Who cares?!
It is/was just a human. People overestimate him so much, let's stop with this shit.
Topic: [POLL] Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 4. (Read 3069 times)
satoshi was anonymous and is anonymous and will be anonymous
like it or not if he/she/they wanted to reveal his/her/their identity, would have done it a long time ago. so you should all respect the privacy of satoshi and get on with your life and stop wanting to make satoshi a god.
i'll vote for Hal any day of the week over all those other people!
like it or not if he/she/they wanted to reveal his/her/their identity, would have done it a long time ago. so you should all respect the privacy of satoshi and get on with your life and stop wanting to make satoshi a god.
Why didn't you list Hal Finney, or Nick Szabo, or Dave Kleiman, or any of the other folks who've been identified as plausible candidates?
i'll vote for Hal any day of the week over all those other people!
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Why didn't you list Hal Finney, or Nick Szabo, or Dave Kleiman, or any of the other folks who've been identified as plausible candidates?
To keep it simple... I think these two persons are the most obvious choices.
Not sure why we only have 2 persons to choose from. The list should include all possible candidates that over the years people have been guessing and talking about.
Voted for noone cause i don't belive that this guys can be a Satoshi also i am not really care about it. Why people hyping so much about Satoshi? Tell me please.
Neither, it doesn't really matter at this point. She is probably dead too
I don't understand what the point behind such threads is. The theories that those two people are Satoshi were disproved, and basically nobody really knows who Satoshi is (or was) at this time.
Heck, I'm a better choice than Dorian.
My cat is a better choice than both. 
I think these two persons are the most obvious choices.
Well that's complete nonsense.
Heck, I'm a better choice than Dorian.
What do you think?
I think neither of them is Satoshi for onus to prove their claim that they are Satoshi is on them and none has proved it yet 
Why do you want to know? I know, I know; I'm about to use the most overused response, but here it is: Satoshi went anonymous for a reason, and I'm sure he doesn't appreciate you guys trying to sniff him out. He would have had one heck of a reason to want to stay incognito instead of the claim to fame of inventing bitcoin.
Why didn't you list Hal Finney, or Nick Szabo, or Dave Kleiman, or any of the other folks who've been identified as plausible candidates?
To keep it simple... I think these two persons are the most obvious choices.
Why didn't you list Hal Finney, or Nick Szabo, or Dave Kleiman, or any of the other folks who've been identified as plausible candidates?
Satoshi is the ultimate example to show bitcoin is anonymous.
What do you think?
Jump to: