Topic: POLL: Which coin should BTC-E add next? - page 9. (Read 19926 times)
Gotta love this polls that ultimately have no connection to BTC-e and are constantly repeated.
I'm voting StableCoin because it actually brings something unique to the table. Quarkcoin pragmatically brings nothing new to the table other than some security features, but cryptocurrencies are already really secure so it's more or less a clone coin. And it being mentioned on a T.V. show does not give it any better fundamentals for it to be a currency.
Stablecoin will offer anonymity with mixed transactions, and will have a very steady supply because its difficulty adjusts rapidly, every 90 blocks.
Also, in reference to the recent bitcoin crash, StableCoin has performed incredibly well:
On Tuesday, December 3rd 2013, the price of Bitcoin was around 1,100 dollars. The price of StableCoin was around 12 - 13 cents.
Today, on Saturday, December 7th 2013, the price of Bitcoin, after ENORMOUS fluctuations and instability, has now settled at around 750-775. About a 30% decrease.
While almost every other altcoin's value has plummeted, what is StableCoin's value at? About 16 cents. This is at least a 25% increase. If this isn't a sign of StableCoin's future and stability, I don't know what is.
So my vote's all for StableCoin.
Stablecoin will offer anonymity with mixed transactions, and will have a very steady supply because its difficulty adjusts rapidly, every 90 blocks.
Also, in reference to the recent bitcoin crash, StableCoin has performed incredibly well:
Quote
On Tuesday, December 3rd 2013, the price of Bitcoin was around 1,100 dollars. The price of StableCoin was around 12 - 13 cents.
Today, on Saturday, December 7th 2013, the price of Bitcoin, after ENORMOUS fluctuations and instability, has now settled at around 750-775. About a 30% decrease.
While almost every other altcoin's value has plummeted, what is StableCoin's value at? About 16 cents. This is at least a 25% increase. If this isn't a sign of StableCoin's future and stability, I don't know what is.
So my vote's all for StableCoin.
This.
Assuming that the mixing service is implemented, SBC will be very appealing for those concerned about privacy. Whereas I don't particularly see the practical advantage of QRK's different hashing approach, and extreme concentration of QRK holdings is concerning.
This.
More than 120 millions quarks have already been traded.
This gives you a better insight that it's not really how some think it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONBPWh2sPo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_FgTV80Ic
Does everyone ignore the fact that Stablecoin has 1.2 million premined?
The premine was removed from circulation by making the genesis block unspendable after the developer came up with a new way to create anonymity without using a laundry system.
Does everyone ignore the fact that Stablecoin has 1.2 million premined?
StableCoin is destroying its premine. I believe this addresses your question:
Quote
DESTRUCTION OF THE PREMINE
As some of you may remember, as part of the old mixing service, there were 1.2 million coins premined to act as the basis of the mixing pool. Of course, this caused much anger within the community, with accusations that the money would be used improperly, among other things. 5 months later, these funds have yet to be touched, so I'm happy to have proved those people wrong on those front.
However, under the new mixing system, these coins are no longer necessary. Accordingly, these coins will be publicly destroyed, as they were never intended to be used for anything other than mixing.
In this case, the 1.2 million coins were created in the genesis block. You might notice this is different than most coins that do their premine in block 1 and onward. This is because there is a well documented quirk within bitcoin that makes the genesis block unspendable. This is because when Satoshi designed the client, he decided not to add the coinbase transaction from the genesis block to the global transaction database.
To make these funds spendable, I added a simple bit of code during the initialization of the client (init.cpp). This code adds the genesis transaction to the global transaction database, making it spendable.
By removing this code, the genesis block becomes unspendable, and the coins are essentially destroyed. This is the most eloquent way to accomplish the goal. Version 1.3 of StableCoin has this bit of code removed. I urge everyone to update immediately.
As some of you may remember, as part of the old mixing service, there were 1.2 million coins premined to act as the basis of the mixing pool. Of course, this caused much anger within the community, with accusations that the money would be used improperly, among other things. 5 months later, these funds have yet to be touched, so I'm happy to have proved those people wrong on those front.
However, under the new mixing system, these coins are no longer necessary. Accordingly, these coins will be publicly destroyed, as they were never intended to be used for anything other than mixing.
In this case, the 1.2 million coins were created in the genesis block. You might notice this is different than most coins that do their premine in block 1 and onward. This is because there is a well documented quirk within bitcoin that makes the genesis block unspendable. This is because when Satoshi designed the client, he decided not to add the coinbase transaction from the genesis block to the global transaction database.
To make these funds spendable, I added a simple bit of code during the initialization of the client (init.cpp). This code adds the genesis transaction to the global transaction database, making it spendable.
By removing this code, the genesis block becomes unspendable, and the coins are essentially destroyed. This is the most eloquent way to accomplish the goal. Version 1.3 of StableCoin has this bit of code removed. I urge everyone to update immediately.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsbc-from-death-comes-life-the-rebirth-of-stablecoin-urgent-update-349198
my order is 1.Quark, 2. Stablecoin, 3. Megacoin, 4.Digitalcoin, 5.Worldcoin
I'll be honest. I invested 2BTC in QRK. I'm in a kinda ''big'' loss atm. I voted for QRK of course, because I see the effort they've been putting in the coin's progress.
So, my vote goes to : QRK
If I wasn't in the situation I'm in right now, I'd say StableCoin, because of some interesting things I found.
So, my vote goes to : QRK
If I wasn't in the situation I'm in right now, I'd say StableCoin, because of some interesting things I found.
Assuming that the mixing service is implemented, SBC will be very appealing for those concerned about privacy. Whereas I don't particularly see the practical advantage of QRK's different hashing approach, and extreme concentration of QRK holdings is concerning.
This.
Does everyone ignore the fact that Stablecoin has 1.2 million premined?
Assuming that the mixing service is implemented, SBC will be very appealing for those concerned about privacy. Whereas I don't particularly see the practical advantage of QRK's different hashing approach, and extreme concentration of QRK holdings is concerning.
More than 120 millions quarks have already been traded.
This gives you a better insight that it's not really how some think it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CONBPWh2sPo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF_FgTV80Ic
I'd pick Worldcoin too, if I have to pick. Interestingly it's the only altcoin that has retained its value through the current Bitcoin crash.
+1 Vote for Worldcoin. I believe WDC is the way to go due to the amount of services, ie. Scharmbeck, that are being developed for it. While most coins are simply another crypto, Worldcoin is a complete package.
All 5 coins are useless. Btc-e won't add any of them.
Doesnt Btc-e have Feathercoin XD ?
And we are off to a SBC vs QRK battle
Yes, SBC FTW
Assuming that the mixing service is implemented, SBC will be very appealing for those concerned about privacy. Whereas I don't particularly see the practical advantage of QRK's different hashing approach, and extreme concentration of QRK holdings is concerning.
StableCoin for sure.
Their Coin Mixing service looks promising.
Their Coin Mixing service looks promising.
Q U A R K.
I guess stablecoin from that list
CGB isn't on the list? 
DGC because it will get a USD/DGC pair soon on cryptoave exchange which will increase demand, so there will be more DGC trade and they should accommodate to market demand.
Jump to: