+1 Quark
Its more special then most of the rest.
Definitly worth it!
Topic: POLL: Which coin should BTC-E add next? - page 4. (Read 19930 times)
quark
It's really different of all another cryptos, emission is close to completion, it could to become a stable and suitable for the real selling and buying goods.
It's really different of all another cryptos, emission is close to completion, it could to become a stable and suitable for the real selling and buying goods.
Cryptos are basically BTC, LTC, some POS, nondeScrypts and Quark. The security may be good enough for several decades, and that it's mined quickly may allow the price to stabilize better once we're all rich from it. It's the current crash will make the distribution even better, compared to the rest. It can enter btc-e on an attractive price.
All the FUD has been disproved ad nauseam.
+QRK
All the FUD has been disproved ad nauseam.
+QRK
Worldcoin is just a LTC copy, maybe even FTC copy? It brings nothing new really
What was new with FTC?
Nothing FTC was just a copy of LTC, brings nothing innovative either. Quark needs to be listed. I have been at BTC-e since LTC was $0.35 each. NVC never had any volume at all, BTC-e got paid to add it. FTC wasn't liked at all and TRC even worse. These 3 coins are just lucky they are on BTC-e.
+1
Worldcoin is just a LTC copy, maybe even FTC copy? It brings nothing new really
What was new with FTC?
Nothing FTC was just a copy of LTC, brings nothing innovative either. Quark needs to be listed. I have been at BTC-e since LTC was $0.35 each. NVC never had any volume at all, BTC-e got paid to add it. FTC wasn't liked at all and TRC even worse. These 3 coins are just lucky they are on BTC-e.
Worldcoin is just a LTC copy, maybe even FTC copy? It brings nothing new really
What was new with FTC?
go Quark, GOOOOO!! 
I believe in QRK because it's a fair currency, mined on CPU, resistant to ASIC and shit.
I believe in QRK because it's a fair currency, mined on CPU, resistant to ASIC and shit.
Worldcoin is just a LTC copy, maybe even FTC copy? It brings nothing new really
In this post shitclone apocalypse my mind, mouth and money is on Quark. Will hold atleast 90% of all my QRK for years to come. Proven to be the most decentralized coin there is, this should attract investors looking for safety and stability in the long run. Now all we need is a bigger and stronger community and development for adoption.
You look at btc-e like a good exchange, like they only add "good"/"legit" coins. I just want to remember you, or to inform you if you are new, that chinacoin was traded there for a few months until abandoned, feathercoin is still there, no comment.
I am actually shocked they have not added dogecoin yet, it seemed the most appropriate for the target audience
I am actually shocked they have not added dogecoin yet, it seemed the most appropriate for the target audience
qrk
is an interesting paradigm in that it is a finished product, mining has turned into a quick buck making scam.
not really being able to mine for quark means that the coins kind of exist in their own right now, and their value should be reasonably constant .. once all the dust clears some time . . some ..... time .......
is an interesting paradigm in that it is a finished product, mining has turned into a quick buck making scam.
not really being able to mine for quark means that the coins kind of exist in their own right now, and their value should be reasonably constant .. once all the dust clears some time . . some ..... time .......
tobad that lottocoin got added like super late on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-which-alt-coin-will-see-the-most-growth-in-2014-359521
it woulth defo had over 50 votes = /
it woulth defo had over 50 votes = /
qrk
BTC-E will add what they feel like, they've never even slightly listened to the community before and they're not going to do it in the future
what no Blakecoin 
Why Blakecoin beats other coins in the long run:
Blakecoin is the fastest !
Why Blakecoin beats other coins in the long run:
- The reward for mining Blakecoin does Not decrease over time it only increases with block height and difficulty
- No restriction on any platform as Blakecoin does not include artificial *Security* that slows down possible mining hash rate and reduces power efficiency
- Already has planned use for Blakecoin as a currency storage between MMO systems with prototypes in development
- The modified blake-256 algorithm hash rate is just under 3x faster on the GPU and just over 2x on the FPGA compared with Bitcoin
Blakecoin is the fastest !
- 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
- 2.2GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
- 1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
- 1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
- 1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
dogecoin
- not listed
I vote for Megacoin because of the developers qualified and effective response to the multipool problem shortly after it was needed.
I see competence and involvement in the developer. I'm expecting a competent implementation of an anonymity protocol.
Also, I vote Megacoin for the audience exposure created by the native Chinese client, website, and forums.
And, for the fifteen languages the website supports. I expect a very internationalized ecosystem of tools and support.
Fifty percent of the coins are being traded now, just over forty-nine left to mine now. (50.7%/49.3%)
This ratio of mined to undiscovered is comparable to where Bitcoin was a little over a year ago. (Today, bitcoin is 57.7%/42.3%)
This liquidity can support a large market. Megacoin can also afford larger block rewards as mining incentive with its shorter schedule of 66 years (2079).
I don't claim coins are better or worse. Features, liquidity, market space, community, and developer involvement are better or worse.
Having seen the effort put into this coin so far, I believe that any feature needed for the success of this coin will be implemented.
Now, I hope visibility will encourage the market space to grow.
I see competence and involvement in the developer. I'm expecting a competent implementation of an anonymity protocol.
Also, I vote Megacoin for the audience exposure created by the native Chinese client, website, and forums.
And, for the fifteen languages the website supports. I expect a very internationalized ecosystem of tools and support.
Fifty percent of the coins are being traded now, just over forty-nine left to mine now. (50.7%/49.3%)
This ratio of mined to undiscovered is comparable to where Bitcoin was a little over a year ago. (Today, bitcoin is 57.7%/42.3%)
This liquidity can support a large market. Megacoin can also afford larger block rewards as mining incentive with its shorter schedule of 66 years (2079).
I don't claim coins are better or worse. Features, liquidity, market space, community, and developer involvement are better or worse.
Having seen the effort put into this coin so far, I believe that any feature needed for the success of this coin will be implemented.
Now, I hope visibility will encourage the market space to grow.
Nicely put, Megacoin is one of the strongest contenders for an every day usage currency and belongs on BTC-e
I vote for Megacoin because of the developers qualified and effective response to the multipool problem shortly after it was needed.
I see competence and involvement in the developer. I'm expecting a competent implementation of an anonymity protocol.
Also, I vote Megacoin for the audience exposure created by the native Chinese client, website, and forums.
And, for the fifteen languages the website supports. I expect a very internationalized ecosystem of tools and support.
Fifty percent of the coins are being traded now, just over forty-nine left to mine now. (50.7%/49.3%)
This ratio of mined to undiscovered is comparable to where Bitcoin was a little over a year ago. (Today, bitcoin is 57.7%/42.3%)
This liquidity can support a large market. Megacoin can also afford larger block rewards as mining incentive with its shorter schedule of 66 years (2079).
I don't claim coins are better or worse. Features, liquidity, market space, community, and developer involvement are better or worse.
Having seen the effort put into this coin so far, I believe that any feature needed for the success of this coin will be implemented.
Now, I hope visibility will encourage the market space to grow.
Nice to see someone offer their opinion instead of linking to Hazard's blog for once I see competence and involvement in the developer. I'm expecting a competent implementation of an anonymity protocol.
Also, I vote Megacoin for the audience exposure created by the native Chinese client, website, and forums.
And, for the fifteen languages the website supports. I expect a very internationalized ecosystem of tools and support.
Fifty percent of the coins are being traded now, just over forty-nine left to mine now. (50.7%/49.3%)
This ratio of mined to undiscovered is comparable to where Bitcoin was a little over a year ago. (Today, bitcoin is 57.7%/42.3%)
This liquidity can support a large market. Megacoin can also afford larger block rewards as mining incentive with its shorter schedule of 66 years (2079).
I don't claim coins are better or worse. Features, liquidity, market space, community, and developer involvement are better or worse.
Having seen the effort put into this coin so far, I believe that any feature needed for the success of this coin will be implemented.
Now, I hope visibility will encourage the market space to grow.
Does everyone ignore the fact that Stablecoin has 1.2 million premined?
WRONG!The coins that were previously pre-mined to serve as a mixing pool, were rendered absolutely unspendable. The code is public and available for anyone to examine to confirm that fact.
Stop spreading FUD and lies.
Jump to: