LOL, You kids kick ass!
Proving once again that you can't make all the people happy all the time, just like on Capital Hill!
But enough distraction from the important political issues, like "how can blockchain technology root out corruption in
your government!"
Do you like what your elected officials are doing with
your tax dollars. Don't get me started.
I came here hoping that today's American youth will help me make America great again, and it seems to be working:
If it is impossible for Evan to steal (scam) shares in the future (like he essentially did in the past), then there can be no future scams, and this stock is accurately priced by the free market, however, if there is indeed a chance that Evan could steal shares again in the future, then, this coin has true potential for further scamming, and I wouldn't touch it with Hillary's dick.
The parameters of DASH have been changed many times (so many, in fact, it is hard to come up with a complete listing of all the changes). There is little question that Evan could change the parameters again (or, more precisely, "propose" that they be changed, while the dominant stakeholders including himself and his close associates would very likely endorse such a proposal).
So I am now wondering if I scratch DASH off my list, then what other coins follow a similar "hybrid" model like the one Amanda describes in her weekly column?
I think Decred is experimenting with blockchain-based voting. I'm sure there are others.
Thank you for your input again smooth, you have clarified my concerns allowing me to reach the conclusion that DASH is indeed 100%
not a scam. Dash is just a community that is ruled by a king or dictator. Those who buy DASH are completely at his mercy. And that is OK, because they are free to leave (sell their coins) at any time. I personally will not allow a dictator to determine the value of my money. Thanks again to smooth and the rest of you guys for helping point out the obvious. It just takes me longer to comprehend your terminology since I am not as familiar with tech as I am with the politics of business.
Which brings us to the other elephant in the room. Amanda B. Johnson is completely wrong when she describes DASH's governance model as anything
but a kingdom. I'm sure that she believed the DASH propaganda before seeking the facts as I did. I hope that she will show high personal and journalistic integrity by recanting her false reporting here when she calls DASH's governance structure a "hashocracy/meritocracy hybrid" when the indisputable facts reveal that DASH is nothing more than a dictatorship or kingdom.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQGlcLFhwE0#t=16s It's OK for DASH to adhere to a dictatorship governance model, however, it is not OK for people to be lied to (which is what is occurring here).
OK, so since DASH is not a hybrid hashocracy/meritocracy, but this "Decred" coin is, maybe?
I'll check into this some more. Thanks again. I'm all about the governance aspect of crypto because I hate getting schlonged by those whom I elect to govern me.
TLDR: The "scam" or lie that is portrayed by the DASH community is that its governance model is a "Hashocracy/Meritocracy hybrid" when in reality it is a Kingdom or Dictatorship.