY obsevable committed acts of direct financially motivated wrong doing for now. Please no more derailing or side tracking.


SO now we have established these things.


Let's take TMAN and see how his UNDENIABLE wrongdoing fits in with your answers and then the actions you have taken.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.  Tman - it is all in the OP but since you seemed to select only PART of his illustrious past then we need to repost it all here for you.

TMAN

This person is clearly a low functioning imbecile. We have previously challenged it to present it best original thought inspiring posts for analysis (since his account was showered in merits to boost it from hero to legendary. He could not provide ANYTHING of real value or merit. He claims he is given merit because people find his swearing and sexual deviant ramblings are entertaining. So he has zero value with regard reaching the optimal solution or opinion. He simply does not have the capacity to add any kind of value to this board.

He is also implicated in some VERY dirty and dangerous behaviors here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

His known PALS both owlcatz and lauda are both implicated in the same extortion attempt.

Seems Tman also is not above a bit of scamming directly when it suits him (we quote OG below who discovered this)

"TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19349060 "


Tman has also admitted in black and white that he used the trust system to punish those that present observable instances (facts) of wrong doing by his friend Lauda.

This DIRTY TURD is currently a merit source and DT.  Time to flush that filthy piece of shit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. You seem to be claiming that you believe the robber running out of the bank and getting busted by the cops .... robber claims (although he has a loaded gun, raccoon suit, swag bag full of freshly stolen money.... " hey officers just doing a security test on the bank to make sure that other investors money is safe "  hahahahahah

Intention is impossible to prove, and you are seemingly willing to just give that a free pass. BUT OKAY we believe you haha

2 Examine the auction debacle next, I mean I am interested to see how you excuse THAT observable and undeniable act as not deception for direct financial gain.  I mean I don't even want a yes or no. I want a full set of excuses and a big story that demonstrates tman should not get negative trust, should be the most trusted member of the community ... can't wait.  How does this NOT meet the criteria for SCAMMING in your books??

3. When someone said to him previously -you can not give negative trust for a post presenting observable instances of laudas prior undeniable wrong doing -

Tman replied in black and white  " I can, I will and I just have... and if anybody does not like it....blah blah.

Explain how this does not fit with trust abuse and deliberately trying to silence whilstle blowing? therefore preventing other members having access to undeniable and proven financially motivated wrong doing of other members? therefore putting them at higher risk.

4. Tman includes the 2 other undeniable scammers Lauda and nutildah or has done until very very recently.


What reasoning did you employ to discount the extortion attempt so freely ? since those such as QS and I believe OG have confirmed after in depth investigation that this looks to be a very solid case. Of course their ACTIONS are undeniable only their intention seems to have been impossible to prove. Then again anyone can say ANYTHING is their intention can't they.

I mean you can say your INTENTION is to use the trust system to PROTECT other members from those PROVEN financially dangerous. However your actions certainly demonstrate the OPPOSITE is true.

If you dispute anything we have said DETAIL IT and then explain in detail WHY.

Read what we are asking you to provide clearly. 

Stop derailing and sidetracking we are investigating WHY you believe they should not have red trust or flags, and WHY you believe they should be the most trusted members of this forum even though there are UNDENIABLE observable events of financially motivated wrong doing that certainly are clear cut cases of SCAMMING in a directly financially dangerous way.

I mean later if you wish to "speculate" others are guilty of what you " believe" is possibly financially dangerous behaviors in the FUTURE. Is not reason to avoid answering the questions about the UNDENIABLE and observable ALREADY committed financially dangerous behaviors of your DT pals and inclusions.

Stop making yourself look even worse. It is as if you KNOW you are corrupt and your friends are clear scammers and you are deliberately trying to derail, create excuses.

We will slice through any excuses and derailing like butter.

OBSERVABLE UNDENIABLE FINANCIALLY DANGEROUS BEHAVIORS  OF THOSE YOU REFUSE TO GIVE RED TRUST TO AND INSTEAD CLAIM ARE THE MOST TRUSTED MEMBERS OF THE FORUM>>> THAT ALSO IN RETURN CLAIM THE SAME ABOUT YOU. 

Now get on with explaining in DETAIL why you concluded the extortion was OKAY, how the auction scamming is not auction scamming, and how the above trust abuse is not trust abuse. The DETAILS.  THE DETAILS on why you feel they are the most trust worthy people on the forum.

Still waiting for confirmation of Theymos as arbitrator.

But I don't mind answering those three questions.




All publicly viewable:
https://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-02_Sat_07.33h/897509.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview

Nutildah and Tman are on my trust list.

I don't know Lauda well. Lauda has never been on my trust list and Lauda has not trusted me.
I do communicate with Lauda at times and the information they have sent to me has always been reliable.
There have been times I have strongly disagreed with Lauda but I don't expect everyone to always agree with my opinion.
Everyone is responsible for their own actions.

Tman was added to my list around August. I had issues with the zeroaxl issue (I did not follow it completely) which was very poor judgement but in my opinion not with malicious intent. His work on resolving the Russian issue made me regain faith in his ability to work through issues.
A lot of things happen behind the scenes that determine whether I do or do not trust someone.

I believe that Tman has always had me on his trust list but I didn't check.

Tman is a dick sometimes. But I believe his heart is in the right place and he is sometimes exactly what is needed.

I consider myself to be a moderate libertarian with liberal tendencies. I try to work with other opinions. Sometimes I learn new things from people with different opinions. Sometimes we just agree to disagree.


I agree with the wording used by Theymos. This is what Theymos said:




Whether something constitutes a lie or is deceptive is sometimes subjective.
Each situation has to be judged on its merits.

For instance -  having an alt account(1) and denying that it is an alt account (2) if that account has negative trust (3) that is a form of scamming.

In my opinion placing negative feedback require several important factors to be considered:

1) In my opinion - is this person involved consistently in deceptive conduct.
2) In my opinion - is this person unlikely to stop their conduct.
3) In my opinion - could this conduct result in the financial harm to other forum users. (Includes scamming and defamation)
4) In my opinion - can a rating potentially prevent such conduct.

My tagging principles are based on my interpretation of   Discussion about acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Community values. DT

Can someone first explain to the tourettes poet that those are analogies of how we are destroying his arguments and excuses , they are not really us saying we are going to beat xldiv to a pulp in real life.  Good though to see the tourettes has returned. We like prefer him that way. I mean without his "entertaining" tourettes poetry as he says ... there is nothing else really -- well perhaps there is.. auction scamming, supporting scammers on DT, trust abuse, highly probable extortion attempts and spamming his gambling sig.



Well, it looks like we are making some small progress. The analogies are helping you see how silly your claims are that we want to escape this debate. Anyway let us not go on about that, since it looks like you are willing to face our challenge now and have decided to man up.

So full marks for not running away YET. We have not really started though have we. Now let's try to stop hiding behind the little bear pics and get down to the core debate. You will note we are only going use the observable and undeniable instances that any member can verify for themselves.

So you are not and have not been a merit source. Fair enough. We cleared that up. Good to know.  Before we decide on whether you employ DOUBLE STANDARDS or just employ standards that are untrustworthy and net negative as far as protecting innocent members from those that are financially high risk, let's proceed a little further. It seems clear to us that you meet the criteria for both of those to be applicable but we may have somehow misjudged you and this will become apparent as we move along.



Lets clear up a few more things before we proceed so we can be sure that we are on the same page.

Remember you have come this far, don't run away now. Stay until we have finished the public debate.



1. Do you or have you in the last 3 months included on your trust list  lauda, tman or nutildah and do they include or have they included you in the last 3 months?  Please answer in full

2. Do you accept that the purpose of negative trust is to place a warning of " financially high risk" or  " scammer"  ( since those are the 2 messages you get at the top of your threads if you meet certain thresholds theymos has set here for negative trust (old system) or flags (new system)). This is the PRIME and central reason for the negative trust and flagging systems. These are clearly theymos's intentions since they are his own words on the warning banners?


3. Is someone that lies or intentionally  deceives others for their own direct financial gain ..  a scammer and financially high risk? yes or no?

Of course I talk like an idiot ! How else would you understand me? You are embarrassed for me ? How cute !  


Yes - the bears make me feel at ease in such a combative environment. Whats wrong with that ?

Crushing minds, stomping boots. I only have the cuddle of a care bear to offer to such a macho brute. Obviously I'm under-resourced for the job.

This is probably about as tough as I can manage without the aid of more bears :



In your wall of words you complain about account sellers.

I dislike account sellers and account buyers. Selling accounts often leads to scams. But generally I have only ever tagged them if the account was used in a proven scam, proven bounty cheating where the manager complains or symilar conduct . However I do not disapprove of others that do tag sold accounts or account sellers.

So no double standard there. I'm also not about to change my personal criteria for tagging.

Also I have never been a merit source.

So many wrong assumptions from Mr The One. If you spend more time reading and less time rambling....then you might actually learn something.





Ewwwww that sounds like you are having a wet dream. I hope you didn't make a mess.

I'm sure that sounded much better in your head.

ever the tough guy!

you are such a twat - you aren't even a shit, they come once a day - you are more like liquid piss coming along multiple times a day

I think we're already overestimating him by assuming the 40 words per minute.

1. observably crushed your mind and all of the pathetic excuse that spilled forth under pressure. UNDENIABLE.. People can simply read the prior interactions to see you just abandon one moronic excuse to pile into the next... each DESTROYED.

2. Which specific part did you find irrelevant - lets drill down pussy - you sound like the trolling trolling brigade who fail to produce any incorrect central points I have made and don't even dispute the observable instances (because they can not) but still claim it is trolling haha.

3. Saying I will accept going ahead WITH or WITHOUT theymos is only weaseling out in the opinion of a foxpooper or SS enthusiast.

2 fighters

above all - I will fight you anywhere any place including RIGHT NOW.

xldiv - I want someone to hold my hand.

above all - okay I'm willing to go ahead just you and me,  or theymos can hold your hand

xldiv - You make theymos do it or I will have an excuse not to fight. I'm counting on him not showing xldiv thinks praying and hoping.

above all - okay theymos is fine,  or else let's just do IT NOW YOU PUSSY.

Xldiv - See everyone he is afraid of me and trying to get out of the fight.

hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha  okay xldiv you just get more stupid



please moron GET THEYMOS, WE ALREADY JUST ASKED HIM TO COME HERE , NOW YOU GO ASK HIM SINCE YOUR HIS DT1 and probably a merit source to boot.

or JUST YOU AND ME.

Hurry UP FFS you look fucking pathetic. Only you and your meta board goons are going to believe we are scared to debate with you after reading the above posts.

NOW COME ON. LET's GET STARTED.

Please stop humiliating yourself over and over before we even get started with the inexorable unveiling of your double standards and colluding ways.


What is it with these little bears? look you can bring them to the fight and let your mommy hold them and do their little voices to support you from the ring side

" that's it xldiv, keep ramming your face into his heel like that over and over" " that's it now you're almost unconscious and looking like you have been hit by a train , you are certainly winning, look at him not a single scratch"    the little bears chant...hahaha

"look the fact he is not actually giving you the death blow and allowing you to survive proves he is a total wussy and knows you would kick his ass xldiv, you are still our hero " says the little  care bears from meta...haha

One moment claiming to be crushing my mind. Next backing out just the simplest agreement that you suggested and I accepted.

Didn't take long for you to try to weazel out of this one. I thought so much. Just cheap talk. Nothing to back it up.



Lets see the sequence of the conversation :

I think its bizarre that CH never bothered to red tag or flag me but is clearly losing his marbles over the fact that other people aren't. Seems a bit hypocritical.