Pages:
Author

Topic: [poll] - The U.S. Dollar Collapse Is Accelerating (Read 6294 times)

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2130
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
This "imminent collapse that hasn't quite happened yet" reminds me of those philosophical examples with the "ominous boulder jutting out over the edge of a cliff". The fact that it has been there for millions of years doesn't make it bound to fall "any minute now".




Though to be fair, you're not wrong, there's plenty of scare-mongering to go around. Things do seem to be accelerating though and unlike many things that appear to be getting crazy but are limited by negative feedback, there's ample evidence that those in control are actually in a positive feedback loop.

I guess that actually makes this somewhat fitting and appropriate:

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
Collapse relative to what?

To bitcoin? Obviously
To physical gold/ silver? Eventually, maybe 5-20 years from now
To other fiat currencies? Nope. It is a full on currency war right now with nations racing to the bottom (to avoid their debt responsibilities). So I don't think we will see any "collapse" of a single fiat currency relative to what our imaginations conjure when considering the word collapse.
sr. member
Activity: 254
Merit: 250
Digital money you say?
If the dollar collapses, will the internet stay on?

Only if you pay your ISP in btc  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1611
Merit: 1001
If the dollar collapses, will the internet stay on?
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
No time is now! Fuck the high maintenance, always about to fall apart, fiat system. we have an alternative! its called BITCOIN,  know it, use it, love it!
 Cheesy

FUCK YEAH!
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003

Yes, clearly. My point is more that people are implicitly thinking that this is going to go the way of a typical debt/bond crises, but there's no mechanism for that in a modern fiat nation that's simply willing to print to buy it's own bonds. You don't get investors suddenly demanding higher rates (because guess who the "investor" is?), which is why the 3rd-world style sudden collapses happen.

Obviously even 0.00001% inflation could not go on forever. But <10% could go on for quite some time (yeah, I know I used 20% in my extreme thought experiment - sorry). Too many people look at the debt situation and predict collapse in the next couple years (or by 2020, or what have you). My point is that this is because they're failing to realize how insidious the dynamics of QE really are. Don't get me wrong - a major restructuring must happen - but it'll probably be another couple generations.

then why did all these subprime lenders along with their debt get vaporized?  

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-subprimeloans0706-sort.html

along with Lehman, Merrill, Bear, Wachovia, Downey, IndyMac?



Because, unfortunately, TPTB (to use your acronym) can continue to keep this thing going for quite some time. I'm essentially arguing that the nasty stagflation situation can last for decades (largely because 100% QE eliminates a rational bond market, totally abusing interest rates, and therefore removing the mechanism that would force better behavior sooner). By contrast, the imminent hyper-inflation->collapse folks think we have 5-10yrs, max. I don't see how we get there in 5-10yrs with such a manipulated bond market. It'll ultimately be worse for humanity the longer this lasts, of course, but that's not the point.

I know your position is medium-term abrupt deflation. That could certainly be the case, but I still don't think it'll unseat the dollar in one dramatic moment. It'll be a slow, long-term process, involving decades of lost prosperity (and we may very well still prosper, just far less than could've been; a tragedy of waste, as it were).

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250

You just defined exactly how an exponential process works.

>>> a = 1
>>> for i in range(1, 50):
...     print a
...     a = a * 1.2



Yes, clearly. My point is more that people are implicitly thinking that this is going to go the way of a typical debt/bond crises, but there's no mechanism for that in a modern fiat nation that's simply willing to print to buy it's own bonds. You don't get investors suddenly demanding higher rates (because guess who the "investor" is?), which is why the 3rd-world style sudden collapses happen.

Obviously even 0.00001% inflation could not go on forever. But <10% could go on for quite some time (yeah, I know I used 20% in my extreme thought experiment - sorry). Too many people look at the debt situation and predict collapse in the next couple years (or by 2020, or what have you). My point is that this is because they're failing to realize how insidious the dynamics of QE really are. Don't get me wrong - a major restructuring must happen - but it'll probably be another couple generations.

Nobody can tell the investors to demand low rates or high rates. What they do, depends on the total situation as seen from the insvestors, including the words from the inflators.

Investors are you and me. Institutions are only collectives, ultimately controlled by you and me. If you and me don't save in a pension fund, it will have to disappear. If you and me regard company bonds as risky, their rate will go up.

There is nothing in the current global situation where we can draw upon experience from earlier times. We are in experimental territory. Mainstream economists say this, including the central bankers themselves. Experiment and forceful action.

According to the Austrians (yes, sue me), the manipulation of interest rate leads to malinvestments and reduced economic output. The longer it goes on, the worse.

Nobody knows when problems occur, or even what the bubbles are. But as soon as investors starts to distrust the bonds, the rates will go up. If people stops depositing in banks, there will be a sharp decrease in money supply, which will be met with more printing. When users of money starts to distrust the fiat, they will try to convert it to real goods as soon as possible, and price increases will start.

When it starts, there is nothing anybody can do.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002

You just defined exactly how an exponential process works.

>>> a = 1
>>> for i in range(1, 50):
...     print a
...     a = a * 1.2




Yes, clearly. My point is more that people are implicitly thinking that this is going to go the way of a typical debt/bond crises, but there's no mechanism for that in a modern fiat nation that's simply willing to print to buy it's own bonds. You don't get investors suddenly demanding higher rates (because guess who the "investor" is?), which is why the 3rd-world style sudden collapses happen.

Obviously even 0.00001% inflation could not go on forever. But <10% could go on for quite some time (yeah, I know I used 20% in my extreme thought experiment - sorry). Too many people look at the debt situation and predict collapse in the next couple years (or by 2020, or what have you). My point is that this is because they're failing to realize how insidious the dynamics of QE really are. Don't get me wrong - a major restructuring must happen - but it'll probably be another couple generations.

then why did all these subprime lenders along with their debt get vaporized?  

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-subprimeloans0706-sort.html

along with Lehman, Merrill, Bear, Wachovia, Downey, IndyMac?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
Does anyone NOT think the dollar will collapse? Why?

Me.   I don't think the dollar is going anywhere, it's too tied into the global economy (too big to fail) so other countries have a vested interest in keeping it afloat. For now.

The question was not "will the dollar collapse NOW", but will it collapse at some point in the future. So it seams you don't disagree fully. The world is exremely pissed at the US scamming them (or at themselves having let it happen to them). They're looking at alternatives and developing them. It takes time, but the US Dollar is not here to stay.


I agree, but I think it will take a long time for this to happen (possibly not within my lifetime), so I don't have a "sky is falling" attitude about it.


edit: To clarify, I dont think the dollar as a monetary unit will go anywhere, but I do believe it will fall out of favor as a reserve currency sometime in the future. 
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner

You just defined exactly how an exponential process works.

>>> a = 1
>>> for i in range(1, 50):
...     print a
...     a = a * 1.2



Yes, clearly. My point is more that people are implicitly thinking that this is going to go the way of a typical debt/bond crises, but there's no mechanism for that in a modern fiat nation that's simply willing to print to buy it's own bonds. You don't get investors suddenly demanding higher rates (because guess who the "investor" is?), which is why the 3rd-world style sudden collapses happen.

Obviously even 0.00001% inflation could not go on forever. But <10% could go on for quite some time (yeah, I know I used 20% in my extreme thought experiment - sorry). Too many people look at the debt situation and predict collapse in the next couple years (or by 2020, or what have you). My point is that this is because they're failing to realize how insidious the dynamics of QE really are. Don't get me wrong - a major restructuring must happen - but it'll probably be another couple generations.

No time is now! Fuck the high maintenance, always about to fall apart, fiat system. we have an alternative! its called BITCOIN,  know it, use it, love it!
 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003

You just defined exactly how an exponential process works.

>>> a = 1
>>> for i in range(1, 50):
...     print a
...     a = a * 1.2



Yes, clearly. My point is more that people are implicitly thinking that this is going to go the way of a typical debt/bond crises, but there's no mechanism for that in a modern fiat nation that's simply willing to print to buy it's own bonds. You don't get investors suddenly demanding higher rates (because guess who the "investor" is?), which is why the 3rd-world style sudden collapses happen.

Obviously even 0.00001% inflation could not go on forever. But <10% could go on for quite some time (yeah, I know I used 20% in my extreme thought experiment - sorry). Too many people look at the debt situation and predict collapse in the next couple years (or by 2020, or what have you). My point is that this is because they're failing to realize how insidious the dynamics of QE really are. Don't get me wrong - a major restructuring must happen - but it'll probably be another couple generations.
sr. member
Activity: 354
Merit: 250
I didn't watch the whole video, but I've heard similar arguments before.

Here's what I don't understand (and I apologize if it's answered in the video): Why now?

We've have "unsound" money for decades.  Why now and not years ago?  Or, if the collapse is inevitable, why now and not later?  This can't be the first "stress test" our monetary system has had.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I hope the dollar collapses.  Then we can stop pricing goods and services in BTC/USD and instead just price in BTC.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
Govs that issue debt in their own currencies (basically all modern economies) need to, over time, buy up most of their own bonds (with newly printed money) to drop rates on the debt to zero or nearly so, and then just print enough to cover ongoing fiscal deficits. So, yeah, fiat will continue to be devalued forever, but there's no inevitable exponential feedback loop (ie, an Argentina/Zimbabwe/Greece style bond crises) in there.

Think of it this way:
The US currently funds itself 2/3 through taxation, and 1/3 through debt issuance (which is mostly financed through QE; ie, direct bond buying). What would happen if the US just eliminated all taxation and funded itself ONLY through money printing? The money base would expand by about 20%/yr. Ok... 20% inflation forever. Again, no feedback loop mechanism. Just large, steady, inflation forever.

Edit: this collapses eventually as government slowly expands that 20% number, such that gov *becomes* the economy. But that's an entirely different issue than a debt/bond crises.

You just defined exactly how an exponential process works.

>>> a = 1
>>> for i in range(1, 50):
...     print a
...     a = a * 1.2
...
1
1.2
1.44
1.728
2.0736
2.48832
2.985984
3.5831808
4.29981696
5.159780352
6.1917364224
7.43008370688
8.91610044826
10.6993205379
12.8391846455
15.4070215746
18.4884258895
22.1861110674
26.6233332809
31.9479999371
38.3375999245
46.0051199094
55.2061438912
66.2473726695
79.4968472034
95.3962166441
114.475459973
137.370551967
164.844662361
197.813594833
237.3763138
284.85157656
341.821891872
410.186270246
492.223524295
590.668229154
708.801874985
850.562249982
1020.67469998
1224.80963997
1469.77156797
1763.72588156
2116.47105788
2539.76526945
3047.71832334
3657.26198801
4388.71438561
5266.45726273
6319.74871528

sr. member
Activity: 254
Merit: 250
Digital money you say?
Just large, steady, inflation forever.

Lol, wut? I may not know a lot about the world economy, but I do know the Earth does not have infinite resources. What makes you think that the US can keep even the stated 1.7% inflation rate going on forever? They can't keep inflating their dollars and expect the rest of the world to just take it laying down. Do you think China, Russia, and India will all just be like, okayface.jpg ?

No way in hell. The rest of the world is pissed that they are at a disadvantage and they all want to be in control of their own economies again.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003
Govs that issue debt in their own currencies (basically all modern economies) need to, over time, buy up most of their own bonds (with newly printed money) to drop rates on the debt to zero or nearly so, and then just print enough to cover ongoing fiscal deficits. So, yeah, fiat will continue to be devalued forever, but there's no inevitable exponential feedback loop (ie, an Argentina/Zimbabwe/Greece style bond crises) in there.

Think of it this way:
The US currently funds itself 2/3 through taxation, and 1/3 through debt issuance (which is mostly financed through QE; ie, direct bond buying). What would happen if the US just eliminated all taxation and funded itself ONLY through money printing? The money base would expand by about 20%/yr. Ok... 20% inflation forever. Again, no feedback loop mechanism. Just large, steady, inflation forever.

Edit: this collapses eventually as government slowly expands that 20% number, such that gov *becomes* the economy. But that's an entirely different issue than a debt/bond crises.
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
Does anyone NOT think the dollar will collapse? Why?

Me.   I don't think the dollar is going anywhere, it's too tied into the global economy (too big to fail) so other countries have a vested interest in keeping it afloat. For now.

The question was not "will the dollar collapse NOW", but will it collapse at some point in the future. So it seams you don't disagree fully. The world is exremely pissed at the US scamming them (or at themselves having let it happen to them). They're looking at alternatives and developing them. It takes time, but the US Dollar is not here to stay.

The inflation rate is at like 1.7% right now, so I'm not particularly concerned with "skyrocketing inflation leading to americas collapse" or whatever glen beck was on about when he was shilling for goldline.

According to shadowstats inflation (of price) is around 5.x% in the US currently. Official Gov't numbers are manipulated downwards.

It's also (IMO) the best store of wealth right now.  Precious metals are WAY overpriced right now (as is bitcoin) and I wouldn't be surprised to see all three crash relatively soon.

Then again, a vast majority of my money is in stocks right now (which is just as risky as the other ventures) so take my opinion for what it is.

Imo, one should keep some cash ready at all times in case of a drop in a desired asset. Storing wealth in USD (or other government-backed FIAT) is not a good idea. Monetary base inflation will lead to the value of the respective currency dropping, there is no question about this. And believe it or not, that's the intention of the people doing it (if you're receiving the fresh money first, the devaluing isn't much of a concern to you because price inflation will hit long after you've spent the money and turned them into some assets or other).

Currency wars, the race to the bottom.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002

No the CAD is not doomed because Canada is a gold producer and mining for gold, silver etc., in Canada will boom. Here in Northern BC it is not uncommon for example for a contractor that used to service the lumber industry (US housing market) turn to service the mining industry instead.

Furthermore because of Canada's cold climate, I strongly suspect that Canada is also a net exporter of Bitcoins.

I'm jealous.  I loved the brief time I spent northern BC a few summers back.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team

No the CAD is not doomed because Canada is a gold producer and mining for gold, silver etc., in Canada will boom. Here in Northern BC it is not uncommon for example for a contractor that used to service the lumber industry (US housing market) turn to service the mining industry instead.

Furthermore because of Canada's cold climate, I strongly suspect that Canada is also a net exporter of Bitcoins.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
The problem is debt.  I think we can all agree on that.

Inflation: There is not exit this way.  Debt gets cheaper to maintain, saving is stupid, people continue to leverage up and buy real assets and stocks since they have negative incentive to save.

Deflation: There is a door here, but it won't be pretty.  We need to remove the bad actors by bankrupting them.  Lessons can be learned, and behaviour will improve.

But really neither direction will work so long as the government guarantees loans.  Banks will continue make bad loans because the government removes all the risk.  If you could borrow at 0.25% and lend at 4-6% with guaranteed repayment, how much money would you borrow and then lend?
Pages:
Jump to: